Vendor Document Cover Sheet: Project: Ar4 4 Aromatics Plant

CONSORTIUM OF :
VENDOR
PROJECT : AR4 DOCUMENT
Owner WorkCOVER
No. : E-79/01
TEC
BORZOUYEH PETROCHEMICAL CO.
SAZEH LG E&C 4th AROMATICS PLANTSHEET
Consortium Work No. : BA-0512
TOTAL 43 SHEETS
AR4
REQ. NO. : BXFB001
ITEM NO. : TK-2501
EQUIPMENT NAME : HYDROTREATER FEED
VENDOR DOC. NO. : C3363A-D-01
DOCUMENT TITLE : CALCULATION SHEET
2 Mar. 13. ’02 FINAL T. Yoshii T. Tsukioka T. Ohashi

ISSUED FOR FINAL
1 Jan. 31. ’02 REV. AS MARKED T. Yoshii T. Tsukioka T. Ohashi
0 Oct. 25. ’01 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL Y. Tanaka T. Tsukioka T. Ohashi

REV. DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED AUTHORIZED
VENDOR NAME : TOYO KANETSU K.K.
File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 521 kB

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
TOYO KANETSU K.K. SPEC. NO. C3363A-D-01 2
TOKYO, JAPAN SHEET NO. 2 OF 43
INDEX
(1). TANK DESIGN CONDITION ........................................................................ 3
(2). TANK CAPACITY........................................................................................... 4
(3). SHELL PLATE THICKNESS.......................................................................... 5
(4). TANK SHELL STABILITY AGAINST EARTHQUAKE LOAD................... 6
(5). INTERMEDIATE WIND GIRDER................................................................. 11
(6). TANK STABILITY AGAINST WIND LOAD................................................. 15
(7). ROOF STRUCTURE....................................................................................... 16
(8). THICKNESS OF ROOF PLATE...................................................................... 31
(9). COMPRESSION RING AT ROOF TO SHELL JUNCTURE ........................ 32
(10). BUOYANCY OF FLOATING ROOF ............................................................. 34
(11). DECK POST .................................................................................................... 36
(12). AUTOMATIC BLEEDER VENT ................................................................... 39
(13). BOTTOM AND ANNULAR PLATE .............................................................. 41
(14). WEIGHT LIST ................................................................................................ 43

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
(1). TANK DESIGN CONDITION
Tank No. TK-2501

Number required 1
Nominal capacity 27,158 m3
Net capacity 25,495 m3
Tank inside diameter 48,500 mm
Tank height 15,100 mm
Design liquid level (D.L.L) 13,800 mm
Max. liquid level (M.L.L) 13,800 mm
Min. liquid level (L.L.L.L) 1,400 mm
Contents Name Hydrotreater Gas Condensate
Flash point Below 38 °C
Max. oper. temp. 47 °C
Specific gravity 0.696
Aromatic Content 40 wt%
Design code API ST’D 650 10TH EDITION NOV. 1998
Operating pressure 0.008 barg
Design temperature 65 / 5 °C
Design pressure 0.02 / -0.005 barg
Pumping In 371 m3/hr
rate Out 371 m3/hr
Corrosion 1st. Shell 3 mm
allowance 2nd. and over 2.5 mm
Bottom 3 mm
Roof 1.5 mm
Floating Wet part 3.0 mm
roof Vapor part 1.5 mm
Roof supp. frame 0.75 mm
(each side)
Shell design API ST’D 650 10TH EDITION NOV. 1998
One foot method (SI unit)
Roof type Dome roof
Bottom slope Cone up 1/100
Earthquake UBC 1997 (Zone4, SC,Ip=1.25)
Design wind velocity UBC 1997 (BWS=125km/h, IF=1.15, Exposure=D)
Snow load 246 N/m2

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
(2). TANK CAPACITY
D D.L.L. H
M.L.L
Hb
L.L.L.L.
1
100
D = 48,500 mm BOTTOM SLOPE = 1 / 100

H = 15,100 mm Hb = 242.5 mm
D.L.L. = 13,800 mm
M.L.L. = 13,800 mm
L.L.L.L. = 1,400 mm
GEOMETRIC CAPACITY : VG
VG =  × D2 × H = 27,897 m3
4
NET CAPACITY : VN
VN =  × D2 × ( M.L.L) = 25,495 m3
4
MAX. STORAGE CAPACITY : VM
VM =  × D2 × ( M.L.L ) -  × D2 × Hb = 25,346 m3
4 12

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
(3). SHELL PLATE THICKNESS

Shell thickness are calculated by One-Foot Method according to API ST’D 650 para. 3.6.3.
4.9 × D × (H’ – 0.3) × G

td = + Sd
C (mm)
4.9 × D × (H’ – 0.3) × G

tt = St (mm)
Where,
td : Design shell thickness, in mm
tt : Hydrostatic test shell thickness, in mm
D : Nominal diameter of tank, in m
D = 48.5 m
H’ : Height from bottom of course under consideration to design liquid level
including design internal pressure. (m)
= H+P/G
H : Height from bottom of course under consideration to the design liquid
level. (m)
P : Design pressure = 0.02 barg = 0.204 mAq.
G : Design specific gravity of the liquid to be stored = 0.696
Gravity of hydrostatic test water = 1.023
c : Corrosion allowance, in mm
c = 3 mm for 1st. shell
c = 2.5 mm for 2nd. and above shell
Sd : Allowable stress for the design condition, in Mpa

St : Allowable stress for the hydrostatic test condition, in Mpa
Allowable stresses Calculated thickness Adopted

No. H’ Sd St td tt thick. Material Width
(m) (Mpa) (Mpa) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
1 14.004 137 154 19.5453 21.6342 21.7 A283M Gr.C 2,450
2 11.554 137 154 16.0874 17.7665 17.8 A283M Gr.C 2,450
3 9.104 137 154 13.1294 13.8987 13.9 A283M Gr.C 2,450
4 6.654 137 154 10.1714 10.0310 10.2 A283M Gr.C 2,450
5 4.204 137 154 7.2135 6.1632 8.0 A283M Gr.C 2,450
6 1.754 137 154 4.2555 2.2954 8.0 A283M Gr.C 2,441
7 0.204 137 154 0.0 0.0 8.0 A283M Gr.C 400

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
(4). TANK SHELL STABILITY AGAINST EARTHQUAKE LOAD
According to UBC 1997 and API ST’D 650 Appendix E
4.1 Calculation Condition
D : Tank diameter ........................................ 48.5 m

H : Maximum design liquid level ................. 13.8 m
G : Specific gravity of liquid ......................... 0.696
ZIC1 = 0.36 (Refer to doc. no. G3363-D-01)
Z : Zone coefficient ....................................... 0.48
I : Essential facilities factor ........................... 1.25
S : Site amplification factor .......................... 1.2
(Eq. to soil profile type Sc)
4.2 Overturning Moment : M
M = ZI (C1 Ws Xs + C1 Wr Ht + C1 W1 X1 + C2 W2 X2)
Where,
C1 : Lateral earthquake force coefficient ........................ 0.6
C2 : Lateral earthquake force coefficient determined per
API ST’D 650 appendix E para. E.3.3. ................... 0.05940
When T is less than or equal 4.5 : C2 = 0.75 S/T
When T is greater than 4.5 : C2 = 3.375 S/T2
Where, T = Natural period of first mode sloshing, in
seconds. T may be determined from the
following equation.
T = KD1/2 = 8.25769 (sec)
K = Factor obtained from figure E-4 of API st’d
650 app’x E for the ratio D/H .... 3.5145
Ws : Total weight of tank shell 2,590 KN
Xs : Height from bottom of tank shell to center of gravity of shell
6.434 m
Wr : Total weight of tank roof 1,700 KN
Ht : Gravity center of roof 18.349 m
W1 : Weight of effective mass of tank contents which moves in unison with tank
shell 56,918 KN

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
X1 : Height from bottom of tank shell to centroid of lateral seismic force

applied to W1 5.175 m
W2 : Weight of effective mass of first mode sloshing contents of tank
109,658 KN
X2 : Height from bottom of tank shell to centroid of lateral seismic force
applied to W2 7.465 m
M = 1.5242 × 105 KN-m
4.3 Resistance to Overturning : WL
WL = 99 tb Fby G H .................. except that WL shall not exceed

WL’ (= 196 G H D)
Where,
WL : Maximum weight of tank contents of shell circumference which may be
utilized to resist the shell overturning moment N/m
tb : Thickness of the annular bottom plate after corroded
= 9-3 = 6 mm
Fby : Minimum specified yield strength of annular bottom plate
205 MPa
WL = 99 × 6 × 205 × 0.696 × 13.8

= 2.636 × 104 N/m
WL’ = 196 × 0.696 × 13.8 × 48.5

= 9.130 × 104 N/m
Then,
WL = 2.636 × 104 N/m

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
4.4 Shell Compression
1) Unanchored tank
The maximum longitudinal compression force at the bottom of the shell may be
determined as follows
M
2
< 0.785
D (Wt + WL)
b 1.273 M
c = = (Wt + ) / 1,000t
1,000t D2
M
0.785 < 2
< 1.5
D (Wt + WL)
b may be computed from the valve of the parameter
b + WL
obtained from figure E-5 (API 650)
Wt + WL
b
c =
1,000t
M
1.5 < 2
< 1.57
D (Wt + WL)
b 1.490 (Wt + WL)

c = = - WL / 1,000t
1,000t 0.637 M 1/2
1- 2
D (Wt + WL)
M
1.57 < 2
D (Wt + WL)
b 1.273 M
c = = (Wt + ) / 1,000t
1,000t D2
Anchor bolts are required.

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
Where,
c : The maximum longitudinal compressive stress in the shell
N/mm2
b : Maximum longitudinal shell compression force of shell circumference
110.617 KN/m
Wt : Weight of tank shell and portion of roof supported by shell
28.132 KN/m
M
1.57 > 2
= 0.955 > 0.785
D (Wt + WL)
c = 5.92 N/mm2
2) Maximum allowable shell compression
G H D2
> 44
t2
83 t
Fa = < 0.5 Fty
D
G H D2
< 44
t2
83 t
Fa = + 7.5 G H < 0.5 Fty
2.5 D

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
Where,
Fa : Maximum allowable longitudinal compressive stress in the shell
N/mm2
t :Thickness of the bottom shell course, excluding any corrosion allowance
18.7 mm
Fty : Minimum specific yield strength of the shell
205 MPa
G H D2
= 65 > 44
t2
Fa = 32.86 N/mm2
c < Fa
Therefore, this tank shell is safe.

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
(5). INTERMEDIATE WIND GIRDER
5.1 The maximum height of unstiffened shell length shall not exceed the following value
according to API ST’D 650 10TH EDITION, 1998 para. 3.9.7.
H1 = 9.47 × t × (t / D)3 × (100 / V)2

= 5.095 m = 5,095 mm
Where,
H1 : Max. height of unstiffened shell, in mm
t : Top shell thickness in height H1, in mm
t = 8 mm
D : Nominal tank diameter, in m
D = 48.5 m
V : Wind velocity, mile/hour
Refer to doc. no. G3363-D-01
V = 44.6 m/sec.
= 99.8 mile/hr
Transposed width of each shell course shall be calculated as follows.
Wtr = W × ( t / t act.) 5
WE =  Wtr
Where,
Wtr : Transposed width of each shell, in mm
W : Actual width of each shell, in mm
t act. : Actual shell thickness, in mm
WE : Total transposed width of shell, in mm

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
Result of Calculation
Course W (mm) t act. (mm) Wtr (mm)
7 th 400 8.0 400

6 th 2,441 8.0 2,441
5 th 2,450 8.0 2,450
4 th 2,450 10.2 1,335
3 rd 2,450 13.9 616
2 nd 2,450 17.8 332
1 st 2,450 21.7 202
WE = 7,776 mm
As WE < H1, intermediate wind girder is not required.
As 1 × H1 < WE < 2 × H1, 1 intermediate wind girder shall be installed.
The location of secondary wind girder is 2,700 mm from compression ring.

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
5.2 Required section modulus
Applicable Code --- API ST’D 650 10TH EDITION, 1998 Para. 3.9.7
The required minimum section modulus of intermediate wind girder shall be determined
by the following equation.
Zw = (D2 × H1 / 17) × (V / 100)2

= 372 cm3
Where,
Zws : Required min. section modulus, in cm3
D : Nominal tank diameter, in m = 48.5 m
H1 : Vertical distance between the intermediate wind girder and
compression ring, in m = 2.7 m
V : Wind Velocity, in mile per hour = 99.8 MPH
(44.6 m/sec.)
Actual section modulus Zas of intermediate wind girder as drawn below is,
1
263
L175×175×12
2
12
251
8.0

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
A Y A·Y A·Y2 Io
(cm2) (cm) (cm3) (cm4) (cm4)
1 52.6 17.9 941.5 16,853 4
2 40.52 4.73 191.6 906 1,170
Total 93.12 1,133.1 18,933
Then,
y =  (A · Y) /  A = 12.16817 cm
I = ( A · Y2 +  Io ) -  A × y2 = 5,145 cm4
e = 12.16817 cm
Actual section modulus wind girder : Zas

Zas = I / e
= 422 cm3 > Zws = 372 cm3

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
(6). TANK STABILITY AGAINST WIND LOAD
6.1 Overturning Moment due to Wind Pressure : Mw
Mw = P  (As  Hs + Ar  Hr) / 1,000 KN-m
Where,
As : Shell projectional area
As = H1  D m2
H1 : Shell height m
Ar : Roof projectional area m2
Hs : Center of gravity height for As m
Hr : Center of gravity height for Ar m
P : Wind pressure
(Refer to doc. no G3363-D-01)
6.2 Resistant Moment : Tw
Tw =
2
× Ww  D KN-m
3 2
Where,
D : Tank inside dia. m
Ww : Weight of shell (after corroded) and dead weight supported by the
shell (excluding uplift from internal operating pressure) KN
6.3 Calculation Result
P D H1 Hs Hr
(N/m2) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1,214.2 48.5 15.1 7.55 17.71
As Ar Mw Ww Tw
(m2) (m2) (KN-m) (KN) (KN-m)
732 214 11,312 2,607 42,146
Mw < Tw
Therefore, anchor bolt is not required.

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
(7). ROOF STRUCTURE
7.1 Design Condition
1) Design load (P)

Live load ( Including 0.005 barg vacuum pressure and 246 N/m2 of snow load )
= 1,177 N/m2
Weight of roof plate (6.5mm) = 537 N/m2
P = 1,714 N/m2
2) Corrosion allowance
Roof plate = 1.5 mm
Roof structure = 0.75 mm
(Each side)
7.2 Roof Frame Assembly
72R6 Rafter
72R5 Rafter
72R4 Rafter
2,890 72R3 Rafter
3,280 72R2 Rafter
3,820 36R1 Rafter
3,990
4,110
4,160
R2,000
R6,160
R10,270
R18,080 R14,260
R21,360
72G2 Girder 36G1 Girder Center ring
72G3 Girder
72G4 Girder
72G5 Girder
R24,250
R48,500
 48,500

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
7.3 Intensity of Rafter
LR
Wi = ( r22 p + W’) / N (N)
r1/2
Hi
Where,
h2 Wi p : Design load (N/m2)
h1
Point W’: Weight of center ring, etc. (to r2) (N)
“m”
N : Number of rafter
Hi
q1 = 2  r1p / N (N/m)
q2 = 2  r2p / N + Wg (N/m)
R 
Where,
Wg = w × LR / r1 (N/m)
w : Weight of rafter (N/m)
A1 = r1 × q1 / 2 (N)
r1 r2 A2 = r1 × q2 (N)
r0
h1 = R2 - r22 - R2 - r02 (m)
A1
q1 h2 = R2 - r22 - R2 - (r2 + r1 / 2)2 (m)
q2 A2
Horizontal force
r1 Hi = (Wi × r1 + A1 × r1 / 3 + A2 × r1 / 2) / h1
(N)
Maximum bending moment at point “m”
Mmax.= (Wi × r1/2 + q1r12/48 + q2r12/8 - Hi × h2)
Nominal force at point “m” × 100 (N-cm)
Vi = Wi + q1 × r1 / 8 + q2 × r1 / 2 (N)
Point
“m”
Axial force at point “m”
T
Hs = Hi × cos  + Vi × sin  (N) Hs
Hi
Shearing force at point “m” Vi 

T = Hi × sin  - Vi × cos  (N)

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
Maximum bending stress
Mmax.
Sb =
z
Axial stress
Hs
Sc = A
Where,
Z : Section modulus of rafter (cm3)
A : Section area of rafter (cm2)
Combined stress (bending & compression)
Sb Sc
b + c < 1
Allowable stress (in accordance with API 650)

b : Allowable bending stress
c : Allowable compressive stress

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
CALCULATION RESULT FOR RAFTER
Zx A LR rgy  w
MARK N SIZE
(cm3) (cm2) (cm) (cm) (LR/rgy) (N/m)
R1 36 H148×100×6×9 115.6 21.9 417.6 2.34 178.6 207
R2 72 H148×100×6×9 115.6 21.9 417.2 2.34 178.4 207
R3 72 H148×100×6×9 115.6 21.9 412.6 2.34 176.4 207
R4 72 H148×100×6×9 115.6 21.9 405.3 2.34 173.4 207
R5 72 H148×100×6×9 115.6 21.9 359.1 2.34 153.6 207
R6 72 H148×100×6×9 115.6 21.9 327.6 2.34 140.1 207
W’ r1 r2 Wi Wg q1 q2 A1 A2
MARK
(N) (m) (m) (N) (N/m) (N/m) (N/m) (N) (N)
R1 9,204 4.16 2.0 854 208 1,244 806 2,587 3,352
R2 60,360 4.11 6.16 3,675 210 615 1,131 1,263 4,649
R3 140,329 3.99 10.27 9,835 214 596 1,750 1,191 6,981
R4 223,789 3.82 14.26 18,310 220 571 2,352 1,091 8,983
R5 310,175 3.28 18.08 28,744 227 490 2,929 804 9,610
R6 393,113 2.89 21.36 39,567 235 432 3,429 625 9,907
h1 h2 Hi Mmax. Vi Hs T
MARK
(m) (m) (N) (N-cm) (N) (N) (N)
R1 0.352 0.131 40,143 127,799 3,176 40,269 212
R2 0.707 0.308 37,321 133,872 6,315 37,851 98
R3 1.044 0.477 52,442 169,757 13,622 54,182 83
R4 1.352 0.631 65,441 187,127 23,074 69,389 65
R5 1.461 0.694 75,925 150,712 33,751 83,088 36
R6 1.541 0.739 83,893 117,574 44,677 95,048 17
Sb Sc b c
MARK Sb/b + Sc/c
(Mpa) (Mpa) (Mpa) (Mpa)
R1 11 18 92 45 0.524 < 1
R2 12 17 93 45 0.504 < 1
R3 15 25 91 46 0.700 < 1
R4 16 32 90 46 0.860 < 1
R5 13 38 102 52 0.853 < 1
R6 10 44 113 58 0.837 < 1

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
7.4 Intensity of Girder
G1 girder Axial force

C
C = 0.5H2 × cot 
 + 0.5(H2 - H1) cosec  N
H2
H1
L
H2 Bending moment
R L
8 (H2 / cos  - W sin )
C Mh = N-cm
W sin 
W cos 
H2 L
Mv = 8 W cos  N-cm
 H2/cos 
Compressive stress
Sc = C / A Mpa
Bending stress
Sbh = Mh / Zx Mpa
Sbv = Mv / Zy Mpa
Where,
X
A : Cross sectional area of girder cm2
Zx : Section modulus of girder
Y Y
(X - X axis) cm3
Zy : Section modulus of girder
(Y - Y axis) cm3 X

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
Gi girder Axial force

C
C = 0.5(Hi+1-Hi) × cosec  N

H2 Compressive stress
H1
L
Sc = C / A Mpa
R C
Combined stress (bending & compression)
Sc Sbh Sbv
+ + < 1
c bc bt
Allowable stress (In accordance with API 650)
c : Allowable compressive stress

bc : Allowable bending stress (compression side)
bt : Allowable bending stress (tension side)

TKK JOB NO.
REV.
T01-3363
CALCULATION RESULT FOR GIRDER
Zx Zy A L rG 
MARK N SIZE
(cm )3 3
(cm ) (cm )2
(cm) (cm) (L/rG)
G1 36 H250 × 125 × 6.0 × 9 269.6 38.17 30.43 107.4 2.78 38.6
G2 72 L90 × 90 × 13 --- --- 19.11 89.6 1.71 52.4
G3 72 L90 × 90 × 13 --- --- 19.11 124.4 1.71 72.7
G4 72 L90 × 90 × 13 --- --- 19.11 157.7 1.71 92.2
G5 72 L90 × 90 × 13 --- --- 19.11 186.3 1.71 108.9
H1 H2 W C Mh Mv Sc Sbh Sbv
MARK
(N) (N) (N) (N) (N-cm) (N-cm) (Mpa) (Mpa) (Mpa)
G1 40,143 37,321 3,675 197,094 490,595 112,548 65 19 29
G2 37,321 52,442 --- 173,331 --- --- 91 --- ---
G3 52,442 65,441 --- 148,998 --- --- 78 --- ---
G4 65,441 75,925 --- 120,172 --- --- 63 --- ---
G5 75,925 83,893 --- 91,345 --- --- 48 --- ---
c bc bt
MARK Sc + Sbh + Sbv
(Mpa) (Mpa) (Mpa) c bc bt
G1 122 137 125 0.896 < 1
G2 115 --- --- 0.783 < 1
G3 104 --- --- 0.749 < 1
G4 91 --- --- 0.691 < 1
G5 78 --- --- 0.609 < 1

Vendor Document Cover Sheet: Project: Ar4 4 Aromatics Plant

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Vendor Document Cover Sheet: Project: Ar4 4 Aromatics Plant

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONSORTIUM OF :

REQ. NO. : BXFB001

ITEM NO. : TK-2501

EQUIPMENT NAME : HYDROTREATER FEED

VENDOR DOC. NO. : C3363A-D-01

DOCUMENT TITLE : CALCULATION SHEET

2 Mar. 13. ’02 FINAL T. Yoshii T. Tsukioka T. Ohashi

0 Oct. 25. ’01 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL Y. Tanaka T. Tsukioka T. Ohashi

VENDOR NAME : TOYO KANETSU K.K.

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 521 kB

(1). TANK DESIGN CONDITION ........................................................................ 3

(2). TANK CAPACITY........................................................................................... 4

(3). SHELL PLATE THICKNESS.......................................................................... 5

(4). TANK SHELL STABILITY AGAINST EARTHQUAKE LOAD................... 6

(5). INTERMEDIATE WIND GIRDER................................................................. 11

(6). TANK STABILITY AGAINST WIND LOAD................................................. 15

(7). ROOF STRUCTURE....................................................................................... 16

(8). THICKNESS OF ROOF PLATE...................................................................... 31

(9). COMPRESSION RING AT ROOF TO SHELL JUNCTURE ........................ 32

(10). BUOYANCY OF FLOATING ROOF ............................................................. 34

(11). DECK POST .................................................................................................... 36

(12). AUTOMATIC BLEEDER VENT ................................................................... 39

(13). BOTTOM AND ANNULAR PLATE .............................................................. 41

(14). WEIGHT LIST ................................................................................................ 43

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 148 kB

(1). TANK DESIGN CONDITION

Tank No. TK-2501

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 148 kB

(2). TANK CAPACITY

D = 48,500 mm BOTTOM SLOPE = 1 / 100

MAX. STORAGE CAPACITY : VM

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 148 kB

(3). SHELL PLATE THICKNESS

4.9 × D × (H’ – 0.3) × G

4.9 × D × (H’ – 0.3) × G

Sd : Allowable stress for the design condition, in Mpa

Allowable stresses Calculated thickness Adopted

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 148 kB

(4). TANK SHELL STABILITY AGAINST EARTHQUAKE LOAD

According to UBC 1997 and API ST’D 650 Appendix E

4.1 Calculation Condition

D : Tank diameter ........................................ 48.5 m

4.2 Overturning Moment : M

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 148 kB

X1 : Height from bottom of tank shell to centroid of lateral seismic force

M = 1.5242 × 105 KN-m

4.3 Resistance to Overturning : WL

WL = 99 tb Fby G H .................. except that WL shall not exceed

WL = 99 × 6 × 205 × 0.696 × 13.8

WL’ = 196 × 0.696 × 13.8 × 48.5

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 148 kB

4.4 Shell Compression

b may be computed from the valve of the parameter

b 1.490 (Wt + WL)

Anchor bolts are required.

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 148 kB

2) Maximum allowable shell compression

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 148 kB

Therefore, this tank shell is safe.

File : /conversion/tmp/scratch/405421796.doc / 148 kB

(5). INTERMEDIATE WIND GIRDER

H1 = 9.47 × t × (t / D)3 × (100 / V)2