Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Walker Style Draft
Walker Style Draft
Walker Style Draft
Natasha Walker
diagnosis caused significant stress in Sigrun’s life, for more reasons than one. Before her
treatment, Sigrun was an avid runner living in an apartment alone and did not know how to cope
with the physical and financial changes she would soon experience. Cancer drugs cost too much
for the average family, even with insurance coverage, and some cannot afford the copays.
According to Sigrun, “I was supposed to start treatment in November 2017. I delayed treatment
until January 2018 because I didn’t have financial resources to start treatment. That was a stupid
thing to do, because there was a lot of damage done during those two months” ("Sigrun K.”,
2018). With the help of the nonprofit, Cancer Care, Sigrun finally began treatment because of its
co-pay assistance. She celebrated, “It’s life-changing. With the stress that you’re under with the
disease, you’re falling apart, and then you have to start stressing about finances. Receiving co-
pay assistance took away that horrible additional stress” ("Sigrun K.”, 2018). Sigrun learned to
adjust to her new life, living with her family for support and using a walker to move around the
house.
No one should have to delay treatment because of the cost. As far back as the 1920s, the
cost of healthcare surpassed what the average American can afford. Individuals cannot pay for
their healthcare, so who should? Citizens and governments in the United States heavily debate
this question, as political and sociological ideals either strongly support universal healthcare, or
How did the American healthcare system become what it is today? Policy for universal
healthcare has been pushed since the 1910s, and some of its strongest opposers are the American
Medical Association and unions. When federal governments first introduced the idea of
3
government funded health coverage, the AMA lead the opposition, and won. They worry most
about how physicians will be financially compensated when providing free care. Therefore,
every time a government considered providing universal coverage, they received strong
opposition. During the Great Depression, Franklin D. Roosevelt wanted to include a national
health system in his “New Deal,” but felt pressured to only include unemployment and “old-age”
benefits in his Social Security Act of 1935. In the 1940s, when wages stabilized, employers
competed by offering employer sponsored health insurance, which became the primary way of
gaining health insurance in the United States. Also, at this time, Truman released a universal
plan, but many labeled his plan as “socialized” and it received heavy opposition due to the Red
Scare. Lyndon B. Johnson successfully passed the Social Security Act of 1965, which began
Medicare and Medicaid. In the next few decades, policy focused on regulating the employer
sponsored health insurance. Obama released the Affordable Care Act in the 2000s, which began
a government mandated healthcare policy in the United States. Tens of millions of the uninsured
now have insurance through the ACA Marketplace, and the most meaningful part of the ACA
was its policy against companies denying health insurance due to a pre-existing condition: “Prior
to the passing of the ACA, it’s estimated that one in seven Americans were denied health
insurance because of a pre-existing condition” (Griffin, 2017). While this isn’t universal
healthcare, it’s a step in the direction of increased government control and regulations on
healthcare.
In the United States, having or not having health insurance can predict a person’s health.
According to a report by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit focused on health care issues
in the US, “Compared to those who have health coverage, people without health insurance are
more likely to skip preventive services and report that they do not have a regular source of health
4
care” (Foutz, Damic, Squires, & Garfield, 2018). Essentially, people delay treatment and
checkups due to lack of access to healthcare, so they wait until their sickness becomes life
threatening to avoid copays. Another study also evidences this correlation by the spike in doctor
visits after age 65, when people begin to qualify for Medicare, especially for those underinsured.
According to a paper published in the American Economic Review, “Race and education groups
that experience the largest gains in insurance coverage at age 65 experience large reductions in
the probability of delaying or not receiving medical care, and relative increases in the probability
of an annual doctor visit” (“Evidence from Medicare”, 2004). This study proves that health
insurance dictates a person’s health. Delaying medical care increases the overall cost of
healthcare in the United States, as evidenced by data collected by Debt.org, emergency treatment
Also, even the insured often cannot afford their medical bills. Richard Dickens, CancerCare’s
director of client advocacy, states, “Many people call us and they are angry. They say I’ve been
working my whole life, I’ve paid my taxes, I’ve been diligent, but now I’m being slammed, I
have to ask for charity ... There’s shame and anger in that” (Olen, 2017). Dickens makes the
Surprisingly, the US is one of the only developed nations without universal healthcare.
According to Max Fisher, a foreign news journalist, “The only developed outliers are a few still-
troubled Balkan states, the Soviet-style autocracy of Belarus, and the U.S. of A., the richest
6
nation in the world” (Fisher, 2012). In countries that provide universal healthcare, the people
support the healthcare system. For example, Canada has a popular and effective single-payer
system. Lawrence O. Gostin, JD, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center
on Public Health Law and Human Rights, cites, “In 2005, 85 percent of respondents to a national
public opinion survey believed that ‘eliminating public health care’ would fundamentally change
Canada and 87 percent believed that the direction of change would be negative” (Gostin, 2017).
These statistics prove that countries which provide coverage have high public support for
universal healthcare.
One major ideological argument against implementing universal healthcare in the United
States is strong opposition to becoming a socialized country with an overly powerful central
government. Even though Canada has a single-payer system, healthcare is not as centralized as
one may think, as provinces determine much of the spending. Gostin explains:
Over time, courts have recognized a federal “spending power”—federal government may
spend (and attach conditions to spending) in areas of provincial jurisdiction, a role that it
fulfills largely through transfers to provincial governments. The federal government also
Accordingly, the federal government accounts for less than 40 percent of total public
spending, although it raises almost half of total government revenues. (Gostin, 2017)
Gostin makes the point that a decentralized healthcare system, which would have more
popularity in the US, proves successful in Canada. States would have more rights than now when
deciding on healthcare.
7
More and more people support universal healthcare. In the summer of 2018, younger
members of the AMA convinced the organization to study changing its stance on the topic after
years of being the main opposition. “We believe healthcare is a human right, maybe more so than
past generations,” says Brad Zehr, a 29-year-old pathology resident at Ohio State University,
who took part in the debate. “There’s a generational shift happening, where we see universal
healthcare as a requirement” (Luthra, 2018). The AMA may finally lead the fight for universal
healthcare, as doctors will spend less time on paperwork and billing and more time with patients,
and Canada saw a rise in physician salaries after implementing its current healthcare system.
Support for universal healthcare from the AMA may shift the public opinion strongly in favor of
While it may appear that Americans stand against healthcare reform, public opinion
quickly changes. As cited by Bernie Sanders, the leader of the “Medicare for All” movement,
“According to an April poll by The Economist/YouGov, 60 percent of the American people want
statistics prove that not only do Americans want universal healthcare, they support direct
Walter McClure, a chairman of the Center for Policy Design, argues that universal
healthcare should be compared to universal public education: “Does government owe people a
public education? Is universal public education a handout to “takers” who ought to go out and
buy it on their own?” (McClure, Enthoven, & McDonald, 2017). Most believe in the necessity of
universal public education for the success of the country. Every person has a right to education to
8
contribute to the well-being of the United States, so every person should have a right to quality
My family moved to America with almost nothing, except a job. My dad worked as a
nurse while my mom pursued an education. In 10 years, my parents had a 401K and I had a
college fund. Then, my father was diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, the same
cancer as Sigrun, and the treatment weakened him until he could not keep up with the physical
demands of nursing. He performed administrative tasks in the same hospital. The cancer and
treatment affected the platelet levels in his blood, and he required monthly infusions to keep his
levels stable. Eventually, all our funds exhausted, and we could not afford the copay for this
infusion. With no other choice, we waited until my father could receive emergency treatment. He
had a stroke, and while recovering in the same hospital he worked in, they fired him, and we lost
our health insurance. We lived on donations from his coworkers for food and clothing, used
finances from our family overseas for rent, and collected hundreds of thousands of medical debts
Stories like mine and Sigrun’s are not uncommon, many suffer from financial struggles
while also suffering from their disease. Sanders recalls, “Oncologists have told me about cancer
patients who have been unable to acquire lifesaving treatments because they could not afford
them. This should not be happening in the world’s wealthiest country” (Sanders, 2017). People
shouldn’t have to suffer because they do not have access to medical treatment. Providing
universal healthcare proves financially and politically possible. According to a research article
published in the Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, “such paradigm changes require
shifts in the political landscape too: the emergence of a set of political actors with the support
necessary to mobilize the relevant loci of state authority and the will to implement substantial
9
change” (Tuohy, 2009). American citizens support universal healthcare. The American
References:
Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research. (2004). The impact of nearly
universal insurance coverage on health care utilization and health: evidence from
Fay, B. (2018). Emergency rooms vs. urgent care centers. Retrieved from
https://www.debt.org/medical/emergency-room-urgent-care-costs/
Fisher, M. (2012, June 28). Here's a map of the countries that provide universal health care
Foutz, J., Damico, A., Squires, E., & Garfield, R. (2018, March 05). The uninsured: a primer –
key facts about health insurance and the uninsured under the affordable care act - how
does lack of insurance affect access to health care? Retrieved from https://www.kff.org
Gostin, L. O. (2017). Five ethical values to guide health system reform. JAMA: Journal Of The
https://www.griffinbenefits.com/employeebenefitsblog/history_of_healthcare
Luthra, S. (2018, August 01). The next generation of doctors is pushing for universal healthcare.
McClure, W, Enthoven A. C., & McDonald, T. “universal health coverage? Why?” Medicare's
www.healthaffairs.org
11
Olen, H. (2017, June 18). Even the insured often can't afford their medical bills. The Atlantic.
Sanders, B. (2017, September 13). Why we need Medicare for all. The New York Times.
Sigrun K., Diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia | Stories of Help and Hope. (2018).
Tuohy, C. H. (2009). Single payers, multiple systems: the scope and limits of subnational
variation under a federal health policy framework. Journal of Health Politics, Policy &