Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

MASLAH INTERNAL
108 100,0% 0 0,0% 108 100,0%
KELUARGA * KPD

MASLAH INTERNAL KELUARGA * KPD Crosstabulation

KPD Total

Kontrol kasus

Count 64 20 84
rendah
MASLAH INTERNAL % within KPD 88,9% 55,6% 77,8%
KELUARGA Count 8 16 24
tinggi
% within KPD 11,1% 44,4% 22,2%
Count 72 36 108
Total
% within KPD 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 15,429 1 ,000
b
Continuity Correction 13,560 1 ,000
Likelihood Ratio 14,723 1 ,000
Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000
Linear-by-Linear Association 15,286 1 ,000
N of Valid Cases 108

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,354 ,000

N of Valid Cases 108

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for MASLAH

INTERNAL KELUARGA 6,400 2,387 17,157
(rendah / tinggi)
For cohort KPD = Kontrol 2,286 1,282 4,075
For cohort KPD = kasus ,357 ,222 ,575
N of Valid Cases 108
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

LINGKUNGAN * KPD 108 100,0% 0 0,0% 108 100,0%

LINGKUNGAN * KPD Crosstabulation

KPD Total

Kontrol kasus

Count 42 11 53
rendah
% within KPD 58,3% 30,6% 49,1%
LINGKUNGAN
Count 30 25 55
tinggi
% within KPD 41,7% 69,4% 50,9%
Count 72 36 108
Total
% within KPD 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7,410a 1 ,006

b
Continuity Correction 6,340 1 ,012
Likelihood Ratio 7,563 1 ,006
Fisher's Exact Test ,008 ,006
Linear-by-Linear Association 7,341 1 ,007
N of Valid Cases 108

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17,67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,253 ,006

N of Valid Cases 108

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

LINGKUNGAN (rendah / 3,182 1,360 7,444
tinggi)
For cohort KPD = Kontrol 1,453 1,100 1,918
For cohort KPD = kasus ,457 ,250 ,832
N of Valid Cases 108
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

EKONOMI * KPD 108 100,0% 0 0,0% 108 100,0%

EKONOMI * KPD Crosstabulation

KPD Total

Kontrol kasus

Count 48 21 69
rendah
% within KPD 66,7% 58,3% 63,9%
EKONOMI
Count 24 15 39
tinggi
% within KPD 33,3% 41,7% 36,1%
Count 72 36 108
Total
% within KPD 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square ,722a 1 ,395

b
Continuity Correction ,406 1 ,524
Likelihood Ratio ,716 1 ,397
Fisher's Exact Test ,405 ,261
Linear-by-Linear Association ,716 1 ,398
N of Valid Cases 108

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,082 ,395

N of Valid Cases 108

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for EKONOMI

1,429 ,627 3,257
(rendah / tinggi)
For cohort KPD = Kontrol 1,130 ,843 1,515
For cohort KPD = kasus ,791 ,464 1,349
N of Valid Cases 108
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

KEHAMILAN SEKARANG *
108 100,0% 0 0,0% 108 100,0%
KPD

KEHAMILAN SEKARANG * KPD Crosstabulation

KPD Total

Kontrol kasus

Count 45 27 72
rendah
% within KPD 62,5% 75,0% 66,7%
KEHAMILAN SEKARANG
Count 27 9 36
tinggi
% within KPD 37,5% 25,0% 33,3%
Count 72 36 108
Total
% within KPD 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1,688a 1 ,194

b
Continuity Correction 1,172 1 ,279
Likelihood Ratio 1,734 1 ,188
Fisher's Exact Test ,279 ,139
Linear-by-Linear Association 1,672 1 ,196
N of Valid Cases 108

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,124 ,194

N of Valid Cases 108

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for KEHAMILAN

,556 ,228 1,356
SEKARANG (rendah / tinggi)
For cohort KPD = Kontrol ,833 ,643 1,081
For cohort KPD = kasus 1,500 ,791 2,843
N of Valid Cases 108
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

PEKERRJAAN * KPD 108 100,0% 0 0,0% 108 100,0%

PEKERRJAAN * KPD Crosstabulation

KPD Total

Kontrol kasus

Count 32 3 35
rendah
% within KPD 44,4% 8,3% 32,4%
PEKERRJAAN
Count 40 33 73
tinggi
% within KPD 55,6% 91,7% 67,6%
Count 72 36 108
Total
% within KPD 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 14,287a 1 ,000

b
Continuity Correction 12,686 1 ,000
Likelihood Ratio 16,484 1 ,000
Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000
Linear-by-Linear Association 14,155 1 ,000
N of Valid Cases 108

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,342 ,000

N of Valid Cases 108

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

PEKERRJAAN (rendah / 8,800 2,471 31,336
tinggi)
For cohort KPD = Kontrol 1,669 1,323 2,104
For cohort KPD = kasus ,190 ,062 ,576
N of Valid Cases 108
Frequencies

Statistics

umur paritas pendidikan pekerjaan jamkes k.bbl tmptbrslin

Valid 36 36 36 36 36 36 36
N
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 2,0278 1,7778 4,3333 2,6389 ,9444 1,8333 1,1944
Median 2,0000 2,0000 5,0000 3,0000 1,0000 1,0000 1,0000
Mode 2,00 2,00 5,00 3,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
Std. Deviation ,16667 ,42164 1,14642 ,72320 ,23231 1,00000 ,40139
Range 1,00 1,00 5,00 2,00 1,00 2,00 1,00
Minimum 2,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 ,00 1,00 1,00
Maximum 3,00 2,00 6,00 3,00 1,00 3,00 2,00

Frequency Table

umur

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

18-35 th 35 97,2 97,2 97,2

Valid > 35 th 1 2,8 2,8 100,0

Total 36 100,0 100,0

paritas

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

primipara 8 22,2 22,2 22,2

Valid multipara 28 77,8 77,8 100,0

Total 36 100,0 100,0

 pendidikan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

tidak sekolah 1 2,8 2,8 2,8

tidak tamat SD 2 5,6 5,6 8,3

tamat SD 4 11,1 11,1 19,4

Valid tamat SLTP 9 25,0 25,0 44,4

tamat SLTA 17 47,2 47,2 91,7

akademi/PT 3 8,3 8,3 100,0

Total 36 100,0 100,0

pekerjaan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

ibu rumah tangga 5 13,9 13,9 13,9

ibu rumah tangga+pegawai 3 8,3 8,3 22,2

Valid ibu rumah tangga
28 77,8 77,8 100,0
+pekerjaan lain

Total 36 100,0 100,0

jamkes

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

tidak 2 5,6 5,6 5,6

Valid ya 34 94,4 94,4 100,0

Total 36 100,0 100,0

k.bbl

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

hidup 21 58,3 58,3 58,3

Valid dirawat 15 41,7 41,7 100,0

Total 36 100,0 100,0

 tmptbrslin

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

rsam 29 80,6 80,6 80,6

Valid yarsi 7 19,4 19,4 100,0

Total 36 100,0 100,0

Frequencies Control

Statistics

umur paritas pendidikan pekerjaan jamkes k.bbl tmptbrslin

Valid 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
N
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 2,0000 1,9306 4,5694 2,4028 ,9861 1,0000 1,6806
Median 2,0000 2,0000 5,0000 3,0000 1,0000 1,0000 2,0000
Mode 2,00 2,00 4,00 3,00 1,00 1,00 2,00
Std. Deviation ,00000 ,25599 ,99047 ,78111 ,11785 ,00000 ,46953
Range ,00 1,00 3,00 2,00 1,00 ,00 1,00
Minimum 2,00 1,00 3,00 1,00 ,00 1,00 1,00
Maximum 2,00 2,00 6,00 3,00 1,00 1,00 2,00

Frequency Table
umur

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Valid 18-35 th 72 100,0 100,0 100,0

 paritas

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

primipara 5 6,9 6,9 6,9

Valid multipara 67 93,1 93,1 100,0

Total 72 100,0 100,0

pendidikan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent

tamat SD 11 15,3 15,3 15,3

tamat SLTP 24 33,3 33,3 48,6

Valid tamat SLTA 22 30,6 30,6 79,2

akademi/PT 15 20,8 20,8 100,0

Total 72 100,0 100,0

pekerjaan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

ibu rumah tangga 13 18,1 18,1 18,1

ibu rumah tangga+pegawai 17 23,6 23,6 41,7

Valid ibu rumah tangga
42 58,3 58,3 100,0
+pekerjaan lain

Total 72 100,0 100,0

 jamkes

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

tidak 1 1,4 1,4 1,4

Valid ya 71 98,6 98,6 100,0

Total 72 100,0 100,0

k.bbl
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent

Valid hidup 72 100,0 100,0 100,0

tmptbrslin

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

rsam 23 31,9 31,9 31,9

Valid yarsi 49 68,1 68,1 100,0

Total 72 100,0 100,0