CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion

Build upon from the data analysis, the writer deduced that there were types

of errors in writing past perfect tense sentences based on Surface Strategy

Taxonomy made by students. They are in form of ommision, addition,

misformation, and misordering. The amount of errors consisted by 35 students

are 260 sentences.

Afterwards, from 260 errors’ sentences the proportions (frequency and

percentage) of the students’ errors in writing past perfect tense sentences are

ommision with 61 items or 23,46 %, addition with 71 items or 27,30 %,

misformation with 111 items or 42,69 %, and misordering 17 items errors with

6,54 %. Consequently, the result of the research shows the highest errors made

by students are misformation.

 48

B. Suggestion

From the conclusion above, the writer tries to give suggestions as follows:

1. For the English Teacher

The teacher could teach more clearly and detail about the material and

give lots of variation examples of past perfect tense. So, the students will

not get confuse to make past perfect tense sentences. In addition, the teacher

should apply attractive method in teaching to get more attention from the

students.

2. For the Students

Students must pay attention when the teacher explain the material,

especially in past perfect tense. If the students do not understand about the

material, try to ask the teacher to get the detail explanation.

3. For Other Researchers

The other researchers can do research about grammar with another types

of grammar, because of many students still have lack of grammar. The

writer recommends to other researchers try another taxonomy to analysis the

students errors.