R J E S R: Manuscript Evaluation

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

RESEARCH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES AND REVIEW

http://pearlresearchjournals.org/journals/rjesr/index.html

Manuscript Evaluation
Reviewer’s Information

E-Mail: dewidian.sukmawati@yahoo.com
Title: dr., Sp.P.D., FINASIM
First Name: Nimade Dewi Dian
Last Name: Sukmawati
Affiliation: Sanglah Hospital – Udayana University, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences
Country: Indonesia
Specialization: Internal Medicine

Manuscript Information

Manuscript Number: RJESR-18-017


Manuscript Title: SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR AND THE PERCEPTION OF HIV/AIDS AMONG
YOUTHS IN SOME TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS IN NORTH-WEST,
NIGERIA
Date sent to reviewer 9 October 2018
Date Expected back 19 October 2018

Evaluation Report

Kindly enter commentspersection ofthe manuscript

The topic is not novel, writing style is not comply with the RJSER author
General comment:
instruction.

Not to the point, using pointless statemenr from outdated references.


Statement of problem and hypothesis better be written in sentences not
Introduction:
numbered or bulleted points.

Methodology: Without ethical consideration, date of study is not mentioned. Research


instrument not standardized and without proper validation method. Better

RESEARCH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES AND REVIEW


provide the full questionnaire as supplemental data.

No demographic data presented. Table 1 is not necessary as in narration


also mentioned exactly the same things. Table 2 is confusing as none
mentioned on how to measure positive or negative perception. The
Results: statement at page 10, first sentence also presumptive since the data in
table 2 can not conclude that. We are not sure whether chi-square is
appropriate for the hypothesis testing, as the variables are confusing.

The supporting facts mentioned, mostly the author assumption on the


matters without solid scientific background or data. Conclusion is not in one
Discussion:
alignment with study questions and hypotheses

Bibliography/References: All out of date (more than 10 years back)

Others:

Decision: Rejected

Please rate thefollowing:(1 = Excellent) (2 = Good) (3 = Fair) (4= Poor)

Originality: 3
Contribution To The Field: 4
Technical Quality: 4
Clarity Of Presentation : 4
Depth Of Research: 4

Recommandation

Kindlymark with an X

RESEARCH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES AND REVIEW


Accept As Is:
Requires Minor Corrections:
Requires Moderate Revision:
Requires Major Revision:
Submit To Another Publication Such As:
The writing is not comply to the author instruction.
Poor methodology, unstandardized instruments
Reject on grounds of (Please be specific) X without proper validation and pointless statistical
analysis. Results is presented poorly, conclusions is
not in aligned with study questions and hypotheses

Additional Comments
Please add any additional comments (Including comments/suggestions regarding online supplementary
materials, if any):

RESEARCH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES AND REVIEW

You might also like