Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rough Draft of Persian Gulf Research
Rough Draft of Persian Gulf Research
Rough Draft of Persian Gulf Research
The Greek philosopher, Plato, once said: “For it is only the dead who have seen the end
of war.” War is unavoidable. But it’s the reasons for war, and the decision whether or not to
enter a conflict, that people love to debate. A widely criticized topic is the United States’ entry
into the Persian Gulf War. “The war introduced several technologically advanced weapon
systems. As well, the United States forged a broad-based international coalition that confronted
Iraq militarily and diplomatically” (Murphy). Although the United States’ decision to enter the
Persian Gulf War is a controversial topic, it is clear that the military efforts were worth the cost,
largely due to the militaristic technology and political ground gained through the invasion.
Stealth Airstrikes were somewhat underdeveloped prior to the Gulf War, but it provided a
golden opportunity to set them into play. “While Allied planes bombed Baghdad, U.S. Apache
attack helicopters prowled the deserts of Kuwait” (Nardo 62). Nardo goes on to explain how the
AH-64 Apache Helicopter is one of the U.S. Army’s main high-tech anti tank weapons. The
Apache is to provide close air support for the ground troops. When Operation: Desert Storm was
initiated, the AH-64’s were on the front lines suppressing enemy fire. “The Apache is equipped
with some of the most advanced computer and laser systems available, among them an infrared
night-vision system allowing the pilot to fly safely at night at low altitudes. The helicopter also
has a radar-warning device that tells the pilot when enemy radar has locked on to it. This allows
the craft to use evasive maneuvers immediately and escape attack by bullets and missiles”
(Nardo 52).
“Laser guided the Hellfire anti-tank missiles. The Apaches' 30-mm gun was also
laser-directed. The laser accounted for the speed of the aircraft, the wind,
and the aircraft's movement for seven seconds prior to firing. Attached to
Michael Duckworth English 10a 3 May 2010
used in one Conflict. Desert Storm was the proving ground for the AH-64 Apache, and it proved
itself to be worth its weight in gold. Without technology like the Apache attack helicopter, there
would have been a much greater number of casualties during the first phase of the Persian Gulf
War.
A major component of a successful military effort is the lack of casualties. The total
death count of U.S. Forces members didn’t even peak 2,000. In the terms of the scale of attack
compared to the amount of casualties, the Gulf war was a success. Also, there were only 147
hostile American military deaths (Fischer). Although the Iraqi death toll was high in comparison
to the U.S. Forces casualties, war doesn’t come without a price. The cost of lives is never
anything to be sought after or even something to be proud of, but it is necessary for a victorious
outcome.
The ground war in the Persian Gulf only lasted 100 hours exactly. This outflanking
Command (CENTCOM). “A military operation involves deception. Even though you are
deception you cannot carry out strategy, without strategy you cannot control the opponent” (Tzu
to launch a large amphibious landing. The Iraqis apparently anticipated that they also would be
attacked frontally. Therefore, they had heavily fortified those defensive positions. Schwarzkopf
instead moved the bulk of his forces west and north in a major use of helicopters, attacking the
Iraqis from their rear” (Murphy). Intensive planning was the key to the Allies’ victory in the
ground war, and such planning would not be possible without the reconnaissance new
The United States had to make a decision whether or not to enter the war, but its
choice to do so was paid off by the huge military gain. With new air, land, and stealth
technology, the U.S. remains the dominant figure on the battle field. Casualties are never a
positive element of war, but if the technology gained from it is valuable enough, tenfold the
number of lives could be saved by knowledge, machinery, and experience gained from previous
wars.