Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Ma Hnin Su San, AEC- 91

No.(1)

Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR)


Thu Dec 27 18:42:14 2018

Analysis of Variance
Latin Square Design

==========================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Yield
==========================================

Summary Information
------------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
------------------------------------------
Treatment 6 A, B, ..., F
Row 6 1, 2, ..., 6
Column 6 1, 2, ..., 6
------------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 36

Descriptive Statistics
---------------------------------------------------
Variable N_Obs Min Max Mean StdDev
---------------------------------------------------
Yield 36 21.40 33.50 29.77 2.84
---------------------------------------------------

ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: Yield
------------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
------------------------------------------------------------
Row 5 32.0733 6.4147 4.27 0.0084
Column 5 33.6667 6.7333 4.48 0.0067
Treatment 5 185.5933 37.1187 24.71 0.0000
Error 20 30.0467 1.5023
Total 35 281.3800
------------------------------------------------------------

Summary Statistics
--------------------
CV(%) Yield Mean
--------------------
4.12 29.77
--------------------
Standard Errors
--------------------
Effects Std Err
--------------------
Row 0.7077
Column 0.7077
Treatment 0.7077
--------------------

Pairwise Mean Comparison of Treatment

Tukeys's Honest Significant Difference (HSD) Test

Alpha 0.05
Error Degrees of Freedom 20
Error Mean Square 1.5023
Critical Value 4.4452
Test Statistics 2.2243

Summary of the Result:


---------------------------------
Treatment means N group
---------------------------------
A 31.02 6 a
B 30.35 6 a
C 31.48 6 a
D 30.62 6 a
E 30.37 6 a
F 24.77 6 b
---------------------------------
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

According to ANOVA results, it can be concluded that at least one


mean yield of sugarcane was different the other.

You might also like