Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Some Fruit Characteristics of Wild Pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) Genotypes From Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey
Some Fruit Characteristics of Wild Pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) Genotypes From Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey
Some Fruit Characteristics of Wild Pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) Genotypes From Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey
-2016
Abstract- In this study, the fruits of ten wild grown pomegranate genotypes were sampled from Mardin province and
compared to standard cultivar ‘Hicaznar’ for some fruit characteristics including fruit mass, shape index, calyx length, peel
thickness, aril yield, juice yield, soluble solid content, titratable acidity, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity and total
anthocyanin content. We found a wide variation for most of the searched characteristics both in wild genotypes and between
wild genotypes and cv. ‘Hicaznar’. The average fruit mass ranged from 138-204 g among wild genotypes and cv. ‘Hicaznar’
had 407 g fruit mass. The results showed that in general wild genotypes had lower aril and juice yields than cv. ‘Hicaznar’
but they have higher total phenolic content and antioxidant activity than cv. ‘Hicaznar’.
Some Fruit Characteristics of Wild Pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) Genotypes From Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey
146
International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 2321-9009, Vol-4, Iss-3, Spl. Issue-2 Sep.-2016
The aim of this study is to determine the some fruit genotypes and also between wild genotypes and cv.
characteristics in wild pomegranate genotypes. ‘Hicaznar’ in terms of most of the physico-chemical
properties (Table 1 and 2).
II. DETAILS EXPERIMENTAL
Wild pomegranates showed fruit mass between 138 g
2.1. Materials and procedures (MAR-05) and 204 g (MAR-01), respectively. The
The study was conducted in Mardin province, Turkey national cultivar ‘Hicaznar’ had fruit mass 407 g.
in 2014. Firstly, the spots of naturally grown wild This result indicating that cv. ‘Hicaznar’ had 2-2.5
pomegranates were identified. The fruits were folds higher fruit mass than wild genotypes.
harvested at maturity phase and the harvested fruits
were immediately taken into sample cups to prevent When we look at inside of pomegranate fruits, aril
moisture loss, transferred to laboratory and stored at - and juice yield of wild genotypes were between
20 C0 until analyses. The samples were subjected to 35.8% (MAR-04) and 42.6% (MAR-07);55.4%
analyses as quickly as possible. (MAR-01) and 66.1% (MAR-06) (Table 1). The
cultivar ‘Hicaznar’ had 57.4% and 71.9% aril yield
Ten fruits from each genotype were randomly
and juice yield, respectively.
chosenand measured. Data were collected on physical
including fruit mass (g), calyx length (mm), peel
thickness (mm), aril yield (%), fruit juice yield (%) It is clear that cultivated pomegranates generally had
and chemical including soluble solid content (SSC higher fruit mass, aril and juice yield that those
%), total acidity (TA, %). characteristics was improved in pomegranate
domestication process. Al-Said et al.10reported big
differences among the pomegranate cultivars and
Total phenolic content expressed as mg GAE per 100
g fresh fruit, total anthocyanins mg cyanidin 3- wild pomegranates both aril yields and fruit mass.
They reported average 187 g fruit mass in wild
glucoside equivalent per 100 g fresh fruit and
pomegranate and between 390-424 g fruit mass in
antioxidant activity (DPPH, %), respectively.
pomegranate cultivars. On the basis of aril and kernel
The wild genotypes were each given an MAR
texture, cv. Hicaznar may be considered more
(Mardin province in the region) number. Fruit mass
was measured by digital balance. Peel thickness was suitable for fresh consumption while all wild
determined in mm by digital caliper. genotypes will be more suited for juice extraction due
to their ‘hard’ seed texture. Overall, these results
indicate that the ten wild pomegranate genotypes and
Flesh parts of fruit samples were used to assess the
cv. ‘Hicaznar’ can be classified into two groups of
soluble solid content (SSC), titratable acidity, total
‘soft’ (cv. ‘Hicaznar’; low seed hardness and
phenolic content, antioxidant activity and total
toughness) and ‘hard’ (all wild genotypes; high seed
anthocyanin content. Soluble solid contents (SSC)
were determined by extracting and mixing one drops hardness and toughness). High juice content is a
desirable attribute in pomegranate production. There
of juice from the each fruit into a digital
were moderately significant differences in the juice
refractometer and displayed as %. Titratable acidity
content of the wild and cultivated pomegranates, with
was determined according to procedure of AOAC6.
cv. ‘Hicaznar’ having the highest amount of juice
For extraction, an aliquot of aril slurry was extracted than the wild genotypes (Table 1). Further
with buffer containing acetone, water and acetic acid examination of the aril toughness and juice content of
(70:29.5:0.5 v/v) for 1 h in the dark. Total phenolic pomegranate genotypes suggested that genotypes
which have lower aril toughness contained more juice
content (TPC) was determined using the colorimetric
per unit mass of aril. This information could be useful
Folin–Ciocalteu method7. Antioxidant activity
determined by DPPH method and the procedure in the early screening of existing wild genotypes,
particularly for juice production.
described by Brand-Williams, Cuvelier and Berset8
was followed. Total anthocyanin content was
estimated by Giusti and Wrolstad9. Shape index, calyx length and peel thickness of wild
genotypes were between 0.89 (MAR-04)-1.01 (MAR-
07); 13.8 mm (MAR-06) and 15.1 mm (MAR-01);
2.2. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of data was done according to 3.9 mm (MAR-07)-4.2 mm (MAR-03). The cultivar
SPSS using statistical software. Data were analyzed ‘Hicaznar’ had 1.04, 22.4 mm and 4.0 mm shape
index, calyx length and peel thickness, respectively
by Statistical Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and
(Table 1).
differences among means were determined for
significant at P<0.05 using LSD test.
Soluble solid content (SSC) of wild pomegranate
genotypes were between 13.8 % (MAR-02) and
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
15.4% (MAR-08) indicating a little bit lower than cv.
‘Hicaznar’; however, the wild genotypes had
As shown in Table 1 and 2, there were statistical
differences (p<0.05) between wild pomegranate significantly high total acidity (between 2.11-2.33%)
Some Fruit Characteristics of Wild Pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) Genotypes From Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey
147
International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 2321-9009, Vol-4, Iss-3, Spl. Issue-2 Sep.-2016
than cv. ‘Hicaznar’ (Table 2). Low sugar and high Table 1. Pomological characteristics of wild
titratable acidity of fruit juice in wild genotypes, pomegranates
resulting in a lower sugar:acid ratio or maturity index
(SSC:TA) and classified all wild pomegranates as
sour taste. However cv. ‘Hicaznar’ classified as
sweet-sour. This very low sugar:acid ratio explains
the characteristic ‘sour’ taste of the wild
pomegranates juice. The acidic taste and related
flavour are some of the important attributes of
pomegranate juice, which contribute to its strong
appeal in the food and beverage industry. In this
regard, the wild genotypes represents a diversity in
local pomegranate genetic resource with very low
sugar:acid ratio that is suited for formulation of a
wide range of food and beverage products.
Some Fruit Characteristics of Wild Pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) Genotypes From Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey
148
International Journal of Advances in Science Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 2321-9009, Vol-4, Iss-3, Spl. Issue-2 Sep.-2016
[8] W. Brand-Williams, M.E. Cuvelier, C. Berset,“Use of a Handbook of food analytical chemistry (pp. 19–31). New
free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity“. York: Wiley, 2005.
LWT-Food Science and Technology, vol. 28, pp. 25–30, [10] FA. Al-Said, LU. Opara, RA. Al-
1995. Yahyai,“Physicochemical and textural quality attributes of
[9] MM. Giusti, RE. Wrolstad,“Characterization and pomegranate cultivars (Punicagranatum L.) grown in the
measurement of anthocyanins by uv-visible spectroscopy“. Sultanate of Oman”. Journal Food Engineering, vol. 90,
Unit F1.2. In R. E. Wrolstad& S. J. Schwartz (Eds.), pp. 129-134, 2009.
Some Fruit Characteristics of Wild Pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) Genotypes From Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey
149