Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project On International Finance
Project On International Finance
Answer1 :-)
US/INR RATES
47.26
47.2
47.16
47.1
47.03
47
46.92
46.81
46.8 Series 2
46.61 46.6
46.6 46.59
46.57
46.4
46.2
ly ly ly ly ly ly ly ly ly ly
ju ju ju ju ju ju ju ju ju ju
h h t d d h h h h h
1 9t 2 ot 2 1s 2n 2 3r 2 4t 2 5t 2 6t 7t 2 8t
2 2
Question 2:) Case Study on a company choosing Joint Venture, Licensing, Exports, or Merger Acquisition
route to go international?
Zain Group is a mobile telecommunications company founded in 1983 in Kuwait as MTC or Mobile
Telecommunications Company, and was later rebranded to Zain in 2007. Zain has commercial presence in 8
countries across Africa and the Middle East and employs over 5000 people.On 8 June 2010, the Indian
company BhartiAirtel completed a deal to buy Zain businesses in 15 African countries for $10.7 billion.
THE DEAL
The board of Kuwait’s ZainTelecom accepted a $10.7-billion (Rs 49,700 crore) offer from BhartiAirtel for the
bulk of its African assets, breathing new life into the Indian company’s cherished ambition of transforming
itself into an emerging-market multinational. Bharti acquired 100% of Zain’s African operations.The
acquisition will give Bharti a firm foothold in a relatively untapped market and pit it in direct competition with
MTN, with which it has tried and failed to merge twice. The operations spread across 15 African countries that
Bharti was seeking to buy and were grouped under an entity called Zain International.Subsequently, Bharti
would become a majority holder of Zain and the total value of the deal would be around $10 billion. Getting it
right for the future relies heavily on bedrock of cost leadership.
”Sunil Bharti Mittal, CMD, BhartiAirtel, announced the closure of the Zain acquisition. Bharti’s $10.7-billion
acquisition of the Zain group's operations in 15 African countries will make Bharti airtel the world's No. 5
wireless carrier by subscribers Of the $10.7 billion enterprise value of Zain, Bharti paid $8.3 billion upfront and
was to pay $700 million after a year. It would also take over approximately $1.7 billion of Zain’s debts as on 31
December, 2009.The countries in which Bharti had acquired the operations were - Burkina Faso, Chad, Congo
Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Niger, Nigeria,
Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. Zain is the market leader in 10 of the 15 countries and second in
four countries.
REASONS FOR THE DEAL
3) Decrease in Average Revenue per user from 500 Rs to 145 Rs today. In last five years telecom density in
1) Bharti may bring in tariff schemes for low average revenue per user but high volume market.
2) Zain can also benefit from Bharti‘s efficiency in managing network operations.
2) It can learn a lot from Zain expertise in data service such as 3G.
Question 3: ) Find the Two News on Export and Import and find the learning’s out of them?
The reason being is that it is used as a fuel for generating power and electricity since the electricity
consumption is more in India.
Secondly, it is also due to the high coal demand by the metallurgical and other industries.
Thirdly, CIL and its subsidiaries, accounting 92% of total coal production in India are not able to meet the
projected demand alone and hence arises the need for coal import.
DABUR INDIA PROFITS UP 19% ON HIGHER EXPORTS
Dabur India today announced a 19% increase in net profit at Rs 107 crore for the first quarter ended June 30,
2010 on 29% increase in exports. Total sales increased 19% to Rs 916 crore from Rs 768 crore reported in
Q1FY10.
The strong volume growth of categories like hair oil, skin care, toothpaste, health supplements,
digestive food and home care have contributed towards the high profit.
Secondly, the improvements in macro environmental factors like change in cultural tastes, govt.
regulations, change in interest rates, competitors and good monsoons have also been favourable for the
company.
THE SYMBOL, €
The Euro currency symbol was designed and created by Alain Biliet, a Belgian. The symbol is actually a
combination of the Greek epsilon, symbolizes the weight of the European civilization. The “E” which stands for
Europe; and the two parallel lines crossing through mean Euro’s stability.
Moreover, there are twenty five (25) states and/or territories where there currencies are pegged to the euro
including countries in mainland Africa, other five (5) European Union members which will eventually join the
coalition, some French Pacific territories, two (2) African island countries, a Balkan country, Bosnia and
Herzegovina.
When the euro was introduced to the financial market, the euro dollar exchange rate against other major
currencies has fallen heavily, and most especially against the US dollar. In 1999, the dollar to euro exchange
rate was at US$1.18 per euro but on October of 2000, the euro exchange rate fell to $0.8228 per US dollar. This
was the lowest exchange rate for euro of all – time. The euro recovered in 2001 rising to $0.96 as its exchange
rate but it fell again on July of the same year. The exchange rate for euro at that time was $0.8344, a little higher
than the all-time low.
When the coins and notes have started to appear in 2002 and with the replacement of all currencies (national),
the euro started to steadily appreciate. Since November 2003, the euro to dollar exchange rate has remained
above $1.15 and no longer fell below $1.25 starting August of 2006. Last October 2007, the euro dollar
exchange rate has reached $1.4299. Now, with the current US crisis, the euro dollar exchange rate is on the
verge of breaking the $1.6 barrier.
2) Having a single currency among European Union member states removes the trade cost of exchanging
money. In banking transactions, banks in the Euro zone must treat cross-border transactions as a simple
domestic transaction, consequently lowering the consumer’s intra-member transaction fees.
3) Another advantage of a unified single currency is the price parity. The differences in prices of a certain
product and/or level should decrease because of the ‘law of one price’. The price transparency across
member states will allow consumers to find more affordable goods and/or services.