Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC)
Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC)
Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC)
The factor of poverty has severely inhibited the overall development of the country even after
achieving impressive G.D.P growth.
Many steps have been taken by consecutive governments for poverty alleviation. Thousands of
crores have been spent and numerous programs have been initiated to fight this scourge.
However, one of the biggest problems faced by policy makers in this regard is defining poverty.
“Who “ shall be considered as poor and on “ what” basis?
To eliminate poverty, it is very important to correctly determine who is poor? This will help the
government to devise appropriate measures to tackle poverty and to reduce leakages/
diversions in the benefits provided to the poor. Over the years various committees have been
appointed for the purpose of defining poverty estimation methodology.
As of today, poverty is measured using the below poverty line ( BPL) method which takes in to
account only one dimension, which is income. But one indicator cannot capture the multiple
aspects that constitute poverty. Poverty is multidimensional, i.e.., it is made up of several factors
that constitute poor people’s experience of deprivations such as poor health, lack of education ,
inadequate living standards , sanitation etc.
The methodology used presently has failed to take in to account the multidimensional aspect of
poverty in to account satisfactorily.
2 .SECC was a mega project conducted jointly by three ministries vise MoRD ,ministry of
housing, urban development & poverty alleviation and ministry of home affairs.
3. This was the first time since 1931 to ask every person their caste name to allow the
government to re-evaluate which caste groups are well off and which caste groups are worst off
and to better target the welfare schemes.
Although, SECC was conducted in both urban and rural areas, only the data of rural areas has
been published by the government.
Alagh committee:
1. Dr.Y.K. Alagh committee was set up in 1979 to determine a formula to measure
poverty in India.
2. This committee recommended the “ minimum calorie intake” formula to define poverty
line. As per this formula people who consumed less than 2400 kilocalories per day in
rural areas and 2100 kilocalories per day in the urban area were considered poor. Thus
,the calorie intake became the basis for poverty line in India.
3. As per the recommendations of the Tendulkar committee, poverty line was based on”
monthly per- capita consumption expenditure” (MPCE). And the MPCE was fixed at Rs
673 per person per month for rural areas and Rs 860 per person per month for urban
areas.
4. The committee recommended updating the MPCE levels every year after taking
inflation in to account.
5. The Tendullkar committee’s recommendations led to huge uproar all over the country.
It was accused of setting the MPCE very low to artificially push down the poverty levels.
N.C.Saxena committee:
2. The committee came out with a new criteria of” automatic inclusion and automatic
exclusion” in poverty estimation.
1. The committee submitted its report in 2014 and fixed the MPCE for a person at Rs
972 for rural areas and Rs 1407 for urban areas.
2. The committee preferred to use monthly per-capita expenditure of household of five
rather than MPCE of an individual. This came out to be Rs 4860 per household in rural
areas and Rs 7035 per household in urban areas.
Presently poverty in India is determined using the BPL method which is based on the income
required to purchase food items (determined using calorie norms) and non-food items ( clothing,
education etc).
SECC is more targeted and precise than the BPL method. While the BPL method
identifies the number of poor people, SECC identifies who actually are poor.
This will help in improving the efficiency of the government schemes and programmes,
leads to better identification and targeting of beneficiaries and avoid duplication and
fraud.
BPL method uses income as the sole criteria to define poverty but income alone can
miss a lot. Poverty is multidimensional and SECC takes this aspect in to account while
determining poverty. Multidimensional approach is very necessary for the success of
poverty alleviation programmes.
For example, an area in which most people are deprived of education is going to require
a different poverty reduction strategy when compared to an area where most people are
deprived in housing facilities.
The deprivations faced by poor in various fields such as education, health, sanitation etc
are not accounted in BPL method but are accounted in SECC. So SECC will help in not
only poverty eradication but also eradication of various deprivations.
The gender related issues of poverty is taken in to consideration in the SECC which was
missing in the BPL method.
Drawbacks of SECC
Even though SECC was conducted in both urban and rural areas, government has
released only SECC data of rural India.
SECC collates data regarding the caste of the people. This caste related information
faces the danger of being misused by political parties for their ulterior motives.
SECC data must be regularly updated in order to remove beneficiaries who have
overcome their deprivations. This will put a huge burden on the part of the government.
Way Forward
A multidimensional approach that incorporate a range of indicators to capture the complexity of
poverty is the need of the hour and the SECC seems to be a good tool in the hands of the
government in this regard. However, government should take necessary steps to avoid the
misusing of SECC and also to strengthen the SECC in order to develop it into a powerful tool to
fight the curse of poverty that has ravaged many Indians for centuries.