Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mamie Green
Mamie Green
December 4,2018
Anthropology 1020
Research Paper
adaption of the Hominin progeny that is considered the major force behind several skeletal
changes shared by all the bipedal hominins (Lovejoy 1988). After finding Lucy’s skeleton in 1974
researchers stated that she had the anatomy of a biped and the characteristics that led them to
believe so was the broad pelvis and thigh bones that nailed in towards the knee which brought
the feet in line with the body’s center of gravity and created stability while walking. From all the
research and videos I have watched on this topic, researchers such as Lovejoy and many others
stated that bipedalism is based solely on the placement of its foramen magnum, which is a hole
in the base of the skull through which the spinal cord passes. In the Becoming Human: The
Evolution of Walking Upright article Wayman stated that the easiest hominid with the most
extensive evidence for bipedalism is the 4.4 million-year-old Ardipithecus Ramidus as well as
that of the teeth and two thigh bones of the 6 million-year-old Orrorin Tugenesis (Wayman 2012).
Although we know today that the earliest hominids were capable of walking upright, we also
know that they probably weren’t able to get around exactly as we do today, this was due to
retained primitive features such as long curved fingers and toes as well as longer arms and
shorter legs that indicated they spent more time in trees. Until the emergence of H. Erectus 1.89
million years ago, this is where we start to see that hominids grew tall and evolved long legs and
the African forests more seasonal and variable environments would have become harder to
navigate and would have taken more time for individuals to find food. This would have made it
especially difficult for females raising their off spring. It was suggested in Lovejoy’s article that
a mutually beneficial arrangement could have evolved and this is where males were made to be
the provider by gathering resources for their mates and their offspring. While females in return
would mate exclusively with their male providers. In order for this “arrangement” to be
successful the males needed their arms and hands free in order to carry food and thus bipedalism
evolved. In this same magazine article Lovejoy also stated that this would in fact be a hard
hypothesis to test but earlier in 2009 researchers offered some information that supported this
hypothesis. They were able to find that Chimpanzees tend to walk bipedally when needing to
How did our brains dramatically increase? The most complex part about understanding
the evolution of bipedalism and brain size is of course knowing the history, but not only that,
also what bone structures and body evolution that needs to take place in order for this to be
possible. Our species is unique because of our exceptionally large brain relative to body size.
Over this long period of human evolution our brains size has more than tripled. This brain size
increase that we hear so much about was accompanied by the reorganization of the cerebral
cortex. The cerebral cortex, which is responsible for complex and mental functions, which
accounts for about 85% of total brain volume. One question that people may come across often
when covering this topic is how did our brains dramatically increase? Literally and physically.
Well, one theory is that our ancestor’s brains expanded to accommodate development of
language. According to a 7 million-year-old skull from and ancestor provided us with clues that
may have been shaped by the changes in the female reproductive system which is what occurred
when ancestors stood upright. This upright motion that we know to be bipedalism or obstetric
dilemma was the beginning of bipedalism. This switch that we eventually see happening
involved a major reconfiguration of the birth canal. As we look at the bone structure of the
pelvis today it is significantly narrower than it was before because of the change of structure and
around this time is when the brain expanded. One of the many adaptations that happened to
make this increase in the size of our brains was openings in the skull called fontanelles. This
opening in the brain is possible because much like tectonic plates the anterior fontanelle enables
the two frontal bones of the skull to slide past each other, which in turn compresses the head
during birth. The anterior fontanelle also known to us now as the soft spot on your skull in the
early years of life gradually gets smaller as new bone is laid down and by the age of two is fully
closed, and this is what we call metric suture. One of the many interesting facts that I found
while doing my research was chimpanzees and bonobos brain growth occurs mostly in the womb
and is closed around the time of birth. In 1990 researchers from Washington University Medical
School published a three-dimensional CT scan of the Taung Child endocast. This child’s skull
that ranged between 3 and 4 years of age and dates back to 2.5 million years ago had the
remanence of the anterior fontanelle as well which I thought was another interesting fact of
information. This research showed us that the Taung Child has a partially fused metric suture at
the time of death that the pattern of brain development was similar to our modern day humans.
Rapid brain growth in the time following birth came before the emergence of homo
sapiens, thus, researchers in the article from the web stated that “bipedalism and big brains are
independent evolutionary processes. Hominins started walking bipedally long before the brain
expanded, but these trends collided at birth, and we believe this happened much earlier than
previously thought.” (Costandi 2012). There are more ways that bipedalism could have led to
increased brains sizes which would free up the forelimbs and this would have led to the
expansion and reorganization of the sensory and motor brain areas that process sensations and
controls movements. Standing upright also led to an expansion of the visual areas at the back of
the brain. New findings of this websites research support the idea that further brain expansion as
well as reorganization of the prefrontal cortex could have occurred as an indirect result of the
pelvic modification that followed the transition to bipedalism however, many genes that have
been implicated in the evolution of the human brain is difficult to link to any of the specific
changes in the brain organization and structure. Researchers from Costandi’s website article of
research reported that a gene known to be involved in the development of the cerebral cortex was
duplicated multiple times and this occurred exclusively in humans. This duplication that we see
now took place 2 to 3 million years ago so it can be tempting to speculate that they are or have to
be somehow linked to the changes that many have occurred as a result of bipedalism.
In conclusion, I would like to add that the evolution and study of the increase in size of
the human brain and bipedalism was by far one of the most interesting of the three topics to
cover and research. Its such a complex topic but so easily explained and understood and makes
sense.