The document outlines a grading rubric for reaction papers with four main criteria: thesis, introduction, conclusion, and evidence/analysis. It provides descriptors to evaluate student work on a scale from 10-8 points (excellent), 7-5 points (satisfactory), and 4-0 points (needs improvement). The rubric assesses elements such as the clarity of the thesis, use of relevant evidence, depth of analysis, organization, mechanics, and proper citation/reference formatting.
(Encyclopedia of Language and Education 6) Arthur Van Essen (Auth.), Leo Van Lier, David Corson (Eds.) - Encyclopedia of Language and Education - Knowledge About Language-Springer Netherlands (1997)
The document outlines a grading rubric for reaction papers with four main criteria: thesis, introduction, conclusion, and evidence/analysis. It provides descriptors to evaluate student work on a scale from 10-8 points (excellent), 7-5 points (satisfactory), and 4-0 points (needs improvement). The rubric assesses elements such as the clarity of the thesis, use of relevant evidence, depth of analysis, organization, mechanics, and proper citation/reference formatting.
The document outlines a grading rubric for reaction papers with four main criteria: thesis, introduction, conclusion, and evidence/analysis. It provides descriptors to evaluate student work on a scale from 10-8 points (excellent), 7-5 points (satisfactory), and 4-0 points (needs improvement). The rubric assesses elements such as the clarity of the thesis, use of relevant evidence, depth of analysis, organization, mechanics, and proper citation/reference formatting.
The document outlines a grading rubric for reaction papers with four main criteria: thesis, introduction, conclusion, and evidence/analysis. It provides descriptors to evaluate student work on a scale from 10-8 points (excellent), 7-5 points (satisfactory), and 4-0 points (needs improvement). The rubric assesses elements such as the clarity of the thesis, use of relevant evidence, depth of analysis, organization, mechanics, and proper citation/reference formatting.
The thesis is well Thesis was present, Thesis is confusing Thesis written and clearly but was simplistic, or (10pts.) indicates the direction confusing or underdeveloped. of the essay. underdeveloped. The introduction is The introduction The introduction clear and interesting provided some provided little or Introduction with excellent information and was no relevant (10pts.) information and moderately information. appeal. interesting. The conclusion relates The conclusion does The conclusion is back to the thesis and not contribute well underdeveloped Conclusion leaves the reader with to the thesis or and not thought (10pts.) a final thought. development of the out well. essay. The thesis is The thesis is There is minimal, supported with supported with irrelevant, or Evidence relevant, accurate, limited evidence. insufficient (15pts.) and substantial evidence. evidences. There is effective Adequate analysis is There is little analysis of the present, but it is analysis; there is Analysis evidence and it simplistic or more summary (15pts.) addresses all aspects superficial. than analysis. of the thesis. Essay has strong Essay has weak The essay was structure, logical flow, structure, but an wandering, Organization and a clear understandable incoherent, or (10pts.) progression of ideas. thought process. unorganized with little agreement between ideas. There are little to no There are some There are errors, or errors (spelling, errors, but it does major errors that punctuation, not detract from the distract the reader. Mechanics margin,etc). overall essay. The (10pts.) Demonstrates a high writing is competent. degree of skill, complexity, and style. Present numerous There are few There are minimal Citations (APA citations. All citations citations. There are citations. There are Format) conform to APA some mistakes in several mistakes in (10pts.) format. parenthetical writing citations. citations. The references are References are References do not Reference (APA written properly that written with few conform to APA Format) conforms to APA mistakes. format. (10pts.) format. Reaction Paper Grading Rubric
(Encyclopedia of Language and Education 6) Arthur Van Essen (Auth.), Leo Van Lier, David Corson (Eds.) - Encyclopedia of Language and Education - Knowledge About Language-Springer Netherlands (1997)