Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3: Materials and Methods 3.1. Materials
Chapter 3: Materials and Methods 3.1. Materials
3.1. Materials
Carica Papaya latex was collected from local garden (Thanjavur, Tamilnadu,
Copper sulfate, Nickel sulfate, Zinc sulfate, cobalt chloride, cadmium carbonate were
Tetra butyl phosphonium bromide, Tetra butyl ammonium bromide was procured from
SIGMA Aldrich, Bangalore, India. Reactive dyes CIBACRON Blue F3GA, PROCION
Red HE3G and PROCION Yellow HE3G were provided at free of cost from Lakshmi
Standard papain and Bovine Serum Albumin were procured from SIGMA
Aldrich, Mumbai, India. Casein, Sodium hydroxide, Trichloro Acetic (TCA) acid, Di
Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India. All chemicals used in the extraction processes
Centrifugation
Integrating Ligands
Backward extraction
Scale up studies
Thermodynamic
SDS Page/FTIR
Studies
analysis
in the local farms of Thanjavur. Thin longitudinal incisions for about 3 mm depth were
made on the skin of Carica Papaya with a stainless steel knife. The exuding milky latex
was allowed to flow down the fruit and drop into the collecting device attached to the
trunk. Following collection, the milky latex was transferred to a storage vial containing
phosphate buffer solution (PBS) maintained at pH 7.2 and the mixture was stirred until it
The homogeneous latex solution was then centrifuged at 4000 rpm (High speed
cooling centrifuge, REMI Instruments Ltd, Mumbai, India) to remove insoluble. The
process was repeated at 6000 rpm in order to get a clarified papaya latex solution as
supernatant phase , the phases were removed carefully and the clarified solution was
stored at 4°C until used for the study. A 10 ml of the clarified papaya solution
maintained at 4°C was used in the following aqueous two phase extraction studies.
ammonium sulfate salt was used for the partitioning of papain. Phase diagram and tie line
length (TLL) for the ATP system (composed of PEG and ammonium sulfate) were
To the clarified enzyme latex solution the stock solutions of polymer and salt
were mixed together and stirred well, so as to get the final concentration of 15%w/v PEG
(4000, 6000 & 8000) and 12%w/v ammonium sulfate. The final volume of the system
30
was made to 10 ml by the addition of deionized water. The pH of the system was adjusted
to 7.2 using K2HPO4/ KH2PO4 solution and the above ATP mixture was stirred well for
about 30 minutes. Then the mixture was transferred into graduated centrifuge tubes and
centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 minutes to attain phase separation. The phase volumes
were measured and the top and bottom phases were separated to determine the partition
coefficient. Initially, PEGs (4000, 6000 and 8000) and ammonium sulfate salt with
different concentrations were tried for aqueous two phase system formation and their
ranges are tabulated in Table 3.1. The effect of pH on papain extraction was also studied
for 15% w/v PEG 6000 and 12% w/v ammonium sulfate aqueous two phase system.
Table 3. 1: Phase forming components and their ranges in ATP system formation
Component Range
3.4. Papain partitioning studies in integrated Aqueous Two Phase (ATPi) system
A ligand assisted aqueous two phase system is termed here as an integrated
aqueous two phase extraction (ATPi) system and the schematic diagram is shown in
Figure 3.1. ATPi system was formed by integrating papain affinity groups (ligand) with
the phase forming compound (either polymer or salt) [84]. The metal salts, dyes and ionic
For the ATPi system formation, stock solutions of PEGs (4000, 6000 and 8000),
ligands (Ionic liquids , Tri-azine dyes and Metal salts ) and ammonium sulfate solution
were prepared separately. Initially, the ligand and PEG were mixed in the deionized
water to form PEG-ligand complex solution. Papain latex solution and ammonium sulfate
were added later to the PEG complex and stirred gently. The pH of the system was
adjusted with the phosphate buffer solution prepared in deionized water. The above ATPi
mixture was allowed to reach saturation with gentle mixing at room temperature for 45
minutes and then centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 minutes. The resulting two phases were
separated carefully by micropipettes without disturbing the interface and used for further
studies. The above procedure was repeated for each of nine ligands and the ATPi systems
were prepared.
Version 9 software, State-Ease Inc., Minneapolis MN, USA) was employed to study and
optimize the factors which are responsible for the maximum extraction of papain from its
clarified latex solution [85]. RSM comprised of central composite design and regression
32
analysis are used to assess the various influencing factors even under complex relations.
interactions of the process parameters and develops process model for the experimental
design and used to optimize the process conditions for the maximum response of the
system with less number of design points thereby reducing the overall cost.
formation where the central point was repeated six times to estimate the experimental
error variance for the extraction of target protein. The four factors taken for the CCD
approach are PEG molecular mass (A), PEG concentration (B), ligand concentration (C)
and pH (D), and are considered as independent variable (X). The interrelationship
between the process parameters and its responses as dependent variables (Y) were also
analyzed through the central composite design approach. The levels and ranges chosen
for the factors in ATPi_IL, ATPi_Dye and ATPi_Metal systems are shown in table 3.2,
3.3 and 3.4. The maximum response of the factors obtained from the RSM analysis tends
to increase the protein affinity towards the ligand bound PEG rich phase.
33
D pH 4-10 4 7 10
D pH 4-10 4 7 10
34
D pH 4-10 4 7 10
i = o + i i ii i ij i j
2
(3.1)
i ii ij
Where Yi is the predicted response, β0, βi, βii and βij are the regression coefficients
for the intercept, linear, quadratic and interaction coefficients respectively, Xi and Xj are
and probability values (P-values) were used to identify statistical significance of each
statistical parameters like F-test and model terms[86]. The interaction between regression
terms were, in addition, visualized using three dimensional surface plots. Through
numerical optimization process, the levels of each factor were optimized for maximum
35
response. Validity of the model was checked by testing various optimized parameter
combinations with maximum response and the same was applied in ATPi, using both
of the sample solution was mixed with 4.5 ml of Lowry’s reagent. The reactive
mixtures were well stirred and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature.
After incubation, 0.2ml of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent was added and mixed well.
temperature. The papain concentration was determined from the BSA calibration
chart.
this method 10µl of enzyme solution was mixed with 5 ml of 1% casein and the reaction
mixture was incubated for 5 minutes at 37◦C. After incubation the reaction was stopped
by the addition of 5 ml of TCA and again, incubated for 30 minutes at 30◦C.Then, the
sample was filtered and absorbance was measured at 280nm.The enzyme concentration
One unit is the amount of papain enzyme that will liberate one µg of tyrosine after one
The partition coefficient of papain (KP) and ligand (KL) were calculated as the
ratio between the concentration in the top phase to the concentration in the bottom phase
Ct
KP = (3.2)
Cb
specific enzyme activity of papain in the top phase to the specific enzyme activity in the
feed sample.
crude.
exhibits the significant model through regression analysis. The nine ligand systems
studied were arranged in descending order, in terms of partition coefficient, and the top
two systems were chosen for further forward and backward extraction studies.
considered from the optimized factors of the RSM analysis. At defined concentration, the
integrated PEG_ligand stock solution and ammonium sulfate stock solution were mixed
in a graduated centrifuge tube and then the clarified papain solution was added to the
mixture placed on the shaker to conduct forward extraction. The pH of the system was
adjusted to 7.0 with the phosphate buffer solution and a final volume of 10 ml from the
mixture was taken and the two phase separation was carried out by performing
centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 10 minutes, then the resulting top phase was carefully
blending 20% of NaCl salt with the top phase separated from the forward extraction. The
centrifugation of the mixture at 8000 rpm for 10 minutes resulted in two phase formation
and the salt rich bottom phase containing the target papain enzyme was separated by
38
micropipette and the Gel filtration chromatography analysis was carried out to perform
point method [90]. Stock solution of concentrated PEG 6000 was prepared and then
ammonium sulfate stock solution was added drop wise into the solution. Initial addition
of ammonium sulfate salt solution produces monophasic system, but the repetitive
addition of salt makes the mixture turbid. The point at which turbidity occurs was noted
for binodal curve, followed by the drop wise addition of deionized (ultrapure) water until
the mixture becomes clear. The procedure was repeated several times with various
concentrations of PEG and ammonium sulfate. All the analytical methods were
performed in triplicates and found the mean with standard deviation. The system
balance.
For the determination of tie line lengths (TLL), a mixture from the two phase
region was selected, vigorously agitated and allowed to reach equilibrium by separating
the two phases for 12 hours at temperature 298 K. After the separation, concentration of
phase forming compounds in top and bottom phases were determined. Conductivity
meter was used for the salt concentration determination, whereas polymer concentration
was determined by refractometer. Finally, each individual tie line was determined by the
application of lever rule to express the effect of aqueous two phase system composition
39
on partitioned material. The tie-line length was calculated from the Equation (3.2) given
below.
TLL = P
top P bottom S top S bottom
2 2
(3.2)
Where [P] and [S] are the polymer and salt concentrations determined in each
phase[90].
GFC purification with the column size of 5ml. The column was previously equilibrated
with pH 7.2 buffer solution and the mobile phase of 20mM sodium phosphate was
allowed with the flow rate 2.5ml/min. The samples isolated from the backward extraction
was injected to remove the ions present in the salt solution. A sample volume of 0.5 ml
was introduced into the column through an injection port. By changing the load to
injection mode, the sample was injected. The sample elution occurred at the same flow
rate were collected separately with fraction collector. The elution was monitored by UV-
vis spectrophotometer at 280nm. When bound molecules elute from the column,
chromatographic peaks were observed. The final fraction of 0.5 ml was collected and the
ENZextractor (Customized bench top extractor, shown in Figure 3.2) with a working
40
volume of 1.5 L. The ENZextractor was equipped with perforated disc and they were
placed in central rotating shaft fixed to a head plate motor. In the extractor, six discs were
placed at various distances at constant spacing. Discs were drilled with 6 holes with a
diameter of 9 mm and they were operated at different rotating speed. The internal
diameter of the vessel and discs were 24 mm and 18 mm respectively. ATPi extraction
parameters such as temperature, pH and phase volume ratio were continuously monitored
with respective probes. ATPi extraction solution (15% w/v PEG 6000 loaded with IL3
ligand and 12% w/v ammonium sulphate) was filled in the ENZextractor. The solution
was added with papain latex (150mg) and the final pH 7.2 of the system was adjusted by
the addition of phosphate salt. The extraction was carried out in batch mode operation for
90 minutes at an impeller speed of 90 rpm. The resulting sample was allowed for setting
(50 rpm) at room temperature (24 3)◦C for 45 minutes which results in the phase
separation. The samples were analyzed for total protein, partition coefficient and papain
activity.
41
bis-acrylamide gel. The samples were first dissolved in SDS buffer (62.5 mM Tris HCl,
pH 6.8, SDS 2% w/v, bromophenol blue 0.01% w/v and 10% glycerol) and then
0.1% of Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining along with the standard papain[18].
42
spectroscopy analysis was carried out using a ATR technique for the purified final
fraction of papain to identify the functional groups present in the sample[91]. The Infra
Red light was passed through the ATR crystal in such a way that it reflects atleast one of
the internal surface in contact with the sample. The samples were scanned in the wave