Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mayerly J. Puchana-Rosero, Eder C. Lima, Bianca Mella, Dimitrius Da Costa, Eduardo Poll, Mariliz Gutterres
Mayerly J. Puchana-Rosero, Eder C. Lima, Bianca Mella, Dimitrius Da Costa, Eduardo Poll, Mariliz Gutterres
Mayerly J. Puchana-Rosero, Eder C. Lima, Bianca Mella, Dimitrius Da Costa, Eduardo Poll, Mariliz Gutterres
, 63, Nº 1 (2018)
ABSTRACT
Coagulation-flocculation (CF) process studies on aqueous solutions of Acid Black 210 dye (AB-210), were performed to investigate efficiency at different
pH, coagulant and polyelectrolyte doses, and sedimentation times. In the adsorption studies of the dye removal, the initial pH and isotherms studies were performed
using an activated carbon prepared by microwave-assisted pyrolysis of Tannery sludge. This adsorbent material was characterized by isotherms of N2
adsorptiondesorption and density functional theory. Finally, the efficiency of the combined process CF followed by adsorption, was shown using a synthetic
effluent identical to that produced in the wet-end process of the leather industry in industrial equipment. Effluent was collected from each treatment bath and
analyzed for its physical properties and by ion chromatography.
The best conditions found in CF processes were: pH 10.0, sedimentation time of 60 minutes, coagulant dose of 71 mg L-1 (Al2(SO4)3) and dose of flocculant
(polyelectrolyte FX AS1) of 0.090 mg L-1. In the adsorption processes, the equilibrium data were best fit to the Liu isotherm model, presenting the maximum
sorption capacity (Qmax) for AB-210 of 974.7 mg g-1 at 303.15K at pH 2.0. Using the synthetic effluent, the combined CF followed by adsorption of AB-210 dye
demonstrated a removal of 85.2%, indicating that the combined process is efficient for real wastewater treatment.
10 was prepared. The experimental conditions for agitation and sedimentation were the same as for the pH tests, only varying the concentration of the coagulant
doses between 14 mg L-1 and 214 mg L-1 without the use of polyelectrolyte. The amount of coagulant added to the Jar Test was determined using the mathematical
expression (1):
For the test of the coagulant dosage, a dye solution of 100 mg L-1 at pH Figure tubes at different pH values (1.0–7.0). A temperature-regulated shaker
1. Molecular structure of the AB-210 dye. (operating at 200 rpm) was used to agitate the adsorbent-adsorbate mixtures.
After agitation at a specified time, the mixtures were centrifuged for 5 min for
separation of the dye solutions from adsorbents [19,26]. After the batch
adsorption experiment, the unadsorbed dyes were measured using a T90+ PG
Instruments spectrophotometer at a maximum wavelength of 615 nm for AB210
(1) dye. The adsorbed quantity of dye per unit mass of activated carbon is given by
Eqs. (3)
where A, is the desired Al2(SO4)3 concentration in the studied solution in mg
L-1, B is the sulfate concentration in mg L-1, and 0.07 is a value representing the
studied volume of 700 mL, using a settling time of 60 minutes.
The percentage of dye removal was calculated according to the following (3)
mathematical expression (Eq. 1): For the equilibrium studies, the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Liu models
were used to analyze equilibrium data. The equations describing these models
are shown below [27]:
(2)
C0, is the initial concentration of dye (mg.L-1) and Cf is the final dye (5)
concentration after the adsorption procedure.
The test of the polyelectrolyte dose was performed under the same (6)
experimental conditions, and the coagulant concentration was maintained
constant at 71 mg L-1 to evaluate the effect of the polyelectrolyte addition. The
volume of stock solution of polyelectrolyte at a concentration of 80.0 mg L-1 (7)
added varied from 0.2 to 6 mL (0.023 mg L-1-0.686 mg L-1), using a settling time
of 60 minutes.
Where qe (mg. g−1) is the amount of dye removed by ACT at equilibrium;
2.3 Preparation of activated carbon from tannery sludge (ACT)
Ce (mg L−1) is the dye concentration at equilibrium; Qmax(mg. g−1) is the
The ACT was prepared by chemical activation of the sludge collected from
maximum adsorption capacity of the ACT; KL (L mg−1), KF[mg g−1·(mg
a tannery wastewater treatment plant using zinc chloride and lime to form a paste
L−1)−1/nF] and Kg (L mg−1) are the respective Langmuir, Freundlich and Liu
(1:1 between the sludge and the inorganic material) and carbonized by
equilibrium constants; nF and nL are the exponents of Freundlich and Liu
microwave heating. The carbonized material was refluxed with 6.0 mol L-1 HCl,
models, respectively, (nF and nL are dimensionless) [28,29].
dried, ground and sieved to obtain the activated carbon [16-18].
The results of the gas-solid isotherms were analyzed in different ranges of 2.5 Statistical evaluation of kinetics and equilibrium models.
pressures, using the BET method on which calculation of specific surface (p/ p0 Usually for testing a given kinetic and equilibrium model, some statistical
range determined using the method proposed by Rouquerol et al. [23], and functions are tested. The best fit model is the one with the lowest value of
density functional theory (p/p0 range 10-7), which considered different pore Standard Deviation (SD) and the one in which the value of Adjusted
models and the effects of surface roughness and heterogeneity (NLDFT and Coefficient of Determination (R²adj) is closer to unity. Equations 8 – 11 depict
QSDFT), using the ASQiWin software [24-25]. the expressions of reduced chi-square, SD, Coefficient of Determination (R²)
While the calculation NLDFT has proven to be a reliable method for the and adjusted Coefficient of Determination (R²adj), respectively.
characterization of a variety of materials ordered and structured, it has the
drawback that it does not consider the geometric and chemical heterogeneity on
the walls of the pores, assuming the structure behaves as a flat or even surface. (8)
Thus, there is a need for further study considering surface roughness, which is a
characteristic in most carbonaceous materials. The QSDFT method was
originally developed to take account of this and has been applied to slit-shaped (9)
pores, assuming typical models are microporous activated carbons [24-25].
However, the emergence of new materials with pore morphology, for example,
predesigned and obtained by synthesis of various precursors, requires the
development of new methods that take into account more complex geometric
details (slit, cylindrical, spherical and combinations) [24-25]. (10)
where qi, model is each value of q predicted by the fitted model, qi, exp is each ascertain the best model since R² and R²adj are of low sensitivity (their values are
q limited to unity) [28].
value of q measured experimentally, exp is the average of q experimentally
2.6 Wet-end processing wastewater, characterization and treatments
measured, np is the number of experiments performed and p is the number of
parameters of the fitted model. To obtain wastewater with characteristics similar to those of the wastewater
The reduced chi - squared is the residual sum of squares divided by the generated in the wet-end stage of the tannery industry, the wet-end process was
degree of freedom (np-p) (Eq. 8). The SD is the square root of reduced carried out using a pilot-scale tannery drum (Master FLD-8 model) according to
chisquared (Eq. 9). Both Equations 8 and 9 are very useful for point to point the formulation (Table 1), where the input percentage of the chemicals and water
evaluation of a given kinetic or equilibrium adsorption model, this is because were based on the mass of wet-blue leather used (1.51 kg). Chemicals specialized
for each experimental point there is a point in the model that corresponds to the leather industry were used (BASF; TFL; LANXESS).
exactly to the point on the curve (model). The lower the reduced chi-squared The steps of the wet-end process were: washing, desacidulation, retanning,
and the SD, the lower the difference between the values of experimental q (qi, preliminary dyeing, fat liquoring and secondary dyeing. In each step the
wastewaters generated were collected and refrigerated at -10ºC until they could
exp) and model q (qi, model), therefore, the best fit is expected. However, it should
be taken into account that it is not possible to compare the values of reduced be used in the wastewater treatment assays.
chi-squared and SD among several kinetic and equilibrium isotherms that
present other different concentrations or other conditions since the values of
SD and chi-squared tend to increase as the concentration increases [28]. On
100 Water 40
2 Retanning polymer(ReluganRV4)
100 Water 25
100 Water 60
the inlet gas was oxygen (O2). All the analyses were performed using Milli-Q
water for washing of the glass materials and for the respective dilutions.
The optimal conditions obtained for dye removal from aqueous solution (at
303 K) were used for the coagulation-flocculation and adsorption treatments of
the wet-end composite wastewater, using 30.00 mg of ACT or AC being used
for this combined treatment test.
The spectrum from 300 to 800nm were recorded for each treatment, and
Microcal Origin 2015 software was used to determinate the percentage of dye
removal using the calculated integral under the curve for each analyzed treatment
process.
3870
J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 63, Nº 1 (2018)
considered to study the size and pore size distribution. Thus, one considers
the correct delay in the condensation exists for a spherical pore type [24-25].
Finally, the appropriate model defined, considering the characteristic
behavior of the pores of the sample, was used to make the pore size
distribution (Fig. 7). The peaks coincide with the pore sizes expected (down
is observed in the boundary area micropore and peaks mesopores of different
size) and predict the size distribution of micro and mesopores in the whole
range of relative pressure (with a volume 0.33 pore cm3 g-1 and characteristic
width of 17 Å). Additionally, the best fit achieved with the QSDFT model
suggests pores of roughness or tortuosity.
3871
J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 63, Nº 1 (2018)
calculated value that is different from qe values that were experimentally The fact that the Liu model was the best fit indicates that, due to the
measured. Qmax is the maximum sorption capacity estimated by a given model. heterogeneity of the surface, this is a useful approach to study the behavior of
Observing the Liu isotherm at the equilibrium concentration of about 900 mg the AB-210 on the surface in the range of concentrations worked. Since the
L-1 the complete saturation of the adsorbent was not attained yet, and this Freundlich model is only appropriate to describe the low concentration region,
saturation would occur at higher values. However, considering that the initial it is not valid at higher concentrations, where the interactions of the dye
AB-210 concentration (Co) is much higher than the equilibrium concentration molecules in the solution are likely to have a more important role, thus reducing
(Ce) left at the solution after the adsorption, it is not feasible to increase the the affinity of the dye towards the surface [37]. The Liu model is similar to the
concentration of the adsorbate even more, until saturation of the adsorbent Freundlich isotherm at low concentrations of adsorbate, while at high
occurs. concentrations it predicts an adsorption monolayer characteristic of the
Langmuir isotherm [38].
Figure 9. Adsorption isotherm at 303 K of AB-210 aqueous solution on ACT the activated carbon from tannery sludge (ACT)
Table 2. Parameters adjusted from the equilibrium experiments on the adsorption of AB-210 using the Langmuir, Freundlich and Liu models (303 K)
Langmuir Freundlich Liu
nL 0.4990
3872
J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 63, Nº 1 (2018)
Figure 10. Experimental dyed leather (a) and pilot-scale drum (b)
Table 3. Characterization of wastewaters of the wet-end process
Stream of wastewater pH Conductivity (μS.cm- TOC
1
) (mg.L-1)
Initial Washing 3.88 1094.7 615.5
3873
J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 63, Nº 1 (2018)
Table 4. Chemical analyses of the composite wastewater from wet-end process before and after the treatments.
TOC
Composite wastewater Na+ NH4+ K+ Ca+2
(mg L-1)
Initial 2024 1736.13 145.55 23.44 107.1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful for funding from the Coordination of Improvement
of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil) under the program PEC-PG,
they are grateful to the National Council for Scientific and Technological
Development (CNPq, Brazil) and to the Financier of Studies and Projects
(FINEP, Brazil) – public call MCTI/FINEP CT-HIDRO 01/2013. The authors
thank the Business and Leather Unit of the LANXESS Company for the dye
provided.
3874
J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 63, Nº 1 (2018)
REFERENCES 32. M.B Silveira, F.A. Pavan, N.F. Gelos, E.C. Lima, S.L.P. Dias, Clean: Air,
Soil, Water, 42, 939 (2014).
1. M. Gutterres, B. Mella, B. Chromium in Tannery Wastewater. Heavy 33. T. Calvete, E.C. Lima, N.F. Cardoso, S.L.P. Dias, E.S. Ribeiro. Clean: Air,
Metals in Water: Presence, Removal and Safety. 1st ed. Cambridge: Royal Soil, Water, 38, 521 (2010).
Society of Chemistry, 2014; pp. 314-338. 34. D. dos Santos, M.A. Adebayo, F. Pinheiro, L.D.T. Prola, R. Cataluña, E.C.
2. J. Piccin, C.S.Gomes, L.A Feris, M. Gutterres. Chem. Eng. J. 183, 30 Lima, C. Saucier, C. Gally, F. Machado. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 31, 1470
(2012). (2014).
3. Y.F., Feng, H. Zhou, G.H. Liu, J. Qiao, J.H. Wang, H.Y. Lu, L.Z. Yang, 35. A. Bazzo, M.A. Adebayo, S.L.P. Dias, E.C. Lima, J.C.P. Vaghetti, E.R. de
Y.H. Wu. Bioresour. Technol. 125, 138, (2012). Oliveira, A.J.B. Leite, F.A. Pavan, Avocado seed powder: characterization
4. X.Y. He, K.B. Male, P.N. Nesterenko, D. Brabazon, B. Paull, J.B.T. and its application for crystal violet dye removal from aqueous solutions,
Luong. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 8796(2013). Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, 15873 (2016). 36. M. Shirmardi,
5. B.H. Tan, T.T. Teng, A.K.M. Omar. Water Res. 34, 597 (2000). N. Alavi, E.C. Lima, A. Takdastan, A.H. Mahvi, A.A. Babaei, Removal
6. J. Bratby, Coagulation and Flocculation in Water and Wastewater of atrazine as an organic micro-pollutant from aqueous solutions: a
Treatment. Second ed., IWA Publishing, 2006. comparative study, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 103, 23
7. C. Liang, S. Sun, F. Li, Y. Ong, T. Chung. J. Membrane Sci., 469, 306 (2016).
(2014). 37. P.A.M. Mourao, P.J.M. Carrot, M.M.L. Ribeiro Carrot. Carbon. 44, 2422
8. M. Rasool, B. Tavakoli, N. Chaibakhsh, A. Pendashteh, A. Ecol. Eng. 90, (2006).
431 (2016). 38. P.D. Húmpola, H.S. Odetti, A.E. Fertitta, J.L. Vicente. J. Chil. Chem. Soc.,
9. I. Michael, A. Panagi, L.A. Loannou, Z. Frontistis, D. Fatta-Kassinos. 58, 1, 1541 (2013).
Water Res. 60, 28 (2014). 39. S. Gaydardzhier, J. Karthikeyan, P. Ay. Environ. Technol. 27 (2) ,193–
10. C. Amor, E. Torres-Socías, J. Peres, M. Maldonado, I. Oller, S. Malato, M. 199.
Lucas. J. Hazard. Mater. 286, 261 (2015).
11. G. Han, C. Liang, T. Chung, M. Weber, C. Staudt, C. Maletzko, C. Water
Res. 91, 361 (2016).
12. S. Papic, N. Koprivanac, A.L. Bozic, A. Metes. Dyes pigm. 62 (3),
291(2004)
13. F. Furlan, L. Melo da Silva, A. Morgado, A. Ulson de Souza. Resour.
Conserv. Recy, 54, 283 (2010)
14. C. Jung, N. Phal, J. Oh, K. Hoon, M. Jang, Y. Yoon. J. Hazard. Mater.
300, 808 (2015)
15. V. Oloibiri, I. Ufomba, M. Chys, W. Audenaert, K. Demeestere, S. Van
Hulle. Waste Manage. 43, 335 (2015)
16. C. Saucier, M.A. Adebayo, E.C. Lima, R. Cataluna, P.S. Thue, L.D.T.
Prola, M.J. Puchana-Rosero, F.M. Machado, F.A. Pavan, G.L. Dotto, J.
Hazard. Mater. 289, 18 (2015).
17. M.J. Puchana-Rosero, M.A. Adebayo, E.C. Lima, F.M. Machado, P.S.
Thue, J.C.P. Vaghetti, C.S. Umpierres, M. Gutterres, Colloid Surf. A, 504,
105 (2016).
18. M. C. Ribas, M. A. Adebayo, L. D.T. Prola, E. C. Lima, R. Cataluña, L. A.
Feris, M.J. Puchana-Rosero, F. M. Machado, F. A. Pavan, T. Calvete,
Chem. Eng. J. 248, 315 (2014).
19. M.A. Adebayo, L.D.T Prola, E.C. Lima, M.J. Puchana-Rosero, R.
Cataluña, C. Saucier, C.S. Umpierres, J.C.P. Vaghetti, L.G. da Silva, R.
Ruggiero, J. Hazard. Mater. 268, 43 (2014)
20. L.D.T. Prola, E. Acayanka, E.C. Lima, C.S. Umpierres, J.C.P. Vaghetti,
W.O. Santos, S. Laminsi, P.T. Njifon, Ind. Crop. Prod., 46, 328 (2013).
21. N.F. Cardoso, E.C. Lima, B. Royer, M.V. Bach, G.L. Dotto, L.A.A. Pinto,
T. Calvete, J. Hazard. Mater. 241-242, 146 (2012).
22. L.D. T. Prola, F.M. Machado, C.P. Bergmann, F.E. de Souza, C.R. Gally,
E.C. Lima, M.A. Adebayo, S.L.P. Dias, T. Calvete, J. Environ. Manage.
130, 166 (2013).
23. J. Rouquerol, P. Llewellyn, F. Rouquerol. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 160, 49
(2007)
24. M. Thommes, K. Kaneko, A. Neimark, J. Olivier, F. Rodríguez-Reinoso,
J. Rouquerol, K. Sing. Pure Appl. Chem. DOI 10.1515/pac-2014 (2015)
25. G. Gor, M. Thommes, K. Cychosz, A. Neimark. Carbon, 50, 1583 (2012)
26. J. Landers, G. Yu, A. Neimark. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem.
Eng. Aspects. 437, 3 (2013)
27. W.S. Alencar, E.C. Lima, B. Royer, B.D. dos Santos, T. Calvete, E.A.
da Silva, C.N. Alves. Sep. Sci. Technol. 47,513 (2012)
28. E.C. Lima, M.A. Adebayo, F.M. Machado. Kinetic and equilibrium models
of adsorption. In: Bergmann CP, Machado FM, editors. Carbon
nanomaterials as adsorbents for environmental and biological applications.
Springer; 2015, pp.33–69.
29. C. Saucier, M.A. Adebayo, E.C. Lima, L.D.T. Prola, P.S. Thue, C.S.
Umpierres, M.J. Puchana-Rosero, F.M. Machado. Clean: Air, Soil, Water,
43, 1389 (2015).
30. A. Zahrim, C. Tizaoui, N.J. Hilal. J. Hazard. Mater., 182, 624 (2010)
31. J.M. Duan, J. Gregory. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 100,475 (2003)
3875