Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Paper Draft 1
Research Paper Draft 1
by Ethan Kong
Ethan Kong
Ms. Abad
7 November 2018
Outline
I. Introduction
A. Background history
B. Why euthanasia is an important topic
C. Definition on euthanasia and on assisted suicide
D. Doctors should be allowed to perform euthanasia on specific patients
A. Advancements in technology
B. Peter Saul TED talk
C. Percy Bridgman suicides
VII. Conclusion
A. Restate thesis
B. Restate Explanations
Kong 1
Ethan Kong
Ms. Abad
7 November 2018
Euthanasia
In today’s society many advances have been made especially in technology and with the increases
in advancements, many are applied to our medicine. With the advancements, we have technology such as
ventilators, feeding tubes, and treatments that can help cure diseases however some of these
advancements, only contribute to prolonging life. In the past, many patients would die with loved ones
surrounding them due to the lack of sufficient medicine advancements however now many patients
usually die within a hospital. The natural and quick deaths of these patients have brought up issues about
whether a suffering patient’s wish to die should be respected. If yes, then do the patients have the right to
request the help from doctors? How about those who are in a coma or vegetable state do the family
Two major issues that have been debated about within the medical community are euthanasia and
assisted suicide. The word “euthanasia” has a negative tone especially within society nowadays however
when looking at the history of “euthanasia” to some it meant “merciful death” and some people even
viewed suicide as “honorable”. Euthanasia can be separated into two different categories: active and
passive. Active euthanasia is when there is a third party included, for example, a physician or family
member, and they help assist the person to commit suicide. Passive suicide is when a patient who has a
disease stops receiving life-sustaining treatment or a equipment and dies naturally. In between both active
and passive euthanasia, there is physician-assisted suicide which is basically when a patient decides to
Kong 2
commit suicide using a prescribed drug from the physician. Currently, euthanasia is illegal, but doctors
should be allowed to perform it on specific patients with incurable diseases and immense pain within
medical facilities.
Perspectives on Euthanasia
Euthanasia tends to start up controversial debates within modern society due to it being the result
of a person’s death. Throughout history, though death has been viewed as the opposite of birth since it
means ones soul/spirit leaving the body. The way religions view suicide and euthanasia differ on what
religion it is. “Christians are mostly against euthanasia. . . life is given by God and that human beings are
made in the image of God” (2014). The Catholic church believes that “no one can in any way permit the
killing. . . no one is permitted to ask for this act of killing” (2014). Many religions believe that asking or
doing the act of suicide is against everything they believe in since it means taking the life given to one by
their God or higher being. However, though some racial cultures believe the opposite of how religious
view euthanasia and suicide. Suicide was viewed and done as a way to save/preserve one’s family honor
is Asia. Dating back hundreds of years the Japanese samurai used to commit suicide when they did
something shameful that could hurt the reputation of their family. “According to the World Health
Organization, ‘Japan has the highest suicide rate among Asian countries with more than 30,000 Japanese
killing themselves each year’”(Louie). According to the Greeks, the word euthanasia meant “merciful
death”. Besides the many religions and races, there are many philosophers who have debated over suicide
and euthanasia.
According to the pupil of Socrates, Plato in the Republic b elieves that “patients unable due to
their suffering to live a normal life, should not receive treatment for the prolongation of life. It is evident
that Plato is against active euthanasia but that he accepts passive euthanasia”(Papadimitriou).
Kong 3
Just like Plato the father of medicine, Hippocrates also supports the idea of passive euthanasia while still
against active euthanasia. Hippocrates later wrote what is known now as the Hippocratic Oath which
prohibits a doctor from giving a patient any kind of lethal drug. Another philosopher would be Thomas
Hobbes and his dark view on human nature. Thomas Hobbes believed that within a society a government
was a necessity since it served as the “mortal god” that helped kept stability and with this belief it allowed
the government to ban suicide since it would protect society from itself. However, John Stuart Mill
opposed this view since he believed in an individual’s own liberty. He believed that a person is their own
guardian over their own body which justified their choice to end their life if they wanted to. According to
his philosophical work On Liberty, he stated that no government or society has the right to interfere with a
person liberty just as long as they don’t do anything to harm someone else. His beliefs and principles
made an impact in a way that they are still used in modern day court decisions.
American Law
Many of the philosophers mentioned believing in what is known as natural law which is the
“moral principles regarding as a basis for all human conduct.” Natural law can be seen from way back
even to the ancient Greeks. Within Antigone, Antigone disobeys Creon by sprinkling a little dirt on her
brother. In Antigone Creon’s authority/law is something that is “unwritten and unshakeable” which is the
law of the gods. This belief that one’s law/authority is that of Gods led to the belief of natural law which
helps guides our life and helped American theory became what it is now. John Locke connected both
natural laws with natural rights which is something that the government should protect. John Locke has
made an impact on America’s and that can be seen mainly within the Declaration of
Kong 4
Independence where it states, “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of
Happiness”(Papadimitriou).
America can be seen as a country that is founded on holding high that fact that they give and
protect individual rights. Throughout history, America has been redefining and protecting new
amendments through rulings of the court. One right that has been looked at is the right of privacy which
can be seen from the refusal of medical treatment. People started to question the moral and right of the
Court Rulings
The first case to help shape a patient's right to die was with the court case of Karen Quinlan. On
April 14,1975 Karen Quinlan was taken to the hospital after an evening out with friends in which she
consumed a large amount of alcohol and drugs. During her stay in the hospital, she stopped breathing then
went into a coma and needed a respirator to help her breathe. Later Karen’s doctors claimed that she had a
one in a million chance of recovery from her vegetative state and soon her family accepted this fact. Her
family had believed that she had “died” and asked for her respirator to be disconnected, however, her
doctors refused to do so because they felt that it would be unethical and that they would be charged
“Karen’s father decided to take the case to court and in November of 1975, Judge Muir ruled over
that the respirator should not be disconnected. However, the New Jersey Supreme Court overturned this
decision on January 1976 on ’right to die’ grounds”(Hughes). Later on, the court found in the Constitution
that it was implied that a person has a right to privacy which allows for the family of a patient to
disconnect them from support. Even though Karen was still connected to the respirator and
Kong 5
lived for another nine more years her family never spoke to disconnect her from support again. However,
it did bring up the question of whether terminally ill patients had the right to refuse support such as food
Elizabeth Bouvia, a 26-year-old woman, was checked into Riverside General Hospital claiming
that she wanted to starve to death. Elizabeth Bouvia suffered from paralyzes from cerebral palsy along
with slight control of one of her hand and part of her facial muscles. Along with paralyzes and slight
control of her body she also suffered from degenerative arthritis. Her doctors decided that they would not
let her starve to death so they went with force-feeding her through feeding tubes. “She has been subjected
to the force intrusion of an artificial mechanism into her body against her will”(Bouvia). Elizabeth was
moved from hospital to hospital and each one refused to act on her request to die. Bouvia lost her case in
court about how “right to privacy did not apply to suicide by starvation.” Later in 1985, Bouvia started to
eat again on her own will, but yet doctors still force-fed her due to her weight being close to starvation.
“Elizabeth apparently has made a conscious and informed choice that she prefers death to continued
In 1986 Elizabeth Bouvia tried to appeal to the court again so that she could starve herself and
according to the Supreme Court case Bouvia v. Superior Court the court ruled in favor of Elizabeth on the
stand that the right to privacy included her right to end her own life. Another case similar to Elizabeth
Bouvia would be Terri Schiavo case. “Terri Schiavo had been in a vegetative state for eight years when
her husband, Michael, petitioned to have her feeding tube removed in 1998”(Caffery). When her husband
petitioned for her feeding tube to be removed Schiavo’s parents took the husband to court to gain
guardianship. The parents had lost the court case and Schiavo’s feeding tube was removed in October
2003.
Kong 6
There are plenty of reasons a person might consider asking their physician or doctor to perform
euthanasia, but according to the American Medical Association also known as AMA most
physician-assisted suicide doesn’t line up with the actual role/occupation of the physician and the two
main reasons to ask are because of pain or psychological discomfort. The AMA usually stands to teach
physicians the advanced pain management techniques to help battle against those who consider
euthanasia. Which leads to the number one reason why people are against the legalization of euthanasia
which is that people who usually ask for euthanasia aren’t in great pain it is due to the circumstance.
According to AMA the lack of ways to reduce pain helps in the patient’s request for suicide, but also
When a patient goes through a terminal illness they fall into this trap of isolation and depression
which separates them from society and puts them into this state of mind that suicide is the only way out.
For a person to help one commit suicide is like robbing them of time that could have been spent doing
something else. One example would be Elizabeth Bouvia as the court ruled in her favor of being able to
disconnect from the support she decided that she wanted to live. During her fight, she had been moved
from hospital to hospital meeting new people and because of this she eventually felt that life was still
worth it and continued to live. Her reasoning shows that when one doesn’t feel connected to others they
have this desire to end their life which shows that most people don’t usually want to die because of their
Loneliness and Depression play a role in a person’s choice of wanting to seek out euthanasia
however one other trait would be someone’s loss of their independence in life. “Larry McAfee, a
quadriplegic who won court permission to turn off his ventilator in 1989. . . was paralyzed in a
motorcycle accident in 1985 and had to use a ventilator to breathe”(Press). Larry McAfee had to live
Kong 7
off from his health insurance but once he had used everything up he did not want to be a burden on his
family so then he was placed into a nursing home. As time passed and his experience for not being able to
take care of himself McAfee went into a state of depression. He sought out the right to disconnect his
ventilator and won the case in the Georgia courts. Although he won the rights Larry decided not to
disconnect himself instead he was qualified to get “additional benefits under Medicare disability” after he
took the offer he was moved into an independent living group home where he found it okay in terms of
living conditions. This shows that people’s decisions on wanting to die can be easily influenced by their
own life situation and mainly to many it is usually their finances. Another reason besides finances would
Besides the fact, most euthanasia seekers are depressed or have some life situation physicians also
believe that euthanasia creates a ripple effect. Dr. Kevorkian, also known as Dr. Death, is a prime
example of why physicians consider euthanasia as a ripple effect. Dr. Kevorkian was known for
performing euthanasia on over 131 patients illegally. He would connect his patients to “his self-made
machine, which he variously called the ‘Mercitron’ or the ‘Thanatron’”(Schneider) and when the patients
click the switch it would inject a lethal drug. He was “convicted of second-degree murder in the death of
the last of about 130 ailing patients whose lives he had helped end”(Schneider). Many people found what
he did to be sympathetic to the people suffering, however, he did not always follow the “standards” he
had publicly claimed he had. Since he never really spent the time to consult his patients he never really
understood the reason some of them wanted to receive euthanasia. Legalizing euthanasia and
physician-assisted suicide can be seen horribly especially if it is in the hands of those similar to Dr.
Kevorkian.
Kong 8
Many who oppose the legalization of euthanasia claim that the roles of doctors and physicians
should be to heal, however in our advanced modern society some of the methods used would not be
considered to be healing. According to the AMA, it claims that a physician’s duties are to sustain life and
relieve suffering, but when either cannot be done then the physician should respect a patient’s wish to end
life-sustaining treatment. When looking at rights we should take a look at a patient’s right to their life and
even further we should take a look at their choice to end it or not. When a patient claims that his or her
life isn’t in good shape then physicians should start to consider that the only way to actually “heal” that
person is to respect their wish to end their life. Since the physician won’t help with the suicide of a patient
what were to happen if the patient tried to do it on their own. They could end up getting worse from what
In our modern world, we have advanced so much especially in terms of medicine. We now have
machines such as ventilators and feeding tubes that help preserve and prolong a person’s life. However, to
some, this isn’t actually saving someone it just delays the inevitable which is death. Peter Saul on TED
talk said, “we started using expressions like ‘lifesaving’. I really do apologize to everybody for doing that.
. . prolong people’s lives, and delay death, and redirect death, but we can’t strictly speaking, save lives on
any sort of permanent basis”(Saul). Even with our advancements we still can’t actually save a person’s
life we just delay and some may even suffer more. Larry McAfee would be a prime example of how
prolonging lives isn’t the way some people want to live. Even Elizabeth Bouvia was forced to use a
feeding tube which seems wrong especially how she was being forced to do it against her own will.
Besides the fact that we don’t actually save lives with our advancements there are people who have made
Kong 9
Percy Bridgman was a Nobel prize winning physicist who shot himself in the head after being
forced alive by society. Bridgman in 1961 became “crippled in both legs, with increasingly intense pain
and great fatigue. . . intractable cancer of major bones, which would inevitably prove fatal in a matter of
months or a year” (Kemble). Even though Bridgman was suffering from cancer that would have killed
him in a year or less and felt intense pain that grew over time he still was denied by society to help him
put an end to his life. Soon after Bridgman could no longer take it and took his own life and left a note
that read, “It isn’t decent for Society to make a man do this thing himself. Probably this is the last day I
will be able to do it myself.” So after being denied Bridgman didn’t take any time to end his own life on
his own. Even with all that he was still going through society drove him to the point of suicide which
Conclusion
In our modern society we believe that we are saving people’s lives with the advancements we
have in medicine, but in reality, we are just prolonging their lives delaying them from death something
that is awaiting everyone at one point. And because we are able to prolong people’s lives we discard
euthanasia especially because it is against the Hippocratic Oath to never take a life and that it is morally
wrong to help end a life. However, though with the research done in this paper doctors should be allowed
to perform euthanasia on specific patients with incurable diseases and immense pain within medical
facilities.
Kong 10
Works Cited
Bachman, J G, et al. “Attitudes of Michigan Physicians and the Public toward Legalizing
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia.” The New England Journal of Medicine.,
U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1 Feb. 1996.
“Bouvia v. Superior Court (Glenchur) (1986).” Justia US Law, 1986
Caffrey, Cait. "Terri Schiavo case." The 2000s in America, edited by Craig Belanger, Salem, 2013.
Salem Online.
Carter, Jack. "U.S. Supreme Court Upholds the Right to Refuse Medical Treatment." Great Events from
History: The Twentieth Century, 1971-2000, edited by Robert F. Gorman, Salem, 2008. Salem
Online.
Frederich, Katherine B. and Tischauser, Leslie V. "Euthanasia." Magill's Medical Guide, Seventh
Edition, edited by Bryan C. Auday, Michael A. Buratovich, Geraldine F. Marrocco and Paul
Moglia, Salem, 2014. Salem Online.
Hughes, Richard. “In Re Quinlan, 355 A.2d 647, 70 N.J. 10 – CourtListener.com.” CourtListener, 31
Mar. 1976.
Kemble, Edwin C, and Francis Birch. “Percy Bridgman.” Nasonline, 1970
Louie, Sam. “Asian Honor and Suicide.” Psychology Today, Sussex Publishers, 30 June
2014.“Religious Perspectives On Euthanasia.” Institute of Catholic Bioethics, 14 Mar. 2011.
Papadimitriou, John D, et al. “Euthanasia and Suicide in Antiquity: Viewpoint of the Dramatists and
Philosophers.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, The Royal Society of Medicine, Jan.
2007.
Press, The Associated. “Larry McAfee, 39; Sought Right to Die.” The New York Times, The New York
Times, 5 Oct. 1995.
Saul, Peter. “‘Let's Talk about Dying.’” TED: Ideas Worth Spreading, Nov. 2011.
Schneider, Keith. “Dr. Jack Kevorkian Dies at 83; A Doctor Who Helped End Lives.”
The New York Times, The New York Times, 3 June 2011.