Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Struggle Is Over, or Everything Continues?
The Struggle Is Over, or Everything Continues?
The
more also about the role Google plays in improv- abstain from the critique and attacks against and pulses there is still more that attracts.
ing domination and control. This technological Google and other tech companies now that Google Then the art is to not smother its contra-
dictions in indifference or to smooth
subversion
progress, that is to say attack, is not only con- doesn’t come to Kreuzberg? If it wasn’t about the
Local
tained in a Google Campus, but is omnipresent in target, but about the path itself to get there, then them out in illusions of unity, but to turn
the prevailing discourse, from the new tech com- what matters is to build further upon that. We will them in open confrontation based on the
panies in Berlin over Industry 4.0 to the political be looking back on the last two years, the forged proposal for a different, liberated life.
Kids
agenda of all parties. The struggle against Google relations, the intense discussions, the conflicts, the And maybe it is in these subversive rela-
& Co is a struggle against the existing domination more or less collective attacks, the acquired experi- tionships, that one can find a place.
and how it manifests itself. The unmasking of the ences, etc. Which raises the question; wie all dies
lies of politicians and self-appointed neighbour- weiter spinnen?
hood spokespersons is not important here, since it
is their job to maintain the status-quo and to pa- That the fires of the revolt burn!. Autumn 2018
Issue 2
—20—
From the Ephemeral Library:
Fantasma
From everywhere and nowhere
In September the second issue of Fantasma was of the conversations (direct or indirect), not creat-
published. This anarchist newspaper consists of ex- ing a wall of silence around them, taking care of
periences, thoughts, debates around the choice of friends and family etc.
clandestine living. In Europe the repressive institu-
tions increasingly tend to harass, threaten and im- From the editorial of the second issue:
prison for relatively “small” offences. Pretrial
detention has become an all too easy way to lock “[...] Deep inside of me I know though that I am still
people away, while the European Arrest Warrant falling. So I am searching for hold and orientation
with its bureaucratic time-lags adds to the extor- on the outside. I grab a droopy liana to straighten
tion. So also increasingly, ways to oppose the im- myself up. It feels real, consistent, certain. I hoist
posed isolation of comrades must be explored. A myself up on it, hoping to see some other lianas,
response can be to not comply and disappear from that can help me to blaze a trail.
their radar (for a specific or for an unlimited
amount of time). A choice that needs to be thought In unsteady times, like we are experiencing now,
through and debated between those engaged in the fantasma embodies this liana, real, consistent,
subversive actions, preferably at an earlier mo- certain. Through it we have created a possibility for
ment. A choice that depends on the specific situ- us to get in touch with comrades from all-around to
ation and of the possibilities that thus are or are exchange notes on the specific issue of clandestin-
not opened up for the individuals involved. Above ity. About all the different facets, angles of view,
all, also a choice that has to be supported by the consternations and perspectives, which such a
habits and attitudes in broader circles that prevent situation brings with it. And in the best case scen-
them from being too transparent to repression. For ario this newspaper can open up mental connec-
example; not spreading rumours, not depending on tions, can encourage comrades to deal more
phones to meet and organize, knowing how to intensely with the possibility of going underground,
move unnoticed etc. But also habits and attitudes can offer an anonymized platform for speaking
that support clandestinity as a choice going about the unspeakable. [...]”
against social isolation – by keeping persons part
—18— —3—
us from fulfilling our wishes and which impuls- oppressors, their institutions and structures? We that speaks in statements that are more meant to
ively resists what imposes itself on us, puts itself are told that with it one would risk one’s life, one’s be felt than understood. Or a myth as a bonding
above us, oppresses, subjugates and hurts us. freedom... but is it not a much greater risk to live a experience on semi-fictional grounds. Or a theory
This not only means resisting and defending life that is perhaps not worth living? Hoping too that constructs its own enclosed conceptual frame-
oneself, but also destroying what denies us the often after waking up that the week will pass as work and historical storyline.
freedom to realize our needs and ideas. Sup- fast as possible? In which there is no room to
pressing this passionate impulse in oneself can breathe, no place to think and above all no free- The production of theory has become firmly en-
also be a cause for inner suffering. dom, no real freedom, for the exploration of our trenched in the world of academia from where it
needs, for the unleashing of our passions? dissipates to other institutions. In as far as its
But democracy teaches us each day that putting members have passed through the most advanced
these “evil” passions into deeds is generally one Let us not be persuaded that it is normal to lie on levels of formation in this society it is difficult to
thing: crazy, sickly, irrational. The very feeling of the ground and that it is pathological to want to apprehend how theory that calls itself radical can
hostile, hateful feelings is pathological, yes, men- get up. Only we ourselves know who we are, what emerge from there. The figure of the dissident intel-
tally ill, because after all... there are no real reas- we want and who and what keeps us from devel- lectual untouched by the rat race of this society, a
ons for the suffering, for the hatred, for the oping and passionately shaping our lives. Let’s see freethinker with no responsibilities but to be crit-
hostility. Declaring as illegitimate the resisting, it as a challenge to attack that which tells us that ical, is the complete opposite of the reality of aca- (or rely on a technological applications that gives
rebellious acts - especially when they are carried we are small and weak, incapable and ignorant. demics. Assuring the reproduction and the them directions – mostly not because of a pro-tech-
out on their own - takes place mainly on a pseudo- Let’s fight against our oppression and invent our continual progress of this exploitative society is its nology theory but because it ‘works’). To overcome a
medical, scientific level, in order to unquestion- own language of joy and revolt, in which we can role. A sceptical approach to knowledge deducted lot of problems theoretical activity poses – a split in
ably support that it is illogical, as a result of self- discover our ideas and feelings, our euphoria and from the academic world seems a wise option. practice and theory, in value and knowledge and
perceived suffering or as a result of oppression enthusiasm. the inherent mystification and alienation – a dif-
and perceived injustice, to act offensively... But I Aside from this, although often referring to aca- ferentiation could be made between ideological
wonder if it cannot be a logical decision to reject Let’s get rid of the causes of our suffering and let demical sources, also anarchists have attempted to theory and self-critical theory. “Critical self-theory is
the everyday little tyrants and attack your own our passions run wild. construct theories in past and present. As many a continually evolving attempt at the conception of
theories have been abandoned or deconstructed to theoretical and practical unity. It is a dynamic to-
get a total makeover while others never managed tality under construction, always dialectically
to stir up anything, the activity itself is questioned transcending (abolishing, yet preserving) itself.” But
—4— —17—
individual. Through and in association with others. to become static. What we need, therefore, is a France during the last decade. Or rather three, if we
And through the destruction of all obstacles, there- completely new approach to life. One that does not include the burning of that one on the plateau of
fore: of everything that is or wants to become an in- allow the institutionalization of relationships. One Aumelas, not far from Saint-Pargoire (Hérault),
stitution. Institution is just standardized that throws overboard the whole of morality and four days later, by one of those coincidences of the
development, domination. That I have spoken be- the prejudices that we learn during our upbringing. calender that sometimes does things the right way.
fore of social experiment, implies precisely that So that the terrain is free for the individuals. So
something as static as the society becomes im- that everyone can find the strength to throw over- That these wind turbines don’t have anything to do
possible because something like the institution and board everything that turns out to be another form any more with the quaint windmills of yesteryear –
the passivity that goes with it cannot take root. of bondage. that, we mention in passing, were for the most part
Clearly everything always tends to establish itself, important sources of accumulation for the more or
less local landlord, often attracting the farmers’
wrath – is without doubt obvious. But then, why do
the states of numerous countries promote the es-
tablishment of these “wind farms” on the hill tops,
Hiding Behind Words in the valleys and even in the sea? It’s maybe not
only because of calculations exclusively mathemat-
ical. Even the engineers cannot change all the stat- history. Whatever the cherished employees of the
Language between the world and me istics and have to admit that wind turbines don’t
function more than 19% of the year (a capacity
technology start-ups say, the exploitation of the
muscle power of the human being has never been
much lower than the nuclear power plants that abandoned… The generalization of the usage of oil
achieve 75% or the coal power plants, between 30 has not provoked the retirement of coal. The intro-
and 60%). It cannot be because of a will to trans- duction of nuclear energy by force didn’t signify at
form the whole energy supply into “renewable”, all the disappearance of the “classical” plants
given that is simply impossible when holding on to working on gas, oil or coal. There is no transition,
an equal amount of consumed electricity (for only addition. The boosted research of new energy
The process of writing a text can be agonizing. It is are written because they flow with the rhythm of France that would mean a wind turbine on each 5 sources is only consistent with strategic interests,
almost a test for yourself and the thoughts that in- the text, even if they drift away from the real km2). It cannot be because of a concern for the “en- and certainly not ethical ones. In a world that is
form your daily behaviour. Thoughts that you have thoughts and actions of the author. Wordplay can vironment”, unless if one is duped by the smart dis- not only dependent on electric energy, but that is
come to consider as self-evident, you now have to be seductive, but also a lie. In formulating thoughts courses of a clean technology, given that only the hyper dependent on it, the diversifying of means of
re-examine. The white sheet demands a structured there are paths that are more easy to take. Com- production and installation of the wind turbines producing it is at stake. To heighten the resilience
exposure of your thoughts that have mostly a monplace arguments don’t need to be reflected (without taking into account the centralised elec- of the supply – of an essential importance in a con-
chaotic flow as they erupt in your mind and get in- upon. Some statements feel almost unavoidable tric network to which they are connected) entails nected world that functions just-in-time on all
terrupted by other thoughts, impressions, events. So because they will resonate with others. Some are the mining of very rare and very toxic materials, levels – the motto is to diversify and multiply the
these thoughts, do they still appear valid when put left out because they will be stumbled over. the ships that are big consumers of oil to transport sources. Also to cope with the famous “peak de-
in a more logical sequence? Glueing together the minerals, the huge factories for producing mands” that – for technical reasons – only can be
scattered thoughts leads more often than not to In my effort to communicate with others – do I pri- them, the highways to dispatch the parts and so on dealt with by only one type of energy production
discarding them all together. And even if the exer- oritize the effect my words have on others or the and so forth. Finally, it cannot be because of put- (nuclear plants, for example). Therefore not only the
cise succeeds and there appears a consistent body exposure of my thoughts to others? A reductive du- ting a spanner in the works of the big energy mul- development of the wind turbines and solar power,
of thought, the most difficult of questions arises – alism, maybe. The idea of correspondence is close tinationals – that have accumulated wealth but also of power plants on biomass fuel (genetic-
what do these words actually mean? to this project. That means that texts are part of an notably with oil and gas – because it are the same ally modified rapeseed as biofuel – what acrobatics
ongoing conversation and are an expression of an companies that invest massively in renewable en- does the language of the techno-world provide us
Between the thoughts I hold and the words that anarchist life and the subversive projects it con- ergies. No, in this way we’re not going to under- with!), of new types of nuclear plants, of nano pro-
are supposed to reflect them on paper there is a tains. They are laying bare a position and its stand anything, we have to look elsewhere. duced conductive materials that promise to reduce
complex interplay. While a certain distance or sep- choices. But a lot of radical speech aims to produce (by tiny micro percentages) losses during the trans-
aration is always inevitable, sometimes a feeling of an effect on others rather than assuming a posi- Let's do away also at once with all the environ- mission of electricity, and the list goes on.
alienation sneaks in. It seems as if these words tion. The words become tools in shaping a dis- mental and ecologist posturing, now not only dis-
need a permanent re-appropriation. Do they really course that begins to live a life of its own. Mostly played by the citizens on duty, but also by each So it’s not surprising that from the three fields referred
correspond to my reality? There is the danger that the sought after effect is that of mobilizing people. company, each state, each researcher. There is no to by the European research programmes funded in
the internal logic of the text takes over. The words This can take different forms. For example rhetoric “energy transition” going on, there never was one in the framework ofHorizon 2020, one is energy.
—16— —5—
* ample of how an ideological construct influences – sion, it is still possible to think about our steps, to and burgled hundreds of houses of bourgeois. They
and is in its turn influenced by – social relations, is orientate our explorations, to project our efforts. planned meticulously their hits, logistics, means
But then, what is this energy, and to what relates the very contemporary association between mobil- The love for the idea and the hate for authority go (even setting up a silver and gold foundry, an an-
the energy question in general? Like numerous ity, energy and life. Moving continually, never re- perfectly together with a projectuality, a reflection tiques shop and a hardware store to order legally the
struggles in the past have highlighted – notably maining, “seeing the world” by jumping from a high in the middle- and long-term to give a more suffi- latest of safes to study them in peace). Alexandre
those against nuclear technology – energy is a speed train to a low cost air plane to cross hundreds cient, greater,, more daring breath to our passage Jacob could have been content with some occa-
kingpin in industrialised society. If energy means of kilometres in the blink of an eye, is the new on the surface of this planet. sional thefts, and that would have maybe spared
production, production allows for profit through paradigm of social success. Travel, discover, adven- him a deportation to Guyana. But he wanted to fly
commodification. If energy means power, power al- ture or unknown are words that appear now prom- * higher, to shine brighter and longer. Nothing has
lows for war, and war means power. inently on all the publicity screens, destroying by a been easy on this journey, no effort was spared, cer-
fake assimilation a whole set of human experi- At the turn of a past century, an anarchist with tain hopes were frustrated and the generalized ex-
The power granted by control over the production ences, reduced to fast and risk-free visits of places some accomplices developed a formidable plan. propriation has not happened as he had wished for
of energy is huge. The western states have not developed specifically to that end. Even staying in After some more or less successful thefts, Alexandre so fervently. So what?
waited for the 1973 oil crisis – when their depend- the room of someone unknown to you is duly con- Marius Jacob looked to a farther horizon. A crazy
ence on the oil producing countries, that wanted to trolled, protected and exploited by the profiling and idea came to his mind: rather than being content Let’s not step back in front of what is difficult, let’s
follow their own power plans, became clear to databases of a virtual platform. That’s maybe as with a nice bit of thievery here and there (not bad confront them guided by our perspectives. Let’s
everybody – to realize that. It was one of the main well why the cheeks get red or the lips start to already), why not work out a massive project of ex- dare to embark on the most limitless projects, let’s
motives for several states, including France, to jus- tremble when someone dares to suggest we should propriation through the whole country (even better)? live anarchy.
tify the multiplication of nuclear power plants. To cut the energy to this world. In the end these workers of the night were hundreds
have a relative energy independence and to use it
as a weapon to compel other countries to not break To overcome this embarrassment is not an easy
ranks. But one thing might even be more import- thing. State propaganda warns us permanently,
ant, and it is there that the critique of nuclear and with images of war – real enough – as evidence,
its world allows us to grasp to the fullest extent the
role of energy for domination: nuclear technology
confirms that only the state and capital should
about what the destruction of the supply of energy
entails. Nonetheless, a small effort to get rid of the
spectres that hound our minds will be a necessary
Experiment
posses the capacities to produce energy. That these step. And this, however, without developing “al-
capacities represent a relationship relative to the ternative programmes” to resolve this question, be- First appeared as Experiment in Aufruhr (Anarchistisches Blatt, Zürich),
degree of dependence of the population, that every cause – in this world – it cannot be resolved. The Volume 1 - Issue 10, August 2013
revolutionary surge wanting to transform radically modern cities cannot do without a centralised sys-
the world will have to confront these energy jugger- tem of energy, regardless if produced by nuclear
nauts. In short, that energy means domination. As power plants, nano materials or wind turbines. The We want a rupture with this society. This society, experiment is that of its destruction. The destruc-
a very backed-up critical essay from some years industry cannot do without devouring monstrous which consists of totally institutionalized relation- tion of all the institutions that make our oppression
ago emphasized, linking the question of the nuc- amounts of energy. ships which are completely exposed to exploitation possible.
lear to the wind turbines: “the bulk of the energy by the market, and which keep us from experien-
consumed currently serves to make function a sub- The worst – and that’s already partly happening, cing free relationships. We want a rupture with this The experiment that we want to make possible -
jugating machine from which we want to escape.” not only inside the struggles against the energy society, to put an end to it. And to make room for but which, in a sense, is already brewing today in
management and exploitation of resources, but the experiment. For the free experiment in all areas every revolt - is an insurgent and revolutionary one.
Yet, to bring up the question of energy frequently also against patriarchy, racism or capitalism – of life and on a social level. For an experiment that The outcome of each experiment is uncertain (but
generates – including amongst the enemies of this would be that out of concern for being empty is possible only in open hostility with the dominant this is equally true of the authoritarian projects
world – at least a certain embarrassment. We in- handed in the face of an uncertain and murky fu- society (and its defenders), which allows the experi- from those who believe they can control
deed easily associate energy with life. Like the ener- ture, the research and experiments of an autonomy ment only in a closed framework, and only for as everything). Although, with an experiment, we also
getics specialists who have hugely contributed to will fuel the progresses of power. The experimental far as money can be made from it. really mean that the significance lies not only in
the spread of a view that explains every vital phe- wind turbines in the hippie community of the six- the success, but also in the failure. In failing; to
nomenon through transfers, losses and transform- ties in the US maybe took some time to make an We say that free life is possible only in and through learn and go further. That the significance lies in
ations of energy (chemical, kinetic, entrance on the industrial stage, but it is today an an experiment, a permanent experiment that the attempt, in the persistent attempt.
thermodynamic…). The body would only be a important factor in the capitalist and state re- blows up the boundaries of domination (and isola-
cluster of energetic processes, as a plant would only structuring. As a recent text, sketching perspectives tion). On the grounds that the dominant civiliza- The experiment that we seek in the rupture with
be a set of chemical transformations. Another ex- of struggle inspired on the ongoing worldwide con- tion sets before us, the only possible free social this society is that of the free development of each
—6— —15—
– the only one we have – what matters is to fight, to overcome. There resides the only fatalism that is: flicts around the energy question, resumed: “Admit- yearly report of one of the most renowned agencies
live that tension towards the destruction of author- the anarchist who renounces anarchy while trying tedly, unlike in the past, it is possible that in this for the observation of political and social tensions
ity. It’s by moving, moving on the path we have to make it rhyme with the concept of victory and third beginning of a millennium the desire for sub- in the world (funded by the global giants of the in-
chosen, that we realize ourselves, that we become defeat. The love for the idea is thus seen and rejec- version intersects with the hope of survival on the surance sector), that of all the attacks and acts of
what we are. It is the quality that bursts into our ted as youthful folly, beautiful and passionate, but same terrain that aims to hamper and prevent the sabotage reported as such on the planet and car-
life, the quality of the action and the idea that go far from practical. technical reproduction of the existent. But it is an ried out by “non-state” actors – all tendencies and
together. Victory or defeat have nothing to do encounter that is destined to transform in con- ideologies mixed up – 70% took aim at energy and
where there is only persisting or abandoning, per- On the other hand, the life of anarchists also frontation, because it is obvious that one part ofthe logistics infrastructure (namely pylons, trans-
severance or resignation, passionate love and hate doesn’t have to necessarily look like the passing of a problem cannot be at the same time the solution. To formers, gas and oil pipelines, cell towers, electricity
or political obliteration. Irredeemable dreamers, comet that is consumed upon few seconds in the do without all that energy mainly necessary to the lines, fuel depots, mines and railways).
yes, a lot of anarchists are. “To act is to not only atmosphere. Certainly, each to his or her own. It is politicians and industrialists, one has to want to do
think with the brain, it is to make the whole being without doubt better to go up in flames than waste without those that are seeking, exploiting, selling, Admittedly, the motives that can animate those
think. To act is to close in the dream, in order to open away waiting for the Revolution. But let’s not erect using it. The energy necessities of an entire civiliza- fighting in these conflicts are very diverse. Either
up in the reality, the most profound sources of think- absolute oppositions where none have to be there tion – the one of money and power – cannot be reformist, ecologist, related to indigenous or reli-
ing”, said Maeterlinck. Effectively, anarchists are necessarily. If in the past certain anarchists have called into question just out of respect for hundred- gious claims, revolutionary or simply to strengthen
dreaming with their eyes wide open. Which means gone in head first, we doubt if their plan was that it year-old olive trees, for ancestral rites, or for the the bases of a state – or a future state. Far from us
to arm their desires, convictions, choices to realize would be for as short a time as possible. Why hope protection of forests and beaches already in large the idea to neglect the development, the deepening
them. It may be that other exploited, once their for a rapid end to hostilities when we can try to part polluted. Only another conception of life, the and the spreading of a radical critique of all the fa-
thirst for destructive rage is quenched, turn back to prolong them without disavowing oneself? If the world and relations can achieve this. Only this can cets of domination, but what we want to emphas-
admiring a leader, to bow down for a god, strength- time has closed in rather fast for certain anarchists and should challenge energy – in its use and false ize here is that inside a part of these asymmetrical
ening a new power. It is possible, and the reaction in the past, it was because what have surrounded needs, and so also in its structures – by calling in to conflicts is spreading a method of autonomous
will do everything to make it happen. But that them – notably the repressive forces – have struck question society itself.” struggle, self-organized and starting from direct
doesn’t render null and void the initial attempt, fast, too fast. Not because they had the desire to action, joining de facto the anarchist proposals on
that doesn’t invalidate the efforts of anarchists to finish the fastest possible or because they seek a And if this titanic society is indeed going down – this field. Beyond the insurrectionary potentials
deepen the rupture, to destroy authority at its root. tragic ending on principle. reducing or destroying on its way all possibilities of that the conflicts around new energy projects can
Even if it would only be some days, weeks or an autonomous life, all inner life, all singular exper- have, that maybe give us a glimpse of a more vast
months. But such an opportunity to taste, feel the The passion for life can collide, including too fast, ience, devastating the lands, intoxicating the air, and massive revolt against these nuisances, it is
thrill, live to the full the quality, cannot but pas- with forces that want to annihilate it: the hate for polluting the water, mutilating the cells – do we clear that the production, storage and transmission
sionately attract all the lovers of freedom. oppression can lead us to come close to a death really think it would be inept or too rash to suggest of all the energy this society needs to exploit, con-
that prowls. It is the consequence of putting your that to harm domination, to have some hope of trol, make war, submit and dominate, depends in-
On the contrary, when anarchists give up this life at stake, of living instead of surviving. Rebels opening onto unknown horizons, to give some variably on a set of infrastructures spread out over
quality, this tension towards freedom against all par excellence, anarchists shouldn’t however de- space to a freedom unbridled and without modera- the whole territory, favouring the dispersed action
authority, to replace it with a logic of victory and velop a cult of blindfolds. We have a brain to think, tion, undermining the energy foundations of that in small autonomous groups.
defeat borrowed from politics, then the fatal des- a heart to feel, arms to act. Why to go without one same domination could be a most precious trail?
cent has begun. That all the foundations of the of those faculties? Between living in the moment If the history of revolutionary struggles has an
anarchist idea erode, collapse and dissipate. That and longing for a brighter future, there is a sea of * abundance of very suggestive examples concerning
the first to come, dressed in more or less liber- possibilities. When we throw ourselves into battle, the possibilities of taking action against that
tarian clothes (and who doesn’t give himself that ferociously if needed, it is not blindfolded but with Think of what we have in front and around us. which makes the state and capitalist machinery
adjective today?), takes it all by flaunting a strong the world we want to destroy in our sights. Ferocity Everywhere in the world conflicts are ongoing function, taking a look at the chronologies of sab-
organization, a massive work of the masses, an al- is not to be measured by blindness, but by the per- around the exploitation of natural resources and otage during the last years demonstrates that the
leged formidable military efficacy, the end of “isol- spectives that drive our lives, that we insert in our against the construction of energy structures (wind here and now is also not lacking in suggestions.
ation”. That the anarchist weary of going to prison efforts. If we have to be comets, very well, but let’s farms, nuclear plants, oil and gas pipelines, high Getting rid of embarrassment, looking elsewhere
“for nothing” or so little, tired of an unfulfilled love not precipitate their end. Our passage on this earth voltage lines, biomass powered plants, fields of ge- and differently, experimenting with what is possible
that burns his heart, exhausted by the hate that is short; let’s satisfy it by exhausting all possibilit- netically modified rapeseed, mines…). All the states and what can be tried. Some paths to explore.
nourishes him and that encounters so little com- ies, all potentials. What is fatal, is not to bump into consider these new projects and the existing energy Nobody can foresee what that can give, but one
plicity, disappointed the lack of understanding of rocks, but to realize that you don’t have a compass infrastructures as “critical infrastructure”, meaning thing stays certain: that it pertains to the anarch-
his fellows in misery, takes the poisoned hand ex- in your pocket when the storm breaks. Against the essential for power. In light of the centrality of the ist practice of freedom.
tended to him. Thinking that – finally! - the old ri- logic of victory and defeat, against the fatalism of energy question, it is not surprising to read in the
gidity and ideological blockage have been an alleged efficacy that cancels all anarchist ten-
—14— —7—
After the riots in Hamburg on the occasion of the prosecute the pasting as a “particularly serious Nevertheless, even if hope can sometimes inflame nological stupor, with the flattening of the minds
G20 summit in July 2017 the authorities were un- case of civil disorder”, since the poster was not only the tender hearts of anarchists, we cannot forget and hearts, can we not defend that insurrection is
der intense pressure: Thousands of investigations approving of the rioting, but also calling to repro- that despair has also been an agony that has gone maybe even more necessary, more desirable than
followed, as well as public calls for denunciation, duce it. As a result in Berlin several events and dis-
the publishing of photos of hundreds of wanted cussions were taking place around the topic of how with many of their journeys. Lovers of the idea, they ever to be able to put things in perspective? The
persons, several - partly trans-national - waves of the state can be faced with an offensive attitude in hated equally the oppressors. So it is that a pas- same refrains on the material and social conditions
house-searches and now also international arrest the context of repression and trials. Thus it was at- sionate love that inflamed their lives of desires that are not similar to those of the beginning of the
warrants and extraditions (in October a comrade tempted to tackle the trial on a collective level to went alongside a ferocious hate that could strike previous century or on the fact that the state is now
was arrested in France and transferred to Ger- not put the question of guilt or innocence, convic- ruthlessly and spill the blood of tyrants, their min- over-equipped, rather sometimes tire the discussion
many) were launched. The revenge of the Justice tion or acquittal in the center of attention, but to ions and their worshippers. But why talk in the past instead of bringing it forward. Melancholic indeed
system is targeting also those who continue to de- put the focus rather on the strength and complicity tense? That universe, that vocabulary, that inner would the anarchists be until a point of only seeing
fend the rioting and keep on antagonizing the which can grow out of a common process of action
state after the turbulent weekend in Hamburg. and discussion. Only those can create the circum- world of anarchists, did it really change? Are the the many obstacles on the path, even ending up for-
stances which give us the courage and determina- hopes not inflamed when hundreds of thousands of getting that the question is how to confront them
This May the anarchist library Kalabalik in Berlin tion to encounter the state offensively and people have risen up against the ruling regimes in ourselves, right here and now in an anarchic per-
as well as two private flats got searched by the minimize the fear of consequences which this can many countries some years ago, during the so- spective. If not, it would not be called struggle or re-
cops to prosecute the pasting of a poster, which result in. So the posters kept on appearing on the called “Arab Spring”? The despair of seeing these volt or nothing at all, but – borrowing Marxist
showed the photos of some politicians in Hamburg, streets of Berlin and different calls were published uprising liquidated by a multifaceted reaction, did jargon – only the observation of the mole that digs;
some G20 responsibles and some cops in the style to be present during the trial which unexpectedly
of a “wanted terrorists” poster. In August a trial even ended with a discharge. it not arm the hands of several of them to strike, and is dying [Marx used the metaphor of the “old
took place against a comrade who was accused of once more? Nevertheless, no fatalism in that. That mole” to symbolize the necessary maturation of so-
pasting a poster. The prosecution assessed this as a This declaration was read out at the beginning of is elsewhere, as we will see… cial forces beneath the surface of society that will
“disturbance of public peace” and attempted to the trial: eventually erupt in revolution].
If the anarchist idea proposes the destruction of au-
Disturbing Public Peace thority and the social relations it induces, that
doesn’t forcefully imply a belief in the famous
“dawning of liberty”, final and irreversible. Actually,
*
Lets return to the initial problem: are the anarch-
First pronounced in a courtroom in Berlin, 8th ofAugust 2018 contrary to the logic of victory and defeat, anarchy is ists, with their idea of freedom and destruction of
above all a tension, a practical idea that seeks ever- authority, doomed to lose? Meaning to see all their
For me, the court, this building of authority, is not a a human coexistence without any domination. But more the destruction of all power. “Belief” hasn’t got efforts, sacrifices, initiatives being wiped out, dur-
meaningful setting for anarchist and revolutionary this idea does not solely belong to me. Thousands anything to do with that. If the horizon of anarchy ing relative peaceful times as well as during
confrontation with domination. The struggles for a of comrades showed this clearly in July 2017 in doesn’t stop at revolt, but also opens up towards so- massive revolutions? “It has always been like that
world without exploiters and exploited take place Hamburg - among other dates - where for a brief cial revolution, it is to destroy from top to bottom in history”, the pragmatics say. “Shouldn’t believe in
in everyday life and on the streets. A trial is an im- moment state control has failed altogether, despite power. An addition of individual revolts is not the revolution and the masses”, the cynics say.
posed snapshot that seeks to weaken current and massive security measures. During this moment, enough. Certainly, the one who talks about “social Nevertheless, an other possibility may be closer to
past struggles and to deprive them of their fellow the will to create a rupture with the existing order revolution” while denying individual revolt that is its anarchists. Contrary to cats, we indeed only have
combatants. has moved and inspired many people to act in base, has a corpse in his mouth. And will probably one life, and we dare to say that it is during this life
solidarity. be between the first to cry foul when an individual –
In a way, however, I involve myself with this jur- or a fistful of individuals – combine ideas and ac-
idical spectacle by sitting in the dock today. I could That today a public prosecutor will judge me, is to tion. But, on the other hand also, thinking that the
have simply paid the fixed fine to avoid this trial. me an admission of the vulnerability of the state. perspective of a social revolution amounts to nour-
But to pay for what? I am here today to create a In that sense, I'm certainly not the one who is justi- ishing a blind faith in a final solution, only reintro-
certain publicity that should show that state re- fying himself with this trial and judgment, but you: duces the notions of victory and defeat, while
pression can be counteracted by combative deeds. who must defend your blood-soaked power and deleting all tension or adopting the dreadful Marxist
Therefore, it is not my intention to negotiate with submission to the state and capital! determinism (that made the communist proletari-
the prosecutor and to enter into the discourse of in- ans of the past century accept the worst in the name
nocence or guilt. It is perfectly clear to me that if I Because of my views, I certainly do not insist on the of “inevitable historical necessity”).
am convicted - as in principle is true for all accused right to freedom of expression, because the lan-
- I will be convicted as an example, to deter others guage of the law is not mine. Accordingly, I expect If an uprising, an insurrection allows the tension to-
from committing the reproached deeds. I doubt and demand nothing from this court and its ser- wards freedom to accentuate, deepen or possibly
that in this case the intent of overall repression vants, because as I have already said: the struggles generalize, why would we not strive to hasten, to
and oppression will have an effect, because I do not for a liberated society and against the existing or- trigger it? Faced with historical amnesia, with tech-
feel attacked as a person, but mainly for my idea of der will be fought elsewhere.
—8— —13—
have seen political groups organizing real steward autonomous revolutionary path, we go from one
teams [services d’ordre] inside the cortège de tête or demonstration to another, on terrains chosen and
physically assaulting individuals or other groups
that didn’t respect their instructions. These author-
itarian excesses don’t seem surprising to me, they’re
part of the will of these groups to channel the de-
negotiated by the labour unions and the prefecture.
So the voice of anti-authoritarian individualities
disperses in this collective euphoria, engulfed by
the ultra-consensual hymn “Siamo tutti antifas-
Without Detour
sires for revolt in a view on struggle that makes its cisti!” (sic!), implicitly or passively accepting the role First appeared as the editorial ofSans Détour (journal anarchiste apériodique),
central axes from composition and strategy. More of the new little leaders of the radical movement. Issue 0, June 2018
disturbing on the other hand, is the almost total And if we would decide to undermine the normal-
absence of critique, passivity that allows these ising and ritualising of revolt? If we would try to be
groups to establish their strategies. really uncontrollable, outside the ranks and the ap- It’s useless to deny it or to look away: with each Hostile against all authority, recalcitrant against
pointments of the parties? What would happen if flare of lucidity we have the feeling of living in an all political strategy and manoeuvre, contrary to
These moments of revolt end up losing their sub- hundreds of persons would organize in small age where cynical realism and disillusion reign. A delegation and passivity, we endeavour to reflect
versive character to re-enter in the ranks of the groups, everywhere, during the night, without time where relations are increasingly mediated by upon, to understand the reality that surrounds us
political ritual and the spectacle. This with all the troops or leaders, to attack domination in its mul- technologies, leading to the loss of meaning and to sharpen the arms of critique and to search new
elements specific to them, even if they are camou- tiple structures? If anti-authoritarian groups and the belief that nothing can be changed about it. A angles of attack. Because this other world we
flaged by informality and masks; leaders and fol- individuals would decide at times to coordinate to time of generalized dispossession and collective should cherish, defend, grow, spread. And to this
lowers, beginnings of steward teams and media act together, for example to sabotage the flux of apathy; where nothing much opposes the domina- end we need space, to sweep away this one.
representation. We could ask ourselves if, in fact, economy? But that has to necessarily go through a tion of money, the exploitation and commodifica-
these dynamics are not intrinsic to a tendency to- critique and surpassing of the political rituals, in- tion of every element of the globe, of every piece of In an age of continuous connection, of virtual so-
wards centralization, to wanting at all costs take cluding the most radical ones. The point is not to life (down to the most intimate), the devastation cial networks, of flicking through and superficiality,
part in the “social movements” in the hope of radic- oppose collective action to that from small groups, and poisoning of the earth, the growing hold of the we want to make an effort, to challenge ourselves
alising them. For being more visible, for gathering but to oppose the centralizing logic that tends to police and army on our lives. For the rich, the bosses and others: to evade the bright lights of the ongo-
a greater quantity of forces, we end up sacrificing steer, channel and often recuperate revolt. It’s and the statesmen, business prospers. Whereas a ing spectacle, breaking with the urgency of being
the most important part of ourselves and to serve, about deepening the creative potential of destruct- part of the exploited - not believing anymore in the part of it. In order to take the necessary time to ex-
sometimes in spite of ourselves, as a radical work- ive action, by freeing these actions from the limited tales of democracy and progress – seems attracted change and confront positions, deepen ideas and
force for political forces with which we share neither horizons in which some want to enclose them. to the nationalist pest, to the identitarian dogmas nourish subversive perspectives and projects. To get
perspectives nor methods. Incapable of tracing an and to the religious straitjackets - preaching exclu- rid of preconceived thoughts, reflexes conditioned
sion and a return to traditional values. Weighed by habit, to move away from roads already marked
down by the mental idiocy, the social cannibalism out. To venture onto unforeseen paths. But also to
Nor Defeat
unity that are always needed by the politicians and
Nonetheless, a flicker stays glowing. For those who recuperators of revolt.
know to look for them - here and there - revolts and
conflicts disrupt social peace, attacks break
through the night, rebellious solidarity is forged. So
First appeared as Sans victoire, ni défaite in Avis de tempêtes (bulletin anarchiste breaking with the routine of obedience and resig-
pour la guerre sociale), Issue 7, July 2018 nation, and arousing our will to continue to fight,
to hope and think that nothing is lost. As anarch-
“Anarchists have always lost, they never won any- columns of joyful anarchist militiamen – brandish- ists we hold a stake in these diffuse conflicts. For us,
thing.” It is not seldom one hears these words, even ing weapons, flags and striking up songs to arouse anarchism is neither an identity, nor a cocoon
amongst the enemies of authority, with great re- the heart – leaving Barcelona during that July woven with certainties in which one can settle
luctance or remorse. These kind of final sentences 1936. One heaves a sigh of nostalgia that takes us comfortably, looking down on a world that doesn’t
even sometimes interrupt the discussions on recent straight to melancholia, very characteristic to belong to us. It is an idea we carry in our hearts, a
struggles, if they don’t interfere with certainty in many anarchists – according to a famous singer – tension that navigates our actions, a will that
the discussions about the contributions of anarch- to conclude fatally: “We always lose, we are the black drives us. In short, a relation to the world that can-
ists during uprisings, insurrections and revolutions sheep ofhistory.” not be developed but in disparity with this one.
of a past already bygone. Musing about proud There is an other world, but it is in and staunchly
against this one.
—12— —9—
So a journal to bring forward ideas that don’t be- doesn’t want to take part in the forum of sterile and ity and delegation from childhood on, to paternal- clearly now that there are forces that want to con-
long to a homogeneous and monolithic group, but inoffensive opinions, but undertakes to strengthen ism and the omnipresent eye of the state. Not of trol, channel, represent and steer the dancing.
that emanate from individuals. Forging them the bond between thought and action. the destruction of one’s own - provoked by the in- For example, the force of a party – increasingly less
along their imaginaries, their experiences and their A journal that is also this; an opportunity for those fernal spiral of social cannibalism, alienation, mal- imaginary – that issues bombastic communiqués
respective tensions. who write it, an invitation for those who read it. adjustment, exclusion, depression and addiction. to celebrate its potency and galvanize its troops. A
A journal that – recognizing the scourge that con- On the contrary, of destruction as an act of will and group that performs excellent acrobatic pirouettes
stitutes any collective identity – doesn’t look for any We are a minority in the minority. But that doesn’t of individual resistance – a necessary action that to maintain an insurrectionary face – to seduce the
other interlocutor than the stray individuals in bring us to renounce a part of ourselves, to silence implies to bring down on its path every thing that rebellious youth – while keeping a political credibil-
search of freedom, thinking far away from the our disagreement or to feint agreement in order to allows the perpetuation and reproduction of dom- ity towards the friends and allies of the institu-
shadow of a chapel. grow in numbers. Because the quest for quantity at ination, exploitation, misery, alienation of a sub- tional left, towards the intellectuals, the
A journal that isn’t dependent on the current events all costs is irreconcilable with authenticity and sin- dued life and not a lived one, the representations syndicalists, towards the associations and towards
of the “movement”, but that searches to interact gularity, real precious sprouts that have to shoot up that forge our most intimate and profound being the journalists. Besides, beyond this “party”, it
with the rebels of its time. Bringing to the table, on in all domains of life, and so also in the complicities and that tear up our repressed existence. Destruc- seems that behind the masks are hidden several
occasion, suggestions for the ongoing struggles. that we want to concoct. tion, finally, as the only act not to be recuperated small groups and individuals that are sincerely
A journal that doesn’t want to cling on to all the so- The upheaval of this world will not arise from ob- by the progressive and humanist tentacles of a democratic, always concerned about maintaining
cial conflicts, but that at times sees there a terrain jective conditions, political strategies or alliances power that is capable of changing face a thousand a legitimacy for the public opinion. A whole range
favourable to subversion. between different social groups. But rather the times while preserving its essence. As a passion, a of texts explaining that the black block is nothing
A journal that digs recklessly through the arsenal propagation of surges of freedom, rage and dispro- liberatory drive; it foils strategies, it doesn’t make more than a spatial strategy, that its aim is only to
of distant subversive experiences, in time and portionate dreams, the abundance of individual ini- calculations, it is far removed from politics. How- “attack symbols of domination”. They define limits,
space, as to enrich our present perspectives. tiatives and of fights to undertake in chorus. And it ever, it is not synonymous with blind irrationality if normalise these moments of collective revolt. And
A journal that – attached to this anarchist prin- is to this that we want to contribute. With hate and it is moved by a liberatory fervour. we sometimes saw some of these vandals physic-
ciple according to which all separations between love, poetry and humour. But, straightforwardly. ally blocking other demonstrators from attacking
what is said and done should be abolished – Since some time, in several demonstrations in an office from Emmaüs – a humanitarian associ-
France, a certain destructive joy seems to have ation that collaborates with the state in the man-
shaken up the political forms of consented dissent, aging of migrants – or from snatching the cameras
ritualised and inoffensive, that – today as well as of journalists, auto-media or spectators producing
Political Ritual?
in black, appears suddenly in demonstrations to tervening when it is not a bank or a McDonalds
shatter windows and burn some cars, that seems to that loses its windows, but a big bar for the bour-
want to do away with democratic representation. geois in the 5th district. Of course, because “the
Yet, in the sequence of masked moments and those people” will not understand and they will not agree
First appeared as Déstruction ou rituel politique ? in Sans Détour with faces uncovered, in the heterogeneous en- with us!
(journal anarchiste apériodique), Issue 0, June 2018 semble that is called cortège de tête, it transpires
So, lets go for the passion of destruction, but within
certain limits, limits set by the strategy. But who
“Instead of large snail-paced processions, insurrec- trained promoter of tumult and insurrection, gets to decide the strategy? After all, we arrive
tion prefers scattering, drifting, and moving fast. enemy of all authority irrespective of the colour or again to this place. The cancer of politics re-
Looking not to take hold of power, but to disband it ideology that legitimized it. He wasn’t talking of appears, the thirst for freedom and revolt has to
by negating all authority, all privilege of caste, it the destruction caused by armies – bombarding, give way to the quest for consensus. No looking for
chooses its targets by their psycho-geographical pillaging and raping on their way – but of destruc- complicity between exploited, marginal, pissed-off,
proximity: scores to settle, rich residences to loot, tion as an act that makes tabula rasa of the values potentially rebellious individuals. But rather the
symbols of slavery to demolish. It doesn’t look to en- and symbols of power, breaking up the social bonds will to appear credible towards fantasized revolu-
gage in battle nor to militarise the confrontation; by of submission and dependence, upending the roles tionary subjects; “the workers”, “the popular neigh-
its omnipresence and vibrancy, it aims for the anni- assigned by society. He wasn’t talking of the at- bourhoods”, “racialised persons” etc. etc. Brands
hilation ofall separations.” tempt – from the side of power – to destroy every most of the time identified with different compon-
form of life, every rebellious or non-conforming ex- ents of the reformist left: labour unions, citizen or-
The passion for destruction is also a creative pas- istence, but of destruction as an individual act of ganisations, associations… We also arrive at serious
sion, said an anarchist revolutionary – an unres- awareness in a world where we get used to passiv- authoritarian excesses: on several occasions we
—10— —11—