Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Literature Review Domain B
Literature Review Domain B
Literature Review Domain B
B 1
Andres Gonzalez
National University
LITERATURE REVIEW: DOMAIN B 2
Abstract
This Literature Review will examine one of artifacts I have chosen to include in domain
B of my Professional Development Quest Portfolio. The artifact chosen is an exit ticket given to
a third grade student aligning to standard 3.NF.A.2 understanding fractions on a number line.
The article Exit Tickets Open the Door to University Learning examines a study done by Four
instructors from a mid-western university who implemented exit tickets for university courses.
These tickets are based on Robert Marzano’s types of exit tickets. Upon completion, surveys
were done to determine the benefits of using this type of formative assessment. This review
highlights their findings and why I use exit tickets in the classroom.
LITERATURE REVIEW: DOMAIN B 3
is was not very difficult choosing an exit ticket to align with Teacher Performance Expectations
2 and 3. TPE 2 states “Candidates use multiple measures for progress monitoring throughout
instruction to determine if all students are understanding content and making progress toward
identified key concepts from state-adopted academic standards (CCTC, 2013, p. 11).” The use of
an exit ticket meets this expectation. Artifact 3 within domain B is an exit ticket given in my
third grade class focusing on standard 3.NF.A.2.This standard focuses on student’s ability to
understand fractions on a number line. For mastery of the standard students should be able to
represent a fraction on a number line diagram by defining the interval from 0 to 1 as a whole and
According to the article Exit Tickets Open the Door to University Learning, exit tickets
provide an easy way to assess student learning. The article is based on a study of four university
professors giving exit tickets to university students to determine the benefits of exit tickets as
formative assessment. These benefits include teachers refining practice based on student need,
the stimulation of student self-analysis, and data collection (Angela, 2016, p. 48.).
information needed to make any adjustments to my instruction. My exit ticket also shows a
response to a prompt highlighted in the university study from Robert Marzano. Marzano’s
prompt asks students to rate their level of understanding. Students use a number scale from one
to four ranging from 1 totally lost, 2 confused, 3 understand but can’t explain it, and 4
understand enough to teach. (Marzano, 2012, p. 80). In my artifact my student rated herself a 3
that she understands it enough to get the answer but cannot explain it. This rating allows me to
The rating system is also a great way to stimulate student self-analysis. In other exit
tickets I can ask students to express how hard they worked and why. Marzano states this type of
prompt ask students to “reflect on their effort used in class rather than the content (Marzano,
2012, p.80).” Student self-analysis can also help a teacher in making proper adjustments in
teaching the standards. The teacher can implement various strategies and choose which works
best based on student need. This satisfies TPE 3 in the interpretation and use of assessments.
The article also discusses that exit tickets can be used for data collection. The instructors
provided students with a different exit ticket for four weeks using various prompts from
Marzano. This allowed instructors to document how students respond to various strategies and
hold students accountable for what they were learning. Concluding, exit tickets are a simple
assessment that has numerous benefits for both students and instructors.
LITERATURE REVIEW: DOMAIN B 5
References
Angela, D., McCoy, A., & Weed, R. (2016). Exit Tickets Open the Door to University Learning.
Marzano, R. (2012). Art and science of teaching: The many uses of exit tickets. Educational
leadership.aspx
source/educator-prep/standards/adopted-tpes-2013.pdf