Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Williams, RG - Anatomical Discourse & Burtons Anatomy of Melancholy, (2001) 68 ELH 593
Williams, RG - Anatomical Discourse & Burtons Anatomy of Melancholy, (2001) 68 ELH 593
BY R. GRANT WILLIAMS
R.
ELHGrant Williams
68 (2001) 593–613 © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University Press 593
of knowledge. Whereas anatomical discourse enables a subject to
project onto textuality a corporeal order and thereby to gain an
imaginary mastery over knowledge, disfiguration brings out the mon-
strous condition of textuality, which does not permit the subject any
imaginary identification. By comparatively tracing the anatomical cut
with Burton’s, I will explain how disfiguration produces the epistemo-
logical aberration known as The Anatomy.7
A body of knowledge participates in a systemic misrecognition, what
Vico, the famous eighteenth-century rhetorician, aptly calls an axiomatic
ignorance through which man establishes an “imaginative metaphys-
ics.”8 When discussing the ancients’ predisposition for using corporeal
tropes, Vico contends that man, in seeing himself as “the rule of the
universe,” becomes all things by not understanding them.9 Marvelously
anticipating Lacanian psychoanalysis in its sensitivity to the link be-
tween the imaginary and symbolic orders, Vico’s observation applies just
as much to anatomical as to microcosmic discourse. No matter how
progressive for the history of science, Renaissance anatomical discourse
is founded upon an axiomatic misrecognition—the notion that the body,
an a priori structure, can make known the self and the world.10 One
compelling example is Helkiah Crooke’s Microcosmographia, a medical
compilation that celebrates the anatomical procedure by vaunting its
transdiscursive application. Because “man is the rule and square of all
bodies,” an adage reiterated by Crooke, “whosoever dooth know himselfe,
knoweth all things.”11 And thus because anatomizing is the “most sure
guide to the knowledge of ourselves,” it is logically the most sure guide
to knowledge in general, including, for Crooke, cosmology, politics,
theology, and natural and moral philosophy.12 Because the human body,
“the rule and square of all bodies,” measures every disciplinary object as
a unified corporeality, the anatomical cut, by revealing design, can
comprehend any body of knowledge.13
Since for Lacan, as for Vico, corporeal unity constitutes an epistemo-
logical misrecognition, the anatomist is susceptible to the lure of the
imaginary order—the subjective realm responsible for narcissistic func-
tions.14 Praised as the founding father of modern anatomy, Andreas
Vesalius models an imaginary paradigm for subsequent anatomists
inasmuch as he does not envision his project in figures of disjecta
membra.15 In the Epitome, the educational supplement to De Fabrica,
he laments the fact that, in a world friendly to study, the “harmony of
the human body should lie constantly concealed,” “the structure of
instruments so divinely created by the Great Artificer of all things
should remain unexamined.”16 In practice, Vesalius’s hope to recover the