 Revilla-León M, Olea-Vielba M, Esteso-Saiz A, Martínez-Klemm I, Özcan M.

Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive

Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations. Eur J
Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018 Mar 1;26(1):31-38. doi:
10.1922/EJPRD_01733RevillaLeon08. PubMed PMID: 29461746.
 Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of
measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):121-8. doi:
10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1. PubMed PMID: 23395338.
 Turner JW, Moazzez R, Banerjee A. First impressions count. Dent Update. 2012
Sep;39(7):455-8, 460-2, 465-6 passim. PubMed PMID: 23094567.
 Da Costa JB, Pelogia F, Hagedorn B, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of different
methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with
CEREC 3D. Oper Dent. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):324-9. doi: 10.2341/09-178-L. PubMed
PMID: 20533633.
 Wöstmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M. Accuracy of impressions obtained with
dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):158-60. PubMed PMID:
19418862.
 Mitchell ST, Ramp MH, Ramp LC, Liu PR. A preliminary survey of impression
trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations. J Prosthodont. 2009
Oct;18(7):582-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00493.x. Epub 2009 Jun 11. PubMed
PMID: 19523024
 Santucci NM, Santucci ET, Geissberger M. A simplified clinical technique for a
routine indirect restoration impression on a challenging patient using a dry
field illuminator. Oper Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):15-21. doi: 10.2341/11-290-T.

 Revilla-León M, Olea-Vielba M, Esteso-Saiz A, Martínez-Klemm I, Özcan M.

 Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive
 Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations. Eur J
 Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018 Mar 1;26(1):31-38. doi:
 10.1922/EJPRD_01733RevillaLeon08. PubMed PMID: 29461746.
 Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of
 measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):121-8. doi:
 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1. PubMed PMID: 23395338.
 Turner JW, Moazzez R, Banerjee A. First impressions count. Dent Update. 2012
 Sep;39(7):455-8, 460-2, 465-6 passim. PubMed PMID: 23094567.
 Da Costa JB, Pelogia F, Hagedorn B, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of different
 methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with
 CEREC 3D. Oper Dent. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):324-9. doi: 10.2341/09-178-L. PubMed
 PMID: 20533633.
 Wöstmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M. Accuracy of impressions obtained with
 dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):158-60. PubMed PMID:
 19418862.
 Mitchell ST, Ramp MH, Ramp LC, Liu PR. A preliminary survey of impression
 trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations. J Prosthodont. 2009
  Oct;18(7):582-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00493.x. Epub 2009 Jun 11. PubMed
 PMID: 19523024
 Santucci NM, Santucci ET, Geissberger M. A simplified clinical technique for a
 routine indirect restoration impression on a challenging patient using a dry
 field illuminator. Oper Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):15-21. doi: 10.2341/11-290-T.
 Epub 2013 May 15. PubMed PMID: 23675740
Epub 2013 May 15. PubMed PMID: 23675740