Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vibes Literaturestudy
Vibes Literaturestudy
Know:
Students will know that they can have unique interpretations of a text, but that as they read, this
interpretation will change.
1. Students will know how to activate prior knowledge by use of anticipation reading
guides.
2. Students will know what the difference between an inference and a prediction is.
Do:
1. Students will be able to use textual features to make predictions by using textual features
and enhance comprehension.
2. Students will be able to make inferences and draw conclusions based on explicit and
implicit information.
SOL’s:
7.5 The student will read and demonstrate comprehension of a variety of fictional texts, narrative
nonfiction, and poetry.
e) Make, confirm, and revise predictions.
f) Use prior and background knowledge as a context for new learning.
g) Make inferences and draw conclusions based on the text.
7.6 The student will read and demonstrate comprehension of a variety of nonfiction texts.
a) Use prior and background knowledge as a context for new learning.
d) Draw conclusions and make inferences on explicit and implied information.
CCS’s:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.7.1
Cite several pieces of textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly
as well as inferences drawn from the text.
Methods of Assessment:
[How will you know if the intended learning occurred?] Describe all methods of assessment used
in this lesson or which are related to this lesson and come in a future lesson (use the sentence
stems provided). After each assessment, indicate in brackets the number(s) of the related lesson
objectives that the assessment is evaluating.
Formative: Students will show their progress toward today's objectives by...
Group Discussion Feedback
o Student will show their progress towards today’s objectives by The students will
be working in groups for the last 10 minutes of class. I will be spending a couple
minutes with each group listening to them answer the final prompt on their
anticipation reading guide, and giving them feedback on their answers. This will
give me a chance to evaluate their ability to describe their process before, during
and after reading. (7.5 e. 7.6 d)
Exit Slip
Students will show their progress towards being able to make inferences and predictions, the the
lesson’s objectives by being able to actively describe their reading process on the exit slip that
will be turned in at the end of class. They will have to discuss the differences between what they
thought when making the predictions, and after having read the text. This will help me assess if
they understood what they did in class, were able to describe their personal process and will be
able to reproduce it on their own time. (7.5 e. g. 7.6 d, CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.7.1 )
Summative: Students will ultimately be assessed (today or in a future lesson) on these standards
by...
Reading Log/Journal
Students will ultimately be assessed on these standards at the end of the unit by turning in their
Reading Log. This will consist of them turning in their completed SSR books in which they will
have monitored their reading throughout the book using sticky notes. They will have placed one
sticky note on the cover of the book with a prediction based on the title and book cover. Then at
the beginning of each chapter the students will have made predictions on their sticky notes on
what they think will happen, and at the end of the chapter they have a sticky with what happened
compared to what they were expecting to happen. Finally, at the end of the novel I will be
expecting a brief summary (it can be in the form of a sticky note) on what happened and if this in
line with what they had predicted. (7.5 e. f. g. 7.6 a. d, CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.7.1)
Materials Needed:
Appendix A: Do Now
Appendix B: The Dancing Plague of 1518
Appendix C: Anticipation Reading Guide
Appendix D: Exit Slip
Procedures/Instructional Strategies
Each step should have bolded heading that identifies the activity, and then is followed by the
teacher scripting, student and teacher actions, and a description of the activity.
[Note: Any words that represent what I would say directly to students appear in italics.]
How this lesson incorporates specific insights from course readings and/or class discussion:
My lesson plan incorporates reading strategies from the Beers reading, mostly because while
reading I was so drawn to the pre-reading strategies. I particularly thought that the anticipation
guide was a great tool to teach students how to apply predictions to their readings. I also
incorporated Beers during and after reading strategies, having the students continue to make
predictions and alter them throughout their reading, as well as reflecting on how their predictions
matched up with what they actually read.
Technology Use:
Overhead projector: To project the “Do Now”inferencing “Hook” image on the board.
In July of 1518, in full view of her neighbors, Frau Troffea began to violently dance in the streets
of the city of Strasbourg, France. There was no music and her face betrayed no expression of joy.
She appeared unable to stop herself from her frenzy.
Had this remained an isolated[1] incident, the city elders may have put it down to madness or
demonic possession, but soon after Troffea began her dancing, a neighbor joined in. And then
another.
By the end of a week more than 30 people were dancing night and day on the streets of the city.
And it didn’t stop there. By the time a month had passed, at least 400 citizens of Strasbourg were
swept up in the phenomenon[2].
Medical and civic authorities were called in once some of the dancers began dying from heart
attacks, exhaustion, or strokes. For some inexplicable[3] reason, these men believed that the cure
for the dancing was more dancing, so they erected a wooden stage for the dancers and musicians
were called in.
This all sounds like some archaic[4] bit of folklore, but the dancing plague of 1518 is clearly
chronicled[5] in medical, civic, and religious notes of the time. Modern researchers pour over
those notes to develop theories as to what caused this bizarre incident.
One of those theories postulates[6] that the dancers were the victims of mass hysteria[7]:
instances when more than one person believes they are afflicted[8] by an identical malady[9]—
often during times of extreme stress within the affected community. The Strasbourg incident
occurred during a time of rampant[10] famine and malnutrition[11] and subsequent deaths. But
400 people? A well-known recent incident generally seen as an example of mass hysteria is
1962’s “The Tanganyika Laughter Epidemic” which affected only 95 people.
A second theory is in the realm of agriculture. The condition called Ergotism occurs when
grains of rye are attacked by a specific mold. Eating the infected rye can lead to seizures,
although the movements of Strasbourg’s afflicted looked much more like traditional dancing
than seizures of any sort.
A final school of thought states that the dancing was in result of some kind of religious
ecstasy[12] caused by veneration[13] of Saint Vitus, the patron saint of epilepsy.
None of the theories completely explain the 1518 dancing. Bit by bit the dancers stopped, and the
dancing would end as mysteriously as it began.