Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HRM Hospital Unit 3
HRM Hospital Unit 3
HRM Hospital Unit 3
103
personnel. Wages and salary are paid on the basis of fixed period of time and
normally not associated with productivity of an employee at a particular time.
2. Incentives: Incentives are the additional payment to employees besides the
payment of wages and salaries. Often these are linked with productivity, either in
terms of higher production or cost saving or both. These incentives may be given on
individual basis or group basis.
3. Fringe Benefits: Fringe benefits include such benefits which are provided to the
employees either having long-term impact like provident fund, gratuity, pension; or
occurrence of certain events like medical benefits, accident relief, health and life
insurance; or facilitation in performance of job like uniforms, Canteens, recreation,
etc.
4. Perquisites: These are normally provided to managerial personnel either to
facilitate their job performance or to retain them in the organisation. Such perquisites
include company car, club membership, free residential accommodation, paid holiday
trips, stock options, etc.
Reward management
Under HRM philosophy, rewards are financial and non-financial means used in order
to get the best effort and commitment from the employee as a partner in business. As
observed by McKenna & Beach (2002), and rightly so, that while the financial aspect
of rewards relates to extrinsic motivation meant for the satisfaction of basic needs of
life, the non-financial rewards are more intrinsic, in that, they are meant for the
satisfaction of psychological needs including job variety and challenging people,
achievement, recognition, employee development and involvement in determining the
affairs of the organisation. These ideas are well developed by various motivation
theories including Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Herzberg’s two factor and
expectancy theories (Bratton & Gold 2007). Armstrong in all of his works on HRM
takes the position that reward management is the design, implementation,
maintenance, communication and evolution of reward processes, which helps
organisations to achieve high performance.
Reward systems are put in place in order to improve an organisation’s performance.
The assumption is that reward packages motivate employees for total commitment to
104
the organisation’s effectiveness. Since the organisation’s high performance also
depends on significant improvement in all its aspects, there are also other specific
objectives when rewarding employees, which can be subdivided into the categories of
the organisation, individual, employees and teams and also employee representatives
At the level of the organisation, reward management is expected to:
•Help the organisation recruit the required number and quality of staff.
•Employees have their needs and expectations from the employer with regards to pay.
This includes the demands of the job, market rates elsewhere, comparison to other
jobs, pay in the organisation and the cost of living. The employer rewards staff in
order to meet these expectations and hence make them feel that they are justly
rewarded.
•Harmony in the work place cannot be ensured if there is a conflict between
employees through their trade unions and management when demanding better pay
and working conditions. Conflicts are counterproductive to performance. Better pay
also means better relationships with trade unions and less conflict.
Reward strategy is a declaration of intent that defines what the organization wants to
do in the longer term to develop and implement reward policies, practices and
processes that will further the achievement of its
business goals and meet the needs of its stakeholders.Reward strategy provides a
sense of purpose and direction and a framework for developing reward policies,
practices and processes. It is based on an understanding of the needs of the
organization and its employees and how they can best be satisfied. It is also
concerned with developing the values of the organization on how people should be
rewarded and formulating guiding principles that will ensure that these values are
enacted. Reward strategy is underpinned by a reward philosophy that expresses what
the organization believes should be the basis upon which people are valued and
rewarded. Reward philosophies are often articulated as guiding principles.
105
CHARACTERISTICS OF REWARD STRATEGY
As Murlis (1996) points out: ‘Reward strategy will be characterised by diversity and
conditioned both by the legacy of the past and the realities of the future.’ All reward
strategies are different, just as all organizations are different. Of course, similar
aspects of reward will be covered in the strategies of different organizations but they
will be treated differently in accordance with variations between organizations in
their contexts, strategies and cultures. Reward strategists may have a clear idea of
what needs to be done but they have to take account of the views of top management
and be prepared to persuade them with convincing arguments that action needs to be
taken. They have to take particular account of financial considerations – the concept
of ‘affordability’ looms large in the minds of chief executives and financial directors,
who will need to be convinced that an investment in rewards will pay off. They also
have to convince employees and their representatives that the reward strategy will
meet their needs as well as business needs. Duncan Brown (2001) has suggested that
effective reward strategies have three components:
1. They have to have clearly defined goals and a well-defined link to business
objectives.
2. There have to be well-designed pay and reward programmes, tailored to the needs
of the organization and its people, and consistent and integrated with one another.
3. Perhaps most important and most neglected, there need to be effective and
supportive HR and reward processes in place.
106
4. Is it based on a thorough analysis and diagnosis of the reward situation in the
organization?
5. Has a realistic assessment been made of the resources required to implement the
strategy and the costs involved?
6. Is it affordable in the sense that the benefits will exceed any costs?
7. Have steps been taken to ensure that supporting processes such as performance
management, communication and training are in place?
8. Is the programme for implementation realistic?
9. Have steps been taken to ensure that it is supported and understood by line
managers and staff?
10. Will HR and line managers be capable of implementing and managing the
strategy in practice?
Base wages and salaries are defined as the hourly, weekly and monthly pay that
employees receive for their work in an organization. It is on the basis of these that
employees judge the fairness of the pay system. Base wage and salary are the
foundation of employee pay structure, and total compensation is calculated after these
are fixed. The total compensation of an employee includes other elements like
incentives and benefits. The system of compensating employees in a fair manner,
maintaining the principle of equity and matching employee expectancy, is called
compensati8on administration.
107
6. It should be comparable with wages of other similar industries in similar
locations
7. It should attract talented personnel to join the organization
8. It should be flexible enough to bring about changes as and when found
necessary.
108
of they organization to ensure equity in compensation administration while
abiding to the laws of the countries it operates in.
TYPES
1. Primary compensation
2. Incentive Compensation
Primary compensation
It is basic pay in the form of wages or salaries. The word wage is used to denote
payment to hourly rated production workers and word salary is used to denote
payments to clerical, supervisory and managerial employees.
Time as a Basis form of pay the oldest and most common system of paying
employees is on the basis of time, rate per hour, per day, per week, per month or per
year.
The merits of the system
1. It is simple to understand.
2. It is liked by trade unions because it assures a guaranteed income for a given period
of work.
3. It helps in maintaining the quality of output.
4. It saves machine from being overworked and damaged.
5. It protects employees from overwork and fatigue
6. It is the only satisfactory system when the output is not distinguishable or
measurable.
109
2. In order to make the labourers work without wasting their time, supervision
becomes necessary. This increases cost of production.
2. External Competitiveness
To achieve external alignment the management must first know what the average
rates of its key job are prevailing in the community.
Average rates may be decided
110
1. when there is abundance of labour.
2. when the enterprise is incurring losses.
3. when the cost of living is going down.
4. when the enterprise has the reputation of being a stable employer with no layoffs.
5. when the enterprise pays sustained fringe benefits.
6. when wages are linked to productivity which is constant or falling.
111
rating systems assume that performance can be observed with reasonable accuracy
even when it cannot be objectively measured.
112
8. Increment system: In some organizations wages automatically increase annually
at a prescribed rate without any relation to workers‟ performance. In some other
organizations annual increases based on merit. Thus, the prevailing system of
granting increments also affects wages.
JOB EVALUATION
For fixing compensation to different jobs. it is essential that there is internal equity
and consistency among different job holders. Job evaluation aims to provide this
equity and consistency by defining the relative worth of different jobs in an
organisation. Job evaluation is the process of determining the relative worth of
different categories of jobs by analysing their responsibilities and, consequently,
fixation of their remuneration. International Labour Organisation (ILO) has defined
job evaluation as follows:
"Job evaluation is an attempt to determine and compare them without taking into
account the individual performance of the workers concerned"
The definition of job evaluation provided by ILO has been adopted by others. For
example, French has defined job evaluation as follows:
"Job evaluation is a process of determining the relative worth of the various jobs
within the organisation. so that differential wages may be paid to jobs of different
worth. The relative worth of a job means relative value produced. The variables
which are assumed to be related to value produced are such factors as responsibilities.
skills. efforts and working conditions"
The definition of job evaluation provided by ILO has been adopted by others. For
example, French has defined job evaluation as follows:
"Job evaluation is a process of determining the relative worth of the various jobs
within the organisation. so that differential wages may be paid to jobs of different
worth. The relative worth of a job means relative value produced. The variables
which are assumed to be related to value produced are such factors as responsibilities.
skills. efforts and working conditions"
113
OBJECTIVES OF JOB EVALUATION
The basic objective of job evaluation is to determine the relative contributions that the
performance of different jobs makes towards the realisation of organisational
objectives. This basic objective of job evaluation serves a number of purposes which
may be grouped into three categories: wage and salary fixation, restructuring job
hierarchy and overcoming anamolies.
1.Wage and Salary Fixation
The basic principle of wage and salary fixation is that it should be based on the
relative contributions of different jobs and not on the basis of who the job holders are.
If this principle is adopted, the first requirement is to identify the likely contributions
of different jobs. This is what job evaluation precisely does. It provides the
information about what is the worth of a job in terms of its contributions to the
achievement of organisational effectiveness. From equity point of view, this method
is more appropriate.
2. Restructuring Job Hierarchy: Job evaluation helps in restructuring job hierarchy.
Job hierarchy refers to arranging various types of jobs in the order of their importance
either on ascending basis or descending basis. Sometimes, job hierarchy becomes too
lengthy creating administrative problems and creating organisational problems by
increasing the number of levels in the organisation. In today's context, more emphasis
is being put on flat structure instead of tall one. Job evaluation exercise can be
undertaken to reduce the number of job levels by merging closely related jobs
together.
3. Overcoming Anamolies
Job evaluation, if carried on periodically and objectively, helps in overcomings
various anamolies which may develop in an organisation over the period of time with
regard to compensation management. Knowles and Thomposon have identified that
there are following anomalies and evils which may develop in an organisation and
may be overcome by job evaluation:
1. Payment of high wages and salaries to persons who hold jobs and positions
1. not requiring great skill, effort and responsibility;
2. Paying beginners less than that they are entitled to receive in terms of what
114
3. is required of them;
4. Giving a raise to persons whose performance does not justify the raise;
5. Deciding rates of pay on the basis of seniority rather than ability;
6. Payment of widely varied wages and salaries for the same or closely related
7. jobs and positions; and
8. 6. Payment of unequal wages and salaries on the basis of race, sex, religion, or
political differences.
115
4. It ensures the payment of regular and specific wages which is beneficial from
social point of view.
5. Product/service quality tends to be high as workers are not in hurry to produce
more without regard to quality.
116
6. Where workers' unions oppose the introduction of piece rate system.
7. Where supervision is good and the supervisors can estimate a fair day's work.
117
6. Trade unions generally oppose this system because of the fear of
discrimination among workers based on their working.
Various merits and demerits of piece wage system indicate that this system is not
suitable for all conditions but only to specific conditions which are as follows:
1. Where the output of each individual worker can be measured precisely.
2. Where the quantity of output is a direct result of skills and efforts of
individual workers.
3. When the flow of work is regular and work interruptions do not occur.
4. Where production methods are standardised and job is of repetitive nature.
5. Where workmanship is not required.
Balance Method
Balance method also known as debt method, is essentially a combination of time
wage and piece wage methods. Under this method, a worker is guaranteed a fixed
wage based on time rate with a provision of piece wage method. Thus, if a worker
produces more quantity in a period, usually on weekly or monthly basis, and earns
more than his time wage, he is given credit for additional output which is
compensated in another period in which production quantity falls below the time
wage.
This method provides a sense of security to a worker so far as his wage earning is
concerned. At the same time, he is also motivated to produce more because of
inclusion of piece wage system. This method has its relevance in a workplace where
the work flow is irregular like docks.
INCENTIVES
Incentive may be defined as any reward of benefit given to the employee over and
above his wage or salary with a view to motivating him to excel in his work.
Incentives include both monetary as well as non-monetary rewards. A scheme of
incentive is a plan to motivate individual or group performance.
The following are some of the definitions of the term Incentive
1. Wage incentives are extra financial motivation. They are designed to stimulate
human effort by rewarding the person, over and above the time rated remuneration,
118
for improvements in the present or targeted results” – The National Commission on
Labour.
2. “It refers to all the plans that provide extra pay for extra performance in addition to
regular wages for a job” – Hummel and Nickerson.
3. “It is any formal and announced programme under which the income of an
individual, a small group, a plant work force or all the employees of a firm are
partially or wholly related to some measure of productivity output” – Scott.
Robert E. Salton has mentioned the following nine factors as the Motives for work.
1. Doing something worthwhile (Good).
2. Trust in leadership.
119
3. Doing my share (Participation)
4. I count for something (Recognition).
5. A decent living (Fair Wages).
6. A chance to get somewhere (Opportunity).
7. A safe future (Security).
8. Know what‟s going on (Communication).
9. Conditions at work (Environment)
CLASSIFICATION OF INCENTIVES
All forms of incentives can be broadly classified into two kinds namely,
(i) Financial Incentives, and (ii) Non-financial Incentives. These
incentives can be further sub-divided into various kinds. These
kinds can be explained with the help of the figure below:
(ii)
Types of Incentives
Financial or Pecuniary Incentives
1. Wages
2. Salary
3. Premium
4. Bonus
Non-financial Incentives
1. Job security
2. Recognition
3. Participation
4. Pride in Job
5. Delegation of Responsibility
6. Quick Promotion
7. Facilities for Development
8. Labour Welfare Amenities
Now we shall briefly discuss the various kinds of incentives.
120
1. Financial Incentives
Financial incentives or pecuniary incentives are the most original of all the incentives.
It is given in the form of money. The financial incentives still form the most
important influencing and motivating factor up to a certain limit. Because it is only by
virtue of the monetary compensation that the workers can satisfy their fundamental
needs such as food, clothing, shelter etc. The financial incentives may be either direct
or indirect. Direct incentives include wages, bonus and other incentives directly given
to the workers in the form of cash. Indirect financial incentives include subsistence
allowance expenses, medical expenses etc.
2. Non-financial Incentives
Non-financial or non-pecuniary incentives include all other influences planned or
unplanned, which stimulate exertion. Mere monetary incentive cannot help the
management in solving all the problems of industrial unrest. Further additional cash
wage may also tempt the workers to misuse the money in vices like gambling,
drinking etc. Under such circumstances, the non-financial incentives have a
significant role to play. Such incentives create a healthy atmosphere and change the
mental outlook of the workers. They make the working class more stabilized and
economically sound. Thus, in short, the workers by virtue of the non-financial
incentives are enabled to enjoy a richer and fuller life. Experiences of foreign
countries particularly countries like Britain, America and Japan have shown that there
is a high degree of positive correlation between non-financial benefit schemes and
labour productivity.
1. Job Security: The management must try its best to create a sense of job
security. There should be no risk of retrenchment, demotion and termination.
Experiences have also shown that the productivity is less in those concerns
121
where workers have no feeling of safe and secure. But it is high in those
concerns where they have a feeling of job security.
2. Recognition: Recognition of work is the essence of securing good work. Efficient
people would naturally like to get recognition for their skill and excellence in their
work. Such recognition can do many things that what a cash reward can do. Of course
it is not practicable for the superiors to praise everybody for every thing done by
them. But the technique of praise must be practiced as far as possible.
3. Participation: Workers feel more satisfied when they are given an opportunity to
raise their voice in handling the affairs of the enterprise. Since they actually take part
in the decision-making their co-operation is assured.
4. Sincere Interest in Subordinates as Individual Persons: The workers must be
made to feel pride in their job. Various techniques can be employed to develop pride
to work. Food products, dynamic leadership, fair treatment, ethical conduct etc. can
effectively stimulate the workers‟ pride in their job and in the firm.
5. Pride in job: The workers must be made to feel pride in their job. Various
techniques can be employed to develop pride to work. Food products, dynamic
leadership, fair treatment, ethical conduct etc. can effectively stimulate the workers
pride in their job and in the firm.
6. Delegation of Responsibility: Delegation of rights and responsibilities to execute
a given task often proves to be a strong motivating factor. By delegation the superior
trusts his workers and stimulates them to show better results.
7. Other Incentives: Other incentives like quick promotion, provisions of facilities
for development and training, provision of labour welfare amenities etc. also have a
significant role to play in motivating the employees.
MERITS OF INCENTIVES
The following are the advantages derived by providing incentives to employees:
1. Higher output: By providing incentives to his employees, the employer is able to
induce them to work better. This leads to higher output.
122
2. Greater profits: Needless to say, higher output results in greater profits for the
business. This happens in two ways. First, the cost per unit becomes less and second,
the enterprise is able to keep the selling price low and this results in greater sales.
3. No problem of idle time: In an organisation where no proper incentives are
available for the workers, the tendency will be to while away the time. When suitable
incentives are available, the workers become time conscious. They begin to see every
minute in terms of money.
4. Supervision does not pose any problem: When suitable incentives are available,
the workers become duty conscious. The need for close supervision, thus, does not
arise.
5. Efficient workers are able to earn more: Such of those workers who are highly
efficient are able to earn more by way of performance bonus, higher commission and
so on.
6. Possible to identify inefficient and dull workers: If, in spite of the incentive
schemes, some workers are able to earn only their normal wage, it should mean that
they are basically dull. The employer, therefore, has to decide whether to retain them
or subject them to rigorous training.
7. Rate of labour turnover is bound to be low: If adequate incentives are available
to the workers, they may not have a feeling of dissatisfaction. Such workers are sure
to have greater work commitment and therefore may not leave the organisation. The
rate of labour turnover, as a result, is bound to be low.
8. Reduction in complaints and grievances: As the organization makes available
suitable incentives to the workers, they may not have anything to complain about.
This leads to reduction in complaints and grievances.
123
2. Inter-personnel relationships may suffer: Only those employees who are really
efficient will be benefited out of incentives. This may promote ill-feelings among the
employees of an organization.
3. Wear and tear of machines may be more: As the employees are keen on
increasing the output all the time, they may handle the machines carelessly. This
increases the wear and tear of machines.
4. Health of the workers may get affected: Some workers tend to overwork in order
to earn more and this may affect their health.
5. Increase in accidents: There is always a preference to step up output disregarding
even safety regulations and this may increase the rate of accidents in the workplace.
6. Increase in paper work: Proper administration of any incentive scheme involves
lot of paper work. It necessitates the maintenance of proper records and books.
124
6. Beneficial to both the workers and the management - The incentive plan should
be beneficial to both the workers and the management. From the management's point
of view, it should be cost effective. From the workers' point of view, it should offer
return, at a rate higher than the normal rate of wages, for the extra efforts made by
them.
7. Sound system of evaluation - A perfect system of evaluating the employees
performance should be created in the organisation. The results of evaluation should
be made known to the employees at the earliest.
8. Redressing grievances - Grievances and complaints are bound to arise whenever
any incentive plan is in vogue in the organisation. Proper machinery should be
installed for the quick handling of all such complaints.
9. Review - The progress of the incentive scheme should be periodically reviewed.
Only then it would be possible to notice and remove defects, if any, in the plan
125
time. Under the output-based plans, standard output is determined and the worker gets
his incentive only when he produces more than the standard output.
Under the group incentive plans, incentive is determined based on the collective
output of a group of workers whose work is inter-dependent. Such an amount is
apportioned among the group members on an agreed basis.
Time-based Individual Incentive Plans
Halsey's Plan
F.A.Halsey, an American engineer, introduced this plan. Under this plan, standard
time is determined for each job. A worker who completes the job by taking the
standard time or even exceeding it is paid normal wages calculated at the time rate. In
case, he completes the job in less than the standard time, he is given bonus equal to
50% of the money value of the time saved.
The bonus payable to the worker and his total earnings, under the Halsey's plan, are
calculated as follows
126
Bonus = 50% (Time Saved x Time Rate)
Total Earnings = Time Rate x Time Taken + Bonus
Merits of Halsey's Plan
The following are the plus points of Halsey's plan:
1. It is simple to understand.
2. The workers are assured of a minimum wage.
3. The employer and the worker share equally the benefit resulting from
savings in time.
4. The plan encourages workers to be more efficient in their work.
Demerits
Halsey's plan, however, suffers from the following limitations:
1. The efficiency of the worker is rewarded to the extent of50% only.
2. The time saved is wholly due to the efficiency of the worker but the
management grabs 50% of the resulting benefit.
3. The plan does not say anything about, the quality of the work done.
Rowan's Plan
Under Rowan's plan, the manner of calculating bonus is slightly different from that
under the Halsey's plan. Bonus, under Rowan's plan is calculated as follows:
Bonus = % of Timesaved x Time Wage
Standard Time
Total Earnings of the worker = Time Wage + Bonus
Merits
The following are the positive aspects of Rowan's plan:
1. Minimum wage is guaranteed to all workers.
2. When compared with Halsey's plan, bonus under Rowan's plan is more
although the basic time wage is the same under both the plans.
3. The plan provides a check against over-speeding by workers. As the worker
127
saves more time, his bonus and total earnings only begin to decline. In the
above illustration, suppose, the worker completes his task within one hour, i.e.
he saves 4 hours; his bonus will only be Rs.16. He earns the same bonus of
Rs.16 by completing the task in 4 hours, saving just one hour.
Demerits
The drawbacks of Rowan's plan are given below:
1. It is not as easy as Halsey's plan is.
2. The earnings of the worker become less as he saves more time. This
discourages efficient workers.
Emerson's Efficiency Plan
Under Emerson's plan too minimum wage is guaranteed to all workers. Payment of
bonus, however, is related to the efficiency of the workers. Efficiency is determined
by the ratio of time taken to standard time. Usually, a worker is given bonus only
when his level of efficiency, in terms of percentage, is above 66.67%.
Merits
The following are the advantages of Emerson's efficiency plan:
1. Minimum wage is guaranteed.
2. It pays bonus to workers based on their level of efficiency.
3. The 66.67% or two-third efficiency criterion is within the reach of many
workers.
Demerits
The disadvantages of the plan are as follows:
1. It is not a straight-forward approach to determining bonus.
2. If the standard time allowed itself is low, it may not be possible for many
workers to fulfil the efficiency criterion laid down under the plan. .
Bedeaux's Plan
Under this plan, the standard time and time taken for each job is reduced to minutes,
and each minute is referred to as "B", i.e., one hour is the same as 60 B's. The bonus
and total earnings of the worker, under the plan, are calculated as follows:
Bonus = 75% (Standard Time - Time Taken) x Time Rate
Total Earnings = Time Wage + Bonus
128
Merits
The benefits of Bedeaux's plan are:
1. It guarantees minimum wages to the workers.
2. It enables efficient workers to earn more.
3. The benefit of three-fourth of the time saved is given to the worker.
Demerits
The weaknesses of the plan may be stated as follows:
1. The unit name of 'B' in place of the 'minute' does not make the plan altogether
different.
2. The entire benefit of time saved by the worker is not passed on to him.
OUTPUT-BASED INDIVIDUAL INCENTIVE PLANS
Taylor's Differential Piece Rate Plan
F. W.Taylor, who is known as the Father of Scientific Management, developed the
differential piece rate plan. Under the plan, two piece rates are laid down –
(i) A lower rate for those workers who are not able to attain the standard output
within the standard time; and
(ii) A higher rate for those who are in a position to produce the standard output within
or less than the standard time.
Under the plan, minimum daily wage is not guaranteed.
Taylor's differential piece rate plan has the following components:
1. Standard Output.
2. Standard Time
3. A Lower Piece Rate and
4. A higher Piece Rate
Merits
The following are the merits of Taylor's differential piece rate plan:
1. It is easy to understand and simple to operate.
2. It enables efficient workers to earn more.
3. Workers not reaching the standard are paid at a lower rate. Such people, thus,
are punished for their inefficiency. This protects the interests of the
organisation.
129
Demerits
The limitations of Taylor's plan are given below:
1. It does not guarantee minimum wage. This creates a sense of insecurity for
the workers. .
2. There may be ill-feelings among workers in view of the differential piece
rates.
3. The quality of the output is ignored.
Merrick's Multiple Piece Rate Plan
Under this plan too a standard task is set for the workers. But unlike Taylor's plan that
provides for two differential rates, Merrick's plan contemplates three rates as shown
below:
(i) Workers producing less than 83% of the standard output are paid at a basic rate.
(ii) Workers producing between 83 % and 100% of the standard output will be paid
110% of the basic piece rate.
(iii) Those producing more than the standard output will be paid at 120% of the basic
piece rate.
Merits
The merits of the plan may u~ stated as follows:
1. It is an improvement over Taylor's plan.
2. It has greater flexibility.
3. It offers greater scope for efficient workers to earn more.
Demerits
The following are, probably, the drawbacks of the plan:
1. It is a complicated plan.
2. Even a worker achieving 83% target is branded as a poor performer.
Gantt's Task Plan
This plan guarantees minimum daily wage. Its special feature is that it combines time
rate, piece rate and bonus. A worker who is unable to produce the standard output
receives only the time wage. He becomes eligible for bonus only when he attains or
exceeds the standard output within the standard time. The rate of bonus varies
between 20% to 50% of his wages.
130
Merits
The plus points of Gantt's task plan are:
1. It has, as mentioned above, time wage, piece rate and bonus. It is, therefore,
a three-in-one scheme.
2. It guarantees daily minimum wage.
3. It provides enough opportunities for efficient workers to earn more.
Demerits
The weaknesses of the plan are:
1. It is not easy to understand.
2. The fluctuations in the output levels, of different workers not attaining the
standard, are ignored and they all receive the same daily minimum wage.
131
Merits of Profit Sharing
The advantages are profit sharing are as follows:
1. Better employer-employee relations - This is possible, as the employer is ready
to share the profits of the enterprise with his employees.
2. Increase in productivity -The employees make every possible effort to increase
productivity because they know very well that higher profits for the enterprise would
mean higher bonus for them.
3. Better living standards - It helps to increase the living standards of the employees
as the amount received is in addition to the usual wages.
4. Reduced costs of supervision - The workers themselves are duty conscious and,
therefore, they need no close supervision. Thus, costs of supervision are reduced.
5. Promotion of team spirit - The employees know the importance of teamwork, as
only such an effort would result in higher output.
Limitations of Profit Sharing
The limitations of profit sharing are as follows:
1. Regular income not assured: Payment to workers, by way of profit sharing, at a
particular rate depends upon the profits of the enterprise. If the enterprise makes low
profits or incurs losses, it will not be in a position to pay bonus as agreed.
2. Suppression of profits: Attempts may also be made to suppress true profits so that
the employees need not be paid their share. This is done by manipulating accounts.
3. No inducement: Payment under the profit sharing scheme will be made to the
employees once or twice a year when accounts are closed. Such payments at longer
intervals may not really motivate employees. Daily or weekly incentive payments are
far more superior to profit sharing.
4. All workers paid alike: Payment to workers under profit sharing is made without
considering their relative level of efficiency. This amounts to doing injustice to those
who have really made target attainment possible.
132
FRINGE BENEFITS
Benefits given to employees in addition to their salary or wage are called „fringe
benefits‟.
Thus fringe benefits are those monetary and non monetary benefits given to the
employees during and post employment period which are connected with
employment but not to the employees contribution to the organization.
Cockmar defined those benefits which are not provided by an employer to or for the
benefits of an employees and which are not in the form of wages, salaries and time
related payments.
COVERAGE
The fringe benefits covers bonus, social security measures, retirement benefits like
provident fund, gratuity, pension workmen‟s compensation, housing medical,
canteen, Co-operative credit, consumer stores educational facilities, recreational
facilities financial advice and so on.
NEED
1. Employee Demands
2. Trade Union Demands
3. Employers preference
4. As a Social Security
5. To improve Human Relation
OBJECTIVES
1. To create and improve sound industrial relations.
2. To boost up employee morale.
3. To motivate the employees by identifying and satisfying their unsatisfied needs
4. To provide qualitative work environment and work life.
5. To provide security to the employees against social risk like old age benefit and
maternity benefits.
133
6. To protect the health of the employees and to provide safety to the employees
against accidents
7. To promote employees welfare by providing welfare measures like recreation
facilities.
8. To create sense of belongingness among employees
9. To meet requirements of various legislations relating to fringe benefits.
Benefits under this head include employment insurance, technological adjustment pay
, leave travel pay, overtime pay, level for negotiation, leave for maternity, leave for
grievances, holidays, cost of living bonus, call back pay , lay off pay, retiring rooms,
jobs to the sons/daughter of the employees.
2. Health protection
Benefits include accident insurance, disability insurance, health insurance,
hospitalization, life insurance, medical care, sick benefits sick leave.
134
3. Old Age and Retirement Benefits
It include deferred income e plan pension , gratuity, provident fund, old age pension
old age counseling, medical benefits for retired employees, traveling concession to
retired employees.
4. Personnel Identification, Participation and Stimulation:
The category covers the following benefits: anniversary awards, attendance bonus,
canteen, cooperative credit societies, educational facilities, beauty parlour services,
housing, income tax aid, counseling, quality bonus, recreational programmes, stress
counseling, safety measures etc.
In addition to fringe benefits, managements provide different types of non-monetary
rewards. These non-monetary rewards include:
(i) Treats cover free lunches, festival bashes, coffee breaks, picnics, dinner with the
boss, dinner for the family, birthday treats.
(ii) Knick-Knacks cover desk accessories, company watches, tie-pins, brooches,
diaries/planners, calendars, wallets and T-shirts.
(iii) Awards include trophies, plaques, citations, certificates, scrolls, letters of
appreciation.
(iv) Social Acknowledgment includes informal recognition, recognition at office get-
together, socialisation of advice, suggestions etc.
(v) Office Environment covers redecoration, flexible hours etc.
(vi) To kens covers movie tickets, vacation trips, early time-offs etc.
(vii) On-the-job rewards include increased responsibility, job rotation, training etc.
135
Disadvantages of Fringe Benefits
The non-monetary rewards, despite the advantages discussed above, suffer from the
following disadvantages.
1. These benefits demotivate the employees, if the processes are not transparent.
These rewards may result in short-sighted and hasty decision-making. These rewards
may result in unhealthy competition among employees. Work intrudes on the home
life of employees.
2. Employees feel that managements concentrate on the non-cost programmes.
3. These rewards will not work, if monetary rewards are not adequate.
136