Professional Documents
Culture Documents
University of Jordan Faculty of Engineering Mechanical Engineering Dept
University of Jordan Faculty of Engineering Mechanical Engineering Dept
Faculty of Engineering
.Mechanical Engineering Dept
Exp. 1
Heat Exchangers
Theory
Results
4 20 57 52 5 10 14 24 10
Graphs
The following graph shows the relation between m vs. Q
0.35
0.3
0.25
Mass Flow Rate
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
(kg
/s
)
0
0 2 4 6 8
Heat Loss Rate (kW)
Calculations
Q = U*A*ΔTLM
Q= mhCph(T1-T2) and
Q= mcCpc(T4-T3)
At steady state the last two equations are equal. For the cold water;
Test No. V (m3/s) (kg/s)
m T3 T4 Cpaveg. Q (kW)
1 10 0.167 8 14 4.189 4.197
2 10 0.167 12 19 4.185 4.892
3 10 0.167 13 22 4.184 6.289
4 10 0.167 14 24 4.183 6.986
Q = 0.167*4.189*(14 – 8)
= 4.197 kW
Conclusions
As can be noticed from the table in the calculations section, as the flow rate
of the hot water was increased the heat transfer to the cold water also
increased. This was an expected result because according to the heat transfer
relation, the heat transfer rate is directly proportional to the mass flow rate
and specific heat capacity in addition to the differences in temperature of the
water entering and the water exiting the heat exchanger.
In the experiment it was necessary to take the readings off the thermometers
at steady state, this could be noticed when the heat gain by the cod water
was approximately the same as the water lost by the hot water.