Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Turing Patterns With Pentagonal Symmetry
Turing Patterns With Pentagonal Symmetry
M. Torres
Instituto de Fı́sica Aplicada, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı́ficas, Serrano 144, 28006 Madrid, Spain
D. Gil
Departamento de Paleontologı́a, Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad Complutense, Ciudad Universitaria,
28040 Madrid, Spain
R. A. Barrio
Instituto de Fı́sica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 20-364, México 01000, Distrito Federal, Mexico
P. K. Maini
Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, 24-29 St. Giles, Oxford OX1 3LB, United Kingdom
共Received 3 November 2001; revised manuscript received 28 January 2002; published 16 May 2002兲
We explore numerically the formation of Turing patterns in a confined circular domain with small aspect
ratio. Our results show that stable fivefold patterns are formed over a well defined range of disk sizes, offering
a possible mechanism for inducing the fivefold symmetry observed in early development of regular echinoids.
Using this pattern as a seed, more complex biological structures can be mimicked, such as the pigmentation
pattern of sea urchins and the plate arrangements of the calyxes of primitive camerate crinoids.
U
⫽D U ⵜ 2 U⫹ f 共 U,V 兲 ,
t
V
⫽D V ⵜ 2 V⫹g 共 U,V 兲 .
t
051913-2
TURING PATTERNS WITH PENTAGONAL SYMMETRY PHYSICAL REVIEW E 65 051913
051913-3
ARAGÓN, TORRES, GIL, BARRIO, AND MAINI PHYSICAL REVIEW E 65 051913
051913-4
TURING PATTERNS WITH PENTAGONAL SYMMETRY PHYSICAL REVIEW E 65 051913
V. PATTERNS OF CRINOIDS
051913-5
ARAGÓN, TORRES, GIL, BARRIO, AND MAINI PHYSICAL REVIEW E 65 051913
VI. CONCLUSIONS
冉 冊
tern that evolution may have occupied in the morphospace of
early crinoid skeletons. Hence, this is another example that 1 1
corroborates the claim of the more general work by Thomas u t ⫽D ␦ u rr ⫹ u ⫹ u r ⫹ ␣ u 共 1⫺r 1 v 2 兲 ⫹ v共 1⫺r 2 u 兲 ,
r2 r
et al. 关33兴, where it is established that viable design elements
available for animals, to use as skeletons, have been fully 共A1a兲
冉 冊 冉 冊
exploited in early ages. Evidently, evolution also tried the
twinned structure itself, as can be seen in Fig. 9, where the 1 1 ␣r1
v t ⫽ ␦ v rr ⫹ v ⫹ v r ⫹  v 1⫹ u v ⫹u 共 ␥ ⫹r 2 v 兲 ,
schematic plate arrangement of Pycnocrinus dyeri camerate r 2 r 
crinoid fossil 关31,32兴 is shown. In the figure, plates are indi- 共A1b兲
cated by thick white lines. The centers of the plates are in-
dicated by circles and form a lattice of ridges decorating the with zero-flux boundary conditions u r ⫽ v r ⫽0 at the bound-
plates. Observe that this lattice 共drawn with thin white lines兲 ary of the disk (r⫽a).
is a twinned pentagonal structure formed by distorted hexa- We use the simple Euler 共forward difference兲 approxima-
gons with a pentagon at the center, quite similar to the ones tion to approximate u t , u r , v t , v r , and central differences to
shown in Fig. 8. Notice also that plates constitute the Dirich- approximate u rr , u , v rr , and v . Using equally spaced
let domains of the lattice of ridges 关34兴. This plate arrange- points along r, , and t we thus denote r i ⫽(⌬r)/2⫹i⌬r,
ment is also observed in Glyptocrinus decadactylus camerate j ⫽ j⌬ , and t n ⫽n⌬t, where i⫽0,1, . . . ,M , j
crinoid fossil 关31,32兴. ⫽0,1, . . . ,N, ⌬r⫽1/M , and ⌬ ⫽2 /N. We start from r
The plate arrangement shown in Fig. 9 was directly ob- ⫽(⌬r)/2 in order to avoid the singularity of the Laplacian at
tained from the calyx or cup of the published images of fossil the origin. The center of the disk is obtained by using bound-
crinoids 关31,32兴. A schematic diagram of the calyx is shown ary conditions such that central points are joined in pairs
in the inset of Fig. 9; the stem of the fossil is represented by separated by ⫽ /2, that is,
the three white lines at the bottom of the figure and white
filled circles indicate the starting point of the arms. U 共 r 0⫺1 , j ,t n 兲 ⫽U 共 r 0 , j⫹N/2 ,t n 兲 ,
051913-6
TURING PATTERNS WITH PENTAGONAL SYMMETRY PHYSICAL REVIEW E 65 051913
D ␦ ⌬t
for j⫽N/2, . . . ,N. ⫹ n
共 U (i, j⫹1) ⫺2U (i, j) ⫹U (i, j⫺1) 兲
n n
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2
j) and V (i, j) denote U(r i , j ,t n ) and V(r i , j ,t n ),
n n
If U (i,
respectively, we then solve D ␦ ⌬t n
⫹ 共 U (i⫹1,j) ⫺U (i, j) 兲 ⫹ ␣ ⌬tU (i, j) . 共A4兲
n n
r i ⌬r
D ␦ ⌬t
i, j ⫽U i, j ⫹
U n⫹1 ⫺2U (i, j) ⫹U (i⫺1,j) 兲
n n n n
共 U (i⫹1,j)
共 ⌬r 兲 2 The truncation errors arise from the Taylor series expan-
sions used to approximate derivatives
D ␦ ⌬t
⫹ n
共 U (i, j⫹1) ⫺2U (i, j) ⫹U (i, j⫺1) 兲
n n
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2 i, j ⫺U i, j
U n⫹1 n
⌬t
⫽u t ⫹ u 共兲 共 t⭐ ⭐t⫹⌬t 兲
D ␦ ⌬t n ⌬t 2 tt
⫹ 共 U (i⫹1,j) ⫺U (i, j) 兲 ⫹⌬t 关 ␣ U (i, j) ⫹V (i, j)
n n n
r i ⌬r
and
⫺ ␣ r 1 U (i,
n
j) 共 V (i, j) 兲 ⫺r 2 U (i, j) V (i, j) 兴 ,
n 2 n n
共A2a兲
n
U i⫹1,j ⫺2U ni, j ⫹U i⫺1,j
n
␦ ⌬t 共 ⌬r 兲 2
i, j ⫽V i, j ⫹
V n⫹1 ⫺2V (i, j) ⫹V (i⫺1,j) 兲
n n n n
共 V (i⫹1,j)
共 ⌬r 兲 2
共 ⌬r 兲 2
⫽u rr ⫹ u 共 兲共 r⫺⌬r⭐ ⭐r⫹⌬r 兲 ,
␦ ⌬t 12 rrrr
⫹ n
共 V (i, j⫹1) ⫺2V (i, j) ⫹V (i, j⫺1) 兲
n n
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2
with similar expressions for u r and u .
␦ ⌬t From these equations, we can calculate the truncation er-
⫹ ⫺V (i, j) 兲 ⫹⌬t 关  V (i, j) ⫺ ␣ U (i, j)
n n n n
共 V (i⫹1,j)
r i ⌬r ror introduced by the finite-difference discretization of Eq.
共A3a兲,
⫹ ␣ r 1 ⌬tU (i,
n
j) 共 V (i, j) 兲 ⫹r 2 ⌬tU (i, j) V (i, j) 兴 ,
n 2 n n
共A2b兲
⌬t 共 ⌬r 兲 2
with zero-flux boundary conditions T ni, j ⫽ u tt 共 r i , j , i jn 兲 ⫹ u 共 , ,t 兲
2 12 rrrr i jn j n
U nM ⫹1,j ⫽U nM , j , n
U i,N⫹1 ⫽U i,N
n
, 共 ⌬ 兲2 ⌬r
⫹ u 共 r i , i jn ,t n 兲 ⫹ u rr 共 i jn , j ,t n 兲 ,
12 2
V nM ⫹1,j ⫽V nM , j , n
V i,N⫹1 ⫽V i,N
n
.
which is O(⌬t)⫹O(⌬r 2 )⫹O(⌬ 2 )⫹O(⌬r). By assuming
As initial conditions we use random small fluctuations that the involved derivatives are bounded, the truncation er-
around the steady state U 0i, j ⫽0 and V 0i, j ⫽0, for all i, j. ror goes to zero as ⌬t, ⌬r, and ⌬ go to zero. Consequently,
Given the nonlinear terms in Eqs. 共A2兲 a rigorous analysis the numerical method is consistent with the partial differen-
of the stability of the difference scheme is not an easy task. tial equation 共A3a兲.
In practice, however, since important sources of instability To determine when the method is stable, we find the equa-
are the higher-order terms 关35兴, necessary conditions and a tion satisfied by the error e⫽U⫺u. By definition of the trun-
good estimation of ⌬t are obtained by investigating the con- cation error, the exact solution u satisfies
sistency and stability of Eqs. 共A2兲 as if they were uncoupled.
Thus, we consider the equations D ␦ ⌬t
i, j ⫽u i, j ⫹
u n⫹1 ⫺2u (i, j) ⫹u (i⫺1,j) 兲
n n n n
共 u (i⫹1,j)
冉 冊
共 ⌬r 兲 2
1 1
u t ⫽D ␦ u rr ⫹ u ⫹ u ⫹ ␣ u, 共A3a兲 D ␦ ⌬t
r2 r r
⫹ n
共 u (i, j⫹1) ⫺2u (i, j) ⫹u (i, j⫺1) 兲
n n
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2
冉
v t ⫽ ␦ v rr ⫹
1
r2
1
r 冊
v ⫹ v r ⫹  v . 共A3b兲 ⫹
D ␦ ⌬t n
共u
r i ⌬r (i⫹1,j)
⫺u (i,
n
j) 兲 ⫹ ␣ ⌬tu (i, j) ⫹⌬tT i, j .
n n
As above, the finite-difference discretization of Eq. 共A3a兲 By substracting Eq. 共A4兲 from this equation, after grouping
is common terms, we obtain
051913-7
ARAGÓN, TORRES, GIL, BARRIO, AND MAINI PHYSICAL REVIEW E 65 051913
n⫹1
e (i, 冉
j) ⫽ 1⫺2
D ␦ ⌬t
共 ⌬r 兲 2
⫺2
D ␦ ⌬t
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2
⫺
D ␦ ⌬t
r i ⌬r
⫹ ␣ ⌬t e (i,
n
冊j)
TABLE I. Normalized magnitudes of the coefficients for the
Fourier-Bessel decomposition of the pattern in Fig. 4共c兲.
冉 冊 冉 冊
m/n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
D ␦ ⌬t
D ␦ ⌬t n D ␦ ⌬t n
⫹ ⫹ e ⫹ e (i⫺1,j) 0 0.372 0.021 1.000 0.058 0.013 0.004 0.015
共 ⌬r 兲 2 r i ⌬r (i⫹1,j)
共 ⌬r 兲 2 1 0.003 0.006 0.012 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.000
⫹ 冉 D ␦ ⌬t
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2 冊 n
e (i, j⫹1) ⫹ 冉 冊 D ␦ ⌬t
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2
n
e (i, j⫺1) ⫺⌬tT i, j .
n
2
3
4
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.016
0.010
0.010
0.004
0.002
0.000
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
共A5兲 5 0.594 0.057 0.012 0.017 0.014 0.011 0.011
6 0.002 0.008 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001
If we define T max⫽max兩T (i,j)
n
兩 and E n ⫽max兩e(i,j)
n
兩, for 1⭐i 7 0.002 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001
⭐M and 0⭐ j⭐N, from Eq. 共A5兲 we get
兩 e (i,
n⫹1
冏
j) 兩 ⭐ 1⫺2
D ␦ ⌬t
共 ⌬r 兲 2
⫺2
D ␦ ⌬t
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2
⫺
D ␦ ⌬t
r i ⌬r
⫹ ␣ ⌬t E n 冏 Equations 共A7b兲 and 共A8b兲 can be written in a more trans-
parent way if we take into account that, since we are avoid-
ing the origin r⫽0, min(ri)⫽r0⫽(⌬r/2). By substituting this
⫹ 冏 D ␦ ⌬t
共 ⌬r 兲 2
⫹
r i ⌬r 冏 冏 冏 冏
D ␦ ⌬t n D ␦ ⌬t n
E ⫹
共 ⌬r 兲 2
E ⫹ 2
D ␦ ⌬t
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2
En 冏 into Eqs. 共A7b兲 and 共A8b兲 and rearranging the terms we
obtain
␣ ⭓0, 共A7a兲 1
⌬t⭐ , 共A9b兲
4␦ 4␦
D ␦ ⌬t D ␦ ⌬t D ␦ ⌬t ⫹ ⫹兩兩
1⭓2 ⫹2 ⫹ , 共A7b兲 共 ⌬r 兲 2 ⌬r 共 ⌬ 兲 2
共 ⌬r 兲 2
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2 r i ⌬r
so that, after removing absolute value signs in Eq. 共A6兲 and respectively. Both inequalities provide necessary conditions
simplifying, we obtain for the stability of Eq. 共A2兲.
The values used in all our calculations are D⫽0.516,
⌬r⫽1/34, ⌬ ⫽2 /68, and  ⫽⫺0.91. Thus by consider-
兩 e (i, j) 兩 ⭐E ⫹ ␣ ⌬tE ⫹⌬tT max⫽ 共 1⫹ ␣ ⌬t 兲 E ⫹⌬tT max . ing, for example, the value of ␦ to obtain the pentagonal
n⫹1 n n n
 ⭐0, 共A8a兲
␦ ⌬t ␦ ⌬t ␦ ⌬t
1⭓2 ⫹2 ⫹ ⫹ 兩  兩 ⌬t. 共A8b兲 FIG. 10. Reconstructed image using the complex coefficients
共 ⌬r 兲 2
r i共 ⌬ 兲 2 r i ⌬r tabulated in Table I and Eq. 共B1兲.
051913-8
TURING PATTERNS WITH PENTAGONAL SYMMETRY PHYSICAL REVIEW E 65 051913
0
u 共 r, 兲 rJ m 共 k mn r 兲 e ⫺im d dr.
lated in this work can be revealed by means of a modal By examining the magnitude 兩 C mn 兩 of these coefficients, we
decomposition. In particular, the solution of Eqs. 共1兲, u(r, ), can determine the principal modes of the function u(r, ).
can be expanded in a Fourier-Bessel series as We performed the Fourier-Bessel decomposition of the
pattern in Fig. 4共c兲. In Table I, the normalized magnitudes
⬁ ⬁ 兩 C mn 兩 for m⫽0,1, . . . ,7 and n⫽1,2, . . . ,7, are tabulated. It
can be seen that the more relevant modes are 共03兲, 共51兲, and
u 共 r, 兲 ⫽ 兺 兺
m⫽0 n⫽1
C mn J m 共 k mn r 兲 e im , 共B1兲
共01兲. Since J 0 is nonzero at the origin, the enhancement of
modes k 03 and k 01 account for the central spot in the pen-
tagonal pattern.
where k mn ⫽ mn /a, as defined in Sec. II. In order to verify our result, we use the obtained 共com-
Using the orthonormality and completeness of plex兲 coefficients, to reconstruct the pattern using Eq. 共B1兲.
J m (k mn r)e im , the complex coefficients C mn are given by The result is shown in Fig. 10.
关1兴 F.H.C. Hotchkiss, Paleobiology 24, 200 共1998兲, and references 关18兴 K.J. Painter, P.K. Maini, and H.G. Othmer, Proc. Natl. Acad.
therein. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5549 共1999兲.
关2兴 D. Gil, P. Domı́nguez, M. Torres, and I. Jiménez, Geobios 32, 关19兴 C. Varea, J.L. Aragón, and R.A. Barrio, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4588
861 共1999兲, and references therein. 共1999兲.
关3兴 A.J. Koch and H. Meinhardt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1481 关20兴 S.S. Liaw, C.C. Yang, R.T. Liu, and J.T. Hong, Phys. Rev. E
64, 041909 共2001兲.
共1994兲.
关21兴 Y. Chen and A.F. Schler, Nature 共London兲 411, 607 共2001兲.
关4兴 J. Boissonade, E. Dulos, and P. De Kepper, in Chemical Waves
关22兴 R. Dillon, P.K. Maini, and H.G. Othmer, J. Math. Biol. 32, 345
and Patterns, edited by R. Kapral and K. Showalter 共Kluwer, 共1994兲.
Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995兲, p. 221. 关23兴 E.J. Crampin, E.A. Gaffney, and P.K. Maini, Bull. Math. Biol.
关5兴 P. Borckmans, G. Dewel, A. Dewit, and D. Walgraef, in 61, 1093 共1999兲.
Chemical Waves and Patterns 共Ref. 关4兴兲, p. 323. 关24兴 C.J. Lowe and G.A. Wray, Nature 共London兲 389, 718 共1997兲.
关6兴 D.J. Wollkind and L.E. Stephenson, in Mathematical Models 关25兴 G. Panganiban et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 5162
for Biological Pattern Formation, edited by P. K. Maini and 共1997兲.
H.G. Othmer 共Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000兲, p. 113. 关26兴 A clear example of the disklike arrangement of the five pri-
关7兴 R.B. Emlet, Biol. Bull. 174, 4 共1988兲. mary podia is also shown in Fig. 212 of L.H. Hyman, The
关8兴 P.K. Maini, M.R. Myerscough, K.H. Winters and J.D. Murray, Invertebrates, Echinodermata 共McGraw-Hill, New York,
1995兲, Vol. IV, p. 497.
Bull. Math. Biol. 53, 701 共1991兲.
关27兴 B. David and R. Mooi, in Echinoderms: San Francisco, edited
关9兴 A.M. Turing, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B Biol. Sci.
by R. Mooi and M. Telford 共Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998兲, p. 21.
237, 37 共1952兲. 关28兴 H. Meinhardt, Dev. Biol. 157, 321 共1993兲.
关10兴 J.D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, 2nd ed. 共Springer-Verlag, 关29兴 B.N. Nagorcka, Austral. J. Agric. Res. 46, 333 共1995兲.
New York, 1993兲. 关30兴 H.F. Nijhout, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 239, 81 共1990兲.
关11兴 H. Meinhardt, Models of Biological Pattern Formation 共Aca- 关31兴 H. Hess, W. I. Ausich, C.E. Brett, and M. Simms, Fossil
demic Press, London, 1982兲. Crinoids 共Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999兲.
关12兴 J.D. Murray, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B Biol. Sci. 关32兴 G. Ubaghs, in Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part T:
295, 473 共1981兲; J. Theor. Biol. 88, 161 共1981兲. Echinodermata 2, edited by R.C. Moore and C. Teichert 共The
关13兴 H. Meinhardt and M. Klinger, J. Theor. Biol. 126, 63 共1987兲; Geological Society of America/The University of Kansas,
H. Meinhardt, The Algorithmic Beauty of Sea Shells, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO/Lawrence, KS, 1978兲, Vol. 2.
共Springer, New York, 1998兲. 关33兴 R.D.K. Thomas, R.M. Shearman, and G.W. Stewart, Science
关14兴 S. Kondo and R. Asai, Nature 共London兲 376, 765 共1995兲. 288, 1239 共2000兲.
关15兴 T. Hofer and P.K. Maini, Nature 共London兲 380, 678 共1996兲. 关34兴 The appearance and role of Dirichlet domains in biology is
关16兴 C. Varea, J.L. Aragón, and R.A. Barrio, Phys. Rev. E 56, 1250 discussed in the A.J. Koch and H. Meinhardt review paper 关3兴
共1997兲. in the context of the giraffe coat pattern.
关17兴 R.A. Barrio, C. Varea, J.L. Aragón, and P.K. Maini, Bull. 关35兴 G. Sewell, The Numerical Solution of Ordinary and Partial
Math. Biol. 61, 483 共1999兲. Differential Equations 共Academic Press, London, 1988兲.
051913-9