Professional Documents
Culture Documents
My Philosophy of Early Literacy Education: Where We Are Going
My Philosophy of Early Literacy Education: Where We Are Going
Introduction
First grade students can actively construct knowledge through an exposure to literacy that
aligns with the world that is familiar to them. In addition to relevant and engaging texts,
literacy is experienced through art, music and play (such as socio-dramatic play) that
mirrors and/or complement the world in which they participate (Hall, 2008).
Classroom curriculum will be standards based, with content delivered in such a way that
supports learning to all students. Standards, such as the National Common Core
Standards (www.corestandards.org) provide consistent, strong, and clear benchmarks,
These guide me, as an educator, towards the foundational concepts that my students
should master during their time in my classroom. Standards provide some form of
consistency to ensure equitable content across schools, communities, and states by
building unity in understanding of objectives. A professional understanding of the intent
of the standard must be coupled with a holistic understanding of the students with whom
I work; this facilitates the delivery of a well planned and an effective learning experience.
The Classroom
Artwork on the walls (photographs, printed materials, and drawings) will reflect the
world outside of the classroom. Literacy centers, at which books of varying content are
accessible in an inviting manner, are established throughout the classroom and are
available to students during independent work time, exploration time, and reading/rest
time. Additional exposure to literacy concepts are evident throughout the room to further
reinforce that text conveys meaning, and that spoken language can be represented
through print (Meyer, 2009). Classroom items (desks, computers, markers, etc.) are
labeled in an eye-catching manner. Color words, numbers, number words, sight words,
and calendar words are prominently displayed to reinforce the relationship that print
represents words, and words represent objects. For many students this skill be well
engrained, while others may still benefit from the reminders. A conceptual floor plan of
the classroom, demonstrating the various areas of the classroom where literature is
accessible to students, is provided in Figure 2.
The acquisition of strong literacy skills (reading, writing, and speaking) is foundational; it
is used in all content areas and supports a lifelong appreciation for learning (Dorst, 2006).
Literacy content includes not only the mechanics (or process) of print, but also
comprehending, evaluating, questioning, and appreciating the content that is consumed or
produced. I employ a whole-language, progressive approach to literacy, where learning
takes place on a developmental continuum that is unique to each student.
First grade students will likely have progressed along the continuum of literacy
development due to their experience in a kindergarten classroom. Generally speaking,
kindergarten students will have initiated development in their phonemic awareness
through exposure to letter names, letter sounds, sight words, and the mechanics of printed
literature. By first grade, many students will have been practicing invented spelling,
approximated (phonetic) spelling, and conventional spelling (ELIPSS,) and be applying
these skills to more complex words. The phonemic awareness, especially with struggling
students, is an important component of my approach to literacy, and reinforcement of
these strategies will be integrated into my classroom through a variety of daily activities
that challenge students to identify phonemes in the world around them (Licina and Silva,
2010). Phonemes are one component of the whole language experience, so instruction of
these concepts will be done in a way that is “natural” (i.e., students appreciate that print is
an extension of their own language competencies); they apply their learning to familiar
and functional activities (Goodman and Goodman, 1979 in Stahl and Miller, 1989). This
will also be supported through direct instruction as needed.
First grade students will be continuing to build their conceptual understanding of the
process used to construct the written language (Kamii, 1991). As they deepen their
understanding of the concept, they can more thoroughly utilize written language to
express their experience of the world around them. Writing opportunities are embedded
within all areas of study, and students are encouraged to employ writing skills throughout
the school day. Writing is purposeful and relevant, and the appropriate level of writing
instruction is imbedded within other areas of study (Cambourne, 1995). In practice,
teacher directed and interactive writing will evolve into guided writing, which will then
become independent writing. This process supports the gradual release of responsibility,
where support is gradually transferred from the teacher to the learner as understanding
and skills develop.
Students are presented with a variety of fiction and non-fiction literature in all subject
areas through read-alouds, group reading, independent reading exploration, and writing
activities. In addition to “subject specific” study, students will utilize their literacy skills
through an integrated curriculum, where a variety of subjects and skills are interwoven
into a broad theme or topic. A science lesson on bats is introduced through a dialogic
read-aloud of a fictional book about echolocation. Students explore new vocabulary
terms, compare bat skeletons to humans, and build technical drawings of bat anatomy
where words are decoded through a guided writing exercise. Students write their
observations in their science journals, and are provided a personalized level of support
from the instructor to convey their ideas about the project.
Providing students with independent time to appreciate books in a way that is natural to
them is essential in supporting their motivation towards literature; a foundation for
developing reading and writing fluency. Students are offered time within the daily
schedule to utilize classroom literacy materials in their own way during exploration time,
reading and rest time, and independent work time. Each student will appreciate a book
differently, and their appreciation will evolve as they progress along the continuum of
literacy development. Some students will look at pictures, others will read words; each
experience has the potential to engage the student and develop literacy acquisition. With
the goal of developing comprehension skills, I employ Dialogic Reading strategies to
encourage students to question, visualize, make inferences, predict, synthesize, and
summarize stories through one-on-one, small group, or large group discussions. To build
the skill of conceptual understanding, I will provide opportunities where students write
their own reflections about the topics discussed in our lessons.
Assessment
As a teacher I am responsible for helping each student discover their strengths and
empower them to achieve their potential. Student assessments play critical part in
supporting this goal. I use assessments to evaluate whether I am effective in reaching my
students. My students gain valuable feedback on their ability to recall and apply the
information they have learned. As I build an assessment strategy, I look to work by
Gronlund and Waugh (2009) to ensure that assessments are a means to provide feedback
to students and teachers, incentives to students, information to parents, information for
selection and certification, and information for accountability.
Both summative and formative assessments are delivered throughout the school year, and
the outputs from these assessments are used to inform my day-to-day practice with my
students (Miller, 2008). Formative assessments are designed to help me understand
where my students are in their learning process. These include conferring, listening in,
observing, examining student work samples, charting student thinking, and taking note of
student reflection, sharing, and teach (Miller, 2008). This authentic information provides
a glimpse of how students are responding to the information delivered in class, and
allows me to personalize my teaching strategies to meet the needs of my students.
Summative assessments also provide information on how individuals perform when
compared to the curriculum expectations, and how students are retaining the information
that they had learned in previous lessons. These assessments provide a “birds eye view”
of student progression, and when coupled with formative assessments contribute valuable
information to guide instruction.
Volunteers
Incorporating volunteers into the classroom is mutually beneficial for the students and the
adults (both teacher and volunteers). When well organized, it provides parents and
community members the opportunity to demonstrate that the learning process is
important, and a valuable use of their ever-extended time and effort. By engaging
volunteers in a variety of ways, I can enhance the experience for all. Parent volunteers
will have a variety of preferences, and it is important to recognize and accommodate
them if possible. Some adults will want to work directly with students (one-on-one
reading, craft and artwork projects, or individual student support in critical areas), while
others will prefer to work behind the scenes (making copies, preparing projects,
managing classroom supplies), and still others who may want to contribute their time
outside of the school day (formatting newsletters, organizing projects at home). Some
may want to share their experience with class through group presentations on their
professions, passions, or experiences. Engaging all volunteers as contributing and
valuable members of the learning environment can enhance the educational experience
for the students.
Schedule
A well planned yet flexible schedule helps the instructor ensure that important curriculum
components are scheduled and delivered in accordance with district/state standards. This
can support students as they connect their prior learning to their current learning, and are
well prepared to consume new information as they progress to the next level. The
planning process also provides the opportunity to integrate curriculum in an organized
manner, while also supporting the appropriate connections to support the learning
continuum.
The attached schedules provide a weekly (detailed) daily schedule and yearly (summary)
outline of literacy content.
Weekly Schedule
Weekly Theme
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
9:00-9:30 Announcements: Announcements: Announcements: Announcements: Announcements:
Check for Check for Check for Check for Check for
Understanding Understanding Understanding Understanding Understanding
Welcome Meeting Welcome Meeting Welcome Meeting Welcome Meeting Welcome Meeting
9:10-10:30 Literacy/Writing Literacy/Writing Literacy/Writing Literacy/Writing Literacy/Writing
Read Aloud Read Aloud Read Aloud Read Aloud Read Aloud
Group Discussions Group Discussions Group Discussions Group Discussions Group Discussions
Student Writing Student Writing Student Writing Student Writing Student Writing
Brain Break Brain Break Brain Break Brain Break Brain Break
10:30- Computer Lab Music Health/Art Computer Lab Music
11:10
11:10- Recess/Lunch Recess/Lunch Recess/Lunch Recess/Lunch Recess/Lunch
12:10
12:10-1:10 Math Math Math Math Math
1:10-1:40 Library Social-Emotional Exploration Time Social-Emotional Special Activity
Learning Learning with (Theme related Craft
Associated Reading Associated Reading with read-aloud)
and/or Writing and/or Writing
Exercise Exercise or
Rest/Reading
1:40-2:05 Rest/independent or PE Rest/independent PE PE
small group Reading or small group
Reading
2:05-2:20 Snack/Class News Snack/Class News Snack/Class News Snack/Class News Snack/Class News
2:20-3:05 Science/Social Studies Science/Social Science/Social Science/Social Fun
Associated Studies Studies Studies Friday/Exploration
reading/writing and Associated Associated Associated
reflection reading/writing and reading/writing and reading/writing and
reflection reflection reflection
3:05-3:15 Closing Meeting Closing Meeting Closing Meeting Closing Meeting Closing Meeting
3:15-3:30 Stack and Pack Stack and Pack Stack and Pack Stack and Pack Stack and Pack
Annual Schedule (Summary)
Brand, Susan M., Dalton, Elizabeth M., (2012) Universal Design for Learning: Cognitive
Theory into Practice for Facilitating Comprehension in Early Literacy. Forum on
Public Policy Online, v2012 n1. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ979433 on
November 21, 2014.
CAST (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA:
Author. Retrieved on November 24, 2014 from
http://www.udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/updateguidelines2_0.pdf.
Dorst, Dorothy A. (2006) Reading their way: A Balanced Approach That Increases
Achievement. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22. pp305-323. Taylor and Francil
Group, LLC.
Gronlund, N.E., and Waugh, C.K., (2009). Assessment of student achievement. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hall, Nigel. (2008) Literacy, Play, and the Authentic Experience. In K.A.Roskos & J.F.
Christie (Eds.), Play and Literacy in Early Childhood: Research from Multiple
Perspectives (pp. 169-184)
Johnston, Peter H., 2012. Opening Minds: Using Language to Change Lives.
Stenhouse.
Lacina, J. and Silva, C.,(2010) Cases for Successful Literacy Teachers. SAGE.
Stahl, Steven A, and Miller, Patricia D. (1989) Whole Language and Language
Experience approaches for beginning reading: A quantitative Research Synthesis.
Review of Educational Research, Spring, Vol 59, No. 1. Pp. 87-116
Meyer, Kelley. (2009) Emerging Knowledge About Emergent Readers in Informing
our Practice: Useful Research on Young Children’s Development. Essa E.L. &
Burnham M.M.., (eds) 2009 by the National Association for the Education
of Young Children.
Miller, Debbie (2008), Teaching With Intention. Stenhouse.
Wilson, S.M. & Peterson, P.L. (2006). Theories of Learning and Teaching: What Do
They Mean for Educators, National Education Association