Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and The Nigerians' Victimization: An Empirical Analysis
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and The Nigerians' Victimization: An Empirical Analysis
JSSH is a quarterly (March, June, September and December) periodical that considers for publication
original articles as per its scope. The journal publishes in English and it is open to authors around the
world regardless of the nationality.
Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities aims to develop as a pioneer journal for the social
sciences with a focus on emerging issues pertaining to the social and behavioural sciences as well as
the humanities.
Areas relevant to the scope of the journal include Social Sciences—Accounting, anthropology,
Archaeology and history, Architecture and habitat, Consumer and family economics, Economics,
Education, Finance, Geography, Law, Management studies, Media and communication studies, Political
sciences and public policy, Population studies, Psychology, Sociology, Technology management, Tourism;
Humanities—Arts and culture, Dance, Historical and civilisation studies, Language and Linguistics,
Literature, Music, Philosophy, Religious studies, Sports.
History
Pertanika was founded in 1978. A decision was made in 1992 to streamline Pertanika into three journals
as Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, Journal of Science & Technology, and Journal of Social
Sciences & Humanities to meet the need for specialised journals in areas of study aligned with the
interdisciplinary strengths of the university.
After almost 25 years, as an interdisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, the revamped
journal focuses on research in social and behavioural sciences as well as the humanities, particularly in
the Asia Pacific region.
Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
Goal of Pertanika
Our goal is to bring the highest quality research to the widest possible audience.
Quality
We aim for excellence, sustained by a responsible and professional approach to journal publishing.
Submissions are guaranteed to receive a decision within 14 weeks. The elapsed time from submission
to publication for the articles averages 5-6 months.
Publication policy
Pertanika policy prohibits an author from submitting the same manuscript for concurrent consideration
by two or more publications. It prohibits as well publication of any manuscript that has already been
published either in whole or substantial part elsewhere. It also does not permit publication of manuscript
that has been published in full in Proceedings.
Code of Ethics
The Pertanika Journals and Universiti Putra Malaysia takes seriously the responsibility of all of its
journal publications to reflect the highest in publication ethics. Thus all journals and journal editors are
expected to abide by the Journal’s codes of ethics. Refer to Pertanika’s Code of Ethics for full details, or
visit the Journal’s web link at http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/code_of_ethics.php
Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities: ISSN 0128-7702 (Print); ISSN 2231-8534 (Online).
Lag time
A decision on acceptance or rejection of a manuscript is reached in 3 to 4 months (average 14 weeks).
The elapsed time from submission to publication for the articles averages 5-6 months.
Authorship
Authors are not permitted to add or remove any names from the authorship provided at the time of
initial submission without the consent of the Journal’s Chief Executive Editor.
Manuscript preparation
Refer to Pertanika’s Instructions to Authors at the back of this journal.
Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
Most scientific papers are prepared according to a format called IMRAD. The term represents the first
letters of the words Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, And, Discussion. IMRAD is simply
a more ‘defined’ version of the “IBC” [Introduction, Body, Conclusion] format used for all academic
writing. IMRAD indicates a pattern or format rather than a complete list of headings or components of
research papers; the missing parts of a paper are: Title, Authors, Keywords, Abstract, Conclusions, and
References. Additionally, some papers include Acknowledgments and Appendices.
The Introduction explains the scope and objective of the study in the light of current knowledge on the
subject; the Materials and Methods describes how the study was conducted; the Results section reports
what was found in the study; and the Discussion section explains meaning and significance of the results
and provides suggestions for future directions of research. The manuscript must be prepared according
to the Journal’s Instructions to Authors.
Editorial process
Authors are notified with an acknowledgement containing a Manuscript ID on receipt of a manuscript,
and upon the editorial decision regarding publication.
Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
Pertanika follows a double-blind peer-review process. Manuscripts deemed suitable for publication
are usually sent to reviewers. Authors are encouraged to suggest names of at least three potential
reviewers at the time of submission of their manuscript to Pertanika, but the editors will make the final
choice. The editors are not, however, bound by these suggestions.
Notification of the editorial decision is usually provided within ten to fourteen weeks from the receipt
of manuscript. Publication of solicited manuscripts is not guaranteed. In most cases, manuscripts are
accepted conditionally, pending an author’s revision of the material.
As articles are double-blind reviewed, material that might identify authorship of the paper should be
placed only on page 2 as described in the first-4 page format in Pertanika’s Instructions to Authors
given at the back of this journal.
Peer reviewers are experts chosen by journal editors to provide written assessment of the strengths and
weaknesses of written research, with the aim of improving the reporting of research and identifying the
Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
3. The chief executive editor, in consultation with the editor-in-chief, examines the reviews and
decides whether to reject the manuscript, invite the author(s) to revise and resubmit the
manuscript, or seek additional reviews. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Edito-
in-Chief, who reserves the right to refuse any material for publication. In rare instances,
the manuscript is accepted with almost no revision. Almost without exception, reviewers’
comments (to the author) are forwarded to the author. If a revision is indicated, the editor
provides guidelines for attending to the reviewers’ suggestions and perhaps additional advice
about revising the manuscript.
4. The authors decide whether and how to address the reviewers’ comments and criticisms and
the editor’s concerns. The authors return a revised version of the paper to the chief executive
editor along with specific information describing how they have answered’ the concerns
of the reviewers and the editor, usually in a tabular form. The author(s) may also submit
a rebuttal if there is a need especially when the author disagrees with certain comments
provided by reviewer(s).
Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
5. The chief executive editor sends the revised paper out for re-review. Typically, at least one of
the original reviewers will be asked to examine the article.
6. When the reviewers have completed their work, the chief executive editor in consultation
with the editorial board and the editor-in-chief examine their comments and decide whether
the paper is ready to be published, needs another round of revisions, or should be rejected.
7. If the decision is to accept, an acceptance letter is sent to all the author(s), the paper is sent to
the Press. The article should appear in print in approximately three months.
The Publisher ensures that the paper adheres to the correct style (in-text citations, the
reference list, and tables are typical areas of concern, clarity, and grammar). The authors are
asked to respond to any minor queries by the Publisher. Following these corrections, page
proofs are mailed to the corresponding authors for their final approval. At this point, only
essential changes are accepted. Finally, the article appears in the pages of the Journal and is
posted on-line.
SOCIAL SCIENCES
& HUMANITIES
The publisher of Pertanika will not be responsible for the statements made by the authors in any articles published in the journal. Under no circumstances will the publisher of this publication be liable for any loss or damage caused by your
reliance on the advice, opinion or information obtained either explicitly or implied through the contents of this publication.
All rights of reproduction are reserved in respect of all papers, articles, illustrations, etc., published in Pertanika. Pertanika provides free access to the full text of research articles for anyone, web-wide. It does not charge either its authors or
author-institution for refereeing/publishing outgoing articles or user-institution for accessing incoming articles.
No material published in Pertanika may be reproduced or stored on microfilm or in electronic, optical or magnetic form withou t the written authorization of the Publisher.
Copyright © 2018-19 Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. All Rights Reserved.
Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
Vol. 26 (4) Dec. 2018
Contents
Foreword i
Abu Bakar Salleh
Education
Analysis of the Factors Influencing Job Burnout: Empirical Evidence from 2211
Spain
Patricia Sastre-Morcillo, Francisco Javier Blanco-Encomienda and
María José Latorre-Medina
Assessing Omani University Entrants’ Critical Thinking Skills with the 2229
Cornell Class-Reasoning Test Form X
Sandhya Rao Mehta, Rahma Al-Mahrooqi, Christopher Denman and
Khalsa Al-Aghbari
Organisation and Move Structure in the Results and Discussion Chapter in 2365
Malaysian Undergraduates’ Final-Year Projects
Nur Izyan Syamimi Mat Hussin and Vahid Nimehchisalem
Management Studies
A Study of Entrepreneurial Mindset through the Dual Sided Role as Service 2473
Seeker and Service Provider among University Students
Mohd Zaidi Abd Rozan and Masoumeh Zibarzani
Knowledge Acquisition toward Startups’ Perspectives: Empirical Cross- 2489
Case Study of Leading Technology Business Incubators in Thailand
Kittichai Rajchamaha, Mongkolchai Wiriyapinit, Voraphan
Raungpaka and Akkharawit Kanjana-Opas
Psychology
The Usage of Sexual Internet Media and Sexual Behaviour among Sexually 2571
Experienced Adolescents in Malaysia: Sexual Intention as a Mediator
Soon Aun Tan, Siti Nor Yaacob and Jo-Pei Tan
Accounting
Economics
Alcohol Perception and its Economic Impact - A Study among Males in 2613
Rural Areas
Ramamurthy Srinath and Subramanian Sendilvelan
Religious Studies
Sociology
Tourism
Finance
Geography
Analysis of Factors for Determining Suitable Site for Giant Freshwater 2867
Prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) Farming Through the Local
Knowledge in Negeri Sembilan of Peninsular Malaysia
Ezekiel, B. B., Firuza, B. M., Mohammad, L. A. and Subha, B.
Law
Philosophy
Sports
JSSH is an open-access journal for studies in Social Sciences and Humanities that is
published by Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. It is independently owned and managed
by the university and run on a non-profit basis for the benefit of the world-wide science
community.
This issue contains 46 articles, out of which one is a review articles and 45 are regular
articles. The authors of these articles come from different countries, namely, Bangladesh,
India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Oman, Russia, South Africa, Spain,
Syria and Thailand.
Articles submitted in this issue cover wide range of social sciences and humanities
scope including accounting, architecture and habitat, consumer and family economics,
economics, education, finance, geography, language and linguistics, law, management
studies, media and communication studies, philosophy, political sciences and public
policy, psychology, religious study, sociology, sports and tourism. The most favoured
scope in this issue is education.
Selected from the education scope is an article entitled “Validity and Reliability of the
Mathematics Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (MSEQ) on Primary School Students” by Chan
Huan Zhi and Melissa Ng Lee Yen Abdullah from School of Educational Studies, Universiti
Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. The study was conducted with the objective of determining
the construct validity of MSEQ on primary school students and the internal consistency
reliability of MSEQ on primary school students. To achieve the objectives of the study,
quantitative data were collected from a sample of 100 primary school students. Findings
from the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) suggested that mathematics self-efficacy was
a unidimensional construct. It is highly reliable and can be used to gauge primary school
students’ mathematics self-efficacy in a Malaysian school setting. The details of this
study is available on page 2161.
Selected from tourism scope is an article entitled “Efficiency of Cruise Port Management:
A Comparison of Phuket and Singapore” by Phaiton Monpanthong from National
Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), Thailand. This study investigated and
i
compared cruise port managementsystems between Phuket and Singapore by employing
quantitative research methods. From the study, the empirical findings showed that the
top five biggest gaps regarding two cruise port management were port infrastructure,
port facility, political stability, cruise tourism policy and cleanliness in rank. Hence, the
results revealed that port management in Singapore was more efficient than in Phuket
in most variables. However, tourism attractions, tourism activity, service providers, value
for money, climate/sea conditions, and immigration formalities of Phuket were slightly
better than that in Singapore. The detail of this study is available on page 2787.
Selected from the scope of language and linguistics is an article entitled “Incorporating
Critical Thinking: Teaching Strategies in an English Language Programme” by Muhammad
Harriz Zaini, Norzie Diana Baharum and Ahmad Firdaos Shauqi Ahmad Sidiki, fellow
researchers from Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. The study focused on application
of critical thinking by English lecturers as well as students in the classroom for the English
Language programme in the Academy of Language Studies (ALS) UiTM Shah Alam –
English for Professional Communication (LG240).The study was carried out by adapting a
framework and concluded that both lecturers and students in the ALS shared the same
perception of the application of critical thinking in their classroom. Details of the study
is available on page 2379.
Selected from the scope of psychology is an article entitled “Psychological Risk Factors
for Postnatal Depression: A Prospective Study of Iranian Low Income Primigravidae at
Health Care Centres” by Matinnia, N., Ghaleiha, A., Jahangard, L., Ghaleiha, A. and
Farahmand, E., fellow researchers from three different countries (Iran, New Zealand and
Malaysia). The study aimed to identify the prevalence of postpartum depression and
its association with risk factors in low socioeconomic populations. Questionnaires were
distributed among 451 low income pregnant women referred to health care centres and
they were assessed using Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for depression.
The study found out that the prevalence of depression in pregnancy was higher in low
socio-economic primigravidea from Iran. The details of the study is available on page
2555.
We anticipate that you will find the evidence presented in this issue to be intriguing,
thought-provoking and useful in reaching new milestones in your own research. Please
recommend the journal to your colleagues and students to make this endeavour
meaningful.
ii
All the papers published in this edition underwent Pertanika’s stringent peer-review
process involving a minimum of two reviewers comprising internal as well as external
referees. This was to ensure that the quality of the papers justified the high ranking
of the journal, which is renowned as a heavily-cited journal not only by authors and
researchers in Malaysia but by those in other countries around the world as well.
In the last 12 months, of all the manuscripts passed editoral review, 53.7% were accepted.
This seems to be the trend in Pertanika Journals for JSSH.
We would also like to express our gratitude to all the contributors, namely the authors,
reviewers and editors, who have made this issue possible.
JSSH is currently accepting manuscripts for upcoming issues based on original qualitative
or quantitative research that opens new areas of inquiry and investigation.
iii
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
ABSTRACT
The issue of xenophobia has become a common phenomenon in South Africa, where
significant numbers of innocent lives have been lost, properties worth millions of dollars
destroyed, and many people displaced. The victims of these attacks were majorly black
Africans. Surprisingly, the molestation and attacks originated from Africans and targeted
at fellow Africans particularly the blacks. The ugly trend which has been linked to the
parochial mindset among South Africans with the belief that the foreign nationals in their
land are the cause of unemployment, poverty rate and spreading of deadly diseases in the
country. Given this fact, it has become a notion within the country that foreigners have
hijacked the socio-economic sector of South Africa and the solution was to frustrate the
migrants out of the society. However, the attacks on Africans and Nigerians in particular
is a barbaric and disturbing scenario which definitely has implications on the external
relations of both countries (Nigeria and South Africa). Thus, it is cogent to explore the
xenophobic violence in South Africa with special focus on Nigerians. The paper infers that
Africans need to embrace tolerance and treat foreign nationals in their countries, irrespective
of race or gender, with high sense of
brotherliness to promote cooperation among
ARTICLE INFO the African States as well as enhance peace
and development of the continent.
Article history:
Received: 13 July 2017 Keywords: Diplomacy, negrophobia, Nigeria, South-
Accepted: 25 June 2018
Published: 24 December 2018 Africa, violence, xenophobia
E-mail addresses:
kalmurtala@gmail.com (Muritala Dauda)
sakrauf2002@yahoo.com (Rauf Tunde Sakariyau)
abdlateef4ever@gmail.com (Abdullateef Ameen)
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 0128-7702
e-ISSN 2231-8534 © Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
2678 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
In the same vein, the study is aimed Obi, 2015). On the other hand, the rate at
at bringing to the awareness of the public which the incessant xenophobic violence
on the likely consequences of the negative through assaults and attacks on Nigerians
acts of the South African citizens on other living in South Africa calls for a serious
foreign nationals living in the country. This concern. Although, the xenophobic violence
is also to sensitize the South Africa citizens, in South Africa recorded massive attacks on
particularly those who are involved in the foreigners who are predominantly Africans,
ill-treatment of foreign nationals residing but this study is focused on the frustration
in the country on the likely danger they are and victimization experienced by Nigerians
exposing South African nationals who are in the country.
living in other countries. Therefore, this Even though past studies such as Obi
study is aimed at highlighting the need for (2015), Fayomi, Chidozie, and Ayo (2015),
Africans to imbibe the spirit of brotherhood Ogunnubi (2016), and Ogunnubi and
among fellow Africans irrespective of Amusan (2018), had been conducted on the
their colour or race in order to encourage Nigeria-South Africa hegemonic influence
cooperation and promote stability in Africa in the African continent. There are scanty
continent. studies on the effects of the ill-treatment
meted out on Nigeria’s nationals in South
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Africa on the economic relations and
Xenophobia is a common phenomenon diplomatic ties of the two countries. The
in Africa that has been experienced in victimization of Nigerian nationals by
countries like Angola, Botswana, Ghana, South Africans can destabilize the long-
Nigeria, Zambia, Zimbabwe among others term relationship between the two countries.
(Akinola, 2018b; Benyera, 2018; Carciotto, It is against this backdrop that the study
2016; Oni & Okunade, 2018; Shulika & examines how xenophobia in South Africa is
Sabi, 2018; Tella, 2016, 2018). However, affecting the Nigeria-South Africa relations,
the recurring event of xenophobia in South in order to prevent any disengagement
Africa has become a burning issue in Africa. between the two countries.
This has been canvassed for by several
literature found on the xenophobic violence METHODS
in South Africa. The study employs a systematic review of
Hence, Nigeria like many other African literature majorly on xenophobia in Africa
countries has cordial relationship with South with emphasis on South Africa. The study is
Africa government which has made it easy equally qualitative in nature which is based
for the duo to work things out together in the on the use of secondary data sources. This
African continent such as the contribution study used literature on different xenophobic
to Africa’s peace, stability and development violence recorded on books, journal articles,
(Colliers, Schunemann, & Moyer, 2015; Newspapers and experiences of Nigerian
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2679
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
returnees from South Africa who were Baron (1977), on his own suggested that,
victim of xenophobic attacks on foreigners “frustration is not a very common or
in the country. important (antecedent of aggression) and is
Moreover, the study makes use of probably far less crucial in this respect than
frustration-aggression theory as a good has widely and persistently been assumed”
theory is hypothetical set of norms where (Baron, 1977). He argued further that
facts will be derived from the body of “barriers to goal attainment would produce
knowledge (Asika, 1991). Hence, the aggressive reaction only when they were
theory of frustration-aggression best fits the unexpected” (Dill & Anderson, 1995).
explanation of the xenophobic violence on Hence, the aggression theory emphasizes
foreigners living in South Africa, particularly that, frustration always leads to aggression,
the influence of such ill-treatment on but if the frustration act is not well curbed,
Nigeria’s nationals. The frustration- the resultant effect of it will be disastrous
aggression theory can also be referred to which can lead to inflicting unnecessary
as the frustration-aggression-displacement pains and attacks on the innocent target
theory. The theory was formulated by (Pastore, 1950).
Dollard, Doob, Miller, Mowrer and Sears The relevance of the theory to this
in 1939, before it was later developed by study is that the xenophobic attack on
Miller et al. and Berkowitz in 1941 and 1969 foreign nationals is capable of disorganizing
respectively (Berkowitz, 1989). The theory the existing cordial relationship between
stipulated that, “….aggression is always a countries in Africa. For instance, Nigeria’s
consequence of frustration and, contrariwise foreign policy ensures the protection
……the existence of frustration always of rights and properties of its citizens
leads to some form of aggression” (Dollard both within the country and outside, any
et al., 1939). Similarly, aggression has infringement on rights or properties of its
been described as “the result of blocking, citizens by any country without a reasonable
or frustrating, a person’s efforts to attain a cause can affect Nigeria’s relation with the
goal” (Friedman & Schustack, 1999). country. As Nigerians are in other countries
According to Zillmann (1979), the carrying out different forms of activities,
responses to frustration could involve other countries’ nationals are also in Nigeria
“supplementary factors such as personal for a purpose. It becomes the responsibility
attacks or the instrumental value of of the host country to ensure the safety of
aggressive reactions” (Zillmann, 1979). lives and properties of both its citizens and
He stressed further that “the blockage of a foreigners residing legitimately in their
goal reaction, in and of itself…..generally country.
will not induce interpersonal hostility or
aggression” (Zillmann, 1979). However,
2680 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2681
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
2682 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2683
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
Zimbabwe, Namibia, Guinea, Gabon, are living (Hickel, 2014; Zwane 2014).
Angola, South Africa among others have Nevertheless, the country whose nationals
experienced one form of xenophobia is being rejected or expelled for no reason
or the other (Oloruntoba, 2018). Like than xenophobia, may not likely be in a good
Ghana in 1969, under the administration term with each other.
of Kofi Busia deported 20,000 to 500,000 Hence, the act of xenophobia is totally
Nigerians in less than three months under condemned in African continent, particularly
the pretence of Aliens Compliance Order the hatred of Africans by Africans (Brobbey,
(Gocking, 2005; Owusu, 2012). Similarly, 2018; Ogunnubi & Amusan, 2018; Tafira,
in 1983 and 1985, Nigeria equally deported 2018). Specifically, the frequency at which
Ghana citizens residing in the country the xenophobia in South Africa is taking
through Alien and Immigrants laws, same place, calls for a serious concern among
in Angola, Uganda, Gabon, Chad, Kenya, African States. It is important to stress
Cote d’Ivoire, South Africa among others that, the xenophobia in Ghana, Nigeria,
(Neocosmos, 2010; Romola, 2015). The and some other countries like that did
xenophobic actions in countries like Ghana, not record violence (Hart, 2016; Oni &
Angola, Nigeria, Uganda and South Africa Okunade, 2018). Meaning that, none of
were attributed to the economic issue. The the xenophobia occurrences in Africa has
reaction of xenophobia in Kenya and Chad exhibited violence, the way the South
were caused by war on terror. Also, the Africa’s xenophobic attacks was launched
xenophobic prejudices in Cote d’Ivoire, on foreign nationals living in the country.
Equatorial Guinea and Gabon were attached Therefore, xenophobic acts by South
to politics and economic considerations. Africans on other nationals can be better
The deportation of Angolans by the Congo examined in history of xenophobia in the
Kinshasa was attributed to political issue of country.
the country then (Aremu & Ajayi, 2014; Oni Genesis of Xenophobia in South Africa
& Okunade, 2018; Romola, 2015).
South Africa has been faced with rapid influx
Therefore, the idea behind the
of both legal and illegal foreign immigrants
deportation or expulsion of foreign
entering and living in the country. It has
nationals among African countries is to
been on record that, more than 2.2 million
create opportunities for the indigenes in
immigrants were residing in South Africa
their native land (Hart, 2016). This has
from the 53 African States (Molatlhwa,
formed part of the arguments in those
2012). In 2011, the South African statistical
countries where xenophobia has taken place,
records showed that Zimbabwe had the
having forgotten that, other nationals who
largest immigrants in South Africa, followed
residing in their country are contributing
by Mozambique among other foreign
either directly or indirectly to the economic
nationals (Molatlhwa, 2012).
development of the country where they
2684 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
Similarly, South Africa is one of the Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
countries in Africa where foreigners or (UNHCR ROSA, 2015), over 310,000
immigrants love to visit and perhaps stay refugees and asylum seekers are in South
due to its industrialized setup and conducive Africa in July, 2014. Meaning that in 2015
atmosphere (Dyson, 2015). The country is upward, the number of refugees will have
one of the most industrialized countries, if increased beyond, while 60,000 to 80,000
not the first of its kind in Africa. In fact, asylum seekers come into the country
the buoyant nature of the South African yearly. This made the population rate of
economic has attracted people from all South Africa to be increased daily. Noticing
walks of life to migrate into the country this increase in the population of South
(Adeogun & Faluyi, 2018). Africa, the South Africans assumed most
Since the nineteenth century when gold foreigners or immigrants in their country
was discovered in Witwatersrand in South particularly the black Africans illegally
Africa, the country has started employing entered the country. This perception as noted
foreign nationals (Adam & Moodley, by Gumede (2015) was the primary cause
2013; Adeogun & Faluyi, 2018). This has that triggers other factors in the xenophobic
made the country to have experienced an or Afrophobic or negrophobic attacks in
influx of foreign immigrants from different South Africa.
parts of the world and mostly from African The incidence of discrimination in
countries. The black immigrants were South Africa could be traced back to its
employed to the mining industries even apartheid experience which had inculcated
during the apartheid era in South Africa. some element of racism in South Africans
Since then, the native of South Africa, (Kalitanyi & Visser, 2010). Evidence had
particularly, the black South Africans mostly shown that illicit discrimination meted on
referred to the foreign immigrants as a threat foreigners or immigrants in South Africa
in their land (Fayomi et al., 2015). Hence, had not just started but dated back to
the industrialized nature and comfortable 1994. The South Africans reportedly threw
environment in South Africa, attract the some foreigners out from moving trains,
influx of migrants to the country. simply because they believe that foreigners
These particular attributes made were those taking their jobs and bringing
foreigners from all walks of life to troop diseases to South Africa (Misago, 2015).
in for the purpose of seeking refuge from Nonetheless, the 1994 transition from
economic crises, poverty, unfavorable apartheid rule into a democratic system
government policies and wars in their of government in South Africa betrayed
various native lands (Solomon & Kosaka, all expectations as the xenophobic attacks
2013). In fact, the refugees and asylum increased.
seekers prefer to reside in South Africa. The South Africa’s Xenophobia was
According to the report of the United described by Nyamnjoh (2006), as an effect
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2685
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
2686 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
more than 100,000 displaced (Consortium Mbeki was reported to have addressed the
for Refugees and Migrants in South Africa nation on the need to desist from assaulting
[CORMSA], 2009; Nyar, 2009; Tafira, or killing of foreigners particularly the
2018). Furthermore, the xenophobic attacks Blacks who are Africans. He was quoted
did not end there, similar attacks were that:
lunched between 2009 and late 2010 where When I walk down the streets
almost 20 foreigners were hacked to death, of Johannesburg and this other
above 40 were critically injured, over 200 black person approaches me,
shops owned by foreigners were looted and there is no way [of] my telling
over 4000 immigrants were displaced for that they are Zimbabwean or
their safety (CORMSA, 2011). Mozambican. There is nothing
While trying to calm the situation there that says, ‘ah, this is the
during the 2008 South Africa xenophobia, enemy I must hate’. But if a
one of the parliamentarians of the country, white person comes up, they are
Motsoko Pheko described the actions of the different. So I am saying that if
natives of South Africa as a barbaric when there was xenophobia, I would
he described the term xenophobia: expect it to be expressed against
What is called “xenophobia” people who might stand out as
in South Africa is brother being different from me and
hating or disliking brother. also, given our history, these
This signals that the colonial are the people that oppressed
mentality is too deep-seated in us. But you don’t have any
this country, if this is not the evidence of racism among our
work of hooligans or a “third people (Ncana, 2010).
force” to derail the Pan-African The declaration made by Thabo Mbeki
agenda, which fathers of the to condemn xenophobia in South Africa
liberation struggle in Africa was a bit relief to the African continent
such as Kwame Nkrumah, with the hope that peace has returned to the
Sekou Touré, Julius Nyerere, country. However, in the year 2011 another
Robert Sobukwe, Patrice series of attack on foreigners were carried
Lumumba, Marcus Garvey, out where over 120 people were killed
W.E.B. Du Bois, George and some burnt alive, 100 were seriously
Padmore, Malcolm X and many wounded, 120 businesses / shops owned
more embraced (cited in New by foreigners were closed and not less than
African Magazine 2015). 1000 immigrants were displaced (UNHCR
Immediately after the attack incidents of ROSA, 2014). Similarly, in the years 2012,
2010, the South African government under 2013 and 2014, there were weekly frequent
the leadership of the former President Thabo attacks on foreign nationals. In fact, between
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2687
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
January 2014 to March same year, estimated reported to have occurred due to some
300 incidents of violence meted on foreign conditions the indigenes of South Africa
nationals were recorded, over 200 shops found themselves and believed to have
owned by foreigners were either looted or been caused by the foreigners in their land.
destroyed and 900 persons were displaced Hence, if these attitudes are not properly
(UNCHR ROSA, 2014). addressed and well handled, it could lead
Similarly, in 2015, another attack was to the law of karma where the nationals of
launched by the South African native on other countries who are victims of South
foreign nationals living in the country African xenophobia may in turn reciprocate
(Gordon, 2017). The violence started in such on South Africans and their properties /
April 2015 in EThekwini and Johannesburg investment in their countries as well.
cities. Many casualties were recorded on Unlike other xenophobic attacks
both human and properties (Egan, 2015; experienced in other part of African
Gordon, 2017). The xenophobic attacks continent, the South Africa’s xenophobia
were launched on foreigners after Zulu therefore, is always accompanied by
King Goodwill Zwelithini was quoted to violence. The evidence to this could be seen
have said that “foreigners should go back from the 2008, 2015 and 2017 xenophobic
to their countries” (Masenya, 2017). The attacks on foreign nationals residing in
pronouncement aggravated the attacks on South Africa (Tella, 2018). The experience
immigrants and their properties. In fact, of some victims of the xenophobia in
some relevant government departments and South Africa revealed that, South African
the South African Police Service (SAPS) government at all levels need to guarantee
who are supposed to be protecting innocent the safety of all individuals in its country
lives and properties were reportedly to be in irrespective of where they come from in
support of the attacks on foreigners (Misago, order to reciprocate such to its nationals in
2016). Thus, these energized government other countries. According to Misago:
of some countries such as Nigeria to start Local residents in these areas
repatriating its citizen back home (Gumede, have become increasingly
2015). convinced that foreign
Again, in March 2016, another nationals are to blame for all
xenophobic treatments and violence their socioeconomic ills and
was instigated in Katlehong community hardships including poverty,
of Gauteng where foreign nationals unemployment, poor service
were brutally harassed and labeled as delivery, lack of business
“Makwerekwere” meaning “foreigners in space and opportunities; crime;
South Africa” with all sorts of condemnation prostitution; drug and alcohol
(Mkhize, 2016). All these ungodly attacks abuse; and deadly diseases
on fellow human by South Africans were (cited in Akinola, 2018b).
2688 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
Therefore, it is obvious that the major Nigeria whose relationships are cordial may
root cause of xenophobia claimed by the be affected.
native of South Africa is the presence of Having related the theory of frustration-
immigrants in the country, particularly, the aggression to the xenophobic act by the
illegal immigrants entering South Africa natives of South Africa as posited by
(Akinola 2018b; Tella, 2018). However, Dollard et al. (1939), Berkowitz (1989),
it has been equally argued that, the South and Friedman and Schustack (1999), that
African government encourages its citizens the aggression is mostly a product or
to maltreat other nationals residing in consequence of frustration. The application
South Africa. The statement made by of this theory is germane to both the
South African President, Jacob Zuma in his South Africa whose natives carried out
reaction over the 2015 xenophobia in the the xenophobic attacks on the foreign
country is arguably attested to this fact. He nationals who are residing in their country.
stated that: And similarly, the resultant effects of such
Our brother countries contribute attacks on the immigrants can jeopardize
to this. Why are their citizens the relationship between the South Africa
not in their countries? It is and other countries in Africa, particularly
not useful to criticise South Nigeria.
Africa as if we mushroom In other words, the benefits that the two
these foreign nationals and countries (Nigeria and South Africa), jointly
then ill-treat them…Everybody enjoy may be stopped or paralyzed which
criticizes South Africa as if may have negative impacts on the nationals
we have manufactured the of the two countries. Mostly, the resultant
problem. Even if people who effects of the xenophobia in South Africa
are xenophobic are a minority, may affect the South Africa’s investments in
but what prompts these refugees Nigeria (Gaffey, 2017; Mbamalu, 2017). In
to be in South Africa? It is a fact, that was the point made by the Senator
matter we cannot shy away Olusola Adeyeye who alluded to the fact that
from discussing (Maromo, South Africa’s companies and investments
2015; Mkandawire, 2015) in Nigeria such the MTN, DSTV, Nandos,
Shoprite, Pep and Game and many more are
Hence, the above statement is capable
doing well and making exorbitant profits
of instigating or encouraging the natives
from Nigerians, yet Nigeria’s government
of South Africa, who have or have not
is protecting them (Babalola, 2017; Unah,
actively participated in the act to join
2017). Hence, the resultant effect of the
the group (Ogunnubi & Amusan, 2018;
South Africa’s xenophobia which resulted in
Oloruntoba, 2018; Wilson & Magam, 2018).
a series of frustrations to Nigeria’s citizens
Consequently, the impact of such on South
in the country can cause or raise the tension
Africa with other African countries such as
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2689
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
2690 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
respectively (Oni & Okunade, 2018; Tafira, in South Africa have contributed to the
2011). economic and other developments taking
The literature has revealed that the skill place in the country. This is argued by
and initiative which the natives of South Meintjies that:
Africa lack about trading or business is Studies have shown that
what made them to have assumed that, the immigrants are, in fact, net
foreigners have taken away their jobs from contributors, not parasites.
them (Fagbadebo & Ruffin, 2018). This Immigrants are, on average,
has made Lindiwe Zulu, the South Africa’s healthier, more energetic and
Minister for Small Business to have posited better educated than people
that: in the host population.
Let me tell you why they are Consequently, they draw
better at running shops than comparatively less on social
the local owners – they have wel fare an d o t h er s o ci al
a great network system. And services. Many pay tax and,
also that is how they live. From through their entrepreneurship,
the moment they are born, they make a positive injection into
are introduced to trade. Their local economic development
mothers, uncles- everyone (Maharaj, 2002).
trades. They started at an early Aside from the claims that the foreign
age (Zwane, 2014). immigrants take the jobs of South Africans,
The Minister revealed further that the so literature has equally argued it that, an
called “secret” behind the successful records average native of South Africa are lazy
of foreign nationals business in South Africa (Shulika & Sabi, 2018). According to Tafira,
is the ability to economize the resources (2018), majority of the South African’s
(Fagbadebo & Ruffin, 2018). He stressed blacks, who see themselves as native of
further that: the country do not considering looking for
Our people need to learn what other job an option, rather they utilize their time
people are doing. They must ask themselves; idling or sitting in township. He posited
how are they able to be successful in a further that:
space where we fail? Then they must look, While these South African
learn and do the same. They must do it; the men are accusing immigrants
government cannot, the ministry cannot. We of taking all the jobs for less
cannot just give money away. We have no pay, immigrants and South
money to give (Zwane, 2014). African women generally say
Similarly, evidence from the literature South African men are lazy,
has shown that the foreign immigrants do not like to work, and kill
their time drinking, sleeping
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2691
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
and playing dice, where they in the State has been found to be biased in
may win a couple of Rands and its dealing, exposing the immigrants to all
then drink with the earnings… sorts of abuses, attacks and discriminations
Alexandra women are not keen to the point of losing lives and properties.
to have relationships with these It is important to note at this point that, as
kinds of men. Unemployed long as the government of South Africa
men are seen as both dom does not rise up to curb the menace with full
Khanda (thick-headed) and implementation and enforcement of laws or
omahlalela (loafers) unable to policies prohibiting such acts, the lives and
provide and both inadequate properties of foreign nationals will continue
and not real men. Women, to be unsecured.
rather, are looking for men who The Perception of South Africans
are either employed or are seen on Non-indigenes: Scholars associated
to make money in other ways. xenophobia in South Africa to some of the
This kind of man happens to be heritage inculcated in South Africans during
the immigrants (Tafira, 2018). apartheid (Kalitanyi & Visser, 2010). The
Therefore, the attitudes among some racism in South Africa’s history has made
native of South African, particularly the the indigenes of the country to have the
blacks toward their means of livelihood perception that the foreigners particularly
has made their women to always patronize the blacks who are residing in the country
the immigrants (Saleh, 2015; Tafira, 2018). are there to hijack their economy, spread
The jealousy among the unemployed South deadly diseases, and above all taken over
Africans arose the neo-apartheid relations their land from them (Zouandé, 2011). It is
which resulted in the killings and attacks of the belief of some South Africa’s indigenes
the innocent immigrants. that the best way to deal with the matter is to
Similarly, other reasons for xenophobic make lives uncomfortable for the foreigners
violence in South Africa could be grouped who are in the country in order to leave and
as follows; return to their various native lands.
The Political backup: Scholars have Cultural Norms and Beliefs: The
observed that one of the causes of the xenophobic attacks on non-indigenes
persistence in the attacks of foreign nationals in South Africa were not only confined
in South Africa is simply because the toforeign nationals but also to any person
perpetrators enjoy the supports of relevant that does not belong to the dominant groups
government apparatus or departments in in the country. For a South African not to
South Africa (Masenya, 2017). As argued by be attacked, the person must be either Zulu
Klotz (2016), and Crush and Ramachandran or Xhosa. Citizens of South Africa who
(2017), the relevant government departments do not belong to these dominant groups
who are supposed to protect the human rights will be seen as foreigners (Gumede, 2015;
2692 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
Masenya, 2017). The dominant groups to redefine its foreign policy direction
in South Africa prevented their children towards South Africa.
from getting married to people tagged as To this end, it will not be in the interest
foreigners and vice versa. This attitude of Africa to experience disunity or any act
has made it easier for the perpetrators of that can cause crisis between and among
the evils through xenophobia to carry out the African countries. The foreign nationals
their discriminate killings and attacks on in South Africa, particularly the Africans,
foreigners. are having their countries contributing
Attitude of South African Government to the development of the continent in
towards xenophobia in the country: The either stability contribution as the case of
whole blame of the xenophobic attacks Nigeria, others are contributing in the areas
on foreign nationals in South Africa has of economic socials and political settings
arguably apportioned on its government of the continent. Therefore, the earlier
(Fayomi, Chidozie, & Ayo, 2015; Masenya, Africa realizes the need for the continent to
2017). The government of South Africa has avert all forms of racism or discrimination,
been accused of nonchalant attitude to enact the better for it to promote the existing
laws or policies that will bring end to the cooperation among the African countries
illicit acts in the country and at the same for the continent to develop.
time its failure to bring the perpetrators to
book (Akindès, 2009). In as much as the CONCLUSION
government of a country is not ready to take The reoccurrence of xenophobia in South
the bull by the horn by dealing decisively Africa is capable of breaking the relationship
with the criminally minded people in the between the country and other African
society, such environment will not know countries, particularly Nigeria whose
peace as the hoodlums will take advantage nationals were among those molested or
to carry out their nefarious activities. victimized by the natives of South Africa.
Therefore, molestation and frustration Nigeria - South Africa economic and
experienced by Nigerians and other foreign diplomatic ties which have developed
nationals who are residing in South Africa through mutual relationship between the
has caused serious havoc to many in the two countries in African continent may
country. Some become widows or widowers, be affected as a result of the attacks on
while some children become orphans and Nigerians in the country (Koutonin, 2016).
many whose properties were destroyed or If this happens, it will affect the role that
carted away by thieves under the pretence the two countries have been playing jointly
of xenophobia are subjected to series of in Africa towards the development of the
financial difficulties. Hence, the country continent.
whose nationals have witnessed any of the Historically, Nigeria’s foreign policy
above conditions or more may be influenced towards Africa which South Africa shared
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2693
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
similar attribute, has made the government displeasure over apartheid by boycotting the
of the former in its big brother role in the Olympic Games and Commonwealth Games
continent to have favoured the entire Africa in to the nationalization of British Petroleum
its leadership role and stability commitment assets in 1979. All these contributions by
in African continent (Chukwuka, 2017; Nigeria to South Africa command respect
Ifijeh, 2017). The Afrocentric policy of and gratitude from the latter to the former
Nigeria influences the country in its stability (Ana-Caj, 2017)
and developmental contribution to Africa. However, the xenophobic attacks
Nigeria’s commitment to Africa has its in South Africa against the immigrants
long history particularly its efforts towards residing in the country, which Nigeria’s
the campaign against apartheid in Africa. nationals were equally affected has been
This has translated to the creation of viewed in the Nigeria’s perspective that,
United Nations Special Committee against “South Africa is often considered as an
Apartheid through the lobbying by Nigeria’s ungrateful” (Ogunnubi & Amusan, 2018).
government with some countries. The This is because the South Africans’ act of
Committee was overseen by Nigeria as shedding blood of innocent immigrants
its chair for 30 years. The country equally and destroying of their properties under the
loss over $41 billion due to its reaction pretence of taking their jobs, controlling
against apartheid by forfeited its trade their economy, spreading deadly diseases
with South Africa through stop selling oil among others is arguably not convincing for
to the latter for decades in protest against attacks to be launched on foreign national
discrimination by white minority in South (Unah, 2017). This has influenced Nigeria’s
Africa (Koutonin, 2016). Nigeria was government to condemn the illicit act and
one of the first category in the world to described such as barbaric in Africa. The
set up the National Committee Against South African Government is urged to take
Apartheid (NACAP) as far back as 1960 decisive measures to protect both Nigerians
(Ana-Caj, 2017). The government through and other Africans within the country’s
NACAP embarked on series of awareness, borders. Similarly, Nigeria’s Senior Special
orientations and sensitization on the evil of Assistant to President on Foreign Affairs and
apartheid as crime against humanity. Diaspora, Honourable Abike Dabiri-Erewa
Similarly, Nigeria has been shouldered urged the AU to intervene in order to find
with the responsibility to bring an end a lasting solution to the ugly incidents in
to apartheid since its independence to South Africa (Channels News, 2017).
the level of being given sanctions by the As it has been argued by Senator
Britain. Between 1960 and 1995, Nigeria Olusola Adeyeye that for “every penny
alone had spent $61 billion so support the a Nigerian made in South Africa, South
end of apartheid in South Africa (Channels Africans are making multiple of that in
News, 2017). Nigeria even demonstrated its Nigeria”, therefore the government of
2694 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
South Africa and those that involved in may break. It becomes pertinent for Africans
the ill-treatment of foreigners in their land to see themselves as one and brothers
should take some caution (Chukwuka, irrespective of race, colour, gender, and
2017). The assertion by the Senator alluded background for the continent to progress.
to the fact that South Africa’s companies
and investments in Nigeria such the MTN, REFERENCES
DSTV, Shoprite and many more are doing Adam, H., & Moodley, K. (2003). Imagined liberation:
Xenophobia, citizenship and identity in South
well and making exorbitant profits from
Africa, Germany and Canada. Stellenbosch,
Nigerians yet Nigeria’s government is
South Africa: Sun Press.
protecting them (Unah, 2017).
Adeogun, T., & Faluyi, O. (2018). Xenophobia, racism
From the foregoing it is arguable that
and the travails of black immigrants in South
South Africa depends on other African
Africa. In A. O. Akinola (Ed.), The political
countries for some of the achievements economy of xenophobia in Africa (pp. 125-134).
attained in the country. Similarly, as part of Cham, Switzerland: Springer International
the move to promote African economic and Publishing.
development, there is need for cooperation Adjai, C., & Lazaridis, G. (2014). People, state and
and stability among the African the African civic responses to immigration, xenophobia
states. This can only be achieved in the and racism in the New South Africa. Journal of
absence of discrimination and abuse of International Migration and Integration, 15(2),
foreigners by local indigenes of their 237-255.
residing countries. Achieving this will Akindès, F. (2004). The roots of the military-political
promote the partnership and cooperation crises in Côte d’Ivoire. Uppsala, Sweden:
among the countries in Africa and at the Nordiska Afriakinstitutet.
same time achieve the common goals toward Akindès, F. (2009). South African mediation in the
the development of the continent. South Ivorian crisis. In K. Shillinger (Ed.), Africa’s
Africa like other countries in the Africa has peacemaker? Lessons from South African conflict
mediation (pp. 113-151). Johannesburg, South
cordial relationship with Nigeria which has
Africa: Jacana Media.
involved signing of various agreements and
treaties between the two countries in the Akinola, A. O. (2018a). Introduction: Understanding
xenophobia in Africa. In A. O. Akinola (Ed.), The
areas of economic, security and diplomatic
political economy of Xenophobia in Africa (pp.
ties. Hence, Nigeria’s citizen diplomacy 1-8). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International
as included in the country’s foreign policy Publishing.
sought for the protections of Nigerians and
Akinola, A. O. (2018b). The scourge of xenophobia:
their properties both home and abroad. From Botswana to Zambia. In A. O. Akinola,
Therefore, if South Africa’s xenophobia (Ed.), The Political economy of xenophobia in
on foreign nationals continues, there is Africa (pp. 23-36). Cham, Switzerland: Springer
possibility that the ties between the two International Publishing.
countries and with other African countries
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2695
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
Akinola, A. O. (2018c). Xenophobia and the paradox South Africa. Channel News Online. Retrieved
of regionalism in Africa: The West African July 13, 2017, from https://www.channelstv.
experience. In A. O. Akinola, (Ed.), The political com/2017/02/20/nigeria-condemns-xenophobic-
economy of xenophobia in Africa (pp. 169-180). attacks-on-citizens-in-south-africa/
Cham, Switzerland: Springer International
Chinomona E., & Maziriri, E. T. (2015). Examining
Publishing.
the phenomenon of xenophobia as experienced
Ana-Caj (2017, February 27). South Africa must be by African immigrant entrepreneurs in
grateful to Nigeria for defeating apartheid. The Johannesburg, South Africa: Intensifying the
Citizen Online News. spirit of ‘Ubuntu’. International Journal of
Research in Business Studies and Management,
Aremu, O. J., & Ajayi, T. A. (2014). Expulsion of
2(6), 20-31.
Nigerian immigrant community from Ghana in
1969: Causes and impact. Developing Country Chukwuka V. (2017, March 1). Xenophobic attacks:
Studies, 4(10), 176-186. Maybe its time to send MTN, DSTV away. Apex
Reporters, p. 2.
Asika, N. (1991). Research methodology in the
behavioural sciences. Ikeja, Nigeria: Longman Colliers, J., Schunemann, J., & Moyer, J. D. (2015).
Publishing. Power and influence in Africa: Algeria, Egypt,
Ethiopia, Nigeria and South Africa. Institute for
Babalola, A. A. (2017, March 29). Xenophobia
Security Studies - African Futures March Paper,
attacks of Nigerians in South Africa. Vanguard
14, 1-28.
Newspaper, pp. 3-4.
Consortium for refugees and migrants in South
Baron, R. A. (1977). Human aggression. Spring, New
Africa [CORMSA]. (2009). Protecting refugees,
York: Plenum Press.
asylum seekers and immigrants in South Africa.
Benyera, E. (2018). The xenophobia-coloniality Retrieved July 13, 2017, from http://www.unhcr.
nexus: Zimbabwe’s experience. In A. O. Akinola org/en-my/partners/ngodirectory/4ea7186b1f/
(Ed.), The political economy of xenophobia consortium-refugees-migrants-south-africa.html
in Africa (pp. 135-151). Cham, Switzerland:
Consortium for refugees and migrants in South Africa.
Springer International Publishing.
(2011). Protecting refugees, asylum seekers
Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression and immigrants in South Africa during 2010.
hypothesis: Examination and Reformation. Retrieved from July 13, 2017, http://www.unhcr.
Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59-73. org/en-my/partners/ngodirectory/4ea9189b1f/
consortium-refugees-migrants-south-africa.html
Brobbey, C. A. (2018). Democratization and
legitimization of xenophobia in Ghana. In Crush, J., & McDonald, D. A. (2001). Introduction
A. O. Akinola, (Ed.), The political economy to special issue: Evaluating South African
of Xenophobia in Africa (pp. 69-80). Cham, immigration policy after apartheid. Africa Today,
Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 48(3), 1-13.
Carciotto, S. (2016). Angolan refugees in South Crush, J., & Ramachandran, S. (2017). Migrant
Africa: Alternatives to permanent repatriation? entrepreneurship collective violence and
African Human Mobility Review, 2(1), 362-382. xenophobia in South Africa. Cape Town, South
Africa: Southern African Migration Programme.
Channels News. (2017, February 20). Nigeria
condemns xenophobic attacks on citizens in
2696 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
Danso, R., & McDonald, D. (2001). Writing Gaffey, C. (2017, February 23). South Africa:
xenophobia: Immigration and the print media Xenophobic attacks prompt angry backlash in
in post-apartheid South Africa. Africa Today, Nigeria. Newsweek, p. 2
48(3), 122-131.
Gocking, R. (2005). The history of Ghana. California,
Dassah, M. O. (2015). Naming and exploring the USA: Greenwood Publishing Group.
causes of collective violence against african
Gomo, T. (2010). Analysis of media reporting and
migrants in post-apartheid South Africa. Whither
xenophobia violence among youth in South
Ubuntu l? The Journal for Transdisciplinary
Africa (Masters thesis, School of Arts and
Research in Southern Africa, 11(4), 127-142.
Communication, Malmö University Electronic
Dill, J. C., & Anderson, C. A. (1995). Effects of Publishing, Malmö, Sweden). Retrieved July
frustration justification on hostile aggression. 13, 2017, from https://scholar.google.com/sch
Aggressive Behavior, 21(5), 359–369. olar?cluster=5749271896170383112&hl=en&
as_sdt=0,5
Dollard, J., Doob, L. Miller, N., Mowrer, O., & Sears,
R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Gordon, S. L. (2017). Subjective national wellbeing
Haven, USA: Yale University Press. and xenophobia in Sub-Saharan Africa: Results
and lessons from South Africa. In P. Kraeger, S.
Dyson L. L. (2015). A heavy rainfall sounding
Cloutier, & C. Talmage (Eds.), New dimensions
climatology over Gauteng, South Africa, using
in community well-being (pp. 85-114). Cham,
self-organising maps. Climate Dynamics, 45(11),
Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
3051-3065.
Gumede, W. (2015, April 20). South Africa must
Egan, A. (2015). Xenophobia in South Africa.
confront the roots of its xenophobic violence.
America, 212(16), 11-17.
The Guardian, p. 1.
Fagbadebo, O., & Ruffin, F. (2018). From hate to
Harris, B. (2002). Xenophobia: A new pathology for
love: Black South Africans and the xenophobia
a New South Africa? In D. Hook & G. Eagle
project. In A. O. Akinola (Ed). The political
(Eds), Psychopathology and social prejudice (pp.
economy of xenophobia in Africa (pp. 109-124).
169-184). Cape Town, South Africa: University
Cham, Switzerland: Springer International
of Cape Town Press.
Publishing.
Hart, B. (2016, June 13). How Shehu Shagari expelled
Fayomi, O. O., Chidozie, F., & Ayo, C. K. (2015).
a million Ghanaians from Nigeria. Naij News
A retrospective study of the effects of
Online, p. 4.
xenophobia on South Africa-Nigeria Relations.
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Hickel, J. (2014). Xenophobia in South Africa: Order,
Technology, 1(1), pp. 1-10. chaos, and the moral economy of witchcraft.
Cultural Anthropology, 29(1), 103–112.
Friedman, H., & Schustack, M. (1999). Personality
classic theories and modern research (5th ed.). Ifijeh, M. (2017, March 6). Why can’t South Africans
Jarkarta, Indonesia: Erlangga Publisher. love Nigerians in return? This Day Newspaper,
pp. 2-3.
Fungurai, P. N. (2015, March 30). Xenophobic
attacks in South Africa: Redefining apartheid. Kalitanyi, V., & Visser, K. (2010). African immigrants
Transconflict, pp. 3-5. in South Africa: Job takers or job creators? South
African Journal of Economic and Management
Sciences, 13(4), 376-384.
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2697
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
Kaluba, A. (2016, April 23). Zambia: Tackling McDonald, M., & Jacob, S. (2005). (Re) Writing
xenophobia in Zambia. Times of Zambia, p. 5. xenophobia: Understanding press coverage
of cross border migration in Southern Africa.
Ki-Zerbo, J. (2005). African intellectuals,
Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 23(3),
nationalism and pan Africanism: A testimony.
296-327.
In T. Mkandawire (Ed.), African intellectuals:
Rethinking politics, language, gender and Misago, J. P. (2015, September 17). Xenophobia
development (pp. 78-93). Dakar, Senegal: in South Africa: Causes, attacks and history.
Council for the Development of Social Science Aljazeera News Online, p. 1.
Research in Africa and Zed Books.
Misago J. P. (2016). Responding to xenophobic
Klotz, A. (2016). Borders and the roots of Xenophobia violence in post-Apartheid South Africa: Barking
in South Africa. South African Historical up the wrong tree? African Human Mobility
Journal, 68(2), 180-194. Review, 2(2), 443-467.
Koutonin, M. R. (2016, April 12). Nigeria’s role in Mkandawire, L. (2015, April 29). Zuma under attack.
ending Apartheid in South Africa. Silicon Africa The Nation Online News, p. 2.
News Paper Online, p. 3.
Mkhize, V. (2016, September 9). Xenophobia rears
Maathai, W. (2009). The challenge for Africa: A new its ugly head in Katlehong. Eyewitness News
vision. London, England: Heinemann. Online, p. 1.
Magubane, B. M. (1986). The political economy of Mogekwu, M. (2005). African Union: Xenophobia
South African revolution. African Journal of as poor intercultural information. Ecquid Novi,
Political Economy, 1(1), 1–28. 26(1), 5-20.
Maharaj, B. (2002). Economic refugees in post- Ncana, N. (2010, October 17). Mbeki calls for probe
apartheid south Africa-asset or liabilities? into attacks. The Sunday Times, p. 1.
Implications for progressive migration policies.
Neocosmos, M. (2010). From foreign natives to
Geo Journal, 56(1), 47–57.
native foreigners: Explaining xenophobia
Mamdani, M. (1996). The citizens and subjects: in post-apartheid South Africa - Citizenship
Legacy of late colonialism. Princeton, USA: and nationalism, identity and politics. Dakar,
Princeton University Press. Senegal: Council for the Development of Social
Science Research in Africa.
Mamdani, M. (2012). Define and rule: Native as
political identity. Cambridge, England: Harvard New African Magazine. (2015, May 8). Afrophobia
University Press. is undermining African unity. New African
Magazine, p. 1.
Maromo, J. (2015, April 27). African nations to blame
for influx: Zuma. Independent Online, p. 1. Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2006). Insiders and outsiders.
Citizenship and xenophobia in contemporary
Masenya M. J. (2017). Afrophobia in South Africa: A
Southern Africa. Dakar, Senegal: Council for
general perspective of xenophobia. Bangladesh
the Development of Social Science Research
e-Journal of Sociology, 14(1), 81-88.
in Africa.
Mbamalu, S. (2017, February 24). Nigerians strongly
Nyar, A. (2009). What happened? A narrative of the
react to xenophobic attacks in South Africa. This
May 2008 xenophobic violence. Synthesis Report
is Africa, p. 2.
by the Atlantic Philanthropies, pp. 1-36
2698 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)
Xenophobic Violence in South Africa and Nigerians’ Victimization
Obi, C. (2015). Repositioning South Africa in global Piazza, J. A. (2017). Repression and terrorism: A
economic governance: A perspective from cross-national empirical analysis of types of
Nigeria. South African Journal of International repression and domestic terrorism. Journal of
Affairs, 22(2), 165-184. Terrorism and Political Violence, 29(1), 102-118.
Ogunnubi, O., & Amusan, L. (2018). Nigeria’s attitude Romola, A. (2015). Preventing xenophobia in Africa:
towards South Africa’s perceived xenophobia: What must the African Union do? African
Exploring a shared hegemonic power for Human Mobility Review, 1(3), 254–259.
Africa’s development. In A. O. Akinola (Ed.),
Ruedin, D. (2018). Not everyone is xenophobic in
The political economy of xenophobia in Africa
South Africa. Open Science Framework, 1(1),
(pp. 53-68). Cham, Switzerland: Springer
1-4.
International Publishing.
Sain, R. (2015, April 28). Jacob Zuma asks Africa:
Ogunnubi, O., & Isike, C. (2015). Regional hegemonic
Why are their citizens not in their countries and
contention and the asymmetry of soft power:
are in South Africa? African News Agency, p. 2.
A comparative analysis of South Africa and
Nigeria. Strategic Review for Southern Africa, Saleh, I. (2015). Is it really xenophobia in South Africa
37(1), 152-177. or an international act of prejudice? Global
Media Journal – African Edition, 9(2), 298-313.
Ogunnubi, O. (2016). Effective hegemonic influence
in Africa: An analysis of Nigeria’s hegemonic Shulika, L. S., & Sabi, S.C. (2018). Zimbabwe and
position. Journal of Asian and African Studies, the quest for development: Rethinking the xeno-
52(7), 932-946. ethnophobia tint and the land reform question.
In A. O. Akinola (Ed.), The political economy
Oloruntoba, S. (2018). Crisis of identity and
of xenophobia in Africa (pp. 153-167). Cham,
xenophobia in Africa: The imperative of a Pan-
Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
African thought liberation. In A. O. Akinola
(Ed), The political economy of xenophobia in Sichone, O. (2008). Xenophobia. In N. Shepherd &
Africa (pp. 9-22). Cham, Switzerland: Springer S. Robins (Eds.), New South African keywords
International Publishing. (pp. 255–263). Johannesburg, South Africa:
Jacana Press.
Oni, E. O., & Okunade, S. K. (2018). The context
of xenophobia in Africa: Nigeria and South Solomon, H., & Kosaka, H. (2013). Xenophobia
Africa in comparison. In A. O. Akinola (Ed). in South Africa: Reflections, narratives and
The political economy of xenophobia in Africa recommendations. Southern African Peace and
(pp. 37-52). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Security Studies, 2(2), 2-30.
International Publishing.
Tafira, H. K. (2018). Xenophobia in South Africa:
Osoro, R. (1993). The African identity in crisis: A history. In T. Falola & M. M. Heaton (Eds.),
Hudsonville. Michigan, USA: Bayana Publishers. African histories and modernities (pp. 15-35).
Cham, Switzerland: Springer International
Owusu, S. A. (2012, January 10). Ghana must go: The
Publishing.
aftermath. City Pulse News Online, p. 2.
Tafira, K. (2011). Is xenophobia racism? Anthropology
Pastore, N. (1950). A neglected factor in the
Southern Africa, 34(3 & 4), 114–121.
frustration-aggression hypothesis: A comment.
The Journal of Psychology, 29(2), 271–279. Tella, O. (2016). Understanding xenophobia in
South Africa: The individual, the state and the
Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018) 2699
Muritala Dauda, Rauf Tunde Sakariyau and Abdullateef Ameen
international system. Insight on Africa, 8(2), Webber, M., & Smith, M. (2014). Foreign policy
142-158. in a transformed world. Abingdon, England:
Routledge.
Tella, O. (2018). South African higher education:
The paradox of soft power and xenophobia. Whitley, B., & Kite, M. (2010). The psychology of
In A. O. Akinola (Ed.), The political economy prejudice and discrimination (2nd ed.). Belmont,
of xenophobia in Africa (pp. 81-92). Cham, USA: Cengage Learning.
Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Williams, V. (2008). Xenophobia in South Africa:
Unah L. (2017, March 1). Who is South Africa to Overview and analysis perspectives. Political
humiliate Nigeria? African Arguments, p. 2. Analysis and Commentary from Southern Africa,
3(8), 2-6.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Regional Office for Southern Africa (UNHCR Wilson, R., & Magam, L. (2018). Frustration-
ROSA). (2014). UN protection working group aggression, afrophobia and the psycho-social
meeting minutes. Retrieved July 13, 2017, from consequences of corruption in South Africa.
http://www.unhcr.org/en-my/ In A. O. Akinola (Ed). The political economy
of xenophobia in Africa (pp. 93-108). Cham,
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Regional Office for Southern Africa (UNHCR
ROSA). (2015). Situation Update #17 on the Zillmann, D. (1979). Hostility and aggression.
Xenophobic Attacks in South Africa. Retrieved Hillsdale, USA: Erlbaum.
July 13, 2017, from https://www.un.org/
Zouandé, S. F. (2011). Governance and democratic
youthenvoy/2013/09/office-of-the-united-
transition in Africa: Understanding Ivoirité
nations-high-commissioner-for-refugees/
and the ethnicity challenges to citizenship and
United Nations Population Fund. (2015). A world on nation-building in Côte d’Ivoire. Washington,
the move. Retrieved July 13, 2017, from http// USA: Howard University Press.
www.unfpa.org/migration
Zwane, T. (2014, November 7). Spazas: Talking shop
Wang, Z. (2014). Never forget national humiliation: is good for business. Mail & Guardian, p. 4.
Historical memory in Chinese politics and
foreign relations. New York, USA: Columbia
University Press.
2700 Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 26 (4): 2677 - 2700 (2018)