Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Total Rewards Program
Total Rewards Program
[Name of Instructor]
[Subject]
[Date]
ASSIGNMENT 1
The Geico total reward Model that establishes the bases to design reward packages that
obtain, on the one hand, the satisfaction and commitment of the employees and, on the other, the
good performance of the organization. This model establishes that in order to design a Geico
total reward strategy it is necessary for the organization to take into account external agents
(economy, labour market, culture and regulations) and strategic elements (organizational culture,
business strategy and human resources strategy) (Victor & Hoole, 2017). This analysis allows us
to understand the environment and the company to combine, in the most appropriate way to each
Compensation: compensation given to a worker for the administrations gave (e.g. time,
exertion, and aptitudes). This incorporates both the settled and the variable connected to
execution.
Benefits: are programs that the business uses to enhance money pay. Advantages, for
example, wellbeing, monetary insurance, funds, and retirement programs offer security to
programs that, together with the philosophy, support and help the employee to achieve
Recognition: are programs that value the actions, efforts, behaviours or performance of
employees. They strengthen the business system by strengthening certain practices (e.g.
ASSIGNMENT 2
Performance management: consists of aligning the efforts that must be made individually
Development of talent: gives representatives the chance and the devices to propel their
abilities and skills in both their here and now and long haul professions.
The key to the success of the design of the Geico total reward consists of combining these
elements forming a remunerative mix that responds to the needs of the business and the
organization, to its culture, strategy, life cycle, without forgetting at any time the satisfaction of
the employees (Lyons & Ben-Ora, 2002). To implement a Geico total reward strategy it is
important:
Be aware of the environment: know the sector, the applicable legislation, the labour
Know the organization: keep in mind the mission, vision and values. Know the strategy
Design a tailor-made Geico total reward strategy: taking as a reference what competitors
do does not always work. A certain remunerative mix can work perfectly in one
Understand the different elements of reward and manage them together: it is important to
visualize the strategy of Geico total reward as a puzzle in which each reward element is a
piece. Managing in isolation each element will only produce higher costs, lower return on
Consider employees as an asset and not as a cost: conceiving employees as the main asset
concerns and offering them, through reward, what they really need as long as it is
In short, what the Geico total reward Model allows us is to design a reward strategy that
increases the company's competitive advantage while increasing employee satisfaction and
Models or Flexible Reward Plans allow the employees to choose on the composition of
their total reward, both in regards to your cash as to the social benefits they receive, always
complying with the regulations in strength of each country. This reward scheme allows
organizations, in addition to adapt to the needs of workers, increase your net salary without
additional salary costs for the company (Smit et.al, 2015). The flexibility of these models is
based on offering the possibility for workers to replace payments money for payments in kind.
This choice, despite decreasing its gross salary, increases its final liquidity as it reduces yields of
work subject to taxation thanks to the best tax treatment that grants in US certain forms of
This aspect is important when designing the package of benefits that the company offers
to employees because the positive fiscal repercussions are, in many cases, increase the
attractiveness and profitability for the worker who perceive this reward (Gulyani & Sharma,
2018). However, these models should not be understood only as a tax saving instrument for
employees since, if so, these systems would not be valid in those countries whose labour and
ASSIGNMENT 4
fiscal legislation did not favour any form of retribution in kind. Flexible compensation offers
On the other hand, this reward system does not only pursue economic purposes but also
aims to offer a deal customized to the worker, adapting to their needs personal according to these
vary. The adaptation of the reward to the interests of workers increases their link with the
company. It responds with it to an increasingly diverse workforce in its composition: age, sex,
economic situation, family responsibilities, culture, etc., with very different needs. That
adaptation individual reward increases the perception of equity of the workers in the distribution
of benefits (Werner et.al, 2017). From the point of view of the company, the professional partner
of his reward package achieves that the employee values much more the effort made by the
company for his person and their needs, increasing the perception personnel of the total
compensation received.
employer. The way to manage it has evolved over time as the characteristics and aspirations of
companies and workers. From a routine view, the retribution has gone from being considered
strategic, not only because of its economic importance, for its impact on other aspects of the
organization (Victor & Hoole, 2017). The shape of compensating the staff is a key instrument
not only inhuman resources policies, but also for one's own business strategy In this sense,
companies are each day more aware that, acting in this field, they can have the best professionals
and improve their performance by acting on the behaviour of workers and their job satisfaction.
On the other hand, in situations of economic crisis the appropriate talent management becomes a
ASSIGNMENT 5
critical concern for the companies that consider this fundamental element for its survival and
growth as a source of advantages competitive ones (Pregnolato et.al, 2017). It is now when it
becomes more important to retain, attract and manage talent appropriately to face the new
In this context, organizations they need talented managers, talented employees and ideas
innovators. In addition, the retention of this talent is vital, because the talent of a company is not
their property, where workers can change your organization according to your interests and take
with you they the source of value they represent. In addition, economic crises cause companies
to confront the challenges of recruiting, selecting and retaining the "best" with very limited
funds. The fact that many organizations can not increase the budget line intended for salaries
forces them to offer other solutions in this field that maintain the attractiveness of the company
(Haider et.al, 2015). Before these challenges, improved human resource practices can facilitate
the relations between company and employee, offering new alternatives that improve the
compensation systems in emerging markets contribute to the company's ability to attract, Loyalty
With its application, companies want to influence the perception that their workers have
about the support and concern shown by the organization towards their well-being, with the
purpose to improve your satisfaction and increase your loyalty to the company. This results in an
increase in the capacity of retention of the company that is reflected in a decrease in the rate of
external or voluntary rotation (McCormick, 2015). There are several theories that can support the
previous ones reasoning. In the same way the approach based on the adjustment between the
person and the organization defends that employees are more attracted to organizations that they
ASSIGNMENT 6
meet their needs and demands. Dice that flexible compensation plans offer high flexibility that
allows employees to choose the benefits they want to receive and the percentage of the salary
that they want to dedicate to this purpose, the individuals can design their own compensation
The study of the current situation in the US organizations in the field of labour
motivation revealed the following problems that impede the development of personnel reward
systems, weak flexibility and inadequacy of changes in the external and internal environment,
lack of readiness to introduce advanced personnel reward systems and changes in personnel
management approaches, lack of awareness of the prevailing labour values and motives, the
instability of the financial situation and external conditions for the functioning of organizations
There are a number of personal circumstances, such as age, gender, marital status and
number of children, which influence the individual's preference for data benefits. As people in
different life situations have different needs. Considering the traditional packages that do not
take these differences into account, it is to be expected that many people will not have the
additional benefits they would like; which means that many benefit packages do not give a
positive return on their costs (Werner et.al, 2017). A flexible benefit plan makes it clear to
employees exactly how much the organization is expending to compensate them, and ensures
One of the ways to overcome these problems is to create an in-house personnel reward
system aimed at unlocking the potential of each employee through encouraging productivity,
ASSIGNMENT 7
quality of work, recognition of creativity, performance and initiative all those qualities that
contribute to effective performance and lead to the achievement of strategic goals. The absence
in domestic organizations of traditions and technologies for creating a reward system creates the
need to develop a methodology for its construction that is adequate to market relations (Lyons &
Ben-Ora, 2002). You can assess the impact of the implementation of a staff reward system on its
resource management system, on improving the quality of employees and increase their
satisfaction.
ASSIGNMENT 8
References
Gulyani, G., & Sharma, T. (2018, June). Total rewards components and work happiness in new
Haider, M., Aamir, A., Abdul Hamid, A. B., & Hashim, M. (2015). A literature Analysis on the
Lyons, F. H., & Ben-Ora, D. (2002). Total rewards strategy: The best foundation of pay for
Pregnolato, M., Bussin, M. H., & Schlechter, A. F. (2017). Total rewards that retain: A study of
Smit, W., Stanz, K., & Bussin, M. (2015). Retention preferences and the relationship between
Victor, J., & Hoole, C. (2017). The influence of organisational rewards on workplace trust and
Werner, S., Blair Jones, C. C. P., CBP, C., John Borneman, C. E. C. P., Brooks, J., Reda, J. F., ...
& Watson, W. T. (2017). 06 Adapting Total Rewards to Industry Factors: The Case of