Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Types of Majorities in The Indian Parliament: Simple Majority
Types of Majorities in The Indian Parliament: Simple Majority
In the parliament, all the important decisions are taken by the majority. Framing a law, the passage of the budget,
various bills, motions, amendment are the part of these decisions. There are certain types of majority followed in
the Parliament to pass the specific bill and motion. There are 4 majorities. They are:
1. Simple Majority
2. Absolute majority
3. Effective majority
4. Special majority
SIMPLE MAJORITY
The simple majority is also called as “working majority’. This implies that the majority of more than fifty percent of
the members of the legislature present and voting excluding the member abstaining.
For example: If the total number of members of parliament present and voting is 500, strength of 251 or more will
be a simple majority.
A Simple majority is used in:
● Most of the normal bills and a number of provisions in the Constitution can be amended by a simple majority of
the two Houses of Parliament outside the scope of Article 368. This includes:
● Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing states
● For the proclamation of financial emergency and for revoking the National Emergency.
● Resolution passed by the Rajya Sabha should be approved by the Lok Sabha with a simple majority
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
__________
ABSOLUTE MAJORITY
It is the majority of more than fifty percent of the total strength of the House. It has huge significance in
parliamentary business.
For example, in the case of the Lok Sabha, which has a total strength of 545 members, 273 is the absolute majority.
It is not used anywhere in the constitution as a standalone requirement. If a political party has an Absolute
Majority, it means it gets to form the government.
Absolute majority is used in:
The absolute majority is not used in the normal business of the Parliament or State Legislature But this majority
is used during the general election, for the formation of government at the Center and States.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
__________
EFFECTIVE MAJORITY
The effective majority is more than fifty percent of the effective strength of the house. The vacancies are not taken
into account. The Constitution of India describes “all the then members” which refers to the effective majority.
Vacancies arise due to 3 reasons – Death, Disqualification, Resignation. Some sources mention Absenteeism as a
vacancy but that is incorrect.
For example: the total strength of Rajya Sabha is 245. Suppose if there are 15 vacancies, 230 shall be the effective
strength and more than 50 % of this. That means 116 more than this is called as the effective majority.
The Effective majority is used in:
All types other than the above three are called special majorities. There are 3 types of special majorities for the
parliamentary business.
Article 249 directs the Parliament to legislate on a subject in the State List in the national interest. Article 312 is the
creation of one or more new All India Services. The resolution must be passed by Rajya Sabha supported by not
less than 2/3 of the members present and voting. This is basically a majority of 2/3rd of the members of the House
present and voting excluding the number of members abstaining.
For example: In Rajya Sabha, the total strength is 245. If only 200 members are present and voting, only 2/3rd of
this (200) shall be majority under Article 249.
Special majority under Article 61
Article 61 deals with the impeachment of President. A resolution under this is passed by not less than 2/3rd of the
total strength of the House, including the number of vacancies.
For example: for passing such a resolution it requires the support of 2/3rd of the total strength of the upper house
245, that is 164 or more.
Special majority under Article 368 (Constitutional Amendment)
A bill seeking a constitutional amendment requires its passage by 2/3rd of the members of the House present and
voting. There is no provision for joint sitting for this. Both the houses have to pass it separately. This majority
should be the absolute majority of the house. That means Absolute + Special Majority.
The constitutional amendment bills, resolutions for the removal of the judges of the Supreme Court or the high
courts, chief election commission, comptroller and auditor general etc. are passed. This majority is needed for the
passage of the resolution for approving the continuation of National emergency, from both the Houses of
Parliament.
In-Depth Understanding Of The Directive Principles Of State Policy
1. Resemble the ‘Instrument of Instructions’ enumerated in the Government of India Act, 1935.
2. Aim at realising the high ideals of justice, liberty, equality and fraternity as outlined in Preamble to the Constitution.
3. Embody the concept of a ‘welfare state’.
4. Seek to establish economic and social democracy.
5. Are non-justiciable.
6. Fundamental in the governance of the country.
7. Help the courts in examining and determining the constitutional validity of a law.
#Classification
The Constitution does not contain any classification of the Directive Principles. However, on the basis of their
content and direction, they can be classified broadly into socialist, Gandhian and liberal-intellectual.
#Socialistic Principles:
1. to promote the welfare of the people by securing a social order permeated by social, economic and political justice
and to minimise inequalities in income, status, facilities and opportunities. (Art 38)
2. to secure (a) the right to adequate means of livelihood for all citizens; (b) the equitable distribution of material
resources of the community for common good; (c) prevention of concentration of wealth and means of production;
(d) equal pay for equal work for men and women; (e) preservation of the health and strength of workers and
children against forcible abuse; and (f) opportunities for healthy development of children. (Art 39)
3. to promote equal justice and to provide free legal aid to the poor. (Art 39A)
4. to secure the right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and
disablement. (Art 41)
5. to make provision for just and humane conditions for work and maternity relief. (Art 42)
6. to secure a living wage, a decent standard of life and social and cultural opportunities for all workers (Art 43)
7. to take steps to secure the participation of workers in the management of industries (Art 43A)
8. to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living of people and to improve public health. (Art 47)
1. to organize village Panchayats and endow them with necessary powers and authority to enable them to function as
units of self government. (Art 40)
2. to promote cottage industries on an individual or co-operation basis in rural areas. (Art 43)
3. to promote voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control, and professional management of co-
operative societies. (Art 43B)
4. to promote the educational and economic interests of SCs, STs and other weaker sections of the society and to
protect them from social injustice and exploitation. (Art 46)
5. to prohibit the consumption of intoxicating drinks and drugs which are injurious to health. (Art 47)
6. to prohibit slaughter of cows, calves and other milch and drought cattle and to improve their breeds. (Art 48)
# Liberal-Intellectual Principles:
These principles represent the ideology of liberalism and direct the state to
th
# Added by 44 Amendment Act, 1978:
th
# Added by 97 Amendment Act, 2011:
1. to promote voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic control, and professional management of co-
operative societies. (Art 43B)
th
86 Amendment Act, 2002 changed the subject matter of Art 45 and made elementary education a fundamental
right under Art 21A. The amended directive requires the state to provide early childhood care and education for all
children until they complete the age of 6 years.
#1. The ideal of ‘Welfare State’ in the Indian Constitution is enshrined in its (2015)
(a) Preamble
(b) Directive Principles of State Policy
(c) Fundamental Rights
(d) Seventh Schedule
#2. Consider the following statements regarding the Directive Principles of State Policy : (2015)
#4. According to the Constitution of India, which of the following are fundamental for the governance of the
country? (2013)
(a) Fundamental Rights
(b) Fundamental Duties
(c) Directive Principles of State Policy
(d) Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Duties
#5. ‘Economic Justice’ as one of the objectives of the Indian Constitution has been provided in (2013)
(a) the Preamble and the Fundamental Rights
(b) the Preamble and the Directive Principles of State Policy
(c) the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy
(d) None of the above
#6. Consider the following provisions under the Directive Principles of State Policy as enshrined in the Constitution
of India : (2012)
#7. Which of the above are Gandhian Principles that are reflected in the Directive Principles of State Policy ?
(2012)
(a) 1, 2 and 4 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 1, 3 and 4 only
(d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
In a federal <constitutional division of power b/w centre and states> parliamentary democracy <real power vests
in council of ministers which is accountable to lower house i.e LokSabha> which is India, president and governor are
only ceremonial heads of state, real power lies with elected govt headed by PM and CM. President and governors
have to act in accordance with the aid and advice of council of ministers.
So, are they mere rubber stamps? Do they have any discretionary powers? What’s the nature of that discretionary
power?
Art 74 and art 163 basically states that council of minister will aid and advice president and governor. In its various
judgments supreme court interpreted that they have to act only upon and in accordance with the aid and advice of
CoM, save in a few well known exceptional circumstances.
Infamous 42nd amendment clarified this position and added that president shall act in accordance with aid and
advice which was diluted by 44th amendment so that president can return back advice for reconsideration after
which advice shall be binding. No changes were made wrt governor.
So, it’s clear by constitution (for president) as well as supreme court judgement (governor) that only in exceptional
circumstances can they act as per their own discretion.
Rule of thumb is, a situation where the CoM is not in a position to tender unbiased or impartial advice to the
president / governor can they use their own discretion.
Situation in which discretion can be used?
1. When no party has clear majority– Obviously caretaker govt would tend to advice president or governor to call it’s
candidate for govt formation,, they have to as per their discretion
2. When lower house has lost confidence in the govt– Obviously govt would not ask for dissolution, discretion has to
be used
But the real power comes from the fact that there is no time limit specified within the constitution within which
president/ governor have to give assent to the bill. They may simply decide to sit on the bill and do nothing (pocket
veto).
In the case of governor there is more scope for discretion-
1. For bills– governor can reserve bills for consideration of president. Obviously no govt will ask it’s bill to be reserved,
discretion has to be applied.
2. Recommendation of president’s rule-Again no govt would advise imposition of presidential rule.
This reconsideration of bills become sore point b/w governor and govt <against the federal spirit; president i.e
union CoM taking decisions on state bills; governor is not even elected>
Let’s compare president and governor
Issue President Governor
Nominated by president;
Appointment Indirect election representative of union in
states
State Bills reserved for Presidents’s consideration under the Constitution, may be classified as follows:—
I. Bills which must be reserved for President’s consideration
II. Bills which may be reserved for President’s consideration and assent for specific purposes
a). To secure immunity from operation of Articles 14 and 19. These are Bills for
(b) A Bill relating to a subject enumerated in the Concurrent List, to ensure operation of its provisions despite their
repugnancy to a Union law or an existing law, by securing President’s assent in terms of Article 254(2). <for
instance Rajsthan govt took presidential consent for it’s labour law which violated union legislation>
(c) Legislation imposing restrictions on trade and commerce requiring Presidential sanction under the
III. Bills which may not specifically fall under any of the above categories, yet may be reserved by the Governor
for President’s consideration under Article 200.
They are reserved if the bill is deemed to be against broader national interest
But what if even 2nd advice of CoM which enjoys the confidence of house is unconstitutional and thus comes in
conflict with the oath of president i.e to preserve, protect and defend the constitution?
Well, there’s no precedence. Supreme court will have to take the call if in very exceptional circumstances,
president can overrule the governor.
Appendix-
Presidential election and removal
Presidential election -indirect election
Method – proportional representation by means of single transferable vote
Electoral college – All the elected members of parliament plus elected members of legislative assembly of States
and UT of Puducherry and NCT.
Value of vote of an MLA = total population of state / total elected members in LA ×1000
Value of vote of an MP= total value of votes of all MLAs of all states / total elected members of parliament
Note members of legislative council, nominated members of Legislative assembly, Lok Sabha , Rajya Sabha do not
participate <simple, how can those whom he nominates participate in his own election>
Value of all the states plus UT votes = value of all
Contrast this with election of Vice President in which all members of parliament (nominated as well as elected)
participate but members of state assembles do not.
Removal of president– Impeachment, 2/3rd (absolute 2/3rd not present and voting) of both the houses vote for
his removal.
Parliamentary v/s presidential system
In parliamentary system (India), council of minister is part of legislature<all ministers come from either LS or RS>.
PM is head of govt while president is head of state.
In presidential system, President is the head of state as well as head of govt. He is not part of legislature. He
chooses his own cabinet and cabinet ministers can not be part of legislature. Recall John Kerry had to resign from
Senate when he was appointed secretary of state.
Rule of Law should not be equated with law and order. The breakdown of law and order is
a temporary phenomenon.
Breakdown of Rule of Law means collapse of good governance and breakdown of constitutional machinery in a
State.
It may be difficult to define the concept with precision but in essence it signifies commitment to
certain principles and values. Generally, the rule of law is the principle that no one is above the law and treated
equally among citizens.
Rule of law symbolises the quest of civilised democratic societies to combine that degree of liberty without which
law is tyranny with that degree of law without which liberty becomes licence.
However high you may be, the law is above you.
For instance, One may be the Prime Minister or the Speaker or the Imam or the Archbishop or a judge or the
Sankaracharya or whoever, all are equally subject to the law. That imparts the element of non-discrimination in the
concept of the Rule of Law.
It was A.V. Dicey, the English Professor and Constitutional expert, who developed this concept. He defined 3
principles that govern the rule of law.
1. Supremacy of Law
No man shall be punished or made to suffer in body or goods except for the violation of law. Such a violation must
be established in an ordinary court of land and in ordinary legal manner.
2. Equality before Law
No man is above the law and everyone, whatever his condition or rank is, is subject to the ordinary laws of the
land. <It means a person can sue or be sued in a court of law>
3. Predominance of Legal spirit
The result of the ordinary law of the land is constitution. It indicates that the general principles of the constitution
are the result of judicial decision of the courts in England. <However, this principle does not apply in case of written
constitution. It stands modified in India, where it reads that the constitution is the supreme law of land & all other
laws in order to be legally valid shall conform to constitution>
Nazi Germany put Jews in concentration camps and thereafter sent them to the gas chambers. The justification
offered was that there was a law which empowered such acts to be done. But that was rule by law, not Rule of
Law.
During the apartheid regime in South Africa, repressive and racially discriminatory laws against the black majority
were sought to be justified on the basis of enacted laws.
In India, this concept is implicitly mentioned in the fundamental rights of our constitution. The equality before law
(Article 14) includes Rule of Law in itself.
Indian Constitution grants some exception to the Rule of Law.
1. The President/Governor is not answerable to court of law in discharge of his executive functions.
2. No criminal proceedings whatsoever can be instituted against President or Governor of state, while he is in office.
3. No civil proceedings in which relief is claimed can be filed against President or Governor except after a expire of a 2
month notice that is served on him.
Under International laws, the visiting heads of state, heads of govt, ministers, officials and foreign diplomats who
are posted in country are not subjected to jurisdiction of local courts in discharge of their official functions.
What are the concerns regarding Rule of Law in India?
Legal experts have raised their concerns regarding the implementation of Rule of Law in India. A free democratic
society like India cannot have recourse to measures that violate the very essence of rule of law.
For instance, a law that permits the killing of suspected terrorists or enables indefinite detention without prior
hearing in the absolute discretion of the executive is destructive of the rule of law. Fake encounters have no place
in a govt professedly based on the rule of law.
Therefore, we should strive to instill the rule of law temperament and culture at home and in educational
institutions. The aim should be that rule of law becomes the secular religion of all nations based on tolerance and
mutual respect.
Very quickly then, most of us are familiar with the 3 types of emergencies.
b. Features
Flashback : Lets go back to the time of the Emergency. All it took then was an oral instruction by the then PM
Indira Gandhi to President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed (who received a lot of criticism).
To understand National Emergency, we need to examine the 44th Amendment Provisions whose sole purpose was
to put a check on such powers of the President.
Can only be proclaimed on the written advice of the Union Cabinet (not the PM). Perhaps, this is the only place
where Union Cabinet has a role.
Expires in 1 month from its issue unless approved by a Special Majority (of the second kind*) – Not less than 2/3rd
of the Members present and voting + Absolute Majority – in both the houses of the Parliament.
If the LS is dissolved, then RS shall approve it within 1 month and the re-constituted LS shall ratify within 30 days.
Once approved, the proclamation is extended for 6 months, which can be extended again for 6 more months.
Not less than 1/10th of the Members of the LS(this can only be initiated in the LS) may give notice in writing to the
Speaker or President (when LS is not in session). If there is no session, a special sitting of the LS shall be held within
14 days. If the resolution, the President has to revoke the Emergency.
c. Effects
Executive : State Govt. is not suspended. Union Govt. can issue orders to the State Govt. on subjects on the State
List (something that it can’t normally do).
Legislature : State Legislature is not suspended. However, Parliament can make laws on the State subjects. Such laws
remain valid for 6 months after the Emergency ceases to be.
Financial : Distribution as per the President’s will subject to approval by the Parliament.
Art. 20 and 21 are fundamental of the FRs and cannot be suspended. Interested readers can read the story
of Judge Khanna’s courage here.
#2. Art. 356 – President’s Rule
If the President is satisfied that there exists a situation where the State Admin. cannot be carried in accordance
with the provisions of the Constitution, he can make a Proclamation of Failure of Constitutional Machinery in a
State.
Ambedkar had envisaged Art. 356 to remain a dead letter in the Constitution. Much to his surprise it has been used
not less than 119 times during the first 63 years.
b. Features
Such a proclamation lapses after 2 months, unless approved by the Parliament by a simple majority. Once
approved, it lasts for 6 months which can again be extended for 6 more months subjected to maximum of 3 years.
To extend it beyond 1 year, 2 conditions must be fulfilled
National Emergency should be in operation (in whole of India or whole or any part of the State).
ECI certifies that elections cannot be conducted in the state.
c. Effect
declare Executive powers of the State rest with him. He can also delegate the same to any other authority (like the
Governor) as per his liking.
dissolve or suspend the State Legislature. If suspended, the Parliament can exercise its legislative powers. (or
delegate it to any other authority)
Effect on FR : No Effect
If the President is satisfied that a situation has arisen whereby the financial stability or credit of India or of any part
of the territory thereof is threatened, he may by a Proclamation make a declaration to that effect.
b. Features
It will ordinarily remain in force for 2 months, unless its is approved by both the houses. If LS is dissolved in this
period, similar clause as that of the National Emergency applies.
c. Effect
Effect on FR : No Effect
Conventionally the oath is either a declaration of fact or a promise with wording associated to something
considered sacred as a sign of truth. Here we are giving the list of Oath and Resignations.
Many UPSC aspirants predominantly while studying this Indian Polity would have felt that it is a parched and
theoretical subject. But it is an interesting subject if approached with right strategies. A UPSC aspirant cannot be
avoided during their UPSC IAS exam preparation.
UPSC IAS Exam conducted by Union Public Service commission which is regarded as the most challenging
examination in India. Polity is a vital topic at all the three stages of UPSC IAS exam, be it Prelims, Mains or
Interview. Here we are giving information about Sessions of Indian Parliament.
A session of Indian Parliament is the period during which a House meets almost every day uninterruptedly to
manage the business. There are typically three sessions in a year. A session contains many meetings. The three
important sessions are:
After a brief break of around two months, both the Houses of the Parliament continue business in July and
continue till September.
The monsoon session is devoted mainly to discussions on matters of public interest.
Winter Session
Minerva Mills and Fortified the idea of the basic structure which
Union of India 1980 was put forward earlier in the Keshavananda
Bharti Case.
First Judges Case or S.P. The ruling gave the Executive dominance over
Gupta case 1981 the Judiciary in judicial appointments for the
next 12 years
Second Judges Case or The majority verdict gave back Chief Justice of
Supreme Court India’s power over judicial appointments and
Advocates on Record transfers.
Association versus
Union of India 1993
Samatha and State of SC declared that the forest land, tribal land,
Andhra Pradesh 1997 and government land, in scheduled areas
could not be leased to private companies or
non-tribal for industrial operations. Such
activity is only permissible to a government
undertaking and tribal people.
I.R Coelho and State of If a law is included in the 9th schedule of the
Tamil Nadu 2007 Indian constitution, it can still be examined
and confronted in court.
Section 377 case 2009 The Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860 declared as unconstitutional. The same
was reversed by the Supreme Court in 2013.
Lily Thomas and Union SC ruled that any Member of the legislative
Of India 2013 assembly, Member of a legislative council or
Member of Parliament who was found guilty
of a crime and given a minimum of two-year
imprisonment, would lose membership of the
House with an immediate effect.