Design Curves for
Tendon
Profile in
Prestressed Concrete Beams
Env
Coral Univers
hapa, New York
Y
he preliminary design of prestressed.
concrete beams # generally based
on working steess imitations, In order to
simplify the task of the designer, many
Hinve-saving techniques for optimizing
‘beam cross section, prestessing force,
and tendon cecentricity have bees in=
reduced,
‘One of the first and anost popular de-
sign aids is the Magne] diagram, shown
in Fig, 1a, whieh was introduced im
1945." The Magnel diagram defines, for
a known e1oss section, the acceptible
combinations af eccentrteity and pre-
stressing foree at a particular location
along the span. Although limited in
soope, it hus boon sufficiently useful in
ian to warrant continued use
#, Currant texthuuks on pre-
stressed concrete design continue to
refer to the Magnet diagram as a useful
design tool The primacy Timitation of
the priginal Mayme! diagram is that (he
4
Mohammad R. Ehsani
Dopanment sf Ciul Enginaerig and
Engiwserieg Mechanics
Unversy of arizona,
J. Russell Blewitt
‘Bradusta Renearon Assitant
Boparimont of Ci and
mental Erqinesn ng
‘Asgbtont Profeceor
“Tueson, arizona
Cesignes must genoate a separate iv
gram for eyo critical posut along. the
span,
Keshaamurthy bas proposed
ifieation of the Maunel diagram,
shown in Fig. 1b. This modifienti
graphically represents the safe zanr- of
eccentricity and prestressing fore eit
relates to the actual position en the css
scotion. In purticular, the method cited
in Ref. 7 ean be used to obtain wn
dimensionalized design churts, The
charts apply to a large mumber of cross
sections subjected 9 arbitrary (ouing
and are easily gonerated by band, How
ever, in order to artive at the tendon
profile, the user determines the allen
able eccentricity af a number of ports
along the span. These eccentricities ean
then be plotted to give the accept
able zone Jor the entire length of the
beam.
‘The charts presented herein graplii-
cally represont the zone of acceptable
eeceitricity for the entire span. In adds
tios, a design procedure is proposed
which engbles the user to select the
bbear crass section and the tendon pro-
Ale, The method is applicable ta pris
matic, symmniatrical or onsynumetrical
ross sections. Only vniformly loaded,
Simply supported heams ace considered,
and the effect of the presence of mild
relnforeing steel is ignored.
“The current ACT Gade* wid AASHTO
Specifications? stipulate stress limits
which fom: the primary bass for pre-
Timinary member selection. These
working stress designs olten lead to
members which satisfy ultimate
ftensth and serviceability requirements
‘The move toward wtimate strength de.
signt™ combined with coraputeraided
optimiration techniques has resalted in
Rewer advancements in working stress
design methods. However, the need for
fa continuation in the refinement of
working stress methods should not he
overloaked. The revent wark by Oribson
isa step in this direction.*
OBJECTIVES
As wentianed above, the limitations
of the Magne] diagram and its modifica:
ons are as follows’
1. Bach diggrawn can be wsed only for
‘known eruss-fectional properties,
2. Fach vse of the diageam is himited
tog specific moment; therefore, new
moment celenlations are cequired ot
each eritical location along the span,
Given these Limitations, Magnel's de-
Boition of the safe zone eanaot directly
represent the acceptable range of eo-
centricity for the entize length of the
beam in a single applica
To overcome these limitations.
method is proposed lor developing, de-
sign churts which extend the idea of
Magne!'s safe zone into a relationship
for the entie length of a simply: sup
‘ported beam. The psimary objectives im
PCIJOURNALMsyJune 1986
‘Synopsis
‘A proposed design procedure and
raecompanying design charts for the
working stress design of uniformly
loaded, simply supponed, prestressec
‘concrete beams is presented. The
proposed method is formulated
‘through an oxtansion of Magnet's sao
zone into a relationship for the entire
length of the beam, A briel review of
the Magne! diagram Is followed by &