Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jasroopaneja Ctl-Assignment-1
Jasroopaneja Ctl-Assignment-1
UNIT EVALUATION:
REPORT &
RECOMMNENDATIONS
Abstract
The enclosed report focusses on evaluation and improvement of
the Stage 5, Year 10 Science unit, ‘Fossils & Evolution’. The unit
was originally designed for use in the low ability classes at
Cambridge Park High School, a low socio-economic status school
in Western Sydney. This report proposes recommendations to
expand the suitability of this unit and provide a constructive
learning environment to mixed and high ability students. To
ensure that these recommendations meet the learning needs of
students with diverse abilities, a reconstructed unit of work
designed around the framework of Understanding by Design
(UbD) and Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is included in the report.
With an overall goal to attain educational success, the report
focusses on the development of literacy, numeracy, ICT, critical
and creative thinking, and personal and social capabilities in
students.
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
CONTENTS
I. YExecutive Summa
Goals......................................................................................................................................3
List of recommendations.......................................................................................................3
V. Report of Recommendations.............................................................................................19
VI. References.........................................................................................................................23
VII. Appendices......................................................................................................................26
1
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report has been designed for the Science faculty at Cambridge Park High School to ensure
improvement in learning and educational achievement of students. Situated in Western region of
Sydney, the school offers a comprehensive co-educational environment to approximately 696 students.
The school comprises of a diverse population of students, with 13% of students identifying as
Indigenous Australians, 16% from language backgrounds other than English, 52% males and 48% as
female. With only 2% of the students in the top quarter of ICSEA scale, the school has relatively large
percentage of students that belong to low and mixed socio-educational backgrounds. This unit was
originally designed for use in the low ability Year 10 Science classrooms, mainly consisting of students
from low socio-educational backgrounds.
Figure 1 – Student diversity at Cambridge Park High School for Year 2017
Reference: My School website. Retrieved from: https://www.myschool.edu.au/school/41835
2
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Goals
In order to expand the suitability of this unit and attain educational success in all students, following
goals have been set:
Improve students’ literacy and numeracy skills to enhance metacognition, scientific literacy and,
foster quantitative competency.
Expand students’ ICT capabilities to build conceptual understanding, engagement with science and
technological literacy.
Build critical and creative thinking skills and personal and social capabilities in students to
generate awareness, develop high-order thinking and problem-solving abilities.
Improve the unit design to promote student inquiry, intrinsic motivation and engagement for a
meaningful learning experience.
Figure 2 - Proposed goals for attainment of educational success
List of recommendations
To ensure achievement of the set goals and provide a constructive learning environment to students in a
comprehensive classroom, following recommendations are suggested,
3
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The unit ‘Fossils & Evaluation’ was developed in 2013 to support student learning and engagement with
evolutionary concepts, in low-ability year 10 science classes. Though it provides few opportunities to
students for development of literacy, ICT and critical thinking capabilities, it follows a deductive
teacher-centred approach and lacks the strategies to build transferable knowledge, social interactions,
high-order thinking and problem-solving skills in students. In order to fulfil the overall goal of attaining
educational success in a comprehensive classroom with mixed to high ability students’, it is essential
that teaching and learning experiences are focussed towards active construction of knowledge and
building general capabilities (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA],
2013). The existing literature in educational research encourages the use of UbD framework to promote
meaningful learning and meet the growing learning needs of students (McTighe & Wiggins, 2012). It
suggests identification of the desired results and their alignment with student-centred inquiry-based
learning experiences for knowledge construction (Abdi, 2014). Literature also suggests the use of
concept maps and continuum of assessment methods to organise priority areas and map the learning
process in a valuable sequence for construction of knowledge (Bridges, Corbet & Chan, 2015).
Therefore, to expand the suitability of this unit for mixed to high ability students’ and to ensure
development of meaningful and challenging learning experiences, a reconstruction of this unit is
imperative.
4
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
ICT Opportunities to Limited exposure to ICT Exposure to varied range of ICT based Integration of ICT based resources in curriculum is essential
capabilities watch videos and hampers scientific resources (quizzes, games, interactive to build 21st century competent, technologically literate,
power-points as understanding, technological power-points) to promote critically thinking learners (Ghavifekr & Rosdy, 2015). ICT
visual stimulus, and literacy and students’ understanding, critical thinking and provides a great platform to enhance students’ conceptual
an online research- educational outcomes. engagement. Application of ICT skills understanding and engagement with science (Hu, Gong, Lai,
based task to build (create presentations, mind maps, & Leung, 2018; ACARA, 2013).
ICT skills. research-tasks, timelines and google
docs) to access and communicate
information.
Critical and Few inference style Limited opportunities to Increased opportunities to generate and Critical and creative thinking skills are essential to respond to
creative questions for critically/creatively think and evaluate knowledge/ideas and the challenges of 21st century (Australian Curriculum Studies
thinking processing construct knowledge, results in construct knowledge through guided- Association, 2015). Opportunities to evaluate information,
information on fragmented learning and discussions, inference/evaluation- and investigate alternatives strategies to generate solutions,
Darwin’s theory. negatively impact problem- based responses, reflections, debate, allow the development of high-order thinking and problem-
solving and decision-making puzzles, quiz, game, modelling and solving skills that are integral to build and extend critical and
abilities. research tasks. creative thinking capability in students (Sanders, 2016;
5
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Strengths of the
Area of Concerns of the area of Suggested Changes to counteract
area of Research support for the changes suggested.
consideration consideration concerns
consideration
Yuliani & Saragih, 2015).
Personal and Teacher-led class Lack of opportunities to Incorporation of a broad range of Melbourne declaration identifies personal and social
social discussions to explore/question information, opportunities to engage in scientific competence as the foundation to learning (Towns & Arnett,
capabilities prompt inquiry and work in collaboration inquiry and problem solving, both 2014). Integration of experiences that allow students to
negatively impact critical independently and in collaboration evaluate, reflect, express, share and communicate knowledge,
thinking, self-regulation, and through discussions, brainstorming, work independently and in collaboration, allow the
thus foster aversive social research and hands-on investigations, development of self and social awareness, as well as self and
interactions. to build personal and social capacity. social management (ACARA, n.d.).
Unit design Content focussed Lack of focus on the student Reconstruction of the entire unit using Backward design approach provides a mean to identify the
and approach unit designed using learning outcomes (SLOs) in UbD framework by identifying the relevance of content for a meaningful learning experience
traditional teacher- unit planning and teacher- desired SLOs, designing assessments (McTighe & Wiggins, 2012). By aligning the teaching
centred learning centred approach results in to evaluate and support learning, and strategies with the desired SLOs, UbD allows teachers to
approach accidental learning, inhibit planning the learning experiences to focus on the development of deep understanding, relevant
student engagement, align with the outcomes, based on skills and transferable learning in students for educational
meaningful learning and student-centred IBL approach. success (Yurtseven & Altun, 2017; Emory, 2014).
promote rote memorisation. IBL model provides a constructivist approach to promote
student inquiry and engagement for development of self-
directed, independent leaners (Abdi, 2014; Brandenburg &
Wilson, 2013)
Assessment Formative Absence of a continuous Include a continuum of assessment Integration of a continuum of assessment methods within the
strategies assessment through assessment inhibits through - informal checks instructional period enables evaluation of learning for
pre and post remediation of learning at (observations, discussions and reinforcement/remediation (Gupta, 2016; McTighe &
spelling test and early stages, increase mental worksheets), puzzles, games, self- Wiggins, 2012). By promoting high-order thinking skills, an
quiz. stress and foster reflections, performance tasks ongoing assessment approach supports and shapes student
Summative misconceptions in learning. (research and hands-on investigations), learning (Collins, 2014). Alignment of the assessment criteria
assessment through academic prompts with SLOs and teaching strategies encourage application of
half-yearly (summary/inference-based responses) knowledge for development of deeper-understanding and
examination. and summative assessment (group- intrinsic motivation in students (Muskin, 2015).
based research task).
6
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Weighting 15%
Mark / 30
9
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
10
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Task Description
Students work in groups of 3-4 to perform a research-based investigation on the impact of biological research
on environment and biodiversity. They evaluate the benefits and the interlinked ethical considerations to
develop an evidence-based argument and submit their work as a multimodal presentation/video.
Groups can choose ONE of the following biological research areas as the focus of their investigation
- Antibiotics/Pesticides
- Genetically modified organisms (GMOs)
- Gene silencing/editing
- Gene cloning
The presentation should clearly demonstrate collaboration between group members to undertake effective research,
analyse and evaluate the information to form an evidence-based argument. It should include an,
- Introduction of the chosen biological research area and the reason for selection
- Background of the area and its benefits to the society
- Ethical considerations interlinked with the area
- Synthesis of research for evaluation of the benefits and concerns
- Evidence-based argument to conclude the investigation
Assessment Criteria:
Provide a clear description of the chosen biological research area and its impact on environment and biodiversity
Use a variety of secondary sources to collect reliable information.
Analysis and evaluation of collected information to form an evidence-based argument
Produce an engaging multimodal presentation/video which clearly demonstrates collaboration between
group members
Submission Instructions
Students must work in groups of 3-4 to perform the research investigation and create a multimodal
presentation/video for submission.
Submit a single file (choose any format compatible with windows or mac)
The presentation/video must not exceed 10 minutes
Submitted in a USB drive with name of group members
Deduction of 2 marks per day will be imposed on any late submissions
11
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Marking Criteria
Grade scale and Mark
A group A B C D
(22-30) (15-21) (8-14) (1-7)
Provides a clear and Demonstrates a clear Clearly identifies and Clearly identifies and Identifies the benefits
description of the understanding of the chosen synthesises the attempts to synthesise of the area but does
chosen biological intervention by coherently benefits and the benefits and not provide
research area and synthesising the benefits and interlinked ethical interlinked ethical information on
its impact on interlinked ethical considerations of the considerations of the ethical considerations
environment and considerations of the chosen chosen area to chosen area to describe
biodiversity (10) area to describe the impact describe the impact the impact on
on environment and on environment and environment and
biodiversity biodiversity biodiversity
Uses a variety of Extensively uses a variety of Uses 6 or more Uses at least 6 Uses 2-3 resources to
secondary sources to resources (more than 6) to different resources to resources to collect collect information
collect reliable collect reliable information collect reliable somewhat reliable
information (5) which is highly relevant to information relevant information relevant to
the investigation to the investigation the investigation
Analyses and Thoroughly analyses and Analyses and Attempts to analyse Does not attempt to
evaluate the critically evaluates the evaluates the and evaluate the analyse or evaluate
collected collected information to collected information collected information the collected
information to form develop a coherent to develop a sound to develop a generic information and only
an evidence-based evidence-based argument argument argument provides a summary
argument (10)
12
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
11
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
- Summative assessment: Group-based research investigation “Impact of biological research on environment and Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) capability
biodiversity (Weightage 15%, 30 marks)
Ethical understanding
Scientific metalanguage
Evolution, Natural selection, Fossils, Fossilisation, Biogeography, Comparative anatomy, Homologous structures, Transitional forms, Embryology, Species, Speciation, Isolation, Breeding,
Cross-breeding, Selection pressure, Adaptation, Resistance, Antibiotic, Inheritance, Genes, DNA, Biodiversity
c. Kahoot quiz: Students take a Kahoot quiz to self-assess their existing knowledge on evolution.
Teacher to use this data for evaluation of students prior learning.
d. Glossary on evolution: Students create a glossary of key terms used in their science workbooks.
They will define the word meanings. Students will update their glossaries every lesson.
2. Evidences of evolution
b. Visual stimulus: Students watch introductory video on evidence of evolution and take notes for
SC-4WS the existing evidences.
13
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
e. Glossary: Students update their glossaries with new metalanguage with brief description of the
key terms.
14
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
b. Teacher-led discussion: Teacher plays a video on evolution of marsupials. Students complete the
SC-8WS provided worksheet on the task followed by class discussion facilitated by teacher using open-
ended questions to form student learning and relate evolution to plate tectonics.
d. Interactive game: Students demonstrate their understanding through playing the game ‘Are they
SC-8WS homologous or analogous structures’.
e. Glossary: Students update their glossaries with new metalanguage with brief description of the
key terms.
2.6 Embryology
Hands-on investigation (in pairs): Students are shown pictures of different types of embryos to
demonstrate the similarities and differences of embryos at the first stages of life. After a class
SC-7WS discussion, students will complete a close passage with a word bank and first letter hints or 2.6 Cut outs for variety of embryos
worksheet to demonstrate their interpretation skills of embryology structures across different and their first stages of life
Worksheet on embryology
species structures
2.7 Transitional forms
a. Think, Pair & Share: Students research online about the presence of tailbone and appendix in
humans and other vestigial structures. They discuss their findings in pairs and share their work
SC-6WS with the whole class. Students may upload their work on Google docs as well. 2.7 Interactive powerpoint
SC-7WS presentation.
SC-9WS b. Inference: Teacher explains the features of transitional forms common to individual species.
15
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Groups can choose ONE of the following biological research areas as the focus of their investigation
- Antibiotics/Pesticides
- Genetically modified organisms (GMOs)
- Gene silencing/editing
17
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
The presentation should clearly demonstrate collaboration between group members to undertake
effective research, analyse and evaluate the information to form an evidence-based argument. It
should include an,
- Introduction of the chosen biological research area and the reason for selection
- Background of the area and its benefits to the society
- Ethical considerations interlinked with the area
- Synthesis of research for evaluation of the benefits and concerns
- Evidence-based argument to conclude the investigation
Evaluation
18
REPORT OF RECOMMENDATIONS
An evaluation of the unit ‘Fossils & Evolution’ raised major concerns in relation to student
understanding, knowledge transfer and general capabilities. Based on the requirements of The
Australian Curriculum and current literature in educational research, this report proposes
reconstruction of the entire unit and implementation of ‘Exploring the Evolution’ as the new unit for
teaching evolutionary concepts in Year 10 Science classes. Following recommendations have been
formulated with a focus to improve the student learning experience for success.
The original unit showcases a limited focus on developing scientific metalanguage and literacy in
students. Apart from a glossary of scientific words and few comprehension-based worksheets with
word banks/clues, there are no opportunities for students to comprehend and compose
information. The Australian Curriculum, marks literacy skills as a crucial pre-requisite to access,
understand and evaluate any form of information (ACARA, 2013). To address this, the
reconstructed unit is developed to incorporate a wide range of activities based on reading,
listening, viewing, speaking and writing (discussions/comprehensions/reflections/debates/
presentations/ research tasks). Incorporation of these changes will provide students with
opportunities to comprehend data, understand decontextualized information, express knowledge
and construct arguments, and are therefore imperative for the development of abstract reasoning
and effective communication in students (Seddon, 2017). Persistent exposure to scientific
metalanguage is implemented throughout the unit through an extended ‘glossary’ constructed by
the students themselves to improve their metacognition and scientific literacy. This will not only
build a link between understanding and assessment, but also enable students to develop critical
and analytical thinking (Fenty & Brydon, 2017).
The original unit lacks approaches to build or apply existing numeracy skills. Students’ inability to
transfer their existing skill set form one discipline to another results in disjoined learning and
fosters quantitative incompetency (Feser, Vasaly & Herrera, 2013). To address this concern, the
reconstructed unit incorporates timeline construction activity for identifying trend and patterns,
and activities based on calculating the age of fossils/rocks for analysis and interpretation of data.
These changes will allow synthesis of conceptual knowledge from chemistry as well as earth and
environmental science into the living world to build a cohesive conceptual understanding on
19
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
evolution. Integration of numeracy skills with science will not only enable students to explore
inter-disciplinary relationships, but also transfer their knowledge across different contexts
(ACARA, 2013). Research suggests that quantitative competency built through such activities is
critical to effectively interpret and analyse data, and develop logical thinking and decision-making
skills (Goos, Geiger & Bennison, 2015).
3. Maximise the application of ICT skills for understanding, engagement and technological
literacy
The Australian curriculum recognises ability of students to “access, create and communicate
information, solve problems” as their ICT capability (ACARA, 2013). The original unit provides a
number of opportunities to students to stimulate their learning process for meaningful experiences.
However, it limits the hands-on application of their ICT skills which may hamper scientific
understanding, technological literacy and students’ overall educational outcomes (Ghavifekr &
Rosdy, 2015). To address this, the report suggests for maximising the use of available ICT
infrastructure for building ICT capability in students. This is demonstrated in the reconstructed
unit through increased exposure to varied range of ICT based resources (quiz/interactive
game/power-points/google classroom) to promote understanding, critical thinking and engagement
(Ghavifekr et al., 2016). Integrating a wide range of activities that encourage application of ICT
skills (creating power-point presentations/mind maps/timelines/google docs; undertaking a range
of research-based tasks) will provide opportunities to students to improve their ICT capabilities by
accessing, analysing, processing and communicating information (Hu et al., 2018). Incorporation
of these changes enable teachers to broaden students’ knowledge paradigm, challenge them and
promote high-order thinking (Ghavifekr & Rosdy, 2015).
Melbourne declaration identifies the integration of experiences that enable students to develop
critical and creative thinking and, be personally and socially competent, as the foundation of
learning (ACSA, 2015; Towns & Arnett, 2014; ACARA, 2013). The existing unit of work is based
on a deductive-teacher centred approach and thus provides bare minimum opportunities for
students to explore and evaluate information and develop critical/creative thinking, both
independently and in collaboration. Absence of such experiences negatively impact problem-
solving and decision-making abilities, result in rote-memorisation, fragmented learning, lack of
self-regulation, and foster aversive social interactions (Sanders, 2016; Towns & Arnett, 2014).
20
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
As demonstrated in the reconstructed unit, this issue can be addressed by providing an increased
number of opportunities to generate and evaluate knowledge/ideas and construct knowledge
(through guided-discussions, inference/evaluation-based responses, reflections, debate, puzzles,
quiz, game, modelling and research tasks). Such changes will enable students to process and
evaluate available information, reflect on their perceptions and prior-learning to develop deeper
understanding and high-order thinking for knowledge construction (Yuliani & Saragih, 2015).
They allow students to seek alternative pathways and generate innovative ideas/solutions, and thus
allow the development of problem-solving skills (Sanders, 2016). Opportunities to engage in
scientific inquiry and problem-solving activities, both independently and in collaboration through
discussions, brainstorming, research and hands-on investigations are well reflected in the
reconstructed unit. These experiences encourage the formation of social relationships through
positive interactions, allow the development of self and social awareness, as well as self and social
management (Towns & Arnett, 2014). By empowering students to build their personal and social
capacity, such opportunities enable them to make responsible decisions and manage challenging
situations (ACARA, n.d.).
5. Reconstruct the unit using UbD framework and integrate a continuum of assessment methods
to enhance deep understanding and meaningful inquiry-based learning
Design and structure of a unit considerably influences the formation of learning in students. To
support learning in low-ability students the current unit was designed with a focus on covering the
contents in the syllabus using a teacher-centred learning approach. Absence of student learning
outcomes and concept map from the unit outline and lack of formative assessment strategies
throughout the unit reflect flaws in the unit design. Lack of focus on the student learning outcomes
(SLOs) in unit planning and teacher-centred approach can easily result in accidental teaching and
learning, inhibit student engagement, promote irrelevant learning and rote memorisation (Emory,
2014). UbD framework provides a mean to identify the relevance of content for a meaningful
learning experience (McTighe & Wiggins, 2012).
In order to improve the student learning experience, the entire unit has been reconstructed using
UbD framework. To begin with, the desired SLOs and the essential questions accompanying the
conceptual understanding of evolution were identified. This was followed by designing a
continuum of assessment methods to evaluate and support learning. Finally, a wide range of
teaching and learning strategies based on the student-centred IBL approach were planned to align
with the outcomes. By aligning the teaching strategies with the desired SLOs, UbD allows
teachers to focus on the development of deep understanding, relevant skills and transferable
learning in students for educational success (Yurtseven & Altun, 2017; Emory, 2014). Using a
structured/guided inquiry-based approach for designing resources/activities promote student
21
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Conclusion
Evaluation and reconstruction the existing unit is imperative to enhance its suitability and improve
student learning. In line with the Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians
2008 (ACARA, 2013), these recommendations intend to develop deep understanding and skills that
will enable students to translate their knowledge into practical applications. The incorporated changes
expand students’ general capabilities to develop analytical thinking, social competence and new
expertise.
REFERENCES
Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in
science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37-41. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1053967.pdf
22
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013). The Shape of the Australian
Curriculum: Version 4.0. Retrieved from
http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/The_Shape_of_the_Australian_Curriculum_v4.pdf
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (n.d). General capabilities in the
Australian curriculum: Science. Retrieved from http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/Science_-
_GC_learning_area.pdf
Australian Curriculum Studies Association. (2015). Australian Curriculum: Technologies with a focus on
critical and creative thinking. Retrieved from
http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/ACSA_news_2015_December.pdf
Brandenburg, R., & Wilson, Z. (2013). Pedagogies for the future leading quality learning and teaching in
higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Retrieved from
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uwsau/reader.action?docID=3034855&query=
Bridges, S. M., Corbet, E. F., & Chan, L. K. (2015). Designing problem-based curricula: The role of
concept mapping in scaffolding learning for the health sciences. Knowledge Management & E-
Learning, 7(1), 119– 133. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
doi=10.1.1.902.7544&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Collins, R. (2014). Skills for the 21st century: teaching higher-order thinking. Curriculum & Leadership
Journal, 12(14), Retrieved from
http://www.curriculum.edu.au/leader/teaching_higher_order_thinking,37431.html?issueID=12910
Emory, J. (2014). Understanding Backward Design to strengthen curricular model. Nurse Educator, 39(3),
122–125. Retrieved from https://oce-ovid-com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/article/00006223-201405000-
00006/HTML
Fenty, N. S., & Brydon, M. (2017). Integrating literacy and the content curriculum to support diverse
learners. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(2), 225-238. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1160659.pdf
Feser, J., Vasaly, H., & Herrera, J. (2013). On the edge of mathematics and biology integration: Improving
quantitative skills in undergraduate biology education. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 124–
23
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and learning with
ICT tools: Issues and challenges from teachers’ perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of
Educational Technology, 4(2), 38-57. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1096028.pdf
Ghavifekr, S. & Rosdy, W. A.W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT
integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191.
Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105224.pdf
Goos. M., Geiger, V., & Bennison, A. (2015). Conceptualising and enacting numeracy across the
curriculum. In Beswick, K.., Muir, T., & Wells, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of 39th Psychology of
Mathematics Education conference, 3, 9-16. Hobart, Australia: PME. Retrieved from
https://bit.ly/2MEXD72
Gupta, K. (2016). Assessment as learning. The Science Teacher, 83(1), 43-47. Retrieved from
https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/docview/1755024871?accountid=36155
Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student
literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel
analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1-13. Retrieved from https://www-sciencedirect-
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/science/article/pii/S0360131518301416
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by design framework. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Retrieved from
https://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf
Muskin, J. A. (2015). Student Learning Assessment and the Curriculum: issues and implications for
policy, design and implementation. In-Progress Reflections No.1 on Current and Critical Issues in
the Curriculum and Learning. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. Geneva: Switzerland.
Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002354/235489e.pdf
24
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
Sanders, S. (2016). Critical and creative thinkers in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Student
Engagement: Education Matters, 6(1), 19-27. Retrieved from
https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
referer=https://www.google.com.au/&httpsredir=1&article=1043&context=jseem
Seddon, M. (2017). Strategies for integrating literacy into a science classroom. In Graduate Research
Papers. 115. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/115
Towns, S., & Arnett, D. (2014). The General Capabilities: A project approach to its
implementation, assessment and reporting. Australian Educational Leader, 36(3), 12-14.
Retrieved from https://search-informit-com-
au.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/fullText;dn=889393114046472;res=IELHSS
Yuliani, K. & Saragih, S. (2015). The development of learning devices based guided discovery model to
improve understanding concept and critical thinking mathematically ability of students at Islamic
junior high school of Medan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24), 116–129. Retrieved from
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078880
Yurtseven, N., & Altun, S. (2017). Understanding by Design (UbD) in EFL teaching: Teachers'
professional development and students' achievement. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim
Bilimleri, 17(2), 437-461. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/docview/1888670349?accountid=36155&rfr_id=info%3Axri
%2Fsid%3Aprimo
25
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 – Original Scope & Sequence
CAMBRIDGE PARK HIGH SCHOOL Year 10 Science 2017 | Stage 5 | 2017
Term 1 - 10 weeks 2 days
Week1 Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6 Week7 Week8 Week9 Week10 Week 11
(Only 2 days)
The Mysterious Universe Chemical Reactions
7 lessons per fortnight 7 lessons per fortnight
SC5-12ES, SC5-10PW SC5-16CW, SC5-17CW Common Assignment (Week 8 issue, Due
Week 10)
Term 2 - 9 weeks 3 days
Week1 Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6 Week7 Week8 Week9 Week 10
(Only 3 days)
Fossils and Evolution Reproduction and Genetics
7 lessons per fortnight 7 lessons per fortnight
SC5-15LW Half Yearly Examination SC5-14LW
(Week 4/5)
Term 3 - 9 weeks 4 days
Week1 Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6 Week7 Week8 Week9 Week 10
(Only 4 days)
Reproduction Motion The Body Responds
and Genetics
7 lessons per fortnight 7 lessons per fortnight
SC5-14LW SC5-10PW, SC5-11PW Practical Experience (Week 5/6) SC5-13ES, SC5-14LW
Term 4 - 10 weeks
Week1 Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6 Week7 Week8 Week9 Week10
The Body Responds Improving Science Skills Mechanical Advantage
7 lessons per fortnight 7 lessons per fortnight
SC5-13ES, SC5-14LW Yearly Examination (Week
5/6)
Summary Duration
In this unit, students learn about fossils and evolution of life Term 2; 5 weeks; 7 lessons per fortnight
27
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
K&U content Teaching, learning and assessment Strategies Resources Registration
28
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
K&U content Teaching, learning and assessment Strategies Resources Registration
continents.
Stage 5 - Living 1. a. Describe Darwin's theory of (F, MA, FT) – As an introduction to the topic, students 1a. Core Science Stage 5 pp 336-341
World evolution and the theory of natural will watch the following video clip on natural Science Essential 10 pp 121-127
c. explain, using selection. selection: https://www.youtube.com/watch? National Science 10 pp 48-56
examples, how b. Describe factors needed for the v=vnktXHBvE8s
b. National Science 10 p45-47
natural natural selection process. Students will answer questions to accompany this
selection video.
relates to (MA, F) - Inference-style questions will be utilised for
changes in a all groups in order to determine their understanding
population, of the concept through higher order thinking.
e.g. in the (FT) – These students will complete the graphic
development organiser, ‘starburst’ to summarise the information
of resistance of on Natural Selection. (MA and FT) – These students
bacteria to will complete the graphic organiser, ‘fishbone’ to
antibiotics and summarise the information on Natural Selection.
2. Relate the theory of natural
insects to 2. National Science 10 p 72
selection to resistance in bacteria to
pesticides
antibiotics and insects to pesticides. Have students read through a passage on how
d. outline the
natural selection has increased the resistance of
roles of genes
bacteria like tuberculosis to antibiotics (see webpage
and
below)
environmental
factors in the http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/e
survival of dexcel/problems_in_environment/infectiousdiseasere
organisms in a v6.shtml
population Complete a short quiz to demonstrate student
29
18918928_102098_CTL Assignment 1_2H2018
K&U content Teaching, learning and assessment Strategies Resources Registration
understanding
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/quiz/q35175596
3. Describe how environmental Have a class talk on what is a pesticide and how they
factors and genetics play their part are utilised within farming. Explain how overuse of 3. Core Science Stage 5 pp 345-347
in natural and artificial selection. pesticides causes insects to develop populations that National Science 10 p57
are immune to the effects of the pesticide and the
need for science to develop new and innovative
solutions to the problems this causes.
31