Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0301211514002905
1 s2.0 S0301211514002905
Fig. 1. Detail scan at 21st week: elongated cervix with 82 mm of length (arrow) displaced upward and anteriorly, lying behind the pubic symphysis. No anatomical
malformations identified.
References
A vaginal Gartner duct cyst presenting as a
[1] Smalbraak I, Bleker OP, Schutte MF, Treffers PE. Incarceration of the retroverted cystocele during pregnancy
gravid uterus: a report of four cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 39
1991;151–5.
[2] Newell SD, Crofts JF, Grant SR. The incarcerated gravid uterus: complications
and lessons learned. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:423–7. Dear Editor,
[3] Gardner CS, Jaffe TA, Hertzberg BS, Javan R, Ho LM. The incarcerated uterus: a
review of MRI and ultrasound imaging appearances. Am J Roentgenol
2013;201:223–9. We observed a 33-year-old primigravida who presented at 29
[4] Grossenburg NJ, Delaney AA, Berg TG. Treatment of a late second-trimester weeks of pregnancy, after having discovered tumefaction of the
incarcerated uterus using ultrasound-guided manual reduction. Obstet Gynecol vagina. She reported pollakiuria, nycturia and a bladder filling
2011;118:436–9.
[5] Dierickx I, Van Holsbeke C, Mesens T, et al. Colonoscopy-assisted reposition of sensation. A pelvic examination revealed swelling of the anterior
the incarcerated uterus in mid-pregnancy: a report of four cases and a literature wall of the vagina measuring 7 cm (Fig. 1(1), images have been
review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;158:153–8. reproduced with permission of the patient), which increased in
[6] Van Winter JT, Ogburn Jr PL, Ney JA, Hetzel DJ. Uterine incarceration during the
third trimester: a rare complication of pregnancy. Mayo Clin Proc 1991;66: volume during the following weeks, reaching a diameter of 8 cm
608–13. at 37 weeks of pregnancy. Different possible diagnoses were
made, including cystic vaginal lesion, real pelvic organ prolapse,
Catarina Policianoa,* , Cláudia Araújoa urethral diverticulum, and a vaginal Gartner’s or Sken’s duct cyst
Susana Santoa,b [1]. The swelling exposed the patient to the risk of dystocia, and
Mónica Centenoa,b rupture during labor or the expulsive stage. A diagnostic
Luísa Pintoa,b procedure was carried out by means of MRI imaging, with a
a
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHLN – Hospital non-enhanced fast protocol involving sagittal, axial and coronal
Universitário de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal, bFaculdade de T2-weighted images, using turbo spin-echo sequences. The
Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, CAM – Centro Académico de appearance of the MRI was consistent with a wolffian duct
Medicina de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal remnant in the vagina (Gartner’s duct cyst), as shown in Fig. 1(2)
(A, fetal head; C, vaginal cyst). Uroflowmetry did not reveal any
* Corresponding author at: Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria, abnormality.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CHLN, Av. Prof. Egas The cyst was punctured at the start of labor and an aseptic,
Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal. viscous, translucent liquid was evacuated. Delivery was performed
Tel.: +351 217805578; fax: +351 217805621. vaginally, without instrumentation, at 40 weeks. Surgical excision
E-mail address: catarinapoliciano@gmail.com (C. Policiano). of the cyst was performed 6 months later, as a result of recurrence
and vaginal symptoms (dyspareunia). The cystic mass extended to
Received 24 March 2014 the right lateral side of the bladder, but did not penetrate into the
Received in revised form 18 May 2014 urethra or the bladder (Fig. 1(3)). Pathology revealed a vestigial
Accepted 20 May 2014 paravaginalis cyst (mesonephrotic). Immunohistochemistry find-
ings revealed a high expression of CK7 and CK5/6, but no
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.019 expression of estrogen or progesterone receptors. No
Downloaded for Rahma ulfa Mukhtar (rahmaulfaupenk29@gmail.com) at Universitas Muslim Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on March 22, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Letters to the Editor–Brief Communications / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 180 (2014) 198–208 203
[(Fig._1)TD$IG]
Fig. 1. A vaginal Gartner duct cyst presenting as a cystocele. (1) Pelvic examination during pregnancy (a pelvic examination revealed swelling of the anterior wall of the vagina
measuring 7 cm, mimicking a cystocele (International Continence Society’s pelvic organ prolapse quantifiation system: stage 3 cystocele; Ba = +3; C = 3; D = 7; Bp = 3)). (2)
T2-weighted MRI parasagittal image that revealed a cystic lesion arising from right vaginal wall extended to vulva and measuring 70 mm 30 mm 20 mm (A = fetal head;
C = vaginal Gartner cyst enhanced with contrast). (3) Pelvic examination 6 months after delivery (C = left vaginal Gartner cyst).
complications were observed post-operatively, and at 3 months [2] Cil AP, Basar MM, Kara SA, Atasoy P. Diagnosis and management of vaginal
mullerian cyst in a virgin patient. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19
follow-up the patient no longer suffered from dyspareunia. (May (5)):735–7.
Pelvic organ prolapse does not usually occur during pregnancy [3] Montella JM. Vaginal mullerian cyst presenting as a cystocele. Obstet Gynecol
[2]. The assessment of a vaginal lesion during pregnancy, by means 2005;105(Pt 2):1182–4.
of a pelvic examination and imaging of the surrounding organs, is
needed in order to make a reliable diagnosis and avoid Jeremy Boujenaha,b , Guillaume Ssi-yan-kanc
inappropriate management. Conservative management may be Sophie Prevotd
preferable [3]. Gihad E. Chalouhie
Xavier Deffieuxa,b,f,*
a
Conflict of interest AP-HP, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique
et Médecine de la Reproduction, Clamart F-92141, France, bUniversité
None. Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Orsay F-91405, France, cAP-HP,
Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Service de Radiologie, Clamart F-92141,
Source of financial support/funding France, dAP-HP, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Service d'Anatomopatho-
logie, Clamart F-92141, France, eAP-HP, Hôpital Necker, Service de
None. Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Paris F-75007, France, fGREEN GRC 01
(UPMC), Groupe de RecherchE cliniquE en Neuro-Urologie, Site
References Antoine Béclère, Clamart F-92141, France
[1] O’Boyle AL, Woodman PJ, O’Boyle JD, Davis GD, Swift SE. Pelvic organ support in * Corresponding author at: Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique et
nulliparous pregnant and nonpregnant women: a case control study. Am J Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de
Obstet Gynecol 2002;187(July (1)):99–102.
Downloaded for Rahma ulfa Mukhtar (rahmaulfaupenk29@gmail.com) at Universitas Muslim Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on March 22, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
204 Letters to the Editor–Brief Communications / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 180 (2014) 198–208
[(Fig._1)TD$IG]
la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart, France. Tel.: +33 1 45 374
487; fax: +33 1 45 374 963.
E-mail address: xavier.deffieux@abc.aphp.fr (X. Deffieux).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.015
Dear Editor,
Downloaded for Rahma ulfa Mukhtar (rahmaulfaupenk29@gmail.com) at Universitas Muslim Indonesia from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on March 22, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.