Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

CODE No.

10BT70203
SREE VIDYANIKETHAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution, Affiliated To JNUTA, Anantapur)
IV B. Tech. I Semester (SVEC10) Regular/Supplementary Examinations November - 2014
POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
[Electrical and Electronics Engineering]

Scheme of Evaluation
Answer any FIVE questions Max Marks : 70

1. (a) Representation of Single line diagram 1M


Conversion of Impedance values to admittance values 2M
Conversion of half line charging admittances 1M
Calculation of diagonal elements 2M
Calculation of off-diagonal elements 2M
� 0.8824 - 3.5144i -0.2941 + 1.1765i -0.5882 + 2.3529i 0 �
�-0.2941 + 1.1765i 0.8627 - 3.0726i -0.3333 + 1.0000i -0.2353 + 0.9412i �
Ybus = � �
2M
�-0.5882 + 2.3529i -0.3333 + 1.0000i 1.2157 - 4.4994i -0.2941 + 1.1765i �
� �
� 0 -0.2353 + 0.9412i -0.2941 + 1.1765i 0.5294 - 2.0876i � 4M
(b) any four advantages
2. (i) addition of branch for bus Impedance block diagram 2M
performance equation in Impedance form 1M
derivation of off diagonal elements

2M

derivation of diagonal elements

2M
(ii) addition of line for bus Impedance block diagram 2M
performance equation in Impedance form for addition of link 1M
derivation of off diagonal elements

2M

derivation off diagonal elements

1M
Modified Bus Impedance matrix

1M
3. Formation of Ybus =[ 0 -60.0000i 0 +40.0000i 0 +20.0000i 3M
0 +40.0000i 0 -80.0000i 0 +40.0000i
0 +20.0000i 0 +40.0000i 0 -60.0000i]
1 � P - JQP p -1 n �
VPK +1 = �P K -� K +1
Y pqV pq - �Y pq .VqK � Each
YPP �( VP ) * q =1 q = P +1 � equa
� �
tion
1 � P - JQ2 �
V21 = �2 K -� Y21V21 - Y23 .V30 � 3M
Y22 �( V2 ) * q =1 �
� �
1 � P - JQ3 �
V31 = �3 0 - Y31V31 - Y32 .V20 � 4M
Y33 �( V3 ) * �
� �
st
at the end of 1 iteration voltages for V’2=1.005∟-3.707
at the end of 1st iteration voltages for V’3= 1.032∟-6.649
at the end of 1st iteration voltages for V’2 =1.002∟-7.587
4M
at the end of 1st iteration voltages for V’3= 1.029∟-7.934
4. (a) Comparison between GS and NR Load Flow methods 6M
(b) 8M

 P  J 1 2 
     e 
Q=J 43  
 2 f
VPJ 65 
22
 P  P Q Q V V
PP
WherJ= J= J= J= J= ;;;;; J=
12345 6
Jacobian matrix of NR method
e f e f  f
5. (a) P=2,F=50,11kV, power factor=0.85
S=P/power factor=117.65MVA 1M
ωs=120f/P=3000rpm and ωsm= (2/P)*(ωs) 2M
1 1
J wsm
2
*10000 * 30002
H= 2 =2 =384.5MJ/MVA 2M
S 117.65
SH 117.65 * 384.5
M= = =5.02
180 f 180 * 50 2M
b Definition of transient stability and steady state stability 2M
Explanation for why transient stability is limit is lower than steady state stability 5M
6. (a) Equivalent circuit for Generator under sub-transient condition 3M
Equivalent circuit for Generator under Transient condition 4M
(b) Derivation for three phase fault current
Diagram for three phase fault current 1M
Boundary conditions 2M
E0
three phase fault current If = 4M
Z1
7. Derivation of steady state stability limit using ABCD parameters
Two port model for ABCD 2M
Sending end voltage and current 2M
from Complex power S1=P+jQ=Vs*Is 1M
Derivation and equating the real imaginary parts and assumptions 5M
E *V
Pe = sin d
X 2M
E *V
Steady state stability limit = Pe = whem d = 900
X 2M
8. E *V 2M
before fault conditionPe = sin d
X bf
E *V
during fault condition Pdf = sin d
X df
E *V
after fault condition Paf = sin d
X af 2M
Single line diagram

6M

4M

Explanation and derivation


Prepared by
Prof. M. S. Sujatha. Dr. N.M.G.
Kumar.

You might also like