Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ecological Engineering: Hossein Kazemi, Halil Akinci
Ecological Engineering: Hossein Kazemi, Halil Akinci
Ecological Engineering: Hossein Kazemi, Halil Akinci
Ecological Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoleng
Short communication
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: This study was carried out to analyze the land use suitability of Golestan Province, located in the northeast of
Environmental variables Iran, for rainfed farming performance using Geographic Information System (GIS) and Multi-criteria Decision-
Iran making Analysis (MCDA) in 2016. First, thematic maps of several environmental variables including soil, climate
Land suitability and topographic variables were obtained. After preparing the raster layers, the environmental requirements of
Rainfed farming
rainfed farming were identified from a comprehensive literature review and asking local experts’ opinions; then
they were classified according to FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN) requirements. In the next
step, AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)-acquired weights were assigned to the criteria. Then, digital layers were
overlaid using Weighted Overlay Analysis (WOA) in ArcGIS. According to the results of land suitability analysis,
development of rainfed farming is possible for up to 56 percent of the current land of Golestan Province (about
396,550.5 ha) in the southern and central areas as a long belt from east to west. The results showed that some
climatic variables such as temperature, annual rainfall, and sunshine hours were not limiting factors for rainfed
farming in this region. However, other environmental variables such as salinity, organic matter, soil erosion, soil
texture classes, and the autumn, spring, May and June rainfalls were identified as limiting factors for rainfed
farming performance in the northern and northeastern regions of Golestan Province. We also found that slope
was a limiting cause in the southern part of this province. Generally, the use of specific management practices
such as increasing soil organic matter, saline reduction of lands, conservation tillage, and supplementary irri-
gation canimprove the quality class of low capability lands to higher suitability classes and increase the quality
of environmental resources.
1. Introduction suitability analyses that consider land properties and user needs
(Akbulak, 2010; Amiri and Shariff, 2012). A land-use suitability ana-
Around the world, rainfall and temperature are the two main factors lysis for a particular use is a complex process that may include bio-
that influence crop productivity in arid and semi-arid areas. In Iran, physical, socio-economic, and technical aspects (Silva et al., 2014).
dryland farming areas are mostly limited by low and variable rainfall Basically, the determination of suitable land uses in each region for the
(Nassiri et al., 2006). It is predicted that the plant growth period in Iran optimum use of basic resources while preventing their destruction, can
would decrease significantly and cereal production would decrease by be an effective step towards sustainable development (Makhdoum,
5–40% under rainfed agriculture by 2080 (Rosenzweig and Parry, 2011) because, land use without the identification of differences in
1994). Therefore, agricultural land use planning is required to support ecological and environmental potentials leads to adverse results such as
sustainable agricultural production in Iran. erosion, desertification, pollution and environmental degradation. The
In 1996 the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) defined land- principal purpose of agriculture land suitability is to predict the po-
use planning as the systematic assessment of land and water potential, tential and limitation of land for crop production (Pan and Pan, 2012).
land-use alternatives, and socio-economic conditions in order to adopt There are two important aspects: first, the potential suitability of the
the best land-use options (FAO, 1996). A prerequisite of land use land for a specific use, and, second, management practices that in-
planning is land suitability assessment (Akinci et al., 2013). For this tegrate various factors such as agro-ecological aptitude, environmental
assessment, the most suitable land use type is determined through land impact, hydro-climate conditions, and socio-economic constraints
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: hkazemi@gau.ac.ir (H. Kazemi), hakinci@artvin.edu.tr (H. Akinci).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.021
Received 28 September 2017; Received in revised form 12 February 2018; Accepted 24 February 2018
0925-8574/ © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
H. Kazemi, H. Akinci Ecological Engineering 116 (2018) 1–6
2
H. Kazemi, H. Akinci Ecological Engineering 116 (2018) 1–6
Fig. 1. Locations of Golestan Province(green area) in Iran, meteorological stations and studied agricultural lands in Golestan Province.
Fig. 2. Two layers of the study area in Golestan province, Iran a: autumn rainfall, b: spring rainfall.
3
H. Kazemi, H. Akinci Ecological Engineering 116 (2018) 1–6
because the relationship between erosion and slope depends on the is moderately suitable, and 34.25% is highly suitable (Table 1). This
vegetation cover. Even if the slope degree is high, the erosion level will map will be of value for future rainfed farming planning decisions and
be low if there is vegetation in the field. Therefore, it is preferred to use could lead to reduction in rainfed farming expansion into high-risk
the AHP method in this study because the problem to be solved in the zones. The classes of rainfed land suitability are explained in detail in
study is handled with hierarchical structure instead of network struc- the following subdivisions.
ture, and there are no dependencies between the criteria used in the
study. Solving a problem using AHP is carried out using the weights or 3.2.1. Highly suitable zone (S1)
priorities of the criteria subjected to pairwise comparison (Akinci et al., The highly suitable zone involved all the southern areas of Golestan
2013). Weights or priorities are determined by normalizing the pair- Province(Fig. 3). These areas had suitable properties such as low slope
wise comparison matrix in Expert Choice software (ver. 2001). In this and elevation; sufficient rates of annual, seasonal and monthly rainfalls;
research, 25 local experts in Golestan Province have used their ex- and optimum temperatures in the phenological stages of crops under
perience to generate weights for rainfed land suitability. The factors rainfed farming. Also, this class had low EC and high organic matter.
were ranked according to Saaty (1980) underlying scale with values According to the recorded data, sunshine hours in this area are not
one to nine by discussion with local specialists. The parameter that is restrictive for cereal autumn crops. Also, results showed that there was
used to check the accuracy of the comparisons is called the Consistency no soil erosion risk in thiszone.
Ratio (CR). This ratio is a measure of low variation allowed and must The rainfed land suitability model performance indicated that 34.25
be < 10% (Saaty, 1980; Duc, 2006). percent of the surveyed area was located in zone S1 (246,008.54 ha).
This area can have a high potential production (80–100 percent) for
2.4. Model description: Rainfed land use suitability rainfed farming (Ghafari, et al., 2000).
In order to determine rainfed land suitability, a model was con- 3.2.2. Moderately suitable (S2) zone
structed to match the environmental requirements of rainfed farming Moderately suitable regions were identified as sites that are mod-
with the land characteristics of Golestan Province. First, the environ- erate advantageous for the performance of rainfed farming. These areas
mental requirements for rainfed farming were identified from a com- covered an area of 150,542 ha, which represented 20.96% of the total
prehensive literature review and asking local experts’ opinions, and evaluated area (Table 1). Basically, moderately suitable zone is defined
then they were classified according to FAO. In ArcGIS software, all the by annual rainfall of 250–300 mm, elevation levels between 1000and
spatial data were converted into raster layers with90 m resolution and 2000 m, slope 4–8%, soil pH range of5.5–6.5 and 8–8.5, EC 4-8dS m−1,
georeferred to the UTM (WGS-84) coordinate system. In the next step, and organic matter range of 2–3%. It was found that the moderately
AHP-acquired weights were assigned to the criteria. Then, parameter suitable class (S2) was located from west to east and in southeast Go-
weights and sub-parameter scores were appointed to the related layers lestan Province (Fig. 3). Our results, based on long-term climate data,
in the ArcGIS, and raster maps of 21 parameters were overlaid using showed that rainfed farming of cereal crops are not faced by limiting
Weighted Overlay Analysis (WOA) in raster calculator tools. Finally, a temperatures during the growing season.
rainfed land suitability map was generated and divided into five classes
of equal ranges according to the land suitability classification of FAO 3.2.3. Marginally suitable (S3) zone
(1976) including highly suitable (S1), moderately suitable (S2), mar- This class was identified as the boundary between suitable zones
ginally suitable (S3), currently unsuitable (NS1), and permanently un- and unsuitable zones (Fig. 3). This marginal class consisted of a
suitable (NS2). 91,089.71 ha area that covered about 12.68% of the studied area
(Table 3). These regions were characterized by slope 8–12 percent,
3. Results and discussion elevation 300–2000 m, annual rainfall 250–200 mm, autumn rainfall
80–60 mm, spring rainfall 100–80 mm, EC8-12 dS m−1, and moderate
3.1. AHP results soil erosion risk. In these areas, the cultivation of rainfed wheat will
face high risk such as drought and salinity, but some cereal crops such
The results of AHP analysis demonstrate that climate conditions as barley and hull-less barley are recommended because of the high
play a major role in rainfed farming expansion. According to experts’ resistance of these crops to dry conditions and a low quality of en-
opinions, a higher weight was assigned to rainfall than to other climatic vironmental resources. In general, agronomical management plays an
sub-criteria. Also, among the rainfall criteria, May rainfall (0.273) and important role in increasing or reducing the quality and quantity of this
annual rainfall (0.056) had the highest and lowest weight, respectively. class to other classes. By applying management methods such as soil
In this regard, Srinivasarao, et al. (2013) reported that amount and salinity improvement and the increasing of soil fertility in this area,
distribution of rainfall during critical growth stages was more im- barley production can play an outstanding role in improving this class
portant to agronomic yield than total and seasonal rainfall. It should be to a higher class.
noted that among the soil criteria, EC (0.387) and organic matter
(0.241) play major roles in the delineation of suitable areas for rainfed 3.2.4. Currently unsuitable (NS1) and permanently unsuitable (NS2) zones
farming. Based on the results, final weights of 0.144 and 0.099 were The north and northwest areas, as well as parts of the northeast of
assigned to temperature and sunshine hours respectively in relation to Golestan Province, were identified as a currently unsuitable (NS1) class
rainfed farming. Among the temperature criteria, optimum temperature (Fig. 3). In these areas, dryland farming is not possible with the current
for the germination stage (0.301) and mean temperature (0.061) had state of the environmental resources. Crop production in the dryland
the highest and lowest weight, respectively. farming areas of the northern regions is constrained by low and variable
rainfall. The results showed that some climatic variables such as annual
3.2. Land suitability rainfall < 200 mm, autumn rainfall < 60 mm, and spring rainfall <
80 mm were limiting factors in these regions. From a climatic view-
Suitable regions for rainfed farming were identified based on major point, rainfall and temperature are two main factors that influence crop
environmental factors, and an optimum suitability map was obtained productivity in arid and semi-arid areas, and these two variables are the
by overlaying 21 raster layers. Fig. 3 presents the final map of land principal weather variables that determine the variability of crop yield
suitability in Golestan Province. It was determined that, while 13.88% in Iran. The variability in these variables under rainfed farming was
of the study area is permanently unsuitable for agricultural production, studied by Nassiri et al. (2006), Wang et al. (2015), and Kheiri et al.
18.23% is currently unsuitable, 12.68% is marginally suitable, 20.96% (2017). Nassiri et al. (2006) predicted the impact of climate change on
4
H. Kazemi, H. Akinci Ecological Engineering 116 (2018) 1–6
Fig. 3. Land suitability map for rainfed farming in Golestan Province, Iran.
Table 1 the Artvin City in Turkey were the high degree of erosion, inadequate
The distribution of land suitability degree for rainfed farming in Golestan Province, Iran. soil depth, and high slope.
From a soil properties viewpoint, low organic matter content is a
Suitability degree Area (ha) Zone area/total agricultural lands
area (%)
major challenge in the north and northeast of Golestan Province.
Basically, amain challenge for farmers and researchers in Iran is to
Highly suitable (S1) 246008.54 34.25 sustain a sustainable farming system for the long term, which requires
Moderately suitable (S2) 150542.00 20.96 the continued addition of organic matter. Various studies around the
Marginally suitable (S3) 91089.71 12.68
Currently unsuitable (NS1) 130956.94 18.23
world have shown that cropping systems, fertilization, the addition of
Permanently unsuitable 99724.55 13.88 farmyard manure, integrated nutrient management practices, and per-
(NS2) ennial grass-legume pastures are effective in increasing soil quality,
particularly organic matter (Van-Eekeren et al., 2008, Bellet al., 2012,
Nasrollahi et al., 2017).
rainfed wheat production in Iran. Their results showed that average
yield reductions will be 18 and 24% for 2025 and 2050, respectively.
These yield reductions are related to a rainfall deficit (8.3–17.7%) and a 4. Conclusion
shortening of the wheat growth period (8–36 day). In other research in
Golestan Province, it was determined that the lack of suitable rain, soil This study provided useful information that can be used as a deci-
salinity, some soil physics properties, and poor soil fertility were the sion support tool in quantifying the implication of management policies
most serious problems influencing yield and quality of wheat (Kazemi in Golestan Province and other similar regions. According to the results
et al. 2015). of our land suitability analysis model, the development of rainfed
In the permanently unsuitable (NS2) zone, variables such as slope; farming is possible up to 56 percent of the current land of Golestan
salinity; organic matter; soil erosion; soil texture classes; and the au- Province in the southern and central areas as a long belt from east to
tumn, spring, May, and June rainfalls were identified as limiting factors west. However, about 33 percent of the lands in northern and north-
for rainfed farming performance in the northern and northeastern re- eastern areas of the province had environmental restrictions such as
gions of Golestan Province. From a geomorphological viewpoint, slope organic matter, salinity, soil texture, the autumn, spring, May and June
in Golestan Province varies, decreasing from the south to the north. rainfalls that made the rainfed farming of autumn cereals impossible.
Slope plays a significant role in the land degradation phenomenon that The use of specific management practices such as increasing soil or-
affects the Golestan Province. The results revealed that in the east and ganic matter by farmyard manure, mulching, green manure and cover
southeast parts of Golestan, soil erosion acts as a limiting factor for the crops cultivation, saline reduce of lands, applying methods of con-
cultivation of rainfed crops. Generally, erosion is a problem that pro- servation tillage and supplementary irrigation can improve the quality
duces an important impact on the landscape, especially in agricultural class of low capability lands to higher suitability classes and increase
areas (Silva et al., 2014). According to Akinci et al. (2013) and Akinci the quality of environmental resources. Therefore, determination of
et al. (2017), the main limiting features for agricultural production in overall land suitability for a particular agricultural land use requires
consideration of many criteria. Thus, we recommend similar studies
5
H. Kazemi, H. Akinci Ecological Engineering 116 (2018) 1–6
using other parameters such as soil macro and micro elements, drainage case study: Gonbad-Kavous region, Iran). Ecol. Indic. 63, 37–47.
situation and soil hydrological groups. Kheiri, M., Soufizadeh, S., Ghaffari, A., AghaAlikhani, M., Eskandari, A., 2017.
Association between temperature and precipitation with dryland wheat yield in
northwest of Iran. Clim. Change 141, 703–717.
Acknowledgment Liu, Y.S., Wang, J.Y., Guo, L.Y., 2006. GIS-Based assessment of land suitability for opti-
malallocation in the Qinling Mountains, China. Pedosphere 16 (5), 579–586.
Makhdoum, M.F., 2011. Fundamental of land use planning. University of Tehran Press,
This study has been supported by the grant approval of the Gorgan Iran.
University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Malczewski, J., 2006. Review article GIS-based multi-criteria decisionanalysis: a survey of
(GUASNR),Iran and the authors would like to appreciate it. the literature. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 20 (7), 703–726.
Maleki, F., Kazemi, H., Siahmarguee, A., Kamkar, B., 2017. Development of a land use
suitability model for saffron (Crocus sativus L.) cultivation by multi-criteria evaluation
References and spatial analysis. Ecol. Eng. 106, 140–153.
Nasrollahi, N., Kazemi, H., Kamkar, B., 2017. Feasibility of ley-farming system perfor-
mance in a semi-arid region using spatial analysis. Ecol. Indic. 72, 239–248.
Akbulak, C., 2010. Analitik Hiyerarşi Surecive Coğrafi Bilgi SistemleriileYukarı Kara
Nassiri, M., Koocheki, A., Kamali, G.A., Shahandeh, H., 2006. Potential impact of climate
Menderes Havzası’nın Arazi Kullanımı Uygunluk Analizi. Uluslararası Insan Bilimleri
change on rainfed wheat production in Iran. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 52 (1), 113–124.
Dergisi 7 (2), 557–576.
Pan, G., Pan, J., 2012. Research in crop land suitability analysis based on GIS. Comput.
Akinci, H., Özalp, A.Y., Turgut, B., 2013. Agricultural land use suitability analysisusing
Comput Technol. Agric. 365, 314–325.
GIS and AHP technique. Comput. Electron. Agric. 97, 71–82.
Rosenzweig, C., Parry, M.L., 1994. Potential impacts of climate change on world food
Akinci, H., Yavuz Özalp, A., Özalp, M., 2017. Investigating impacts of large dams on
supply. Nature 367, 133–138.
agricultural lands and determining alternative arable areas using GIS and AHP in
Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting Resource
Artvin, Turkey. Selcuk Univ. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 5 (1), 83–95.
Allocation. McGraw-Hill International, New York, NY, USA.
Amiri, F., Shariff, A.R.B.M., 2012. Application of geographic information systems in
Saaty, T.L., Özdemir, M.S., 2005. The Encyclion: A Dictionary of Decisions with
landuse suitability evaluation for beekeeping: a case study of Vahregan watershed
Dependence and Feedback based on the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications,
(Iran). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7 (1), 89–97.
USA.
Bell, L.W., Sparling, B., Tenuta, M., Entz, M.H., 2012. Soil profile carbon and nutrient
Silva, S., Luı, A.A., Lui, C.D., 2014. Biogas plants site selection integrating Multi-criteria
stocks under long-term conventional and organic crop and alfalfa-crop rotations and
Decision Aid methods and GIS techniques: a case study in a Portuguese region.
re-established grassland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 158, 156–163.
Biomass Bioenergy 71, 58–68.
Chen, H., Liu, G., Yang, Y., Ye, X., Shi, Zh., 2010. Comprehensive evaluation of tobacco
Srinivasarao, C., Kundu, S., Venkateswarlu, B., et al., 2013. Long-term effects of fertili-
ecological suitability of Henan province based on GIS agricultural sciences in China.
zation and manuring on groundnut yield and nutrient balance of Alfisols under
Agric. Sci. China 9 (4), 583–592.
rainfed farming in India. Nutri. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 96, 29–46.
Cong, R.G., Brady, M., 2012. The interdependence between rainfall and temperature:
Tuzmen, S., Sipahi, S., 2011. A multi-criteria factor evaluation model for gas station site
Copula analyses. World J. Sci 10.1100/2012/405675.
selection, In: 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd
Duc, T.T. 2006. Using GIS and AHP technique for land use suitability analysis.
ICBER 2011), 14–16 March, Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia, pp. 601–610.
International Symposium on Geoinformatics for Spatial Infrastructure Development
van-Eekeren, N., Bommele, R., Bloem, J., Schouten, T., Rutgers, M., de Goede, R., Reheul,
in Earth and Allied Sciences.
D., Brussaard, L., 2008. Soil biological quality after 36 years of ley-arable cropping,
FAO, 1996. Guidelines for Land-use Planning. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
permanent grassland and permanent arable cropping. Appl. Soil Ecol. 40, 432–446.
United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Wang, X., Cai, D., Wu, H., Hoogmoed, W.B., Oenema, O., 2015. Effects of variation in
Ghafari, A., Cook, H.F., Lee, H.C., 2000. Integrating climate, soil and crop information:a
rainfall on rainfed crop yields and water use in dryland farming areas in China. Arid
land suitability study using GIS. In: 4th International Conference on Integration GIS
Land Res. Manage. 30, 1–24.
and Environmental Modeling (GIS/EM4), 2–8 September, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Yalew, S.G., van-Griensven, A., van-der Zaag, P., 2016. AgriSuit: a web-based GIS-MCDA
Jihad-e-Agricultural Organization of Golestan Province, 2013. Statistics Report of
framework for agricultural land suitability assessment. Comput. Electron. Agric.
2011–2012 Years. Statistics and Information Office of Jihad-Agriculture Organization
128, 1–8.
of Golestan Province.
Zabihi, H., Ahmad, A., Vogeler, I., Nor-Said, M., Golmohammadi, M., Golein, B., Nilashi,
Kazemi, H., Tahmasebi Sarvestani, Z., Kamkar, B., Shataei, S., Sadeghi, S., 2015.
M., 2015. Land suitability procedure for sustainable citrus planning using the ap-
Ecological zoning for wheat production at province scale using Geographical
plication of the analytical network process approach and GIS. Comput. Electron.
Information System. Adv. Plant Agric. Res. 2, 1–7.
Agric. 117, 114–126.
Kazemi, H., Sadeghi, S., Akinci, H., 2016. Developing a land evaluation model for faba
bean cultivation using geographic information system and multi-criteria analysis (A