Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Potentiality of Utilising Non-Woven Kenaf Fibre Composite For Car Door Map Pocket
Potentiality of Utilising Non-Woven Kenaf Fibre Composite For Car Door Map Pocket
3
Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Multimedia University, 75450 Jalan
Ayer Keroh Lama, Melaka, Malaysia.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Composites are two or more materials made of matrix reinforced by
fibres, combining the high mechanical and physical performance of the
fibres and matrix [1-2]. Over the last few years in the manufacturing
industry, there has been an increasing demand of product based on
composites. Various products in the world have been experimentally
studied as composite materials since they improve the product’s
(a) (b)
Figure 1: (a) non-woven kenaf (b) example of layup sequences of composites
Figure 1: (a) non-woven kenaf (b) example of layup sequences of
composites
Potentiality of Utilising Non-Woven Kenaf Fibre Composite for Car Door Map Pocket
(a)
(b)
Figure of
Figure 2: Sample 2: door
Sample of pocket
map door map pocket
made frommade from (a) non-woven
(a) non-woven kenaf
kenaf (b) polypropylene (PP)
(b) polypropylene (PP)
4
Force (kN)
0
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 PP
Sample
Figure 3: Tensile strength of composites
Figure 3: Tensile strength of composites
3.2 Flexural performance
The average of four samples was recorded for flexural test with
15 x 100 mm2 and crosshead speed of 2 mm/min referred to ASTM
3.2 D790. Figure
Flexural 4 demonstrates that the flexural strength increased by
performance
increasing the thickness respectively. Similar trends were observed
The average of four
in tensile samples
strength. was4,recorded
Figure however,for flexural test
surprisingly withthe
shows 15flexural
x 100 mm2 and
crosshead speed of
strength ofL5
2 mm/min
was lowerreferred
than L4,toabout
ASTM D790.
34.125 %. Figure
From the 4 demonstrates
observation, that the
flexural L5
strength increased
has lack of fibre by increasing
in several partsthe thickness
and has not respectively.
fully coveredSimilar trends were
the entire
sample, which leads to the decreasing thickness of L5 compared
observed in tensile strength. Figure 4, however, surprisingly shows the flexural to L4.
strengthApart
of L5 from that L5
was lower cannot
than withstand
L4, about 34.125higher loads
%. From thecompare to L4L5
observation, duehas lack of
to the thickness of composites. As illustrated in Figure 4, the
fibre in several parts and has not fully covered the entire sample, which leads to the lowest
and the highest flexural strength was L1 and L6, about 0.057 kN and
decreasing thickness of L5 compared to L4. Apart from that L5 cannot withstand
1.041 kN as expected. Also, it was found that L1 is weaker than PP by
higher loads
aboutcompare to L4 L1
43 % because dueisto the
the thickness
thinnest of of
layer composites.
compositesAs illustrated
compared to in Figure
4, the lowest
others. In addition, it can be noted that L6 was stronger 941 % than PPand 1.041
and the highest flexural strength was L1 and L6, about 0.057 kN
kN as expected.
due to theAlso, it was of
capability found that L1composites
laminated is weaker than PP by about
to withstand 43 % because L1
the bending
is the thinnest layer of composites compared to others. In addition, it can be noted that
L6 was stronger 941 % than PP due to the capability of laminated composites to
134 the bending
withstand ISSN: before
1985-3157reaching
Vol. 11theNo. 2 July - December
breaking 2017As demonstrated in
point [19].
Figure 4 and tabulated in Table 1, the flexural strength, density and thickness of L2 was
close to PP that makes L2 the most ideal layer for car door map pocket. It can be
Potentiality of Utilising Non-Woven Kenaf Fibre Composite for Car Door Map Pocket
1.2
1.2
0.8
0.8
Force (kN)
Force (kN)
0.4
0.4
0.0
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 PP
0.0
L1 L2 L3 SamplesL5
L4 L6 PP
Figure 4: Flexural strength of composite
Samples
Figure 4: Flexural strength of composite
Figure 4: Flexural strength of composite
4.0 CONCLUSION
4.0 This
CONCproject
L Uwas undertaken to develop the potential of non-woven
S I ON
kenaf for car door map pocket composite by evaluating the tensile
4.0ThisCONC L U Sundertaken
project was I ON to develop the potential of non-woven kenaf for car door
strength and flexural strength. This study has shown that L2 is the most
map
This pocket
project wascomposite
appropriate for theby
undertaken cartoevaluating
develop
door map the thepotential
pockettensile
since strength 114 %and
itofisnon-woven flexural
higher kenaf strength.
than for
PP car door This
study
map pocket has shown
composite
in tensile that L2
by and
strength is the
evaluatingmost appropriate
the tensile
the density for
of L2 isstrength the
most similar car door
and with map
flexural strength. Thisit is
pocket
PP (only since
114 %
study has higher
shown
11.952 than PP in
that L2 is The
% heavier). tensile
the most strength and
appropriate
flexural strength of the density
forL6the of
car door
which L2
is 941 is
map most similar
pocket
% stronger sincewith
it isPP
(only 11.952
114 % higher
than PP %
than heavier).
is PP
the in The flexural
tensilemajor
second strength strength
andinthe
finding of L6
thedensity which
study due is 941
of L2toisthe %
most stronger than
similar with PP
capability PP is
the11.952
(only second%major finding
heavier). The in the study
flexural due to
strength of the capability
L6 which of %
is 941 laminated
strongercomposites
than PP is to
withstand the bending before reaching the breaking point.
the second major finding in the study due to the capability of laminated composites Also, it was found thattothe
withstand the bending before reaching the breaking point. Also, it was found thatbecause
average mechanicalISSN:properties
1985-3157 value
Vol. for
11 L1
No. is
2 weaker
July - than
December PP
2017(about 36.241
135%) the
L1 is the
average thinnestproperties
mechanical layer of composites
value for L1 compared
is weakertothan others. One of36.241
PP (about the most significant
%) because
L1 findings to emerge
is the thinnest layerfrom this is that compared
of composites the tensile to strength
others.and Oneflexural
of the moststrength increased
significant
by increasing the number of layer of composites. The evidence from this study suggests
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support given by
Skim Zamalah UTeM and industry research partner of PROTON
by providing Grant PJP/2016/PROTON/FKP-AMC/S01498 and also
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka.
REFERENCES
[1] P. Yadav, S. Dhar and K. N. Vijaykumar, “Establish a methodology for
predicting the mechanical properties of composite materials,” International
Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.60-
67, 2013.
[2] M.Y. Yuhazri, M.H. Amirhafizan, A. Abdullah, H. Sihombing, U. Nirmal,
A.B. Saarah and O.M. Fadzol, “The effect of lamina intraply hybrid
composites on the tensile properties of various weave designs,” IOP
Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 160, no. 1, pp.1-15,
2016.
[3] M.S. Huda, L.T. Drzal, D. Ray, A.K. Mohanty and M. Mishra, “Natural-
fiber composites in the automotive sector,” In Woodhead Publishing Series in
Composites Science and Engineering, pp.221, 2008.
[4] A. Ashori, “Wood–plastic composites as promising green-composites for
automotive industries!,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 11, pp.4661-
4667, 2008.
[5] C. Alves, P.M.C. Ferrão, A.J. Silva, L.G. Reis, M. Freitas, L.B. Rodrigues
and D.E. Alves, “Ecodesign of automotive components making use of
natural jute fiber composites,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18, no. 4,
pp.313-327, 2010.
[17] G.N. Ramaswamy, T. Sellers, W. Tao and L.G. Crook, “Kenaf nonwovens
as substrates for laminations,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 17, no. 1,
pp.1-8, 2003.
[18] H. Abdellaoui, H. Bensalah, J. Echaabi, R. Bouhfid and A. Qaiss,
“Fabrication, characterization and modelling of laminated composites
based on woven jute fibres reinforced epoxy resin,” Materials & Design,
vol. 68, pp.104-113, 2015.
[19] R. Yahaya, S.M. Sapuan, M. Jawaid, Z. Leman, and E.S. Zainudin, “Effect
of layering sequence and chemical treatment on the mechanical properties
of woven kenaf–aramid hybrid laminated composites,” Materials &
Design, vol. 67, pp.173-179, 2015.