Decision Making Theory (Snyder, Bruck and Sapin)

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Decision Making Theory

in Foreign policy
Richard C. Snyder, H.W. Bruck and Burton Sapin

by:
N
Himawan Bayu Patriadi, PhD.
W E

S
Departing Points
Process analysis
 Actions, reactions, and interactions of nation-states

Action is planful
 Achieving aims and menacing aims of other states

The process may or may not symmetrical

Relationships are regularized


 Action is planful, interaction is patterned, aims persist,
reactions become uniform
Decision Making Diagram
Fundamental Approach

“The State as Actor in a Situation”


Assumptions
 Level of analysis:
 State
 Represents a model of a fictional state to analyzing any one state or
more despite their differences

 Actions decided at the national level

 State as actor in a situation:

 Any action needs the availability of actors, goals, means, and situation
 The situation defined by the actor relates himself to other actors, possible
goals, possible means and to the way and factors relevant to the
situation
 State action is taken by those acting by the name of
the state:

 Decision makers

 The definition of the situation featuring:


 Perception

 Choice

 Expectation

 Decision makers act upon and respond to domestic


and international settings
Defining International politics as processes of state
interaction at the governmental level:

 Internal setting:  External Setting:


 Domestic Politics, non-  Those which support or
human environment, social constrain of achieving goals
factors
 Depends on what decision
 Interaction between makers’ perceptions
social organization and
behavior and DM
processes (line BD)

 State action designed to


alter factors and behavior
(line EB)
Internal and External Settings are Mutually Related

 International politics:
State to state relations (at the governmental level)

 International relations:

Society to society (Inter-societal interactions at the non-


governmental level) , such as trade, family ties, migration,
shared values, cultural exchanges, etc.

 As long as perceived (by decision makers) affecting


state’s interest
Direction of Relationships
 Action and reaction of states (DEF4D)
 Changes at the external setting can influence state action
(DEF3A3BD)
 The feedback of relationships (DEBD and DEF3A3)
 Feedback from decision makers’ awareness of their own
action and the progress of action (ED)
 International politics (DEF4DE):
 DE represents state action
 EF (particularly EF4) represents impact upon external setting
 FD stands for stimuli-reactions or new action (F4D)

 DEFDE stands for the action-reaction-interaction sequence


Two Ways of Studying International
Politics (Scientifically)

 Description and measurement of interactions

 Decisionmaking - the formulation and


execution of policy

“Interaction patterns can be studied by themselves


without reference to decision-making except the ‘why’
of the pattern cannot be answered”
Practical Functions of DMA

 Alerting observers to relationships among three related


empirical factors:

 State interaction (DEFD) at the governmental level

 Inter-societal interaction (ABF) at the non-governmental level

 Intra-societal interaction (BDEB) at both the governmental and


non-governmental level)

 Specifying the relevant factors in state behavior with a number


of concepts such as: decision making, action, setting, situation,
society, culture etc.

You might also like