Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Repair of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: Comparison Between Suture Annuloplasty and Rings Annuloplasty
Repair of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: Comparison Between Suture Annuloplasty and Rings Annuloplasty
Background. The purpose of this study was to review 5 years were comparable (97% and 84% for group 1, and
our experience with modified De Vega tricuspid annu- 96% and 82% for group 2, respectively). Postoperative
loplasty versus ring annuloplasty for treating functional echocardiography showed significant improvement in
tricuspid regurgitation (TR). tricuspid valve function, with reduction in TR grade from
Methods. In all, 448 consecutive patients undergoing 3.4 to 0.6, and no differences between groups. However,
tricuspid annuloplasty with concomitant procedures be- recurrence-free survival was better for group 2 than for
tween 2000 and 2012 were included. Modified De Vega group 1 (78.8% versus 74.5%; p < 0.62). Risk factors for
annuloplasty was performed in 216 patients (group 1) and recurrent TR included severity of preoperative TR, atrial
ring annuloplasty in 232 patients (group 2). Clinical and fibrillation, and pulmonary hypertension.
echocardiographic follow-up results were used to assess Conclusions. The modified De Vega tricuspid annulo-
TR grade. Recurrent TR was defined as grade 2 or greater plasty is acceptable for repair of functional TR and im-
at echocardiography. provements in clinical and echocardiographic status on a
Results. Preoperative clinical and echocardiographic long-term basis, although the long-term recurrence-free
characteristics were comparable in the two groups. Early survival appeared to be lower than that for ring
mortality was similar (group 1, 0.9%, versus group 2, 1.3%; annuloplasty.
p < 0.67). Follow-up was available for 97%; New York
Heart Association class and symptoms of right-side heart (Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:1286–93)
failure were significantly improved. Survival rates at 1 and Ó 2014 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
ADULT CARDIAC
patients, combined with restriction of the leaflets in 12 characterized as trivial (grade 1, jet area/right atrial
(2.7%) patients, and rolled up and thickened leaflets in 3 area, less than 10%); mild (grade 2, jet area/right atrial
(0.7%) patients. area, 10% to 20%); moderate (grade 3, jet area/right
All patients were prospectively entered into our patient atrial area, 20% to 33%); and severe (grade 4, jet area/right
data management system and then retrospectively atrial area, 33% or more) [8]. All echocardiographic
analyzed. Our Institutional Review Board approved this examinations were performed by the same two cardiologists.
study and waived the need for individual consent. We did not assess intraobserver or interobserver variability
in estimating severity of TR, but accepted the readings
Surgical Procedure used for clinical decision making.
All annuloplasties were performed during concomitant
mitral or aortic valve surgery with cardioplegic arrest.
Follow-Up
Three surgeons performed operations during the study Follow-up data were obtained from hospital chart reviews
periods (G.C.X., M.X., Z.J.Q.). The choice of tricuspid and telephone interviews with patients or family mem-
annuloplasty methods was selected by the surgeons’ bers, When follow-up was not possible, information on
preference: in group 1, modified De Vega’s suture vital status (alive or dead) was obtained through the social
annuloplasty was performed in 216 patients; in group 2, a security database. Follow-up was closed on April 30, 2013.
flexible ring (Cosgrove-Edwards annuloplasty system; We described postoperative events and results according
Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) was implanted in 147 to the guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity
patients and a rigid ring (Edwards Lifesciences) in 85 after cardiac valve interventions, approved by The Society
patients. Ring annuloplasty was performed by standard of Thoracic Surgeons [9]. Every patient underwent clinical
operative techniques [6]. Modified De Vega’s suture assessment by a physician who was blinded to the
annuloplasty was performed by placing a doubled treatment assigned. Deaths and redo valve-related sur-
pledget-supported suture of 3-0 polypropylene from the gery were recorded. Patients’ records included age, sex,
level of the septal annulus in front of the coronary sinus findings of physical examination (cyanosis, jaundice, neck
to the midportion of the annulus of the anterior leaflet vein engorgement, ascites, hepatomegaly, and pitting
(Fig 1). The pledget was placed on the RV surface of edema), and presence of atrial fibrillation on electrocar-
the septal annulus; the other pledget was placed at diogram. Follow-up was 96.7% complete, with a median
the atrial surface of the anterior annulus. This double follow-up of 7.4 years (range, 6 months to 12 years).
multifilament suture is then tied down snugly over a
Hegar dilator calibrated to 2 mm to 3 mm larger than Statistics Analysis
the predicted appropriate pulmonary annulus size Preoperative variables were compared between groups
derived from published nomograms [7], satisfactorily by the Fisher exact test (categorical variables) and the
reducing the orifice size without placing undue strain Student t test (continuous variables). Kaplan-Meier
on the annuloplasty repair. In all patients, intraoperative analysis was used to evaluate mortality and develop-
transesophageal echocardiography was performed to ment of 2þ (moderate) recurrent TR. Univariate analysis
confirm elimination of TR. was performed using the Breslow test and log rank test to
Table 1. Patient Preoperative Characteristics using SPSS software version 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
Probability values of 0.05 or less were considered statis-
Group 1 Group 2 p
Variable (n ¼ 216) (n ¼ 232) Value tically significant.
Table 3. Perioperative Patient Characteristics Figure 2 shows the severity of TR before and after TV
repair. Most of the patients had moderate or severe TR
Variable Group 1 Group 2 p Value
preoperatively; however, 8.7% had mild or even no TR
Operative time, minutes 238.0 66.7 249.5 73.2 0.19 at the time of surgery. In these cases, the indication for
Cross-clamp time, minutes 121 72 148 79 0.58 TV repair was dilation of the native tricuspid annulus.
ADULT CARDIAC
CPB time, minutes 200 82 214 79 0.71 All annuloplasty types proved efficacious at reducing
Preoperative TR grade 2.8 0.6 3.0 0.6 0.06 TR. The TR was significantly reduced at discharge and
Postoperative TR grade 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.14 follow-up in all groups (p < 0.05), but it did increase at
Surgical procedure 0.44 follow-up controls in both groups (Table 2). In contrast, in
MVR 173 (80) 188 (84) 0.23 group 2 patients, it remained stable at further control
MVRþAVR 43 (20) 44 (18) 0.43 follow-up. Indeed, at late follow-up, TR in group 1 pa-
Maze procedure 130 (60) 142 (61) 0.37 tients was zero to mild in 69%, moderate in 14%, mod-
Mortality 2 (0.9) 3 (1.2) 0.67 erate to severe in 7%, and severe in 10%. In group 2
patients, TR was zero to mild in 75%, moderate in 11%,
Data are mean SD or number (%). moderate to severe in 6%, and severe in 8%. There was no
AVR ¼ aortic valve replacement; CPB ¼ cardiopulmonary statistically significant difference in mean TR grade or
bypass; MVR ¼ mitral valve replacement; TR ¼ tricuspid prevalence of TR at last follow-up between the two
regurgitation.
groups (p < 0 .18). However, it got worse in group 2,
because the percentage of patients with TR equal to or
121 72 minutes, respectively) were longer than those in greater than grade 3 was higher in group 2 than in group
group 1 (148 79 minutes, respectively). Cardiopulmo- 1, but the distribution of TR grade was similar in the two
nary bypass and aortic crossclamp times were thus 20 groups.
minutes (p < 0.22) and 17 minutes (p < 0.17) shorter, To evaluate overall efficacy and durability of annulo-
respectively, in group 1. Controlling for number of plasty, we evaluated TR grades by the serial echocardio-
concomitant procedures, there was no statistically sig- graphic data. We determined TR grade at last follow-up
nificant difference in operative times (p < 0 .19). and assessed freedom from development of 2þ TR over
time using Kaplan-Meier analysis (Fig 3). There was no
significant difference between the two groups in the
Echocardiographic Assessment Kaplan-Meier analysis (p < 0.16 weighted by propensity
As expected, after surgical intervention, a reduction in left score; p < 0 .13 unweighted). Six-year freedom from
atrial and left ventricular dimensions was observed in both development of 2þ TR was 74.5% 6.6% and 78.8%
groups, as well as in PASP, which significantly decreased 5.7% in group 1 and group 2, respectively.
from baseline in both groups (p < 0.05). Right ventricular
pressure also decreased significantly, but there was no Clinical Results
difference between the two groups (p ¼ 0.97; Table 2).
In each group, 3 patients (group 1, 1.4%, and group 2,
1.3%; p < 0.8) had a postoperative stroke; a total of
60 patients (group 1, 12%, and group 2, 14.6%; p < 0 .7)
had postoperative low cardiac output syndrome; and
Comment
In this study, we have evaluated TR over time after
modified De Vega’s suture annuloplasty and ring
tricuspid annuloplasty. Six-year freedom from develop-
ment of 2þ TR was 74.5% 6.6% and 78.8% 5.7% for
modified De Vega’s suture annuloplasty and ring annu-
loplasty, respectively; these results are similar to a pre-
vious study performed by Bernal and colleagues [10].
However, the long-term recurrence-free survival of su-
ture annuloplasty appeared to be lower than that of ring
annuloplasty.
Table 4. Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis for Recurrent Tricuspid Regurgitation After Operation
Univariate Logistic Regression Multivariate Logistic Regression
ADULT CARDIAC
Hepatomegaly 0.013 2.667 1.380–9.745
Neck vein engorgement 0.017 2.385 1.146–4.962
PASP 0.023 3.353 1.709–6.579 0.001 7.446 2.321–18.432
LA dimension 0.012 2.561 1.842–4.731
Preoperative TR 0.000 5.433 1.442–6.413 0.001 8.743 2.232–23.652
Atrial fibrillation 0.034 3.638 1.082–12.228 0.0573 1.517 1.218–10.526
Ejection fraction <0.40 0.002 4.563 1.043–9.452
NYHA class IV 0.002 5.412 1.142–8.631
LVEDD 0.033 3.267 1.221–5.361
CI ¼ confidence interval; LA ¼ left atrial; LVEDD ¼ left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; NYHA ¼ New York Heart Association; OR ¼
odds ratio; PASP ¼ pulmonary artery systolic pressure; TR ¼ tricuspid regurgitation.
system provide acceptable results for TV repair, the use of sinus) on the right, differently from traditional De Vega
a rigid ring significantly increases the risk of early repair. This procedure distributes the forces of
annular dehiscence. Pfannm€ uller and colleagues [1], for distension over two double sutures and acts specifically
example, found that use of a Carpentier-Edwards ring on the anteroposterior segment, which is the most
was associated with a significantly higher risk of dehis- dilated portion of the tricuspid annulus, thus creating
cence (Carpentier-Edwards, 8.7%; Cosgrove-Edwards, annular narrowing without excessive tension.
0.9%; p < 0.001), almost exclusively at the septal leaflet This modified De Vega technique was successfully
portion of the annulus. Multivariate analysis identified used by us for preventing recurrent TR in patients with
annuloplasty type as independently predicting ring moderate to severe TR. At 5 years, 69.3% of patients in
dehiscence (odds ratio 10.7; 95% confidence interval: 3.2 this study had zero to mild TR. Thus, we believe that
to 36.5; p < 0.001). There is, therefore, a need to reassess tricuspid annuloplasty should be performed not only in
the early and medium-term postoperative outcomes in patients with moderate TR, but in all patients, even
patients undergoing tricuspid valve suture annuloplasty those with severe TR, especially when an effective
with left-sided valve surgery in modern cardiac surgery. annuloplasty technique can be performed rapidly and
reproducibly. In our experience, this technique has been
Mechanism of the Modified De Vega Annuloplasty as effective as ring annuloplasty in the midterm post-
operative period.
The original De Vega annuloplasty and its variants purse
A few technical points need to be mentioned regarding
the posterior annular segment considerably more than the
the use of this technique. First, careful attention must be
anterior segment [13]. These suture annuloplasties, both
paid to the pledget placed in the RV surface of the septal
the continuous and single running types, have been
annulus. Second, another pledget is placed in the atrial
criticized for being unpredictable and unreliable, perhaps
surface of the anterior annulus. The two pledgets are
because of the long suture line or the use of
tightened between the tricuspid annulus along the base of
polypropylene suture material, which may break and
the posterior leaflet. Thus, this suture is less likely to
slide through the tissue as the annulus dilates [13]. The
break, not come loose, not cut through the annulus, and
anatomic studies of Deloche and coworkers [14]
reduces the dilated anulus to an almost normal diameter
suggested that functional TR is related to the asymmetric
size. In addition, the modified De Vega technique main-
dilation of the tricuspid valve, which mainly affects the
tains a trileaflet valve with a more physiologic, stabilized
posteroexternal half of the tricuspid circumference.
annulus. Third, the suture was tied down snugly over a
Furthermore, these changes involve both the anterior and
Hegar dilator, to allow tight closure, which decreases the
posterior annulus rather than the septum. Hence, the
likelihood of polypropylene suture material breaking and
ideal annuloplasty device should take into account the
sliding through the tissue as the annulus dilates, and
geometric changes and restore or allow the normal three-
hence, late tricuspid stenosis.
dimensional elliptical shape of the annulus to reduce
leaflet stress and possible tethering.
On the basis of this concept, as illustrated by Figure 1, Risk Factors for Recurrent TR
the modified De Vega annuloplasty plicated in Well-known risk factors for residual TR were also found
counterclockwise direction the junction of the annulus in this study [15]. Risk factor analysis using logistic
and the right ventricle along the septal and posterior regression revealed that pulmonary hypertension,
leaflets and the midportion of the anulus of the anterior severity of preoperative TR, and atrial fibrillation were
leaflet, and then, tied down snugly over a Hegar dilator, found to be risk factors for the development of
the suture does not cover the annulus from anteroseptal recurrent TR. Significantly, tricuspid annuloplasty type
commissure on the left to midseptal region (coronary was not found to be a risk factor for recurrent TR.
1292 HUANG ET AL Ann Thorac Surg
SUTURE AND RINGS ANNULOPLASTY FOR FUNCTIONAL TR 2014;97:1286–93
Clinical Assessment tricuspid valve repair with rigid annuloplasty rings. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:1050–5.
Our present study has shown that at 1 year and 5 years, 2. Navia JL, Nowicki ER, Blackstone EH, et al. Surgical man-
Kaplan-Meier survival rates, freedom from reoperation, agement of secondary tricuspid valve regurgitation: annulus,
and improvement in NYHA functional class showed no commissure, or leaflet procedure? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
significant differences between the two groups. Although 2010;139:1473–82.
ADULT CARDIAC
INVITED COMMENTARY
The article by Huang and colleagues [1], comparing They have compared two techniques: a modified De
tricuspid valve (TV) repair techniques, clearly demonstrates Vega technique and a complete ring annuloplasty, which
the need for and outcomes of correcting tricuspid was pioneered by Dr Carpentier of France. The operative
regurgitation (TR) of all causes. They have collected mortality and the long-term correction of TR in their
these data from over 400 patients over a 12-year period, hands have produced enviable results. They are to be
with a very good follow-up. complimented especially for the very low mortality for a