Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RTI-Central Information Commissioner
RTI-Central Information Commissioner
RTI-Central Information Commissioner
RTI Refers to the Right to Information Act under which any citizen of India
can ask for certain information from the authorities operated by the
Government.
The Central Information Commission (CIC) has been set up in order to help
those individuals who have not been able to submit their RTI Applications to
a Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer.
The reasons for this can be either one of the officers not yet been appointed
or one of the officers refuse to accept the individual’s
application under the Right to Information Act.
Had it not been for the information commission or the CIC, individuals
would have no one to turn to if their applications got rejected by the
Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer.
If your RTI application concerns the problems that affects only your
state and if you haven’t received any reply from the authorities to
which your RTI application was addressed, you can submit a First
Appeal to the authority.
If you don’t get any reply after filing a first appeal, you must approach
the State Information Commission.
The CIC will be involved only if the RTI query was sent to central
government department.
A Small Example
Suppose there has been a road construction going on for months in your
locality. It is a great obstacle to anyone travelling or passing by that road. In
this case you must submit an RTI Application with the Municipal
Corporation.
If they don’t respond to your RTI application, a first appeal can be made to
the Appellate Authority. If that too remains unanswered, you can
approach the State Information Commission. Even then if there is not
satisfactory response, approaching the high court is the options and not the
CIC.
Hope we have been able to clear your doubts and explain the role and
importance of the Central Information Commissioner and his department.
Basics of the Central and State information Commissions
The RTI act 2005 provides for establishment of Central and State information
commissioner as a designated authority to receive and inquire into a complaint
from any person.
At present, the RTI Act states that the Chief Information Commissioner and
Information Commissioners must be persons of eminence in public life with
wide knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service,
management, journalism, mass media or administration and governance.
The Supreme Court in September 2012 ruled that “only” serving and
retired judges of the apex court and chief justices of state high courts
can head the Central and State Information Commissions. Directing the
Centre to amend the RTI Act in this regard, the court stated that the functions
of the Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners can
be “better performed by a legally qualified and trained mind possessing the
requisite experience”.
It further ruled that lawyers with work experience of over 20 years will also
be eligible for appointment as a member and all such decisions will be taken
after consultations with the CJI and Chief Justice of the respective high courts.
The court passed the order on a PIL challenging the provisions of the Right to
Information Act, 2005 which enumerate the qualifications needed for
appointment as members to the commissions. As per the court, Information
Commissions are “judicial tribunals” and need to be manned by a person of
judicial mind, expertise and experience in that field.
Central Information Commission
September 4, 2018
The Central Information Commission (CIC) set up under the Right to
Information Act is the authorized quasi judicial body, established in
2005,under the Government of India to act upon complaints from those
individuals who have not been able to submit information requests to a
Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer due to
either the officer not having been appointed, or because the respective
Central Assistant Public Information Officer or State Assistant Public
Information Officer refused to receive the application for information under
the RTI Act. Satyanand Mishra is the current Chief Information
Commissioner.
• who has not been able to submit an information request because a PIO
has not been appointed
• who has been refused information that was requested;
• who has received no response to his/her information request within the
specified time limits ;
• who thinks the fees charged are unreasonable ;
• who thinks information given is incomplete or false or misleading ;and
any other matter relating to obtaining information under this law.
Quasi Judicial Power to order inquiry if there are reasonable grounds
The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, which came into force on 12
October 2005, marked a new and higher level of evolution of India’s
parliamentary democracy.
The Supreme Court has, in various judgements, held that the right to
information is a part of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and
expression under Article 19 (1) of the Constitution, since the right cannot
be properly exercised if the people did not have the right to information.
“The people of this country have a right to know every public act,
everything that is done in a public way, by their public functionaries.
They are entitled to know the particulars of every public transaction in all
its bearing. The right to know, which is derived from the concept of
freedom of speech, though not absolute, is a factor which should make
one wary, when secrecy is claimed for transactions which can, at any
rate, have no repercussion on public security… “
a) The CIC is empowered to receive and inquire into complaints from any
person relating to access to information under the control of public
authorities and to decide appeals against the decisions of designated
appellate officers.
c) The quantum of penalty liable to be imposed is Rs. 250 each day till
the application is received or information is furnished subject to the total
amount not exceeding Rs. 25,000.
f) The Commission may, during the inquiry into any complaint, examine
any record under the control of the public authority, and no such record
may be withheld from it on any grounds.