Findings, Analysis and Interpretation of The Data

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Chapter 4

FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA

This chapter....

1. What is the profile of the students in terms of age, sex, and highest

educational attainment of the parents.

Table 1.1 Distribution of the respondent’s profile in terms of age

Age Frequency Percent


3 years old 18 42.9
4 years old 24 57.1
Total 42 100.0

Table 1.2 Distribution of the respondent’s profile in terms of sex

Sex Frequency Percent


Male 20 47.6
Female 22 52.4
Total 42 100.0
Table 1.3 Distribution of the respondent’s parent’s highest

educational attainment

Father HEA Frequency Percent


Elementary 2 4.8
Level
HS Level 5 11.9
HS Graduate 12 28.6
College Level 10 23.8
College 13 31.0
Graduate
Total 42 100.0

Mother HEA Frequency Percent


Elementary 2 4.8
Level
HS Level 5 11.9
HS Graduate 18 42.9
College Level 12 28.6
College 5 11.9
Graduate
Total 42 100.0
2. What is the level of the fine motor skills of the respondents?

Table 2.1 Respondent’s level of fine motor skills

Fine Motor 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Remarks


Skills Excellent Very Good Fair Poor
Good
1. Hand
Dominance

1.1 Using a 11 25 5 1 0 4.10 Very


preferred Good
hand for most
activities

1.2 13 15 9 3 2 3.81 Very


Sharpening Good
pencils.

1.3 Zipping 18 14 8 2 0 4.14 Very


up school Good
bags and
clothing

1.4 Turns 9 14 16 2 1 3.67 Very


pages of a Good
book one at a
time

1.5 Imitates a 9 19 13 0 1 3.83 Very


vertical and a Good
circular
stroke

1.6 Can cut 4 13 13 10 2 3.17 Good


across a piece
of paper using
scissors

Over-all 3.79 Very


Mean Good
2. Grasp 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Remarks
Excellent Very Good Fair Poor
Good
2.1 Holding a 12 21 6 1 2 3.95 Very
pencil with a Good
tripod grasp
(3pt grasp)

2.2 Holding a 13 18 7 2 2 3.90 Very


pencil with Good
thumb and
fingers on
opposite sides
of the pencil

2.3 Use 12 23 3 3 1 4.00 Very


the tripod Good
fingers to
grasp the
paper and
tear.

2.4 Can 23 12 7 0 0 4.38 Excellent


unscrew a jar
lid
2.5 Turning 27 12 3 0 0 4.57 Excellent
knobs.

2.6 Pull strips 8 25 6 3 0 3.90 Very


of scotch Good
tapes

Over-all 4.12 Very


Mean Good

3. In Hand 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Remarks


Manipulation Excellent Very Good Fair Poor
Good
3.1 Move coin 14 21 3 1 3 4.00 Very
from palm to Good
fingers

3.2 Crumple 21 14 5 2 0 4.29 Excellent


a piece of
paper

3.3 Turning a 9 19 11 0 3 3.74 Very


pencil to use Good
the eraser

3.4 Using one 7 18 14 2 1 3.67 Very


hand Good
consistently
for most
activities.
3.5 Can fold a 6 14 20 1 1 3.55 Very
sheet of paper Good

3.6 Eating 3 23 13 3 0 3.62 Very


with fork and Good
spoon
Over-all 3.81 Very
Mean Good

4. Hand Eye 5 4 3 2 1 Mean Remarks


Coordination Excellent Very Good Fair Poor
Good
4.1 6 25 9 1 1 3.81 Very
Coordinating Good
hands to
brush teeth
or hair.

4.2 Tracing 9 19 11 3 0 3.81 Very


on a line with Good
control

4.3 Copying a 3 23 14 1 1 3.62 Very


circle, cross Good
and a square

4.4 Can 12 17 10 3 0 3.90 Very


connect-the- Good
dot activities

4.5 Building a 8 24 8 1 1 3.88 Very


tower of three
small blocks. Good

4.6 Color 1 29 8 4 0 3.64 Very


picture in Good
general idea

Over-all 3.78 Very


Mean Good

Legend:
1.00 – 1.80 = Poor
1.81 – 2.60 = Fair
2.61 – 3.40 = Good
3.41 – 4.20 = Very good
4.21 – 5.00 = Excellent

3. What is the significance of hand dominance, grasp, hand eye

coordination and in-hand manipulation in terms of respondents’

age?

Fine Motor 3 years old 4 years


P-value Interpretation
Skills Mean old Mean
Hand
3.57 3.94
Dominance 0.060 Not Significant
Grasp 3.86 4.31 0.018** Significant
Hand
Manipulatio 3.58 3.97
n 0.036** Significant
Hand Eye 3.50 3.98
Coordination 0.008** Significant
Fine Motor Male Female
P-value Interpretation
Skills Mean Mean
Hand
3.75 3.81 0.793 Not Significant
Dominance
Grasp 4.05 4.17 0.554 Not Significant
Hand
3.92 3.70 0.246 Not Significant
Manipulation
Hand Eye
3.85 3.71 0.463 Not Significant
Coordination

Father Highest Educational Attainment


Fine Motor Elementary HS HS College College P-
Interpretation
Skills Level Level Graduate Level Graduate value
Hand
3.75 3.83 3.88 3.49 3.89 0.605 Not Significant
Dominance
Grasp 3.75 4.23 4.31 3.83 4.16 0.377 Not Significant
Hand
3.66 3.66 3.90 3.56 3.98 0.514 Not Significant
Manipulation
Hand Eye
3.17 3.83 3.98 3.48 3.88 0.171 Not Significant
Coordination

Mother Highest Educational Attainment


Fine Motor Elementary HS HS College College
P-value Interpretation
Skills Level Level Graduate Level Graduate
Hand
4.50 3.83 3.89 3.61 3.46 0.262 Not Significant
Dominance
Grasp 4.50 4.30 4.33 3.90 3.53 0.046** Significant
Hand
4.41 3.90 3.82 3.91 3.16 0.082 Not Significant
Manipulation
Hand Eye
4.00 3.80 3.89 3.69 3.43 0.599 Not Significant
Coordination
4. What skills training module can be designed based on the findings

of the study?

You might also like