The document discusses the canon of construction known as "expressio unius est exclusio alterius". This canon presumes that when a statute specifically enumerates items, it intends to restrict the meaning of the statute to just those enumerated items and exclude any others. However, the canon does not apply if it appears the legislature did not intend the enumeration to be exclusive, or if the items are listed as examples only. The canon is based on the idea that the legislature would not specifically list items without intending to limit the statute's application to just those items.
The document discusses the canon of construction known as "expressio unius est exclusio alterius". This canon presumes that when a statute specifically enumerates items, it intends to restrict the meaning of the statute to just those enumerated items and exclude any others. However, the canon does not apply if it appears the legislature did not intend the enumeration to be exclusive, or if the items are listed as examples only. The canon is based on the idea that the legislature would not specifically list items without intending to limit the statute's application to just those items.
The document discusses the canon of construction known as "expressio unius est exclusio alterius". This canon presumes that when a statute specifically enumerates items, it intends to restrict the meaning of the statute to just those enumerated items and exclude any others. However, the canon does not apply if it appears the legislature did not intend the enumeration to be exclusive, or if the items are listed as examples only. The canon is based on the idea that the legislature would not specifically list items without intending to limit the statute's application to just those items.
It is based on the presumption that the legislature would not
have made specific enumerations in a statute had the
STATCON / Finals Reviewer / SY 2018-2019 intention been not to restrict its meaning and to confine its terms to those expressly mentioned. However, it does not apply where the legislative did not intend for the enumeration Interpretation of Words and Phrases to be exclusive or where the enumeration is listed only to show examples. Canons of Construction – are a set of background norms and Dissimilum Dissimilis Est Ratio – distinguishing when there conventions that are widely used by courts when interpreting are facts and circumstances showing that the legislature statutes. Courts invoke canons of construction to avoid intended a distinction or qualification. declaring a law unconstitutional. Casus Omisus Pro Omisso Habendus Est – a person, object, Classified as substantive and linguistic or thing omitted from an enumeration must be held to have - Substantive canons can challenge the legislative been omitted intentionally; applies only when the omission is supremacy insofar as their purpose is to promote policies clearly established. external to a statute while the purpose of linguistic canon is to decipher the legislature’s intent. - “inclusio unius est exclusion alterius” – inclusion of the one is exclusion of the other Although the ascertainment of the purpose of the enactment Construction of Statute as a Whole is a step in the process of ascertaining the meaning of the intent; the reason for the enactment must necessarily shed Tenor considerable light on the law of the statue, the enactment should be construed with reference to its intended scope and out its purpose and court should seek to carry out this purpose rather than defeat it. Canons are not divine directives but tools that can aid in interpretation. They are not given persuasive effect because they can always be trumped by express statutory language. General and Particular Uses of Words: - A statute is not rendered void merely because it used general words. - Rule #1 in StatCon – The terms used are generally to be given their ordinary meaning. However, if the literal meaning of the word would lead to absurdity, it could be construed according to the spirit of the law. Words and phrases used in a stature should also be given their plain, ordinary, and common usage meaning in the absence of the legislative intent to the contrary. Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterius – the express mention of one person, thing, act, or consequence excludes all others.