Teaching Shakespeare Straight Up

Paula Marantz Cohen . Wall Street Journal , Eastern edition; New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]18 Apr 2015:
A.11.

ProQuest document link

ABSTRACT
 
Since all English courses at my university are capped at 25 or fewer students, discussion is central to the class.
Reading this way prepares students to better appreciate a live production when the opportunity to see one arises,
and it helps them appreciate Shakespeare's inimitable use of language -- his poetry and his prose -- in a rigorous,
intimate way.

FULL TEXT
 
Of all the courses I have taught over my 30 years as an English professor, the one that I enjoy teaching most and
that students seem to enjoy taking most is "Shakespeare."

That's the title. Not "Shakespeare and the Elizabethan World" or "Shakespeare and Stagecraft"; not "Shakespeare
and Imperialism," "Shakespeare and Gender," or "Shakespeare and Postmodern Theory."

I don't even title the course, as I once did, "Introduction to Shakespeare," though it is open to all students and has
no prerequisites. Appending "introduction to" would admittedly emphasize the fact that Shakespeare is a vast and
deep terrain, but it would also suggest that the course leads to "Advanced Shakespeare."

This is not the case. The Shakespeare course is not the first step in a graded ascent but an immersion in a world. I
want it to be Shakespeare without addendum or dilution. My belief is that anyone at any level can derive benefit
from this course, not because I teach it so well but because reading a certain number of Shakespeare's plays with
close attention is an end as well as a beginning. It can yield rudimentary insights but it can also yield highly
advanced and sophisticated ones.

Since all English courses at my university are capped at 25 or fewer students, discussion is central to the class. In
the old days, I would assign secondary readings and show film clips of key scenes to help spark this discussion.
I've largely stopped doing this. It is Shakespeare's writing that I want students to focus on.

The classroom seems to me the only place where rigorous, communal attention to the words on the page is
possible. Reading this way prepares students to better appreciate a live production when the opportunity to see
one arises, and it helps them appreciate Shakespeare's inimitable use of language -- his poetry and his prose -- in a
rigorous, intimate way. It also prepares them to better understand the politics of family and society and to deal
more intelligently with friendship, love and career. Only by studying the plays closely in a classroom setting, where
many voices contribute to understanding, can these ideas be fully probed.

A good example occurred in a class awhile ago in which we discussed Rosalind's disguise in "As You Like It." One

PDF GENERATED BY SEARCH.PROQUEST.COM Page 1 of 3

of my students observed that Ganymede, the swaggery male persona assumed by the heroine during her exile in
the Forest of Arden, reminded him of Superman, alter-ego to the mild-mannered Clark Kent. The student then
quickly qualified the comparison: Superman is the real self, and Clark Kent is the disguise, he said, while Rosalind
is the real self, and Ganymede the disguise.

But many in the class objected to this distinction: Rosalind is a character created by Shakespeare and originally
played by a boy actor, they noted; the play's epilogue brings this to the fore. Where does the real self in such a case
lie? As for the comic-book hero, which persona is more "real," the superhero or the regular guy he pretends to be?
The class veered off into definition and self-interrogation. What was a "real" self anyway? What was theirs?

These questions led to the question of costume and identity. Is the petticoat of Rosalind less or more of a disguise
than the doublet and hose of Ganymede? The discussion had grown complex but the class was fully engaged,
despite having read nothing in ontological philosophy or gender theory.

Would they have arrived at the same place had I assigned essays on these subjects? Possibly. But I doubt that
there would have been the same excitement as students explored these ideas on their own. The class's insights
seemed more original, more accessible, and less doctrinaire by virtue of being theirs rather than imposed by
others.

One of the great lessons I've learned as a teacher is how satisfying it is to leave good material alone -- not to vamp
it up with theory or aggressively coordinate it with other readings. I like discussing Shakespeare in the context of
the present. I like discussing how his work dovetails with ideas about the self and society. But I like these
discussions to emerge organically in the course of looking closely at the plays.

Keats referred to "negative capability" as a facet of the poetic process. He meant that not directing or imposing
meaning, not trying too hard to make sense of things, can free the imagination to do its work. This applies to
teaching as well as poetry.

Teachers tend not to trust our students as much as we should. Trusting doesn't mean capitulating to them or
allowing them to dictate the curriculum. It means arming them with what Matthew Arnold called "the best that has
been thought and said" and trusting them to be able to discern what is profound and insightful, funny and moving,
in that material. Shakespeare is a teacher's unfailing resource in this effort.

---

Ms. Cohen is an English professor and dean of Pennoni Honors College at Drexel University. Her novel "Beatrice
Bunson's Guide to Romeo and Juliet" will be published by Paul Dry Books next January.

(See related letters: "Letters to the Editor: The Delight Is Shakespeare Straight" -- WSJ April 25, 2015)

Credit: By Paula Marantz Cohen

DETAILS

Subject: Teaching methods; English literature; Classroom discussion

PDF GENERATED BY SEARCH.PROQUEST.COM Page 2 of 3

 People: Shakespeare, William (1564-1616)

Publication title: Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition; New York, N.Y.

Pages: A.11

Publication year: 2015

Publication date: Apr 18, 2015

Publisher: Dow Jones &Company Inc

Place of publication: New York, N.Y.

Country of publication: United States, New York, N.Y.

Publication subject: Business And Economics--Banking And Finance

ISSN: 00999660

Source type: Newspapers

Language of publication: English

Document type: News

ProQuest document ID: 1673930971

Document URL: http://login.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/16

73930971?accountid=4485

Copyright: (c) 2015 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. Reproduced with permission of copyright owner.
Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.

Last updated: 2017-11-22

Database: ABI/INFORM Collection,The Wall Street Journal ,Global Newsstream

LINKS
Get It! @ ASU, Get It! @ ASU

Database copyright  2018 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved.

Terms and Conditions Contact ProQuest

PDF GENERATED BY SEARCH.PROQUEST.COM Page 3 of 3