Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Iasbaba'S Daily Current Affairs (Prelims + Mains Focus) - 23Rd July 2018
Iasbaba'S Daily Current Affairs (Prelims + Mains Focus) - 23Rd July 2018
In news:
Heritage conservationists and members of Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural
Heritage (INTACH) has expressed concerns over proposed construction of
amphitheatre, rest rooms and information centre at second century BCE Buddhist
site, Thotlakonda in Visakhapatnam.
Buildings might mar the original heritage site and are against the norms laid down by
the courts.
Court had ordered – no construction or development activity of any sort shall be
permitted within the boundaries of the ancient site
Tourism should be developed but not at the cost of protected areas
In news:
States are ranked based on 10 themes, 30 focus subjects and 100 indicators, such as
power, water, road and housing; Women and Children, Environment etc.
In news:
2/12
Basics:
PMKSY has been formulated with the vision of extending the coverage of irrigation
‘Har Khet ko pani’ and improving water use efficiency ‘More crop per drop’ in a
focused manner.
In news:
College principals across the country could enjoy a minimum fixed tenure of five
years, according to recent University Grants Commission
3/12
A college principal shall be appointed for a period of five years, extendable for
another term of five years on the basis of performance assessment by a committee
appointed by the (respective) university.
Presently college principals do not have a fixed tenure.
These regulations would replace the UGC Regulations of 2010.
All universities in the country have been mandated to amend their statutes to give
effect to these amendments within six months.
In news:
Ministry is also working on the proposal to amend the Act to award death penalty to those
convicted of raping children below 12 years.
4/12
Keep track of items under GST (We never know, UPSC might ask question on similar lines
of previous year Prelims GST question :D)
The GDP deflator, also called implicit price deflator, is a measure of inflation.
It is the ratio of the value of goods and services an economy produces in a particular
year at current prices to that of prices that prevailed during the base year.
This ratio helps show the extent to which the increase in gross domestic product has
happened on account of higher prices rather than increase in output.
Since the deflator covers the entire range of goods and services produced in the economy
— as against the limited commodity baskets for the wholesale or consumer price indices —
it is seen as a more comprehensive measure of inflation.
Real vs nominal
GDP GDP price deflator measures the difference between real GDP and nominal
GDP. Nominal GDP differs from real GDP as the former doesn’t include inflation,
while the latter does.
As a result, nominal GDP will most often be higher than real GDP in an expanding
economy.
WPI, CPI
A consumer price index (CPI) measures changes over time in the general level of prices of
goods and services that households acquire for the purpose of consumption.
However, since CPI is based only a basket of select goods and is calculated on prices
included in it, it does not capture inflation across the economy as a whole.
The wholesale price index basket has no representation of the services sector and all the
constituents are only goods whose prices are captured at the wholesale/producer level.
Specifically, for the GDP deflator, the ‘basket’ in each year is the set of all goods that were
produced domestically, weighted by the market value of the total consumption of each
good.
5/12
Therefore, new expenditure patterns are allowed to show up in the deflator as people
respond to changing prices. The theory behind this approach is that the GDP deflator
reflects up-to-date expenditure patterns.
GDP deflator is available only on a quarterly basis along with GDP estimates, whereas CPI
and WPI data are released every month.
(MAINS FOCUS)
NATIONAL
TOPIC:
General Studies 3:
Issues related to direct and indirect farm subsidies and minimum support
prices
Inclusive growth and issues arising from it.
General Studies 2:
The present government has increased the MSPs of 14 kharif crops to at least 50 per cent
above paid out costs of farmers, including the imputed cost of family labour (Cost A2+FL).
The Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP), a professional advisory body
has toed the government line. It has bypassed its own terms of reference (ToR) that require
it to look at demand and supply, domestic and international prices, costs, inter-crop price
parity, etc while recommending MSPs.
States like Uttar Pradesh have announced a much higher state-advised price.
Concerns:
Increasing MSP doesn’t address the roots of the problem, which have to do with
excess with the farmers. An extended subsidy will only result in more output, adding
to the stocks and further depressing realisations.
6/12
India’s agrarian crisis today — one of surpluses in most farm commodities — isn’t
amenable to traditional political fixes, such as announcing MSPs that may be fair and
remunerative to farmers, but are divorced from market realities.
Market-distorting MSPs and subsidies or loan waivers aren’t the best way to help
farmers. What they need primarily is income support, which is better done through a
flat per-acre subsidy not specific to any crop or production-linked.
Issues:
Market prices of most kharif crops are well below the announced MSPs.
Ensuring that farmers really get these MSPs will require a major coordination between the
Centre and states.
Given a robust procurement system does not exist for other crops it will become difficult for
the government to procure even 25 per cent of the production of various kharif crops,
except in paddy and cotton.
Cost issues:
In the case of paddy alone, the government will incur an extra food subsidy bill of Rs
12,000-15,000 crore due to increased procurement.
The grain stocks are already brimming and the Food Corporation of India is saddled.
50-60 per cent higher than the current buffer stock norms.
Higher MSPs are likely to make exports globally uncompetitive, leading to further
accumulation of stocks at home, and greater economic inefficiency.
Example-
Setting procurement prices higher than global prices is not a new phenomenon in
global history. The European Economic Community (EEC) has done this earlier
leading to a glut of butter and milk in EU countries.
Lately, China also raised MSPs of wheat, rice and corn substantially above world
prices, leading to grain stocks piling up.
Way ahead:
As Mr Arun Jaitley recently said, “If there is any area in the economy where we can
give an example to the world and to ourselves of cooperative federalism, it is the
agriculture sector. It can benefit people more than what GST has done”.
Coordination is needed amongst Union ministries that deal with agriculture, food, food
processing, fertilisers, water, rural development and trade. This will enable a holistic
approach to agriculture and farmers’ incomes. The process can start with the creation
of an agri-council/cabinet.
Focus should be on long overdue agri- marketing reforms and revisiting the Essential
Commodity and APMC Acts to “get the markets right”. Getting the markets right will
7/12
ensure better and stable prices to farmers, as well as consumers, and also augment
farmers’ incomes in a sustained manner.
India needs to recognise that adressing farmers’ woes by raising procurement prices
can have a limit imposed by global prices, especially in a situation of surplus
production. The moment one crosses that limit, domestic stocks will start
accumulating.
Time has come for India to devise an income policy (DBT) for farmers.
Case study:
Telangana’s Rythu Bandhu scheme with direct investment support is interesting. It
can be refined and made WTO compatible.
Conclusion:
It is time the government switch from price policy to income policy approach to redress
farmers’ distress.
Increasing MSPs to help farmers has several limitations. Discuss. Also, highlight the
need to switch from price policy approach to income policy to redress farmers’
distress.
NATIONAL
TOPIC:General Studies 1:
Social empowerment
Role of women and women’s organization, population and associated issues, poverty
and developmental issues.
Today’s women have broken the glass ceiling and scaled new frontiers in business and
industry, bringing fresh ideas into the commercial and tech landscape of India. These
innovations are actively reshaping engineering, technology, design, handicrafts, weaving,
shoe-making, agriculture, organic farming and other cultural and creative industries.
The recent World Economic Forum meeting at Davos adds to this notion of the new age
women entrepreneur, putting out a call to bring up an equal number of women, in the
labour force. This equalisation can enhance the Gross Domestic Product of a developing
country like India by over 27 per cent.
Indian context:
As professional entrepreneurs, women are truly living their dreams. India has developed a
vibrant entrepreneurial landscape aided by several progressive initiatives and measures
instituted by the government.
8/12
Today, with more than 20,000 start-ups, India has emerged as the second largest start-up
ecosystem in the world and is expected to grow at 10-12 per cent year-on-year.
It is heartening to see that India jumped 50 places in the overall ‘Ease of Doing Business’
rankings and this is just another reason to keep plouging ahead full steam towards
ensuring a groundswell for women leadership in the country.
Women in India:
With women comprising over 48 per cent of the country’s population, it is impossible to
think of economic growth without women as the fundamental drivers of change.
It is projected that by 2025, India’s GDP will get an additional boost of 16 per cent, by
integrating women into the workforce.
The theme of the 8th edition of Global Entrepreneurship Summit, ‘Women first, Prosperity
for all’ highlighted that when women do better, countries do better.
Govt initiatives:
Over the past few years, India has witnessed record growth in women entrepreneurship.
The government initiatives includes-
Several women-led leadership and mentorship programs such as empoWer, SAHA Fund
and Sonder Connect are also gaining traction in India.
Way ahead:
There is an urgent need to create an enabling environment for women to pursue their
entrepreneurial aspirations through progressive policies.
The Indian start-up landscape, with over eight million women entrepreneurs, is at an
inflection point where an accelerated pro-women change is of vital importance.
Each small step that we take today will bring us closer towards fulfilling the larger vision for
India of our Agenda 25×25 — 25 per cent women entrepreneurs by 2025.
To achieve inclusive and equitable socio-economic growth, we must ensure that at least 25
per cent of entrepreneurs in the country are women by 2025.
There is an urgent need to create an enabling environment for women to pursue their
entrepreneurial aspirations through progressive policies. Discuss.
Q.1) Stupas are known to be the first religious structures in India. Which of the
following statements regarding ‘Stupa’ are correct?
1. 1 and 2
2. 2 and 3
3. 1 and 3
4. All of the above
Q.2) Second century BCE Buddhist site, Thotlakonda was in news recently. It is
found in –
1. Telangana
2. Tamil Nadu
3. Andhra Pradesh
4. Kerala
Q.3) Which of the following characteristic feature given below is clearly a distinction
between Mahayana and Hinayana form of Buddhism?
10/12
1. Buddha was a Human being in Mahayana where as he is considered as God in
Hinayana
2. Mahayana did not believe in idol worship
3. Buddha is considered as God in Mahayana sect where as he is just a human being in
Hinayana sect
4. None of the above
Q.4) ‘To protect monuments, places and objects of artistic or historic interest which
are declared to be of national importance’ – This provision is provided in:
1. DPSP
2. Fundamental Duties
3. Fundamental Rights
4. All of the above
Q.6) Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana, PMKSY aims to bring rationality and
investment in irrigation and bring water in every field. Consider the following
1. 1 and 2 only
2. 2 and 3 only
3. 1 and 3 only
4. 1, 2 and 3
11/12
Select the correct statement/s
1. 1 and 2
2. 2 and 3
3. 1 and 3
4. All of the above
12/12