G EOTECHNICAL CAPACITY

OF R. C. C PILE
PROJECT TITLE: LPG TERMINAL . LOCATION: MOHESHKHALI

AASHTO LRFD '07 CLIENT/OWNER: T.K GROUP BOREHOLE ID:

BH-06 FOUNDATION
PILE TYPE: BORED PILE ANALYSED BY: PRIODEEP CHECKED BY: PRIODEEP CONSULTANTS LTD.

PILE DATA
a
Pile diameter, D = 1.00 m Pile Base Area, Ab = 0.785 m2 Ignored Top Friction= 2 m
b
E.G.L= +1.1 RL.m Perimeter = 3.142 m Ignored Bottom Friction= 1.5 m
Cut-off Level of Pile = -1.90 m Length of Pile, L= 30.00 m Required Allowable Capacity of Pile = N.A

A DOPTED DESIGN PARAMETERS

G.W.T: 0.000 m Limiting Value of Ultimate Unit Skin Friction = 190 kPa Evaluated Max. Depth of Liquefiable Sub-soil (m) = N.A
γw: 9.81 kN/m3 Limiting Value of Ultimate Unit End Bearing = 2900 kPa Evaluated Max. Depth of Scouring (m) = N.A

DESIGN SUMMARY
Pile Head@ -1.90 RL.m Pile Dia.(m) = 1.0 Compression Capacity (Ult.), kN = 4440 Allowable Comp. Capacity = 2433 kN [ F.O.S = 2 ]

Pile Toe @ 31.10 m Pile Length (m) = 30 Tension Capacity (Ult.), kN = 4440 Allowable Tension Capacity = 1480 kN [ F.O.S = 3 ]
Layer Thickness

Resistance, qs
Corrected SPT

Ultimate Skin
(Hammer Eff.)

Depth
Eff. Vertical

Resistance
SOIL TYPE

Unit Tip Ultimate Tip Ultimate Pile Allowable Allowable Pile

Field SPT

Unit Skin

All. Tip
Resistance
Stress
Layer

Resistance, Resistance Capacity, Skin Capacity,

From (Cumulative),
R.L Qpr Qp Ult. Qu Ult. Resistance Qu safe
E.G.L QS ULT.
(m)
# (m) (m) Type (kPa) N N60 (kPa) (kN) (kPa) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN)
1 0.0 1.5 1.5 C 5.4 6.0 8.0 20.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

2 1.5 3.0 1.5 S 16.2 10.0 13.3 16.3 0.0 766.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

3 3.0 4.5 1.5 C 27.0 3.0 4.0 13.6 64.3 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.2 0.0 35.2

4 4.5 6.0 1.5 C 37.8 3.0 4.0 13.6 128.6 0.0 0.0 128.6 70.5 0.0 70.5

5 6.0 7.5 1.5 C 48.6 4.0 5.3 18.6 216.2 0.0 0.0 216.2 118.5 0.0 118.5

6 7.5 9.0 1.5 C 59.4 7.0 9.3 33.4 373.7 0.0 0.0 373.7 204.8 0.0 204.8

7 9.0 10.5 1.5 C 70.2 11.0 14.7 53.2 624.4 0.0 0.0 624.4 342.2 0.0 342.2

8 10.5 12.0 1.5 C 81.0 7.0 9.3 33.4 781.9 0.0 0.0 781.9 428.5 0.0 428.5

9 12.0 13.5 1.5 S 91.8 9.0 12.0 46.3 1000.1 690.0 541.9 1542.1 548.1 178.8 726.9

10 13.5 15.0 1.5 S 102.6 14.0 18.7 59.6 1281.0 1073.3 843.0 2124.0 702.0 278.2 980.2

11 15.0 16.5 1.5 C 113.4 7.0 9.3 33.4 1438.5 0.0 0.0 1438.5 788.3 0.0 788.3

12 16.5 18.0 1.5 C 124.2 15.0 20.0 73.0 1782.4 0.0 0.0 1782.4 976.7 0.0 976.7

13 18.0 19.5 1.5 C 135.0 8.0 10.7 38.4 1963.2 0.0 0.0 1963.2 1075.8 0.0 1075.8

14 19.5 21.0 1.5 C 145.8 20.0 26.7 97.7 2423.6 0.0 0.0 2423.6 1328.1 0.0 1328.1

15 21.0 22.5 1.5 C 156.6 14.0 18.7 68.0 2744.2 0.0 0.0 2744.2 1503.8 0.0 1503.8

16 22.5 24.0 1.5 C 167.4 8.0 10.7 38.4 2925.0 0.0 0.0 2925.0 1602.9 0.0 1602.9

17 24.0 25.5 1.5 C 178.2 11.0 14.7 53.2 3175.7 0.0 0.0 3175.7 1740.3 0.0 1740.3

18 25.5 27.0 1.5 C 189.0 17.0 22.7 82.9 3566.2 0.0 0.0 3566.2 1954.3 0.0 1954.3

19 27.0 28.5 1.5 C 199.8 18.0 24.0 87.8 3979.9 0.0 0.0 3979.9 2181.0 0.0 2181.0

20 28.5 30.0 1.5 C 210.6 20.0 26.7 97.7 4440.3 0.0 0.0 4440.3 2433.3 0.0 2433.3

LENGTH OF PILE= 30 m

» SUB SOIL UP TO DEPTH (10 X DIAMETER OF PILE) BELOW PILE TIP CONSISTENCY AND COMPOSITION SHALL BE COMPATIBLE AND CONFIRMED BY TEST.
NOTES
» END BEARING SHALL BE CONSIDERED IF MUD, DEBRIS ETC. FROM PILE TIP IS PROPERLY CLEANED AND COMPATIBLE TO IN-SITU CONDITION.
» FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST SKIN FRICTION HAS BEEN CONSIDERED AS 2.0 & FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST TIP BEARING HAS BEEN CONSIDERED AS 3.0.
» WHERE FACTOR OF SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION IS LESS THAN ONE, SKIN RESISTANCE IS INEFFECTIVE.
» a,bTOP 2.0 M OF SHAFT SIDES ARE CONSIDERED NONCONTRIBUTING DUE TO CYCLIC LATERAL MOVEMENTS THAT SEPARATE THE SHAFT FROM THE SOIL AS WELL AS POTENTIAL DESICCATION SEPARATION OF THE

SURFICIAL SOIL. BOTTOM 1D OF THE SHAFT SIDE SHEAR IS DISREGARDED TO ACCOUNT FOR LATERAL STRESSES THAT DEVELOP RADIALLY AS THE END BEARING MOBILIZES.