Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ironwork For A Rundschau
Ironwork For A Rundschau
Like This
This is relatively advanced stuff and not aimed at the beginner, therefore I will assume that you have an understanding of the techniques shown in the images.
Nonetheless, I am aware that beginners will read this anyway, so I'll start with a very vital step.
Precondition is: You have drafted a complete coat pattern and you have opened the wedge at the pocket (make a cut along the pocket and the dashed line going
from front of pocket to the hem. The word "kneifen" means pinch, which in this case means to make the paper pieces overlap to open the wedge. This is done to
create a better fit at the hips.)
First step: Checking (trueing) the pattern for matching seam lengths, the smooth shape of neckhole and scye and the congruency of the seams at front ant back.
Same with the sleeve pattern. Place the pieces with the actual seam lines on top of each other. Make sure that there are no edges or holes where the pieces meet.
The centre front of the Rundschau sleeve is relocated inwards, usually by about 2cm. This causes the upper sleeve to have a slightly shorter front seam, which is
corrected by shaping/ stretching it with the iron.
Abb. 48: Stretching of the side seam at the waist level. This is mainly done to allow the inlay to fold without distortions once the seam has been pressed open.
Abb. 49: The iron is driven towards the centre of the chest, while the other hand grabs the fullness.
Abb. 50: The front is stretched along the upper chest, this results in a bit of excess length in the front scye.
Abb. 51: The length is partly shrunk (lower scye), partly stretched out (upper scye).
Abb. 52: Let the iron rest for a while to preserve the shape.
Abb. 53: At the CF you strat with the iron at waist level.
Abb. 54: The chest is then thoroughly stretched, the iron follows the free hand towards the shoulder seam.
Abb.55: The front is shrunk, this shortens the bridle as well as the lapel.
Abb. 56: Shows the finished front with sufficient fullness in the chest.
Next follows the treatment of the (modern) shoulder. The images show the treatment for a 50's shoulder, which was not curved and had relatively little padding.
Abb. 57 to 61: The inlay at the front neck hole is slightly stretched, the excess length can be transferred to the armhole (to create room for the shoulder bone).
The stripe/ grainline has to be kept straight.
Abb. 63: The stripes should run straight (perpendicular to the waist line) up to the neck, something that can be achieved with this sort of ironwork.
Abb. 66: The inlay at the side seam gets a good stretching to avoid later distortions.
The actual Rundschau pattern is in the centre back a bit different to older systems.
The difference lies below the waist. In older (and Italian) drafts the CB runs down straight as a perpendicular to the waist line, whereas the Rundschau back is
slightly angled.
The back piece is laid out on the cloth in the same way like all the others, with the CB below the waist following the grainline of the fabric.
Because of the slightly angled back construction, the back neckpoint is further away from the CB, which is corrected by the shaping with the iron.
Before the early 50's the pieces of a coat were treated differently, especially the scye in the back was usually more shrunk than stretched.
Then, at the start of the 50's, Müller & Sohn published another way of treating the back, which is shown in the following images. The thought behind it is the fact,
that any cloth does not allow much shrinking or stretching along the straight run, either warp or weft. But, when using the bias of the fabric, it can take much more
ironwork.
Abb. 70: Starting at the side seam, the back part is stretched towards the neck.
Abb. 71: You start by holding the back piece at the CB, moving the iron slowly but steadily from the side seam towards the upper neck.
Abb. 72: You stretch the back along the blades. This creates a certain length in the cloth along the scye.
Abb.74: The rear scye is pressed short in the process.Depending on the fabric, this might have to be done repeatedly.
Abb. 76 and 77: Shrinking the CB. The roundness in the upper CB is straightened and the length is pressed towards the blades. A way to shorten the CB in this
section before pressing is to gather it along the marked seam (preferably on the inlay side) with a double basting thread.
Abb. 79: The shoulder seam of the modern coat is placed forward and therefore needs some ease (note the „wave“ of cloth at the shoulder seam). For a person with
a round back or strong blades they recommend a shoulder dart.
Abb. 80: This length in the shoulder is shrunk, starting above the blades (to keep the length there).
Abb. 81: This shrinking process has to be done until the shoulders of both back parts lie flat on the table.
Abb.82: It is advised to sew the CB dierctly after it was shrunk, this way the shortness will stay in place. The CB seam is pressed open from the neck down, the length
is distributed towards the blades.
Like This
Brilliant stuffs SG
Like This
Like This
Like This
Schneidergott 07 Sep 2010
'J. Maclochlainn', on 06 Sept 2010 - 4:03 PM, said:
Brilliant stuffs SG
Thank you!
There is more stuff in the booklet these pages are from, but most of it has been covered elsewhere. I'll have a look to see if there's something in it that is worth a
translation.
Like This
Like This
Like This
Absolute wonderful work, Schneidergott. And perfect timing considering I'm going to attempt to make one of these very coats for the very first time. Thank you
so much.
Like This
Then make little snips like shown in the diagram, pressing the dart open where the seam allowances are wide enough. At the top you fold the dart tip to one side
and the cloth to the other. This way you get a flat dart.
The wedge (which will cause the pattern not to match at the front seam) is closed by sewing a piece of lining or thin pocketing under the edges of the opening (blue
area).
If you want the cloth's pattern to match all around the coat (including the sleeve) you must not use the wedge.
Like This
Absolute wonderful work, Schneidergott. And perfect timing considering I'm going to attempt to make one of these very coats for the very first time.
Thank you so much.
Keep in mind that for the first fitting you must not cut in the front at the pocket. Since your friend is very slender it might be a good idea to have a fish dart, which
ends above the pocket (no wedge), so you just baste it. If you think you need a wedge you can have the original dart and pocket/ wedge when you have decided
about the final position of the pockets.
Like This
And also keep in mind they do that with the 16lb iron on the felt mat not with 3lb 500$ steamer on the homebody board.
Edited by Der Zuschneider, 07 September 2010 - 12:09 PM.
Like This
this is the German scientific way which is the only way, there is no other right way then this way.
DZ you sound like an Al-Qaeda tailor! I picture you on the back of a arabian horse waving shears over your head yelling "Schnittahu Akbar"
Like This
SG is revealing all the tricks, excellent, excellent. Keep in mind this is the German scientific way which is the only way, there is no other right way then
this way. Any other way is ancient and only for historic garment. Very important the modern axle, I think they appeared in 1950. If you want to make a
suit from 1936 they use the old form axle. The suits were tight fitting like tanks with good shoulder pads, in the 70thies similar, today suits have width
it would look strange with the old axle form and natural shoulder line.
And also keep in mind they do that with the 16lb iron on the felt mat not with 3lb 500$ steamer on the homebody board.
The only way? I would not go that far, I'd say one of many, although Rundschau is a very easy system to use.
If you know how to ship around the "cliffs" other systems have, they will bring good results, too.
Bear in mind that Great Britain and Italy are still strong at bespoke tailoring with a worldwide reputation, while the Rundschau system (or at least a mutation of the
original) is mostly found in RTW.
And the felt mat? That is so old school. Nothing replaces a heavy iron, dry or with steam, but I don't want to miss my suction table at home or at work.
Like This
DZ you sound like an Al-Qaeda tailor! I picture you on the back of a arabian horse waving shears over your head yelling "Schnittahu Akbar"
Like This
Actually, I think it should be: There is only one (cutting) system and DZ is it's prophet!
Well, still, we all know here there is one Schneider Gott and Rundschau is his system
I believe the One True Prophet regards Rundschau as one of the prophets whose words are but predecessors and prototypes of the Supreme Truth of the True
Prophet
Like This
Well, still, we all know here there is one Schneider Gott and Rundschau is his system
I think it's best to know more than one system, so you can pick up different ideas for making several styles (so Rundschau is not my only system).
Rundschau has a few quirks, like the very straight shoulder line, which needs to be corrected. The Italian way of dealing with the slope of shoulder is a bit better, I
have tried it on my Rundschau based coat and it saved me lots of trouble (I used the Italian formula and compared the result to the direct measurement and they
were almost 100% identical).
I should also add, that while the Rundschau draft was good until the mid seventies, it has slowly mutated to what we see today in most RTW coats, long fronts and
short backs.
If you take a look at the pictures about checking/ trueing the pattern you will notice that the front and side seams are congruent, which made it very easy to sew the
pieces together.
The latest version has a side panel that is slanted above the waist line, causing the fabric to be "stretchable".
In many RTW coats you can notice that the side seam has been stretched out, causing a messy back in that area.
There should be some ease in the back part, but most operators just stretch both pieces, side and back panel, because it's faster and easier to sew.
In the following picture you can see that the side panel has been stretched, while the back piece is short.
The deep armholes reduce the range where a coat can be tapered above the waist. That's why so many RTW (and MTM) coats look so boxy.
That is where the British and Italian cuts have an advantage today.
Like This