Endrew F. is an autistic student whose parents believed the public school was not providing him with an adequate education. They sued the school district for reimbursement of private school tuition. The Supreme Court took up the case to determine what level of educational benefit school districts must provide disabled students under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Court ruled that schools must offer individualized education programs tailored to each child's unique needs and abilities to allow them equal opportunities to progress in the general curriculum.
Endrew F. is an autistic student whose parents believed the public school was not providing him with an adequate education. They sued the school district for reimbursement of private school tuition. The Supreme Court took up the case to determine what level of educational benefit school districts must provide disabled students under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Court ruled that schools must offer individualized education programs tailored to each child's unique needs and abilities to allow them equal opportunities to progress in the general curriculum.
Endrew F. is an autistic student whose parents believed the public school was not providing him with an adequate education. They sued the school district for reimbursement of private school tuition. The Supreme Court took up the case to determine what level of educational benefit school districts must provide disabled students under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Court ruled that schools must offer individualized education programs tailored to each child's unique needs and abilities to allow them equal opportunities to progress in the general curriculum.
Introduction to Special Education 203 Exploration of Historical Foundation in Special Education: Landmark Court Case Thursday, September 28, 2017 Endrew F. is an autistic 5th grade student with attention deficit disorder who was placed in private school because his parents believed the public school education was inadequate. Endrew was placed in Firefly Autism House and his parents sued for reimbursements of Endrew’s private school tuition and related expenses. The case went to the Supreme Court because there have been a steady movement toward a more specific standard for FAPE over the years. There was many outside groups that filed legal papers supporting Drew’s case and more than 100 members of Congress also on record supporting Drew. There was an important legal paper filed by NASDSE, it represents the school administrators who oversee IEP’s in schools. Thanks to people stepping in, supporting Drew, gaining publicity the case itself got spotlight that helped the case go into the Supreme Court. The case went to the Supreme Court because of the question what is the level of educational benefit that school districts must discuss on children with disabilities to provide them with FAPE guaranteed by IDEA because the lower courts had many different interpretations on the level of services required with FAPE guaranteed by IDEA. This is a landmark case because it overturned the decision of Rowley which was to provide what seems like a reasonable amount of support but not the best or most of what’s available. The family won the case because the court ruled that under IDEA the school must offer an IEP that fits the needs of the child’s circumstances and the school must create an environment where students with disabilities have the equal chance to make appropriate progress in the general education curriculum.
William J. Devine, Terry Devine, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants v. Indian River County School Board, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, 249 F.3d 1289, 11th Cir. (2001)