ⓘ Optimized by Google just now View original

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_Nigeria

Colonial Nigeria

Colonial Nigeria was the area of West Africa that later evolved into the modern day Nigeria, during
the time of British rule in the 19th and 20th centuries. British influence in the region began with the
prohibition of slave trade to British subjects in 1807. Britain annexed Lagos in 1861 and established
the Oil River Protectorate in 1884. British influence in the Niger area increased gradually over the
19th century, but Britain did not effectively occupy the area until 1885. Other European powers
acknowledged Britain's power over the area in the 1885 Berlin Conference.

Colony and Protectorate of Nigeria

British colony
1914–1960

Flag
Coat of arms

Anthem
God Save the King (1914–1952)
God Save the Queen (1952–1960)

0:00

Nigeria (red)
British possessions in Africa (pink)
1914
Capital Lagos
Languages English
Hausa
Igbo
Yoruba
Government British Crown colony
High Commissioner/Governor
 •  1914–1919 Sir Frederick John Dealtry Lugard

 •  1955–1960 Sir James Wilson Robertson

History
 •  Established 1 January 1914
 •  Disestablished 1 October 1960
Area
 •  1924 336,700 km2 (130,000 sq mi)
Population
 •  1924 est. 18,500,000 

     Density 55/km2 (142/sq mi)

Currency British West African pound (1914–1958)
Nigerian Pound (from 1958)

Preceded by Succeeded by

Northern Nigeria Protectorate Federation of Nigeria

Southern Nigeria Protectorate
Source for 1924 area and population: [1]

From 1886 to 1899, much of the country was ruled by the Royal Niger Company, authorized by
charter, and governed by George Taubman Goldie. In 1900, the Southern Nigeria Protectorate and
Northern Nigeria Protectorate passed from company hands to the Crown. At the urging of governor
Frederick Lugard, the two territories were amalgamated as the Colony and Protectorate of Nigeria,
while maintaining considerable regional autonomy among the three major regions. Progressive
constitutions after World War II provided for increasing representation and electoral government by
Nigerians. The colonial period proper in Nigeria lasted from 1900 to 1960, after which Nigeria
gained its independence.

Overview

Through a progressive sequence of regimes the British imposed Crown Colony government on the
area of West Africa which came to be known as Nigeria, a form of rule which was both autocratic
and bureaucratic. After initially adopting an indirect rule approach, in 1906 the British merged the
small Lagos Colony and the Southern Nigeria Protectorate into a new Colony of Southern Nigeria,
and in 1914 that was combined with the Northern Nigeria Protectorate to form the Colony and
Protectorate of Nigeria.[2] Administration and military control of the territory was conducted
primarily by white Britons, both in London and in Nigeria.[3]

Following military conquest, the British imposed an economic system designed to profit from
African labour. The essential basis of this system was a money economy—specifically the British
pound sterling—which could be demanded through taxation, paid to cooperative natives, and levied
as a fine.[4][5]

The amalgamation of different ethnic and religious groups into one federation created internal
tension which persists in Nigeria to the present day.[6]

Origins of British influence

In the 1700s, the British Empire and other European powers had settlements and forts in West
Africa but had not yet established the full-scale plantation colonies which existed in the Americas.
Adam Smith wrote in 1776 that the African societies were better established and more populous
than those of the Americas, thus creating a more formidable barrier to European expansion.[7][8]

Earlier elements related to this were its founding of the colony at Sierra Leone in 1787 as a refuge
for freed slaves, the independent missionary movement intended to bring Christianity to the Edo
Empire, and programs of exploration sponsored by learned societies and scientific groups, such as
the London-based African Association.

Local leaders, cognizant of the situation in the West Indies, India, and elsewhere, recognized the
risks of British expansion. A chief of Bonny in 1860 explained that he refused a British treaty due to
the tendency to "induce the Chiefs to sign a treaty whose meaning they did not understand, and
then seize upon the country."[9]

Slave trade and abolition

Map of Negroland and Guinea including the Slave Coast, 1736, by London cartographer Hermann Moll

European slave trading from West Africa began before 1650, with people taken at a rate of about
3,000 per year. This rate rose to 20,000 per year in the last quarter of the century. The slave trade
was heaviest in the period 1700–1850, with an average of 76,000 people taken from Africa each
year between 1783 and 1792. At first, the trade centred around West Central Africa, now the Congo.
But in the 1700s, the Bight of Benin (also known as the Slave Coast) became the next most
important hub. Ouidah (now part of Benin) and Lagos were the major ports on the coast. From
1790–1807, predominantly British slave traders purchased 1,000–2,000 slaves each year in Lagos
alone. The trade subsequently continued under the Portuguese. In the Bight of Biafra, the major
ports were Old Calabar (Akwa Akpa), Bonny, and New Calabar.[10] Starting in 1740, the British were
the primary European slave trafficker from this area.[7] In 1767, British traders facilitated a notorious
massacre of hundreds of people at Calabar after inviting them onto their ships, ostensibly to settle a
local dispute.[11]

In 1807 the Parliament of the United Kingdom enacted the Slave Trade Act, prohibiting British
subjects from participating in the slave trade. Britain subsequently lobbied other European powers
to stop the slave trade as well. It made anti-slavery treaties with West African powers, which it
enforced militarily. Some of the treaties contained prohibitions on diplomacy conducted without
British permission, or other promises to abide by British rule.[12] This scenario provided an
opportunity for naval expeditions and reconnaissance throughout the region. Britain also annexed
Freetown in Sierra Leone, declaring it a Crown Colony in 1808.[13]

The decrease in trade indirectly led to the collapse of states like the Edo Empire. Britain withdrew
from the slave trade when it was the major transporter of slaves to the Americas. The French had
abolished slavery following the French Revolution, although it briefly re-established it in its
Caribbean colonies under Napoleon. France sold Louisiana to the United States in 1803, the same
year that it gave up on trying to regain Saint-Domingue. By the end of the Napoleonic Wars, it ended
slavery in its possessions. Between them, the French and the British had purchased a majority of
the slaves sold from the ports of Edo. The economy suffered from the decline in the slave trade,
although considerable smuggling of slaves to the Americas continued for years afterwards.

Lagos became a major slave port in the late 1700s and into the 1850s. Much of the human
trafficking which occurred there was nominally illegal, and records from this time and place are not
comprehensive. According to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Voyage Database, 308,800 were sold across
the Atlantic from Lagos in 1776–1850. British and French traders did a large share of this business
until 1807, when they were replaced by Portuguese and Spanish. By 1826–1850 the British navy
was interfering significantly with Lagos slave exports.[14]

Whether British conquest of Nigeria resulted from a benevolent motive to end slavery, or more
instrumental motives of wealth and power, remains a topic of dispute between African and
European historians.[15] Many locals remained unconvinced of the Crown's authority to completely
reverse the legal and moral attributes of a social institution through fiat.[16] Regardless, slavery had
decimated the population and fuelled militarization and chaos, thereby paving the way for more
aggressive colonisation.[14][17]

Missionaries
Portuguese Roman Catholic priests who accompanied traders and officials to the West African
coast introduced Christianity to the Edo Empire in the fifteenth century. Several churches were built
to serve the Edo community and a small number of African converts. When direct Portuguese
contacts in the region were withdrawn, however, the influence of the Catholic missionaries waned.
By the eighteenth century, evidence of Christianity had disappeared.

Although churchmen in Britain had been influential in the drive to abolish the slave trade, significant
missionary activity for Africa did not develop until the 1840s. For some time, missionaries operated
in the area between Lagos and Ibadan. The first missions were opened by the Church of England's
Church Missionary Society (CMS). Other Protestant denominations from Britain, Canada, and the
United States also opened missions and, in the 1860s, Roman Catholic religious orders established
missions. Protestant missionaries tended to divide the country into spheres of activity to avoid
competition with each other, and Catholic missions similarly avoided duplication of effort among
the several religious orders working there. Catholic missionaries were particularly active among the
Igbo; the CMS worked among the Yoruba.

The CMS initially promoted Africans to responsible positions in the mission field; for instance, they
appointed Samuel Ajayi Crowther as the first Anglican bishop of the Niger. Crowther, a liberated
Yoruba slave, had been educated in Sierra Leone and in Britain, where he was ordained before
returning to his homeland with the first group of CMS missionaries. The Anglicans and other
religious groups had a conscious "native church" policy to develop indigenous ecclesiastical
institutions to become independent of Europeans. Crowther was succeeded as bishop by a British
cleric. In the long term, the acceptance of Christianity by large numbers of Nigerians depended on
the various denominations adapting to local conditions. They selected an increasingly high
proportion of African clergy for the missions.

In large measure, European missionaries assumed the value of colonial rule in terms of promoting
education, health and welfare measures, so they effectively reinforced colonial policy. Some African
Christian communities formed their own independent churches.

(Note: All of this section to this point is from Nigeria: A Country Study (1991) prepared by staff of the
Library of Congress of the United States.)[18]

The missionaries gained in power throughout the 1800s. They caused major transformations in
traditional society as they eroded the religious institutions such as human sacrifice, infanticide, and
secret societies, which had formerly played a role in political authority and community life.[19]

Commerce

The principal commodities of legitimate trade were palm oil and palm kernels, which were used in
Europe to make soap and as lubricants for machinery, before petroleum products were developed
for that purpose. Although this trade grew to significant proportions—palm oil exports alone were
worth £1 billion a year by 1840—it was concentrated near the coast, where palm trees grew in
abundance. Gradually, however, the trade forced major economic and social changes in the interior,
although it hardly undermined slavery and the slave trade. The incidence of slavery in local societies
increased.

Initially most palm oil (and later kernels) came from Igboland, where palm trees formed a canopy
over the densely inhabited areas of the Ngwa, Nri Kingdom, Awka, and other Igbo peoples. Palm oil
was used locally for cooking, the kernels were a source for food, trees were tapped for palm wine,
and the fronds were used for building material. It was a relatively simple adjustment for many Igbo
families to transport the oil to rivers and streams that led to the Niger Delta for sale to European
merchants. The rapid expansion in exports, especially after 1830, occurred precisely at the time
slave exports collapsed. The Igbo redirected slaves into the domestic economy, especially to grow
the staple food crop, yams, in northern Igboland for marketing throughout the palm-tree belt. As
before, Aro merchants dominated trade in the hinterland, including palm products to the coast and
the sale of slaves within Igboland.

From 1815–1840, palm oil exports increased by a factor of 25, from 800 to 20,000 tons per year.
British merchants led the trade in palm oil, while the Portuguese and others continued the slave
trade.[7] Much of this oil was sold elsewhere in the British Empire.[20] To produce all this oil, the
economy of the southern region crossed over from mostly subsistence to the production of palm oil
as a cash crop.[21]

The Niger Delta and Calabar, which once had been known for the export of slaves, became notable
for the export of palm oil. The Delta streams were called "oil rivers." The basic economic units in
each town were "houses," family-operated entities that engendered loyalty for its employees. A
"house" included the extended family of the trader, including retainers and slaves. As its head, the
master trader taxed other traders who were members of his "house;" he maintained a war vessel, a
large dugout canoe that could hold several tons of cargo and dozens of crew, for the defence of the
harbour. Whenever a trader had become successful enough to keep a war canoe, he was expected
to form his own "house". Economic competition among these "houses" was so fierce that trade
often erupted into armed battle between the crews of the large canoes.

Because of the hazards of climate and tropical diseases for Europeans and the absence of any
centralized authorities on the mainland responsive to their interests, European merchants moored
their ships outside harbours or in the delta, and used the ships as trading stations and warehouses.
In time they built depots onshore and eventually moved up the Niger River to establish stations in
the interior. An example was that at Onitsha, where they could bargain directly with local suppliers
and purchase products likely to turn a profit.

Some European traders switched to legitimate business only when the commerce in slaves became
too hazardous. The traders suffered from the risks of their position and believed they were at the
mercy of the coastal rulers, whom they considered unpredictable. Accordingly, as the volume of
trade increased, merchants requested that the British government appoint a consul to cover the
region. Consequently, in 1849, John Beecroft was accredited as consul for the bights of Benin and
Biafra, a jurisdiction stretching from Dahomey to Cameroon. Beecroft was the British representative
to Fernando Po, where the prevention squadron of the British Royal Navy was stationed.
In 1850, the British created a "Court of Equity" at Bonny, overseen by Beecroft, which would deal with
trade disputes. Another court was established in 1856 at Calabar, based on an agreement with local
Efik traders which prohibited them from interfering with British merchants. These courts contained
majorities British members and represented a new level of presumptive British sovereignty in the
Bight of Biafra.[12]

West Africa also bought British exports, supplying 30–40% of the demand for British cotton during
the Industrial Revolution of 1750–1790.[20]

Exploration

At the same time, the British scientists were interested in exploring the course and related
settlements along the Niger River. The delta masked the mouth of the great river, and for centuries
Nigerians chose not to tell Europeans the secrets of the interior. In 1794 the African Association in
Great Britain commissioned Mungo Park, an intrepid Scottish physician and naturalist, to search for
the headwaters of the Niger and follow the river downstream. Park reached the upper Niger the next
year by travelling inland from the Gambia River. Although he reported on the eastward flow of the
Niger, he was forced to turn back when his equipment was lost to Muslim Arab slave traders. In
1805 he set out on a second expedition, sponsored by the British government, to follow the Niger to
the sea. His mission failed, but Park and his party covered more than 1,500 kilometres, passing
through the western portions of the Sokoto Caliphate, before drowning when their boats overturned
in rapids near Bussa.

On a subsequent expedition to the Sokoto Caliphate, Hugh Clapperton learned about the mouth of
the Niger River, where it reached the sea, but he died before confirming it. His servant, Richard
Lander, and Lander's brother John were the ones to demonstrate that the Niger flowed into the sea.
The Lander brothers were seized by slave traders in the interior and sold down the river to a waiting
European ship.

Initial British attempts to open trade with the interior by way of the Niger could not overcome
climate and diseases such as malaria. A third of the people associated with an 1842 riverine
expedition died. In the 1850s, the benefits of quinine had been found to combat malaria, and aided
by the medicine, a Liverpool merchant, Macgregor Laird, opened the river. Laird's efforts were
stimulated by the detailed reports of a pioneer German explorer, Heinrich Barth, who travelled
through much of Borno and the Sokoto Caliphate, where he recorded information about the region's
geography, economy, and inhabitants.

First colonial claims

Lagos Colony
Flag of the Lagos Colony (1886-1906)

As part of an anti-slavery campaign and a pretext for making inroads into Lagos, Britain bombarded
Lagos in November 1851, ousted the pro-slavery Oba Kosoko and established a treaty with the
newly installed Oba Akintoye, who was more amenable. Lagos was annexed as a Crown Colony in
1861 via the Lagos Treaty of Cession.

British expansion accelerated in the last decades of the nineteenth century. The early history of
Lagos Colony was one of repeated attempts to end the Yoruba wars. In the face of threats to the
divided Yoruba states from Dahomey and the Sokoto Caliphate, as represented by the emirate of
Ilorin, the British governor—assisted by the CMS—succeeded in imposing peace settlements on the
interior.

Colonial Lagos was a busy, cosmopolitan port. Its architecture was in both Victorian and Brazilian
style, as many of the black elite were English-speakers from Sierra Leone and freedmen repatriated
from Brazil and Cuba. Its residents were employed in official capacities and were active in business.
Africans also were represented on the Lagos Legislative Council, a largely appointed assembly. The
Colony was ultimately governed by the British Colonial Office in London.[22]

Captain John Glover, the colony's administrator, created a militia of Hausa troops in 1861. This
became the Lagos Constabulary, and subsequently the Nigerian Police Force.[23]

In 1880, the British government and traders demonetized the Maria Theresa dollar, to the
considerable dismay of its local holders, in favour of the pound.[4] In 1891, the African Banking
Corporation founded the Bank of British West Africa in Lagos.[24]

Oil Rivers Protectorate

Queen Victoria on a stamp of the Niger Coast Protectorate of 1894

After the Berlin Conference of 1884, Britain announced formation of the Oil Rivers Protectorate,
which included the Niger Delta and extended eastward to Calabar, where the British consulate
general was relocated from Fernando Po. The protectorate was organized to control and develop
trade coming down the Niger. Vice consuls were assigned to ports that already had concluded
treaties of cooperation with the Foreign Office. Local rulers continued to administer their territories,
but consular authorities assumed jurisdiction for the equity courts established earlier by the foreign
mercantile communities. A constabulary force was raised and used to pacify the coastal area.

In 1894 the territory was redesignated the Niger Coast Protectorate and was expanded to include
the region from Calabar to Lagos Colony and Protectorate, including the hinterland, and northward
up the Niger River as far as Lokoja, the headquarters of the Royal Niger Company. As a protectorate,
it did not have the status of a colony, so its officials were appointed by the Foreign Office and not by
the Colonial Office.[22]

In 1891, the Consulate established the Niger Coast Protectorate Force or "Oil Rivers Irregulars".[23]

Royal Niger Company

Ensign of the Royal Niger Company (1888-1899)

British stamps used in 1898 at Akassa by the Royal Niger Company

The legitimate trade in commodities attracted a number of rough-hewn British merchants to the
Niger River, as well as some men who had been formerly engaged in the slave trade but who now
changed their line of wares. The large companies that subsequently opened depots in the delta
cities and in Lagos were as ruthlessly competitive as the delta towns themselves and frequently
used force to compel potential suppliers to agree to contracts and to meet their demands. To some
extent, competition amongst these companies undermined their collective position vis-a-vis local
merchants.

In the 1870s, therefore, George Taubman Goldie began amalgamating companies into the United
African Company, soon renamed the National African Company.[12] Ultimately, this became the
Royal Niger Company.

The Royal Niger Company established its headquarters far inland at Lokoja, which was the main
trading port of the company,[25] from where it began to assume responsibility for the administration
of areas along the Niger and Benue rivers where it maintained depots. It soon gained a virtual
monopoly over trade along the River[4]

The company interfered in the territory along the Niger and the Benue, sometimes becoming
embroiled in serious conflicts when its British-led native constabulary intercepted slave raids or
attempted to protect trade routes. The company negotiated treaties with Sokoto, Gwandu, and Nupe
that were interpreted as guaranteeing exclusive access to trade in return for the payment of annual
tribute. Officials of the Sokoto Caliphate considered these treaties quite differently; from their
perspective, the British were granted only extraterritorial rights that did not prevent similar
arrangements with the Germans and the French and certainly did not surrender sovereignty.

Even before gaining its charter, the Company signed treaties with local leaders which granted it
broad sovereign powers. One 1885 treaty read:

We, the undersigned King and Chiefs...with the view to the bettering of the
condition of our country and people, do this day cede to the National Africa
Company (Limited), their heirs and assigns, forever, the whole of our
territory...We also give the said National African Company (Limited) full power to
settle all native disputes arising from any cause whatever, and we pledge
ourselves not to enter into any war with other tribes without the sanction of the
said National Africa Company (Limited).

We also understand that the said National African Company (limited) have full
power to mine, farm, and build in any portion of our territory. We bind ourselves
not to have any intercourse with any strangers or foreigners except through the
said national African Company (Limited), and we give the said National African
Company (Limited) full power to exclude all other strangers and foreigners from
their territory at their discretion.

In consideration of the foregoing, the said National African Company (Limited)

bind themselves not to interfere with any of the native laws or customs of the
country, consistently with the maintenance of order and good government...[and]
agree to pay native owners of land a reasonable amount for any portion they may
require.

The said National African Company (Limited) bind themselves to protect the said
King and Chiefs from the attacks of any neighbouring tribes (Ibid.).[12]
The company considered itself the sole legitimate government of the area, with executive,
legislative, and judicial powers all subordinate to the rule of a council created by the company board
of directors in London. The council was headed by a governor. The deputy governor served as
political administrator for company territory, and appointed three officials in Nigeria to carry out the
work of administration. These were the agent general, the senior judicial officer, and the
commandant of the constabulary.[26] However, the company did accept that local kings could act as
partners in governance and trade. It therefore hired native intermediaries who could conduct
diplomacy, trade, and intelligence work in the local area.[27]

The company, as was common among European businesses in Africa, paid its native workers in
barter. At the turn of the century, top wages were four bags of salt (company retail price, 3s 9d) for a
month of work.[5] Trade was also conducted through a mechanism of barter and credit. Goods were
made available on credit to African middlemen, who were expected to trade them at a pre-arranged
price and deliver the proceeds to the company. The company's major imports to the area included
gin and low-quality firearms.[4]

By the 1880s, the National African Company became the dominant commercial power, increasing
from 19 to 39 stations between 1882 and 1893. In 1886, Taubman secured a royal charter and his
company became the Royal Niger Company. The charter allowed the company to collect customs
and make treaties with local leaders.[5]

Under Goldie's direction, the Royal Niger Company was instrumental in depriving France and
Germany of access to the region. Consequently, he may well deserve the epithet of the "father of
Nigeria," which historians accorded him. He definitely laid the basis for British claims.
The Royal Niger Company had its own armed forces.[23] This included a river fleet which it used for
retaliatory attacks on uncooperative villages.[4]

Britain's imperialistic posture became more aggressive towards the end of the century. The
appointment of Joseph Chamberlain as colonial secretary in 1895 especially marked a shift
towards new territorial ambitions of the British Empire.[28] Economically, local colonial
administrators also pushed for the imposition of British colonial rule, believing that trade and
taxation conducted in British pounds would prove far more lucrative than a barter trade which
yielded only inconsistent customs duties.[4]

Military conquest

The British led a series of military campaigns to enlarge its sphere of influence and expand its
commercial opportunities. Most of the fighting was done by Hausa soldiers, recruited to fight
against other groups. The superior weapons, tactics, and political unity of the British are commonly
given as reasons for their decisive ultimate victory.[29][30]

In 1892 the British forces set out to fight the Ijebu Kingdom, which had resisted missionaries and
foreign traders. The legal justification for this campaign was a treaty signed in 1886, when the
British had interceded as peacemakers to end the Ekiti Parapo war, which imposed free trade
requirements and mandated that all parties continue to use British channels for diplomacy.[12]
Although the Ijebu had some weapons they were wiped out by British machine guns called Maxims.
With this victory, the British went on to conquer the rest of Yorubaland, which had also been
weakened by sixteen years of civil war.[31] By 1893, most of the other political entities in Yorubaland
recognized the practical necessity of signing another treaty with the British, this one explicitly
joining them with the protectorate of Lagos.[12][32]

King Koko in His War Canoe, London Daily Graphic, 30 March 1895; depicting King Frederick William Koko—onetime
antagonist to the Royal Niger Company

In 1896–1897 the forces of the Niger Coast Protectorate fought with the remnants of the Edo
Empire. Following the defeat of an unsuccessful foray by Consul General James R. Phillips, a larger
retaliatory force captured Benin City and drove Ovonramwen, the Oba of Benin, into exile.[33]
The British had difficulty conquering Igboland, which lacked central political organization. In the
name of liberating the Igbos from the Aro Confederacy, the British launched the Anglo-Aro War of
1901–1902. Despite conquering villages by burning houses and crops, continual political control
over the Igbo remained elusive.[34][35] The British forces began annual pacification missions to
convince the locals of British supremacy.[36]

A campaign against the Sokoto Caliphate began in 1900 with the creation of the Protectorate of
Northern Nigeria, under the direction of Governor Lugard. The British captured Kano in 1903. Deadly
battles broke out sporadically through 1906.[37] Lugard was slow to describe these excursions to the
Colonial Office, which apparently learned of preparations to attack Kano from the newspapers in
December 1902. Not wishing to appear out of control or weak, they approved the expedition (two
days after it began) on 19 January 1903.[38] In general the Colonial Office allowed Lugard's
expeditions to continue because they were framed as retaliatory and, as Olivier commented in 1906,
"If the millions of people [in Nigeria] who do not want us there once get the notion that our people
can be killed with impunity they will not be slow to attempt it."[39]

Lugard informed the leaders of conquered Sokoto:

The Fulani in old times . . . conquered this country. They took the right to rule
over it, to levy taxes, to depose kings and to create kings. They in turn have by
defeat lost their rule which has come into the hands of the British. All these things
which I have said the Fulani by conquest took the right to do now pass to the
British. Every Sultan and Emir and the principal officers of state will be appointed
by the high Commissioner throughout all this country. The High Commissioner
will be guided by all the usual laws of succession and the wishes of the people and
chief, but will set them aside if he desires for good cause to do so. The Emirs and
chiefs who are appointed will rule over the people as of old time and take such
taxes as are approved by the High Commissioner, but they will obey the laws of
the Governor and will act in accordance with the advice of the Resident. [40]

Political administration under the Crown

Further information: Northern Nigeria Protectorate, Southern Nigeria Protectorate, and Provinces of Nigeria

The British Colonial Office in Westminster, created in the 1860s by architect George Gilbert Scott; illustrated in 1875
Contemporary photograph of the same building, now housing the Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Transition to Crown rule

Concrete plans for transition to Crown rule—direct control by the British government—apparently
began in 1897. In May of this year, Herbert J. Read published a Memorandum on British possessions
in West Africa, which remarked upon the "inconvenient and unscientific boundaries" between Lagos
Colony, the Niger Coast Protectorate, and the Royal Niger Company. Read suggested they be
merged, and more use made of Nigeria's natural resources[41] In the same year, the British created
the Royal West African Frontier Force (RWAFF or WAFF), under the leadership of Colonel Frederick
Lugard. In one year, Lugard recruited 2600 troops, evenly split between Hausa and Yoruba. The
officers of the RWAFF were British. The operations of this force are still not fully known due to a
policy of strict secrecy mandated by the British government.[42]

Guidelines for running the Nigerian colony were established in 1898 by the Niger Committee,
chaired by the Earl of Selborne, in 1898. The British finalized the border between Nigeria and French
West Africa with the Anglo-French Convention of 1898.[43]

The territory of the Royal Niger Company became the Northern Nigeria Protectorate, and the
Company itself became a private corporation which continued to do business in Nigeria. The
Company received £865,000 compensation for the loss of its Charter. It continued to enjoy special
privileges and maintained a de facto monopoly over commerce. Under Lugard from 1900–1906, the
Protectorate consolidated political control over the area through military conquest and initiated the
use of British currency in substitute for barter.[4][5]

Colonial administration

In 1900, the British government assumed control of the Southern and Northern Protectorates, both
of which were ultimately governed by the Colonial Office at Whitehall. The staff of this office came
primarily from the British upper middle class—i.e., university-educated men, primarily not nobility,
with fathers in well-respected professions.[44] The first five heads of the Nigeria Department (1898–
1914) were Reginald Antrobus, William Mercer, William Baillie Hamilton, Sydney Olivier, and Charles
Strachey.[45] Olivier was a member of the Fabian Society and a friend of George Bernard Shaw.[46]

Under the Colonial Office was the governor, who managed administration of his colony and held
powers of emergency rule. The Colonial Office could veto or revise his policies. The seven men who
governed Northern Nigeria, Southern Nigeria, and Lagos through 1914 were Henry McCallum,
William MacGregor, Walter Egerton, Ralph Moor, Percy Girouard, Hesketh Bell, and Frederick Lugard.
Most of these came from military backgrounds. All were knighted.[47]

Undated British archival photo of locomotive in Nigeria

Walter Egerton's sixfold agenda for 1908, as detailed on 29 November 1907, in a telegram to the
Colonial Office, is representative of British priorities.[48]

1. To pacify the country;

2. To established settled government in the newly won districts;

3. To improve and extend native footpaths throughout the country;

4. To construct properly graded roads in the more populated districts;

5. To clear the numerous rivers in the country and make them suitable for
launch and canoe traffic; and

6. To extend the railways.

Egerton also supervised improvements to the Lagos harbour and extension of the local telegraph
network.[48]

From 1895–1900, a railway was constructed running from Lagos to Ibadan; it opened in March
1901. This line was extended to Oshogbo, 100 kilometres (62 mi) away, in 1905–1907, and to
Zungeru and Minna in 1908–1911. Its final leg enabled it to meet another line, constructed 1907–
1911, running from Baro, through Minnia, to Kano.[49]

Some of these public work projects were accomplished with the help of forced labour, referred to as
"Political Labour". Village Heads were paid 10 shillings for conscripts, and fined £50 if they failed to
supply. Individuals could be fined or jailed for refusing to comply.[5]
Frederick Lugard

Frederick Lugard, who was appointed as High Commissioner of the Northern Nigeria Protectorate in
1900 and served until 1906 in his first term, often has been regarded by the British as their model
colonial administrator. Trained as an army officer, he had served in India, Egypt, and East Africa,
where he expelled Arab slave traders from Nyasaland and established the British presence in
Uganda. Joining the Royal Niger Company in 1894, Lugard was sent to Borgu to counter inroads
made by the French, and in 1897 he was made responsible for raising the Royal West African
Frontier Force (RWAFF) from local levies to serve under British officers.

During his six-year tenure as High Commissioner, Sir Frederick Lugard (as he became in 1901) was
occupied with transforming the commercial sphere of influence inherited from the Royal Niger
Company into a viable territorial unit under effective British political control. His objective was to
conquer the entire region and to obtain recognition of the British protectorate by its indigenous
rulers, especially the Fulani emirs of the Sokoto Caliphate. Lugard's campaign systematically
subdued local resistance, using armed force when diplomatic measures failed. Borno capitulated
without a fight, but in 1903 Lugard's RWAFF mounted assaults on Kano and Sokoto. From Lugard's
point of view, clear-cut military victories were necessary because the surrenders of the defeated
peoples weakened resistance elsewhere.

Lugard's success in northern Nigeria has been attributed to his policy of indirect rule; that is, he
governed the protectorate through the rulers defeated by the British. If the emirs accepted British
authority, abandoned the slave trade, and cooperated with British officials in modernizing their
administrations, the colonial power was willing to confirm them in office. The emirs retained their
caliphate titles but were responsible to British district officers, who had final authority. The British
High Commissioners could depose emirs and other officials if necessary.

Amalgamation

A map displaying Southern and Northern Nigeria, 1914

Amalgamation of Nigeria was envisioned from early on in its governance, as is made clear by the
report of the Niger Committee in 1898. Combining the three jurisdictions would reduce
administrative expenses and facilitate deployment of resources and money between the areas.
(Specifically it would enable direct subsidy of the less profitable Northern jurisdiction.) Antrobus,
Fiddes, and Strachey in the Colonial Office promoted amalgamation, along with Lugard.[50]

Following the order recommended by the Niger Committee, the Colonial Office merged Lagos
Colony and the Southern Nigeria Protectorate on 1 May 1906, forming a larger protectorate (still
called the Southern Nigeria Protectorate) which spanned the coastline between Dahomey and
Cameroon.[50]

Lugard advocated constantly for unification of the whole territory, and in August 1911 the Colonial
Office asked Lugard to lead the amalgamated colony.[51]

In 1912, Lugard returned to Nigeria from his six-year term as Governor of Hong Kong, to oversee the
merger of the northern and southern protectorates. On 9 May 1913, Lugard submitted a formal
proposal to the Colonial Office in which Northern and Southern provinces would have separate
administrations, under the control of a "strongly authoritarian" governor-general. The Colonial Office
approved most of Lugard's plan, but balked at authorizing him to pass laws without their approval.
[52] John Anderson diplomatically suggested:

If it is the necessity for formally submitting the drafts that hurts Sir F. Lugard, I
should be quite prepared to omit that provision provided that the period of
publication of the draft prior to enactment is extended from one month to two. If
an eye is kept on the Gazettes as they come in this will enable us to warn him of
any objections we may entertain to legislative proposals, and also give Liverpool
and Manchester an opportunity of voicing their objections.[52]

The task of unification was achieved on the eve of World War I. From January 1914 onwards, the
newly united colony and protectorate was presided over by a proconsul, who was entitled the
Governor-General of Nigeria. The militias and RWAFF battalions were reorganized into the RWAFF
Nigeria Regiment.[53]

Lugard's governmental model for Nigeria was unique and there was apparently not much planning
for its future development. Colonial official A. J. Harding commented in 1913:

Sir F. Lugard's proposal contemplates a state which it is impossible to classify. It is

not a unitary state with local government areas but with one Central Executive
and one Legislature. It is not a federal state with federal Executive, Legislature
and finances, like the Leewards. It is not a personal union of separate colonies
under the same Governor like the Windwards, it is not a Confederation of States.
If adopted, his proposals can hardly be a permanent solution and I gather that Sir
F. Lugard only regards them as temporary—at any rate in part. With one man in
practical control of the Executive and Legislative organs of all the parts, the
machine may work passably for sufficient time to enable the transition period to
be left behind, by which time the answer to the problem—Unitary v. Federal State
—will probably have become clear.[6]

The Colonial Office accepted Lugard's proposal that the governor would not be required to stay in-
country full-time; consequently, as governor, Lugard spent four months out of the year in London.
This scheme proved unpopular and confusing to many involved parties and was phased out.[54]

Indirect rule

Yoruba sculpture from colonial period depicting the British technique of indirect rule

Emir of Kano, with cavalry, photographed in 1911

The Protectorate was centrally administered by the Colonial Civil Service, staffed by Britons and
Africans called the British Native Staff — many of whom originated from outside the territory. Under
the Political Department of the Civil Service were Residents and District Officers, responsible for
overseeing operations in each region. The Resident also oversaw a Provincial Court at the region's
capital.[55]
Each region also had a Native Administration, staffed by locals, and possessing a Native Treasury.
The Native Administration was headed by the traditional rulers — mostly emirs in the north and
often obas in the south — and their District Heads, who oversaw a larger number of Village Heads.
Native Administration was responsible for police, hospitals, public works, and local courts. The
Colonial Civil Service used intermediaries, as the Royal Niger Company had, in an expanded role
which included diplomacy, propaganda, and espionage.[56]

Half of all taxes went to the colonial government and half went to the Native Treasury. The Treasury
used a planned budget for payment of staff and development of public works projects, and
therefore could not be spent at the discretion of the local traditional ruler. Herbert Richmond Palmer
developed details of this model from 1906–1911 as the governor of Northern Nigeria after Lugard.
[57]

In 1916 Lugard formed the Nigerian Council, a consultative body that brought together six
traditional rulers—including the Sultan of Sokoto, the Emir of Kano, and the Oba of Benin — to
represent all parts of the colony. The council was promoted as a device for allowing the expression
of opinions that could instruct the governor-general. In practice, Lugard used the annual sessions to
inform the traditional rulers of British policy, leaving them with no functions at the council's
meetings except to listen and to assent.

Unification meant only the loose affiliation of three distinct regional administrations into which
Nigeria was subdivided — northern, western, and eastern regions (see fig. 6). Each was under a
lieutenant governor and provided independent government services. The governor was, in effect, the
coordinator for virtually autonomous entities that had overlapping economic interests but little in
common politically or socially. In the Northern Region, the colonial government took careful account
of Islam and avoided any appearance of a challenge to traditional values that might incite
resistance to British rule.[58]

This system, in which the structure of authority focused on the emir to whom obedience was a mark
of religious devotion, did not welcome change. As the emirs settled more and more into their role as
reliable agents of indirect rule, colonial authorities were content to maintain the status quo,
particularly in religious matters. Christian missionaries were barred, and the limited government
efforts in education were harmonized with Islamic institutions.[58]

In the south, by contrast, traditional rulers were employed as vehicles of indirect rule in Edoland and
Yorubaland, but Christianity and Western education undermined their sacerdotal functions. In some
instances, however, a double allegiance — to the idea of sacred monarchy for its symbolic value and
to modern concepts of law and administration — was maintained. Out of reverence for traditional
kingship, for instance, the Oba of Benin, whose office was closely identified with Edo religion, was
accepted as the sponsor of a Yoruba political movement. In the Eastern Region, appointed officials
who were given "warrants" and hence called warrant chiefs, were strongly resisted by the people
because they lacked traditional claims.

In the early stages of British rule, it is desirable to retain the native authority and to work through and by the native
emirs. At the same time it is feasible by degrees to bring them gradually into approximation with our ideas of
justice and humanity. . . . In pursuance of the above general principles the chief civil officers of the provinces are
to be called Residents which implies one who carries on diplomatic relations rather than Commissioners or
Administrators.

Frederick Lugard, shortly before becoming High Commissioner of Northern Nigeria.[59]

In practice, British administrative procedures under indirect rule entailed constant interaction
between colonial authorities and local rulers — the system was modified to fit the needs of each
region. In the north, for instance, legislation took the form of a decree cosigned by the governor and
the emir, while in the south, the governor sought the approval of the Legislative Council. Hausa was
recognized as an official language in the north, and knowledge of it was expected of colonial
officers serving there. In the South, only English had official status. Regional administrations also
varied widely in the quality of local personnel and in the scope of the operations they were willing to
undertake. British staffs in each region continued to operate according to procedures developed
before unification. Economic links among the regions increased, but indirect rule tended to
discourage political interchange. There was virtually no pressure for greater unity among the
regions until after the end of World War II.

Public works, such as harbour dredging and road and railway construction, opened Nigeria to
economic development. British soap and cosmetics manufacturers tried to obtain land concessions
for growing oil palms, but these were refused. Instead, the companies had to be content with a
monopoly of the export trade in these products. Other commercial crops, such as cocoa and rubber,
were encouraged, and tin was mined on the Jos Plateau.

The only significant interruption in economic development arose from natural disaster — the great
drought of 1913-14. Recovery came quickly and improvements in port facilities and the
transportation infrastructure during World War I furthered economic development. Nigerian recruits
participated in the war effort as labourers and soldiers. The Nigeria Regiment of the RWAFF,
integrating troops from the north and south, saw action against German colonial forces in
Cameroon and in German East Africa.

During the war, the colonial government earmarked a large portion of the Nigerian budget as a
contribution to imperial defence. To raise additional revenues, Lugard took steps to institute a
uniform tax structure patterned on the traditional system that he had adopted in the north during his
tenure there. Taxes became a source of discontent in the south, however, and contributed to
disturbances protesting British policy. In 1920, portions of former German Cameroon were
mandated to Britain by the League of Nations and were administered as part of Nigeria.

Until he stepped down as governor-general in 1918, Lugard primarily was concerned with
consolidating British sovereignty and with assuring local administration through traditional rulers.
He was contemptuous of the educated and Westernised African elite found more in the South, and
he recommended transferring the capital from Lagos, the cosmopolitan city where the influence of
these people was most pronounced, to Kaduna in the north. Although the capital was not moved,
Lugard's bias in favour of the Muslim north was clear at the time. Lugard bequeathed to his
successor a prosperous colony when his term as governor-general expired.
The policy of indirect rule used in Northern Nigeria became a model for British colonies elsewhere
in Africa.[60]

Developments in colonial policy under Clifford

Flag of British Colonial Nigeria

Sculptural representation of Africa at the Colonial Office building on Whitehall street; created by Henry Hugh Armstead

Lugard's immediate successor, Sir Hugh Clifford, was an aristocratic professional administrator with
liberal instincts who had won recognition for his enlightened governorship of the Gold Coast. The
approaches of the two governors to colonial development were diametrically opposed. In contrast
to Lugard, Clifford argued that colonial government had the responsibility to introduce as quickly as
practical the benefits of Western experience. He was aware that the Muslim north would present
problems, but he had hopes for progress along the lines which he laid down in the south, where he
anticipated "general emancipation" leading to a more representative form of government. Clifford
emphasized economic development, encouraging enterprises by immigrant southerners in the north
while restricting European participation to capital intensive activity.

Uneasy with the amount of latitude allowed traditional rulers under indirect rule, Clifford opposed
further extension of the judicial authority held by the northern emirs. He said that he did "not
consider that their past traditions and their present backward cultural conditions afford to any such
experiment a reasonable chance of success."[61] In the south, he saw the possibility of building an
elite educated in schools modelled on a European method (and numerous elite children attended
high-ranking colleges in Britain during the colonial years). These schools would teach "the basic
principles that would and should regulate character and conduct."[61] In line with this attitude, he
rejected Lugard's proposal for moving the capital from Lagos, the stronghold of the elite in whom he
placed so much confidence for the future.
Clifford also believed that indirect rule encouraged centripetal tendencies. He argued that the
division into two separate colonies was advisable unless a stronger central government could bind
Nigeria into more than just an administrative convenience for the three regions. Whereas Lugard
had applied lessons learned in the north to the administration of the south, Clifford was prepared to
extend to the north practices that had been successful in the south. Sir Richmond Palmer, acting as
lieutenant-governor in the North, disagreed with Clifford and advocated the principles of Lugard and
further decentralisation.[58]

The Colonial Office, where Lugard was still held in high regard, accepted that changes might be due
in the south, but it forbade fundamental alteration of procedures in the north. A.J. Harding, director
of Nigerian affairs at the Colonial Office, defined the official position of the British government in
support of indirect rule when he said that "direct government by impartial and honest men of alien
race . . . never yet satisfied a nation long and . . . under such a form of government, as wealth and
education increase, so do political discontent and sedition."[61]

Economics and finance

Looms in Lagos, photographed in 1910–1913 by H. Hunting of the Patterson Zuchonis trading company

The British treasury initially supported the landlocked Northern Nigeria Protectorate with grants,
totalling £250,000 or more each year.[62] Its revenue quickly increased, from £4,424 in 1901 to
£274,989 in 1910. The Southern Protectorate financed itself from the outset, with revenue
increasing from £361,815 to £1,933,235 over the same period.[63]

After establishing political control of the country, the British implemented a system of taxation in
order to force the indigenous Africans to shift from subsistence farming to wage labour. Sometimes
forced labour was used directly for public works projects. These policies met with ongoing
resistance[64][65]

Much of the colony's budget went to payments of its military, the Royal West African Frontier Force
(RWAFF).[66] In 1936, of £6,259,547 income for the Nigerian state, £1,156,000 went back to England
as home pay for British officials in the Nigerian civil service.[67]

Oil exploration began in 1906 under John Simon Bergheim's Nigeria Bitumen Corporation, to which
the Colonial Office granted exclusive rights. In 1907, the Corporation received a loan of £25,000,
repayable upon discovery of oil. Other firms applying for licenses were rejected. In November 1908,
Bergheim reported striking oil; in September 1909, he reported extracting 2,000 barrels per day.
However, development of the Nigerian oilfields slowed when Bergheim died in a car crash in
September 1912. Lugard, replacing Egerton as governor, aborted the project in May 1913. The
British turned to Persia for oil.[68]

European traders in Nigeria initially made widespread use of the cowrie, which was already valued
locally. The influx of the cowrie led to inflation.

Emergence of Southern Nigerian nationalism

British colonialism created Nigeria, joining diverse peoples and regions in an artificial political entity
along the Niger River. The nationalism that became a political factor in Nigeria during the interwar
period derived both from an older political particularism and broad pan-Africanism, rather than from
any sense among the people of a common Nigerian nationality. The goal of activists initially was
not self-determination, but increased participation on a regional level in the governmental process.

Inconsistencies in British policy reinforced existing cleavages based on regional animosities, as the
British tried both to preserve the indigenous cultures of each area and to introduce modern
technology, and Western political and social concepts. In the north, appeals to Islamic legitimacy
upheld the rule of the emirs, so that nationalist sentiments were related to Islamic ideals. Modern
nationalists in the south, whose thinking was shaped by European ideas, opposed indirect rule, as
they believed that it had strengthened what they considered an anachronistic ruling class and shut
out the emerging Westernised elite.

The southern nationalists were inspired by a variety of sources, including such prominent American-
based activists as Marcus Garvey and W.E.B. Du Bois. Nigerian students abroad, particularly at
British schools, joined those from other colonies in pan-African groups such as the West African
Students Union, founded in London in 1925. Early nationalists tended to ignore Nigeria as the focus
of patriotism. Their common denominators tended to be based on newly assertive ethnic
consciousness, particularly that of the Yoruba and Igbo. Despite acceptance of European and North
American influences, the nationalists were critical of colonialism for its failure to appreciate the
antiquity, richness and complexity of indigenous cultures. They wanted self-government, charging
that only colonial rule prevented the unshackling of progressive forces in Nigeria and other states.

Political opposition to colonial rule often assumed religious dimensions. Independent Christian
churches had emerged at the end of the nineteenth century. European interpretations of Christian
orthodoxy in some cases refused to allow the incorporation of local customs and practices,
although the various mission denominations interpreted Christianity in different ways. Most
Europeans tended to overlook their own differences and were surprised and shocked that Nigerians
wanted to develop new denominations independent of European control. Protestant sects had
flourished in Christianity since the Reformation; the emergence of independent Christian churches
in Nigeria (as of black denominations in the United States) was another phase of this history. The
pulpits of the independent congregations became avenues for the free expression of critics of
colonial rule.

Colonial Lagos circa 1910

In the 1920s, Nigerians began to form a variety of associations, such as professional and business
associations, like the Nigerian Union of Teachers; the Nigerian Law Association, which brought
together lawyers, many of whom had been educated in Britain; and the Nigerian Produce Traders'
Association, led by Obafemi Awolowo. While initially organized for professional and fraternal
reasons, these were centres of educated people who had chances to develop their leadership skills
in the organizations, as well as form broad social networks.

Ethnic and kinship organizations that often took the form of a tribal union also emerged in the
1920s. These organizations were primarily urban phenomena that arose after numerous rural
migrants moved to the cities. Alienated by the anonymity of the urban environment and drawn
together by ties to their ethnic homelands — as well as by the need for mutual aid — the new city
dwellers formed local clubs that later expanded into federations covering whole regions. By the mid-
1940s, the major ethnic groups had formed such associations as the Igbo Federal Union and the
Egbe Omo Oduduwa (Society of the Descendants of Oduduwa), a Yoruba cultural movement, in
which Awolowo played a leading role. In some cases, British assignment of people to ethnic groups,
and treatment based along ethnic lines, led to identification with ethnicity where none had existed
before.[69]

A third type of organization that was more pointedly political was the youth or student group, which
became the vehicle of intellectuals and professionals. They were the most politically conscious
segment of the population and created the vanguard of the nationalist movement. Newspapers,
some of which were published before World War I, provided coverage of nationalist views.

The 1922 constitution provided Nigerians the chance to elect a handful of representatives to the
Legislative Council. The principal figure in the political activity that ensued was Herbert Macauley,
often referred to as the father of Nigerian nationalism. He aroused political awareness through his
newspaper, the Lagos Daily News. He also led the Nigerian National Democratic Party, which
dominated elections in Lagos from its founding in 1922 until the ascendancy of the National Youth
Movement in 1938. His political platform called for economic and educational development,
Africanization of the civil service, and self-government for Lagos. Significantly, Macauley's NNDP
remained almost entirely a Lagos party, popular only in the area whose people already had
experience in elective politics.

The National Youth Movement used nationalist rhetoric to agitate for improvements in education.
The movement brought to public notice a long list of future leaders, including H.O. Davies and
Nnamdi Azikiwe. Although Azikiwe later came to be recognized as the leading spokesman for
national unity, when he first returned from university training in the United States, his outlook was
pan-African rather than nationalist, and emphasized the common African struggle against European
colonialism. (This was also reflective of growing pan-Africanism among American activists of the
time.) Azikiwe had less interest in purely Nigerian goals than did Davies, a student of Harold Laski at
the London School of Economics, whose political orientation was considered left-wing.

By 1938 the NYM was agitating for dominion status within the British Commonwealth of Nations, so
that Nigeria would have the same status as Canada and Australia. In elections that year, the NYM
ended the domination of the NNDP in the Legislative Council and worked to establish a national
network of affiliates. Three years later internal divisions arose that were dominated by major ethnic
loyalties. The departure of Azikiwe and other Igbo members of the NYM left the organization in
Yoruba hands. During World War II, Awolowo reorganized it as a predominantly Yoruba political
party, the Action Group. Yoruba-Igbo rivalry became increasingly important in Nigerian politics.

Second World War

During World War II, three battalions of the Nigeria Regiment fought in the Ethiopian campaign.
Nigerian units also contributed to two divisions serving with British forces in Palestine, Morocco,
Sicily, and Burma, where they won many honours. Wartime experiences provided a new frame of
reference for many soldiers, who interacted across ethnic boundaries in ways that were unusual in
Nigeria. The war also made the British reappraise Nigeria's political future. The war years brought a
polarization between the older, more parochial leaders inclined toward gradualism and the younger
intellectuals, who thought in more immediate terms.

The rapid growth of organized labour in the 1940s also brought new political forces into play. During
the war, union membership increased sixfold to 30,000. The proliferation of labour organizations
fragmented the movement, and potential leaders lacked the experience and skill to draw workers
together.

The Action Group was largely the creation of Awolowo, general secretary of Egbe Omo Oduduwa
and leader of the Nigerian Produce Traders' Association. The Action Group was thus the heir of a
generation of flourishing cultural consciousness among the Yoruba and also had valuable
connections with commercial interests that were representative of the comparative economic
advancement of the Western Region. Awolowo had little difficulty in appealing to broad segments of
the Yoruba population, but he worked to avoid the Action Group from being stigmatized as a "tribal"
group. Despite his somewhat successful efforts to enlist non-Yoruba support, the regionalist
sentiment that had stimulated the party initially continued.

Segments of the Yoruba community had their own animosities and new rivalries arose. For example,
many people in Ibadan opposed Awolowo on personal grounds because of his identification with
the Ijebu Yoruba. Despite these difficulties, the Action Group rapidly built an effective organization.
Its program reflected greater planning and was more ideologically oriented than that of the National
Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons. Although lacking Azikiwe's compelling personality, Awolowo
was a formidable debater as well as a vigorous and tenacious political campaigner. He used for the
first time in Nigeria modern, sometimes flamboyant, electioneering techniques. Among his leading
lieutenants were Samuel Akintola of Ibadan and the Oni of Ife, the most important of the Yoruba
monarchs.

The Action Group consistently supported minority-group demands for autonomous states within a
federal structure, as well as the severance of a midwest state from the Western Region. It assumed
that comparable alterations would be made elsewhere, an attitude that won the party minority
voting support in the other regions. It backed Yoruba irredentism in the Fulani-ruled emirate of Ilorin
in the Northern Region, and separatist movements among non-Igbo in the Eastern Region.

The Northern People's Congress was organized in the late 1940s by a small group of Western-
educated Northern Nigerians. They had obtained the assent of the emirs to form a political party to
counterbalance the activities of the southern-based parties. It represented a substantial element of
reformism in the North. The most powerful figure in the party was Ahmadu Bello, the Sardauna of
Sokoto.

Bello wanted to protect northern social and political institutions from southern influence. He
insisted on maintaining the territorial integrity of the Northern Region. He was prepared to introduce
educational and economic changes to strengthen the north. Although his own ambitions were
limited to the Northern Region, Bello backed the NPC's successful efforts to mobilize the north's
large voting strength so as to win control of the national government.

The NPC platform emphasized the integrity of the north, its traditions, religion, and social order.
Support for broad Nigerian concerns occupied a clear second place. A lack of interest in extending
the NPC beyond the Northern Region corresponded to this strictly regional orientation. Its activist
membership was drawn from local government and emirate officials who had access to means of
communication and to repressive traditional authority that could keep the opposition in line.

The small contingent of northerners who had been educated abroad — a group that included
Abubakar Tafawa Balewa and Aminu Kano — was allied with British-backed efforts to introduce
gradual change to the emirates. The emirs gave support to limited modernization largely from fears
of the unsettling presence of southerners in the north, and by observing the improvements in living
conditions in the South. Northern leaders committed to modernization were also firmly connected
to the traditional power structure. Most internal problems were concealed, and open opposition to
the domination of the Muslim aristocracy was not tolerated. Critics, including representatives of the
middle belt who resented Muslim domination, were relegated to small, peripheral parties or to
inconsequential separatist movements.[70]

In 1950 Aminu Kano, who had been instrumental in founding the NPC, broke away to form the
Northern Elements Progressive Union, in protest against the NPC's limited objectives and what he
regarded as a vain hope that traditional rulers would accept modernization. NEPU formed a
parliamentary alliance with the NCNC.
The NPC continued to represent the interests of the traditional order in the pre-independence
deliberations. After the defection of Kano, the only significant disagreement within the NPC was
related to moderates. Men such as Balewa believed that only by overcoming political and economic
backwardness could the NPC protect the foundations of traditional northern authority against the
influence of the more advanced south.

In all three regions, minority parties represented the special interests of ethnic groups, especially as
they were affected by the majority. They never were able to elect sizeable legislative delegations, but
they served as a means of public expression for minority concerns. They received attention from
major parties before elections, at which time either a dominant party from another region or the
opposition party in their region sought their alliance.

The political parties jockeyed for positions of power in anticipation of the independence of Nigeria.
Three constitutions were enacted from 1946 to 1954. While each generated considerable political
controversy, they moved the country toward greater internal autonomy, with an increasing role for
the political parties. The trend was toward the establishment of a parliamentary system of
government, with regional assemblies and a federal House of Representatives.

In 1946 a new constitution was approved by the British Parliament at Westminster and promulgated
in Nigeria. Although it reserved effective power in the hands of the Governor-General and his
appointed Executive Council, the so-called Richards Constitution (after Governor-General Sir Arthur
Richards, who was responsible for its formulation) provided for an expanded Legislative Council
empowered to deliberate on matters affecting the whole country. Separate legislative bodies, the
houses of assembly, were established in each of the three regions to consider local questions and
to advise the lieutenant governors. The introduction of the federal principle, with deliberative
authority devolved on the regions, signalled recognition of the country's diversity. Although realistic
in its assessment of the situation in Nigeria, the Richards Constitution undoubtedly intensified
regionalism as an alternative to political unification.

The pace of constitutional change accelerated after the promulgation of the Richards Constitution.
It was suspended in 1950 against a call for greater autonomy, which resulted in an inter-
parliamentary conference at Ibadan in 1950. The conference drafted the terms of a new
constitution. The so-called Macpherson Constitution, after the incumbent governor-general, went
into effect the following year.

The most important innovations in the new charter reinforced the dual course of constitutional
evolution, allowing for both regional autonomy and federal union. By extending the elective principle
and by providing for a central government with a Council of Ministers, the Macpherson Constitution
gave renewed impetus to party activity and to political participation at the national level. But by
providing for comparable regional governments exercising broad legislative powers, which could
not be overridden by the newly established 185-seat federal House of Representatives, the
Macpherson Constitution also gave a significant boost to regionalism. Subsequent revisions
contained in the Lyttleton Constitution, enacted in 1954, firmly established the federal principle and
paved the way for independence.
Self governing regions (1957)

In 1957, the Western and the Eastern regions became formally self-governing under the
parliamentary system. Similar status was acquired by the Northern Region two years later. There
were numerous differences of detail among the regional systems, but all adhered to parliamentary
forms and were equally autonomous in relation to the federal government at Lagos. The federal
government retained specified powers, including responsibility for banking, currency, external
affairs, defence, shipping and navigation, and communications, but real political power was centred
in the regions. Significantly, the regional governments controlled public expenditures derived from
revenues raised within each region.

Ethnic cleavages intensified in the 1950s. Political activists in the southern areas spoke of self-
government in terms of educational opportunities and economic development. Because of the
spread of mission schools and wealth derived from export crops, the southern parties were
committed to policies that would benefit the south of the country. In the north, the emirs intended to
maintain firm control on economic and political change.

Any activity in the north that might include participation by the federal government (and
consequently by southern civil servants) was regarded as a challenge to the primacy of the
emirates. Broadening political participation and expanding educational opportunities and other
social services also were viewed as threats to the status quo. An extensive immigrant population of
southerners, especially Igbo, already were living in the north; they dominated clerical positions and
were active in many trades.

The cleavage between the Yoruba and the Igbo was accentuated by their competition for control of
the political machinery. The receding British presence enabled local officials and politicians to gain
access to patronage over government jobs, funds for local development, market permits, trade
licenses, government contracts, and even scholarships for higher education. In an economy with
many qualified applicants for every post, great resentment was generated by any favouritism that
authorities showed to members of their own ethnic group.

In the immediate post-World War II period, Nigeria benefited from a favourable trade balance.
Although per capita income in the country as a whole remained low by international standards,
rising incomes among salaried personnel and burgeoning urbanization expanded consumer
demand for imported goods.

In the meantime, public sector spending increased even more dramatically than export earnings. It
was supported not only by the income from huge agricultural surpluses but also by a new range of
direct and indirect taxes imposed during the 1950s. The transfer of responsibility for budgetary
management from the central to the regional governments in 1954 accelerated the pace of public
spending on services and on development projects. Total revenues of central and regional
governments nearly doubled in relation to the gross domestic product (GDP—see Glossary) during
the decade.
The most dramatic event having a long-term effect on Nigeria's economic development, was the
discovery and exploitation of petroleum deposits. The search for oil, begun in 1908 and abandoned
a few years later, was revived in 1937 by Shell and British Petroleum. Exploration was intensified in
1946, but the first commercial discovery did not occur until 1956, at Olobiri in the Niger Delta. In
1958 exportation of Nigerian oil was initiated at facilities constructed at Port Harcourt. Oil income
was still marginal, but the prospects for continued economic expansion appeared bright and
accentuated political rivalries on the eve of independence.

The election of the House of Representatives after the adoption of the 1954 constitution gave the
NPC a total of seventy-nine seats, all from the Northern Region. Among the other major parties, the
NCNC took fifty-six seats, winning a majority in both the Eastern and the Western regions, while the
Action Group captured only twenty-seven seats. The NPC was called on to form a government, but
the NCNC received six of the ten ministerial posts. Three of these posts were assigned to
representatives from each region, and one was reserved for a delegate from the Northern
Cameroons.

As a further step toward independence, the governor's Executive Council was merged with the
Council of Ministers in 1957 to form the all-Nigerian Federal Executive Council. The NPC federal
parliamentary leader, Balewa, was appointed prime minister. Balewa formed a coalition government
that included the Action Group as well as the NCNC to prepare the country for the final British
withdrawal. His government guided the country for the next three years, operating with almost
complete autonomy in internal affairs.

Constitutional conferences in the UK (1957-1958)

The preparation of a new federal constitution for an independent Nigeria was carried out at
conferences held at Lancaster House in London in 1957 and 1958, which were presided over by The
Rt. Hon. Alan Lennox-Boyd, M.P., the British Secretary of State for the Colonies. Nigerian delegates
were selected to represent each region and to reflect various shades of opinion. The delegation was
led by Balewa of the NPC and included party leaders Awolowo of the Action Group, Azikiwe of the
NCNC, and Bello of the NPC; they were also the premiers of the Western, Eastern, and Northern
regions, respectively. Independence was achieved on October 1, 1960.

Elections were held for a new and greatly enlarged House of Representatives in December 1959;
174 of the 312 seats were allocated to the Northern Region on the basis of its larger population.
The NPC, entering candidates only in the Northern Region, confined campaigning largely to local
issues but opposed the addition of new regimes. The NCNC backed creation of a midwest state and
proposed federal control of education and health services.

The Action Group, which staged a lively campaign, favoured stronger government and the
establishment of three new states, while advocating creation of a West Africa Federation that would
unite Nigeria with Ghana and Sierra Leone. The NPC captured 142 seats in the new legislature.
Balewa was called on to head a NPC-NCNC coalition government, and Awolowo became official
leader of the opposition.
Independent Nigeria (1960)

By a British Act of Parliament, Nigeria became independent on October 1, 1960. Azikiwe was
installed as governor-general of the federation and Balewa continued to serve as head of a
democratically elected parliamentary, but now completely sovereign, government. The governor-
general represented the British monarch as head of state and was appointed by the Crown on the
advice of the Nigerian prime minister in consultation with the regional premiers. The governor-
general, in turn, was responsible for appointing the prime minister and for choosing a candidate
from among contending leaders when there was no parliamentary majority. Otherwise, the governor-
general's office was essentially ceremonial.

The government was responsible to a Parliament composed of the popularly elected 312-member
House of Representatives and the 44-member Senate, chosen by the regional legislatures.

In general, the regional constitutions followed the federal model, both structurally and functionally.
The most striking departure was in the Northern Region, where special provisions brought the
regional constitution into consonance with Islamic law and custom. The similarity between the
federal and regional constitutions was deceptive, however, and the conduct of public affairs
reflected wide differences among the regions.

In February 1961, a plebiscite was conducted to determine the disposition of the Southern
Cameroons and Northern Cameroons, which were administered by Britain as United Nations Trust
Territories. By an overwhelming majority, voters in the Southern Cameroons opted to join formerly
French-administered Cameroon over integration with Nigeria as a separate federated region. In the
Northern Cameroons, however, the largely Muslim electorate chose to merge with Nigeria's Northern
Region.

See also

Enclaves of Forcados and Badjibo

Bandele Omoniyi

References
References

1. ^ "The British Empire in 1924". The British Empire. Retrieved 7 November 2017.

2. ^ John M. Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 1–2. "Crown Colony Government
in Nigeria and elsewhere in the British Empire was autocratic government. Officials at the
 Colonial Office and colonial governors in the field never pretended otherwise. In fact,
autocratic, bureaucratic rule was the true legacy of British colonial government in Africa."

3. ^ Carland (1985), The Colonial Office and Nigeria, p. 48.

4. ^ a b c d e f g Robin Hermann, "Empire Builders and Mushroom Gentlemen: The Meaning of

Money in Colonial Nigeria", International Journal of African Historical Studies 44.3, 2011.

5. ^ a b c d e Ken Swindell, "The Commercial Development of the North: Company and Government
Relations, 1900–1906", Paideuma 40, 1994, pp. 149–162.

6. ^ a b Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 90.

7. ^ a b c David Richardson, "Background to annexation: Anglo-African credit relations in the Bight

of Biafra, 1700–1891"; in Pétré-Grenouilleau, From Slave Trade to Empire (2004), pp. 47–68.

8. ^ See Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations (1776), Vol. 2 p. 112. (Quoted in Richardson, 2004).
"Though the Europeans possess many considerable settlements both upon the coast of Africa
and in the East Indies, they have not yet established in either of those countries such
numerous and thriving colonies as those in the islands and continent of America."

9. ^ Isichei, A History of Nigeria (1983), p. 362.

10. ^ David Etlis, "African and European relations in the last century of the transatlantic slave
trade"; in Pétré-Grenouilleau, From Slave Trade to Empire (2004), pp. 21–46.

11. ^ Randy J. Sparks, The Two Princes of Calabar: An Eighteenth-Century Atlantic Odyssey; Harvard
University Press, 2004; ISBN 0-674-01312-3; Chapter 1: "A Very Bloody Transaction: Old
Calabar and the Massacre of 1767".

12. ^ a b c d e f Anietie A. Inyang & Manasseh Edidem Bassey, "Imperial Treaties and the Origins of
British Colonial Rule in Southern Nigeria, 1860-1890", Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
5.20, September 2014.

13. ^ Asiegbu, Nigeria and its British Invaders (1984), p. xxiii. "After the Abolition Act in 1807
making the trade in African slaves illegal for British subjects, Britain did not stop there: For the
next quarter of a century successive British Governments embarked on a kind of aggressive
diplomacy, bullying and bribing other European nations, especially Spain and Portugal, to toe
the anti-slavery line with England. / On the West African Coast itself British anti-slavery policy
became very evident. Freed slaves were resettled at Freetown, thus becoming British subjects.
A detachment of the all-powerful British Navy, the West African naval squadron, was stationed
in West African waters to patrol along the coastline and to intercept any slave ships or vessels
equipped for the slave trade, and to bring slave vessels captured for trial before British
controlled courts in Freetown. At the same time Britain embarked on securing from African
rulers, in consideration of payments to these rulers, what became known as anti-slave trade
treaties. By these treaties the rulers engaged to stop the traffic in slaves in their respective
territories. In the process of enforcing these anti-slave trade policies on the west coast with
 its powerful navy, Britain discovered the military weakness or inferiority of the African states in
relation to its own military power."

14. ^ a b Olatunji Ojo, "The Organization of the Atlantic Slave Trade in Yorubaland, ca.1777 to
ca.1856", International Journal of African Historical Studies 41.1, 2008. "Slave production in the
interior raised exports from Lagos ten fold, making it West Africa's leading slave port. The
most accurate trade figures are found in the Trans-Atlantic slave voyage database (TSD),
which put the number of slave exports between 1776 and 1850 at 308,800. Of that number
only 24,000 slaves were shipped before 1801, while 114,200 and 170,600 were sold during
1801–25 and 1826–50, respectively. Exports from Badagry lagged far behind, with about
37,400 slaves sold during 1776–1860."

15. ^ Asiegbu, Nigeria and its British Invaders (1984), pp. xiv–xv. "Here again, European and African
scholars have been at loggerheads and in the same kinds of conflicts as had featured in their
interpretations of the primary motives of the British anti-slavery movement and abolitionism in
the mid-19th century, namely, British self-interest or imperial ambitions on the one hand, and
British humanitarian feeling for Africa on the other."

16. ^ Tamuno, The Evolution of the Nigerian State (1972), p. 6. "To the British, traffic in human
beings after 1807 was both 'uncivilised' and illegal. As the century went on, a strong feeling
developed that the slave trade, as an aspect of piracy, stood condemned in international and
municipal law. This change in moral tone over the slave trade at first seemed
incomprehensible to generations of people in Southern Nigeria who within a relatively short
period were presented with two different concepts of right and wrong. Their scepticism about
the correctness of such conflicting standards persisted into the early twentieth century."

17. ^ Warren Whatley & Rob Gillezeau, "The Impact of the Slave Trade on African Economies",
World Economic History Congress, Utrecht, 23 May 2009.

18. ^ Helen Chapin Metz, ed. "Influence of Christian Missions", Nigeria: A Country Study,
Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1991, accessed 18 April 2012

19. ^ Tamuno, The Evolution of the Nigerian State (1972), pp. 11–12.

20. ^ a b Bouda Etemad, "Economic relations between Europe and Black Africa c. 1780–1938"; in
Pétré-Grenouilleau, From Slave Trade to Empire (2004), pp. 69–81.

21. ^ Tamuno, The Evolution of the Nigerian State (1972), p. 14. "The most significant economic
development in Southern Nigeria since 1807 was the transition from the pre-colonial
emphasis on subsistence agriculture to an increasing concentration on production for sale."

22. ^ a b Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 2.

23. ^ a b c Asiegbu, Nigeria and its British Invaders (1984), pp. xxv. "In the Lagos Colony Captain
John Glover, as administrator of the Colony, created between 1861 and 1862 the famous
Hausa militia ('Glover's Hausas') which became the nucleus of the Lagos Constabulary (itself
splitting after 1895 into two bodies, one a civil police force, the other a military unit). The
 earliest recruits into the Lagos militia came from the liberated African yard or depot which
glover had established in the Colony for the reception of run-away domestic slaves from the
surrounding local communities. In the Niger territories, the Royal Niger Company organized its
own constabulary forces between 1886 and 1899; at the Niger Coast Protectorate the
Consular Administration, with its headquarters at Calabar, established after 1891 the Niger
Coast Protectorate Force or Constabulary, sometimes known as the 'Oil Rivers Irregulars'
(which under Consul Annesley acquired the name of the 'forty thieves'). Thus by 1897 when
the WAFF was created, British West Africa had in some form or other known, like French West
Africa, almost half a century of European or British military presence and activity."

24. ^ Tamuno, The Evolution of the Nigerian State (1972), pp. 15.

25. ^ "Northern Nigeria: The Illo Canceller and Borgu Mail" by Ray Harris in Cameo, Vol. 14, No. 3,
Whole No. 90, October 2013, pp. 158-160.

26. ^ Afeadie, "The Hidden Hand of Overrule" (1996), p. 10–12.

27. ^ Afeadie, "The Hidden Hand of Overrule" (1996), p. 12–13. "Specifically, the Company sought
to secure the cooperation of the traditional rulers in ensuring peaceful conditions for trade.
For this objective, the Company chose to administer the African inhabitants of the Niger
Sudan through their traditional rulers and their political institutions. […] They needed special
personnel: such officials who knew the local conditions and who could communicate between
the Company and the indigenous people. […] These intermediaries assisted government
diplomacy and helped to establish and maintain relations between the company and the
traditional rulers. They gathered information which was needed for policy-making in
administration. Some of them also manned Company stations and served as District Agents."

28. ^ Afeadie, "The Hidden Hand of Overrule" (1996), p. 13–15.

29. ^ Isichei, A History of Nigeria (1983), p. 372–373.

30. ^ Asiegbu, Nigeria and its British Invaders (1984), pp. xiv, xxviii–xxx.

31. ^ Isichei, A History of Nigeria (1983), pp. 365–366.

32. ^ Tamuno, The Evolution of the Nigerian State (1972), p. xiv.

33. ^ Isichei, A History of Nigeria (1983), p. 367.

34. ^ Isichei, A History of Nigeria (1983), pp. 367–368. "East of the Niger, where no obvious and
redoubtable foe existed, it was necessary to invent one. Gradually, in the dispatches of the
1890s, one sees the emergence of an image of Arochukwu rather like that which prevailed of
Benin at the same time: a sinister 'fetish' power, deeply involved with slave trading, indelibly
opposed to European penetration, and wielding a very great influence over the politics of other
states. One has the suggestion that the Igbo were in need of release from Aro tyranny,
precisely the suggestion which was made with reference to Benin and the Sokoto Caliphate."
35. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 56–58. "And so, flying the flags of
civilisation and commerce, the Colonial Office finally authorized the expedition to begin in
December 1901. Over the summer the Aros conveniently made some slave raids on
neighbouring tribes, providing the Colonial Office and the Southern Nigerian Government with,
as Nigeria Department member Butler termed it, 'the technical justification for the expedition'
which, as he further noted, had 'already been decided to be necessary on more general
grounds'. The expedition began and ended right on schedule."

36. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 58–59. "Moor's successor, Sir Walter
Egerton, quickly embarked on, with the blessings of the Colonial Office, a policy of sending out
pacification patrols annually. For the most part the patrols did not involve the use of force so
much as they did the threat of force if submission was not made. At the beginning of each dry
season the Southern Nigerian troops would establish a central base on the edge of the area
they were to take over. Then small columns of soldiers would be sent out to different parts of
the unoccupied country. Usually this show of force was enough, and the area would soon be
open for the introduction of district administration and commercial development."

37. ^ Isichei, A History of Nigeria (1983), p. 369–371.

38. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 60–62.

39. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 64.

40. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 68.

41. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 50.

42. ^ Asiegbu, Nigeria and its British Invaders (1984), pp. xxv–xxvii. "Right from the start Lugard
adopted a policy of keeping the entire force predominantly Hausa, with Yorubas as the next
preferred ethnic group to recruit into the force. By the middle of 1898 Lugard reported to the
Colonial Office that there were already some 2600 native soldiers (made up of Hausa and
Yorubas in equal proportions) in the force, while more vigorous recruiting expeditions were
being undertaken by European officials into Yorubaland and Northern Nigeria. [...] Adequate
historical information and knowledge about the organization and exploits of the WAFF, the
military activities and experiences of some of the remarkable personalities and individual
soldiers and officials who belonged to it, have unfortunately been lacking in our own time
thanks to the strict official policy of secrecy and silence which the British government
imposed right from the start on all officers serving in, or retired from, that force."

43. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 3–4, 50–52.

44. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 19–22. "Those in the upper middle class
were in higher-income groups or in important professional, commercial, or industrial
positions. / These definitions place Colonial Office permanent officials primarily in the upper
middle class. This can be seen by looking at Table 1.2 Three of these men — William Baillie
Hamilton, Dougal Malcolm, and Charles Strachey — also had connections with the nobility and
landed gentry. Nine had fathers in prestigious occupations — the Church, the Bar, and the
 highest ranks of the Civil Service and the armed forces; and the remaining five had fathers in
the important professional, commercial, or industrial positions."

45. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 31.

46. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 32–33.

47. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 35–37.

48. ^ a b Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 104–109.

49. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 135–153.

50. ^ a b Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 79–84.

51. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 87. "Although permanent officials like
some, though not all, of Lugard's ideas, they had built up considerable antipathy toward
Lugard during his tour of duty in Northern Nigeria (1900–6). His unorthodox and
administratively untidy ways exasperated them. However, Harcourt and Anderson decided
they could not have Lugard's ideas without Lugard. In August 1911 Anderson told Lugard that
they were anxious to amalgamate the Nigerian administrations; 'But our difficulty is to get the
right man for the job. We are agreed that you are that man.'"

52. ^ a b Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 88–89.

53. ^ Asiegbu, Nigeria and its British Invaders (1984), p. xxxi.

54. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 92–100.

55. ^ Afeadie, "The Hidden Hand of Overrule" (1996), p. 17–19.

56. ^ Afeadie, "The Hidden Hand of Overrule" (1996), p. 19–21. "The agents performed similar but
more expansive roles as their Company counterparts. They were instrumental in the
development of government diplomacy with the traditional rulers; they spread government
propaganda among the indigenous people; and they assisted colonial officials in parleying
with native forces at war with government troops. Agents also collected intelligence for the
colonial officials; they gathered information on public opinion and the military resources of the
local polities; they also spied on rival colonial forces in foreign territories."

57. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 70–71.

58. ^ a b c Sir Richmond Palmer

59. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 67.

60. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 66. "In British colonial administrative
history the importance of indirect rule – in theory and in practice – should not be
underestimated. Indirect rule, as it developed in Northern Nigeria before 1914, became the
most influential model for local government in other British Crown Colonies. By the 1930s
 practically all of British tropical Africa, outside the urban areas, had accepted indirect rule as
the basic mode of local government."

61. ^ a b c Helen Chapin Metz, ed. Nigeria: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of
Congress, 1991. Retrieved October 11, 2014 from http://countrystudies.us/nigeria/19.htm

62. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 85–86, 103.

63. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), p. 119.

64. ^ Isichei, A History of Nigeria (1983), pp. 386–388.

65. ^ Elliot J. Berg, "The Development of a Labour Force in Sub-Saharan Africa"; Economic
Development and Cultural Change 13.4, July 1965.

66. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 127–128.

67. ^ Isichei, A History of Nigeria (1983), p. 380.

68. ^ Carland, The Colonial Office and Nigeria (1985), pp. 184–198.

69. ^ Isichei, A History of Nigeria (1983), p. 392–393. "A Tiv political sociologist has explored this
theme in Tiv experience. As late as the early 'thirties, a well informed observer could state, 'I
am not conscious of any race consciousness among the Tiv except on the very widest and
vaguest basis . . .'. But this soon changed. 'By its constant treatment of the Tiv as a corporate
body with homogenous interests, the Native Administration went a long way towards creating
the level of ethnic consciousness which developed. And conversely, by imposing a Yoruba
Muslim from Bida as Chief of Makurdi, the British created a wholly new demand for a Tiv
paramount chief, the Tor Tiv. By the 1960s, ethnic consciousness had become a key
determinant of Tiv political behaviour."

70. ^ Helen Chapin Metz, ed. Nigeria: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of
Congress, 1991. Retrieved October 11, 2014 from http://countrystudies.us/nigeria/20.htm

Sources

Country Studies On-Line - Nigeria at the Library of Congress

Bibliography

Afeadie, Philip Atsu. "The Hidden Hand of Overrule: Political Agents and the Establishment of
British Colonial Rule in Northern Nigeria, 1886–1914". PhD dissertation accepted at the
Graduate Programme in History, York University, Ontario. September 1996.

Asiegbu, Johnson U. J. Nigeria and its British Invaders, 1851–1920: A Thematic Documentary
History. New York & Enugu: Nok Publishers International, 1984. ISBN 0-88357-101-3
 Carland, John M. The Colonial Office and Nigeria, 1898–1914. Hoover Institution Press,
Stanford University, 1985. ISBN 0-8179-8141-1

Falola, Toyin, & Matthew M. Heaton, A History of Nigeria, Cambridge, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-
68157-5

Isichei, Elizabeth. A History of Nigeria. Harlow, UK, and New York: Longman, Inc., 1983. ISBN 0-
582-64331-7

Pétré-Grenouilleau, Olivier (ed.). From Slave Trade to Empire: Europe and the colonisation of
Black Africa 1780s–1880s. Abingdon, UK, and New York: Routledge, 2004. ISBN 0-714-65691-7

Tamuno, T. N. The Evolution of the Nigerian State: The Southern Phase, 1898–1914. New York:
Humanities Press, 1972. SBN 391 00232 5

External links

Google Cultural Institute: Birth of the Nigerian Colony, 1851–1914 — Pan-Atlantic University,
School of Media and Communication exhibit.

Last edited on 24 March 2018, at 10:18

Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.

Terms of Use•Privacy•Desktop