Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revalida Hon. Monteclar
Revalida Hon. Monteclar
1. People of the Philippines vs. Kevin Shauwnte Anthony Subing-Subing (M- CEB- 17-
03068- CR)
For: Violation of Ordinance No. 2108 (Anti-Dispatching)
City Ordinance 2108 prohibits the dispatching of passengers for public utility
vehicles. Violators of the ordinance will have to pay a fine of P5,000 or face
one year’s imprisonment.
2. People of the Philippines vs. Warren Halandumon Claro (Criminal Case No. 133559-
R)
For: Illegal Possession of Volatile Substance (P.D. No. 1619)
Section 2. The use or possession of volatile substances for the purpose of
inhalation to induce or produce intoxication or any of the conditions described
in the preceding section shall be punishable by imprisonment ranging from six
months and one day to four years and a fine ranging from six hundred to four
thousand pesos.
3. People of the Philippines vs. Rogelio Ledon Samonte (M- CEB- 16- 01284- CR)
4. People of the Philippines vs. Rolando Saldua (Criminal Case No. 143877-R)
For: Estafa
Swindling or estafa is punishable under Article 315 of the RPC. There are
three ways of committing estafa, viz.: (1) with unfaithfulness or abuse of
confidence; (2) by means of false pretenses or fraudulent acts; or (3) through
fraudulent means. The three ways of committing estafa may be reduced to
two, i.e., (1) by means of abuse of confidence; or (2) by means of deceit. (Sy
vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 183879, April 14, 2010)
The elements of estafa in general are the following: (a) that an accused
defrauded another by abuse of confidence, or by means of deceit; and (b) that
damage and prejudice capable of pecuniary estimation is caused the offended
party or third person. (Sy vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 183879,
April 14, 2010)
Please check Article 315 of the Revised Penal Code.
5. People of the Philippines vs. Rosalina Rago Macaraya (Criminal Case No. 159410-R)
For: Violation of BP Blg. 22
To be liable for violation of B.P. 22, the following essential elements must be
present: (1) the making, drawing, and issuance of any check to apply for
account or for value; (2) the knowledge of the maker, drawer, or issuer that at
the time of issue he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee
bank for the payment of the check in full upon its presentment; and (3) the
subsequent dishonor of the check by the drawee bank for insufficiency of
funds or creditor dishonor for the same reason had not the drawer, without any
valid cause, ordered the bank to stop payment. (Campos vs. People of the
Philippines, G.R. No. 187401, September 17, 2014)
BP 22, often referred to as the “Bouncing Checks Law”, governs the criminal
liability arising from the issuance of bounced checks. What the law punishes
is the issuance of a bouncing check and not the purpose for which the check
was issued, nor the terms and conditions of its issuance. To determine the
reasons for which checks are issued, or the terms and conditions for their
issuance, will greatly erode the faith the public reposes in the stability and
commercial value of checks as currency substitutes, and bring about havoc in
trade and in banking communities. (Caras vs. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 129900, October 2, 2001)
Section 1 of the Bouncing Checks Law penalizes two distinct acts: (1) Making
or drawing and issuing any check to apply on account or for value, knowing at
the time of issue that the drawer does not have sufficient funds in or credit
with the drawee bank. (2) Having sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee
bank shall fail to keep sufficient funds or to maintain a credit to cover the full
amount of the check if presented within a period of 90 days from the date
appearing thereon, for which reason it is dishonored by the drawee bank.
(Bautista vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 143375, July 6, 2001)
6. People of the Philippines vs. Ronald Buscato, Ian Buscato and Hui Lin Chin
(Criminal Case No. 145150-R)
For: Serious Physical Injuries
Art. 263. Serious physical injuries. — Any person who shall wound, beat, or
assault another, shall be guilty of the crime of serious physical injuries and
shall suffer:
1. The penalty of prision mayor, if in consequence of the physical
injuries inflicted, the injured person shall become insane, imbecile,
impotent, or blind;
2. The penalty of prision correccional in its medium and maximum
periods, if in consequence of the physical injuries inflicted, the person
injured shall have lost the use of speech or the power to hear or to
smell, or shall have lost an eye, a hand, a foot, an arm, or a leg or shall
have lost the use of any such member, or shall have become
incapacitated for the work in which he was therefor habitually
engaged;
3. The penalty of prision correccional in its minimum and medium
periods, if in consequence of the physical injuries inflicted, the person
injured shall have become deformed, or shall have lost any other part
of his body, or shall have lost the use thereof, or shall have been ill or
incapacitated for the performance of the work in which he as
habitually engaged for a period of more than ninety days;
4. The penalty of arresto mayor in its maximum period to prision
correccional in its minimum period, if the physical injuries inflicted
shall have caused the illness or incapacity for labor of the injured
person for more than thirty days.
If the offense shall have been committed against any of the persons
enumerated in Article 246, or with attendance of any of the circumstances
mentioned in Article 248, the case covered by subdivision number 1 of this
Article shall be punished by reclusion temporal in its medium and maximum
periods; the case covered by subdivision number 2 by prision correccional in
its maximum period to prision mayor in its minimum period; the case covered
by subdivision number 3 by prision correccional in its medium and maximum
periods; and the case covered by subdivision number 4 by prision correccional
in its minimum and medium periods.
The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall not be applicable to a parent
who shall inflict physical injuries upon his child by excessive chastisement.
Sec. 3. Punishable Acts. - Any person who participates in any illegal numbers
game shall suffer the following penalties:
a) The penalty of imprisonment from thirty (30) days to ninety (90) days, if such
person acts as a bettor;
b) The penalty of imprisonment from six (6) years and one (1) day to eight (8)
years, if such person acts as a personnel or staff of an illegal numbers game
operation;
The same penalty shall likewise be imposed to any person who allows his vehicle,
house, building or land to be used in the operation of the illegal numbers games.
c) The penalty of imprisonment from eight (8) years and one (1) day to ten (10)
years, if such person acts as a collector or agent;
d) The penalty of imprisonment from ten (10) years and one (1) day to twelve
(12) years, if such person acts as a coordinator, controller or supervisor;
e) The penalty of imprisonment from twelve (12) years and one (1) day to ten (10)
fourteen (14) years, if such person acts as a maintainer, manager or operator; and
f) The penalty of imprisonment from fourteen (14) years and one (1) day to
sixteen (16) years, if such person acts as a financier or capitalist;
g) The penalty of imprisonment from sixteen (16) years and one (1) day to twenty
(20) years, if such person acts as protector or coddler.