Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Mathematician's Apology - Medium
A Mathematician's Apology - Medium
Prabhu
Sep 2, 2017 · 4 min read
A Mathematician’s Apology
Re blogged here from my erstwhile and now inactive blog space
https://medium.com/@s_prabhu/a-mathematicians-apology-515cf62ba22e 1/5
11/16/2018 A Mathematician’s Apology – Prabhu – Medium
Just like how a master poet playing with words brings forth great lines,
mathematicians are makers of patterns made of ideas, patterns that are
beautiful. He asserts that the patterns must be beautiful and if they
aren’t they are not worth pursuing. As examples of ideas that are simple
yet profound and possessing inherent beauty Hardy describes Euclid’s
proof of the existence of in nite primes and Pythagoras proof of
irrationality. One cannot disagree. Even a person with no practice in
mathematics can see the beauty of the proofs. I liked the lines that
Hardy uses why reductio ad absurdum is so appealing for
Mathematicians –
The other aspect that Hardy argues and argues he does with rigor is the
di erence between pure mathematics and applied mathematics. Hardy
rates pure mathematics highly and takes comfort with the fact that his
and other realmathematician’s work nds no place in utility for
mankind. It is useless in making life better, yes, he argues, but at the
same time it does play no role in war as does the applied mathematics.
https://medium.com/@s_prabhu/a-mathematicians-apology-515cf62ba22e 2/5
11/16/2018 A Mathematician’s Apology – Prabhu – Medium
Hardy must be forgiven for having not much foresight! His favourite
line of mathematics — Number Theory –plays a crucial role in
cryptography and other applications that do practical good as well as
evil. Hardy belabours to get the distinction between pure and applied
mathematics through and I found it at some places di cult to grasp the
gist. Some chapters are pending further reading for better
understanding.
Hardy ends the essays with one chapter which in substance touches the
life he lived as a mathematician. He considers his collaboration with
Littlewood and Ramanujan as his best works and his craft being bound
with them.
Reading Hardy’s defense for mathematics and its craftsmen I rued how
wrong was it on my part for not taking mathematics seriously. Yes, I
knew that mathematics is an art. I could appreciate its beauty (I
despised shortening the subject to and calling it ‘Max’). But still didn’t
excel and pursue it. Unlike other art forms like poetry or painting many
of us have formal education for mathematics for many years. Still, I
failed in mastering the art thus wasting an opportunity. But one can
defend that software writing — beautiful software at that and
debugging software also to be an art though Hardy would not put
anything on par with mathematics! So, I at least have an opportunity by
means of my profession to ace in some form of art.
https://medium.com/@s_prabhu/a-mathematicians-apology-515cf62ba22e 3/5
11/16/2018 A Mathematician’s Apology – Prabhu – Medium
https://medium.com/@s_prabhu/a-mathematicians-apology-515cf62ba22e 4/5
11/16/2018 A Mathematician’s Apology – Prabhu – Medium
https://medium.com/@s_prabhu/a-mathematicians-apology-515cf62ba22e 5/5