Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MARVIN G-T-test
MARVIN G-T-test
MARVIN G. BONGATO
September 2018
ABSTRACT
The pre – test and post – test questionnaires were item analyzed
in the classroom.
BONGATO, MARVIN
Name: MARVIN G. BONGATO August 11, 2018
Activity 3
T-test
THE PROBLEM
2019.
in:
in:
Statistical Treatment
𝑓
𝑃= 𝑋 100
𝑁
Where:
𝑃 = percentage
𝑓 = frequency of responses
𝑁 = number of cases
20 - 25 Excellent
15 - 19 Very Satisfactory
10 – 14 Satisfactory
5 – 9 Fair
0 – 4 Poor
BONGATO, MARVIN
x
x
N
N = number of cases
0 – 4.99 Poor
𝐷 − 𝜇𝐷
𝑡=
𝑆𝐷
√𝑛
where:
𝑡 = computed t – value
𝑛 = number of respondents
BONGATO, MARVIN
The computed t – value was compared to the tabular t –
𝑥̅1 − 𝑥̅2
𝑡=
𝑠1 2 𝑠2 2
√
𝑛1 + 𝑛2
where:
𝑡 = computed t – value
BONGATO, MARVIN
Chapter 2
Table 1
test respectively.
to post-test respectively.
BONGATO, MARVIN
Table 3
Analysis of the Performance of the
Control and Experimental Group
N = 60
Computed t- Tabular
Degree value t-value
Difference of Decision Interpretation
Freedom at 0.05 level of
significance
Pretest and
Null
Posttest of the
29 -17.843 ±2.002 Hypothesis Significant
Experimental
Rejected
Group
Posttests of
Null
Control and
58 -5.448 ±2.002 Hypothesis Significant
Experimental
Rejected
Group
BONGATO, MARVIN
Furthermore, there is also a significant difference between
BONGATO, MARVIN
Chapter 3
This chapter covers the summary of the study and the findings.
also based on the findings of the study. This will also serve as
investigation.
Summary
students who were exposed to using media and those who were exposed
scores of the respondents to form two groups. The pre - test was
BONGATO, MARVIN
administered first and the pre - test scores were the basis of the
Findings
The following are the findings based upon the data obtained:
satisfactory.
exposure using media fell in the fair level. After the exposure
BONGATO, MARVIN
b.) There was also significant difference in the pre – test to
Conclusion
results.
Recommendations
is highly recommended.
BONGATO, MARVIN
2. To the Students. It is recommended that the students should
BONGATO, MARVIN
Appendix B
QUESTIONNAIRE
BONGATO, MARVIN
APPENDIX C – 1
𝟐
(∑ 𝑫 ) = −2602 𝑛(∑ 𝐷 2 ) − (∑ 𝐷)2 𝐷 − 𝜇𝐷
𝑺𝑫 = √ 𝒕=
𝑛(𝑛 − 1) 𝑆𝐷
= 𝟔𝟕𝟔𝟎𝟎
√𝑛
(30)(2952) − (67600) (−8.67) − 0
∑𝐷 𝑺𝑫 = √ 𝒕=
̅= 30(30 − 1) 4.91
𝑫
𝑛 √30
−260 −8.67
= (88560) − (67600) 𝒕=
30 𝑺𝑫 = √ 0.896
30(29)
𝒕 = −𝟗. 𝟓𝟏𝟒
̅ = −𝟖. 𝟔𝟕
𝑫
𝒕𝒕 = −𝟐. 𝟎𝟎𝟐
BONGATO, MARVIN 20960 𝒕 < 𝒕𝒕 : Reject Ho
𝑺𝑫 = √ = √24.09 = 𝟒. 𝟗𝟏
870 𝒕 > 𝒕𝒕 : Significant
APPENDIX C – 2
𝟐
(∑ 𝑫 ) = −4182 𝑛(∑ 𝐷 2 ) − (∑ 𝐷)2 𝐷 − 𝜇𝐷
𝑺𝑫 = √ 𝒕=
𝑛(𝑛 − 1) 𝑆𝐷
= 𝟏𝟕𝟒𝟕𝟐𝟒
√𝑛
(30)(6468) − (174724) (−13.93) − 0
∑𝐷 𝑺𝑫 = √ 𝒕=
̅= 30(30 − 1) 4.71
𝑫
𝑛 √30
−418 −13.93
= (194040) − (174724) 𝒕=
30 𝑺𝑫 = √ 0.860
30(29)
𝒕 = −𝟏𝟕. 𝟖𝟒𝟑
̅ = −𝟏𝟑. 𝟗𝟑
𝑫
𝒕𝒕 = −𝟐. 𝟎𝟎𝟐
19316 𝒕 < 𝒕𝒕 : Reject Ho
𝑺𝑫 = √ = √24.20 = 𝟒. 𝟕𝟏
BONGATO, MARVIN 870 𝒕 > 𝒕𝒕 : Significant
APPENDIX C – 6
T - TEST COMPUTATIONS OF THE POSTTEST – POSTTEST RESULTS OF
THE CONTROL GROUP AND THE EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
STUDENTS CONTROL (𝒙𝟏 ) EXPERIMENTAL (𝒙𝟐 ) (𝒙𝟏 )𝟐 (𝒙𝟐 )𝟐
1 23 24 529 576
2 15 23 225 529
3 15 19 225 361
4 12 18 144 324
5 10 19 100 361
6 11 18 121 324
7 15 17 225 289
8 23 14 529 196
9 18 19 324 361
10 16 21 256 441
11 15 24 225 576
12 15 15 225 225
13 10 14 100 196
14 10 19 100 361
15 9 21 81 441
16 13 21 169 441
17 10 23 100 529
18 9 24 81 576
19 18 24 324 576
20 16 21 256 441
21 19 23 361 529
22 17 20 289 400
23 21 16 441 256
24 22 24 484 576
25 19 22 361 484
26 19 21 361 441
27 12 16 144 256
28 12 23 144 529
29 12 21 144 441
30 15 24 225 576
∑ 𝒙𝟐 𝟐
𝑵 = 𝟑𝟎 ∑ 𝒙𝟏 = 𝟒𝟓𝟏 ∑ 𝒙𝟐 = 𝟔𝟎𝟖 ∑ 𝒙𝟏 𝟐 = 𝟕𝟐𝟗𝟑
= 𝟏𝟐𝟔𝟏𝟐
𝑥1 − 𝑥2
∑ 𝑥1 451 𝟐 𝑛(∑ 𝑥1 2 ) − (∑ 𝑥1 )2 𝒕=
𝒙𝟏 = = = 𝟏𝟓. 𝟎𝟑 𝑺𝟏 =
𝑛 30 𝑛(𝑛 − 1) 2 2
√𝑆1 + 𝑆2
(30)(7293) − (116281) 𝑛1 𝑛2
∑ 𝑥2 608 𝑺𝟏 𝟐 =
𝒙𝟐 = = = 𝟐𝟎. 𝟐𝟕 30(30 − 1)
𝑛 30 15.03 − 20.27
𝟐 102509 𝒕=
𝑺𝟏 = = 𝟏𝟏𝟕. 𝟖𝟐𝟔
√117.826 + 9.995
𝟐
(∑ 𝒙𝟏 ) = (451)2 870
30 30
= 𝟏𝟏𝟔𝟐𝟖𝟏 𝟐 𝑛(∑ 𝑥2 2 ) − (∑ 𝑥2 )2 −5.24
𝟐 𝑺𝟐 = 𝒕=
(∑ 𝒙𝟐 ) = (608)2 𝑛(𝑛 − 1) √4.2607
𝟐
(30)(12612) − (369664) 𝒕 = −5.4476432 …
𝑺𝟏 =
BONGATO, MARVIN 30(30 − 1) 𝒕 = −𝟓. 𝟒𝟒𝟖
8,696
𝑺𝟏 𝟐 = = 𝟗. 𝟗𝟗𝟓 𝒕𝒕 = −𝟐. 𝟎𝟎𝟐
870 𝒕 > 𝒕𝒕 : Reject Ho
𝒕 < 𝒕𝒕 : Significant
= 𝟑𝟔𝟗, 𝟔𝟔𝟒
APPENDIX D
MS EXCEL DATA ANALYSIS OUTPUTS
Pretest Posttest
Mean 6.366666667 15.03333
Variance 7.205747126 17.68851
Observations 30 30
Pooled Variance 12.44712644
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 58
t Stat -9.514000551
P(T<=t) one-tail 9.51248E-14
t Critical one-tail 1.671552762
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.9025E-13
t Critical two-tail 2.001717484
Reject Null Hypothesis: Significant
Pretest Posttest
Mean 6.333333333 20.26666667
Variance 8.298850575 9.995402299
Observations 30 30
Pooled Variance 9.147126437
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 58
t Stat -17.84260723
P(T<=t) one-tail 1.58239E-25
t Critical one-tail 1.671552762
P(T<=t) two-tail 3.16479E-25
t Critical two-tail 2.001717484
Reject Null Hypothesis: Significant
BONGATO, MARVIN
T - TEST COMPUTATIONS OF THE POSTTEST – POSTTEST RESULTS OF
THE CONTROL GROUP AND THE EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
BONGATO, MARVIN
APPENDIX E
SCREENSHOTS OF MEDIA USED
BONGATO, MARVIN