Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AISC 360 VerificationBeamDesign PDF
AISC 360 VerificationBeamDesign PDF
AISC 360 VerificationBeamDesign PDF
Floor Loads:
Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal deck
[(3.25in)(1ft/12in) + (18.0in2/ft)(1ft2/12in2)](115 lb/ft3) +3.0 psf = 48.52psf
Imposed Dead Load: 25psf
Imposed Live Load: 80psf Office Reducible
Shear:
VDead = (2)(10.255 k) + (0.044 k/ft)(27’)/2 = 21.104 k
VLive = (2)(10.80 k)(0.7064) = 15.258 k
Vu = 1.4(21.104 k) = 29.55 k, or
= 1.2(21.104 k) + 1.6(15.258 k) = 49.74 k Controls
Between the point of zero moment (the beam end for this beam) and the point of maximum
moment (the midspan for this beam) there are 11 studs available (the stud at the midspan
must be ignored since there is no horizontal shear at that point – that stud is only there due to
the maximum stud spacing requirements). Therefore, the shear carried by the studs is:
V’ = (11 studs)(17.68 k/stud) = 194.5 kip (Eq. I3-1c)
This also represents the compression in the concrete, C.
Between the point of zero moment (the beam end for this beam) and the location of the point
load there are 10 studs available. Therefore, the shear carried by the studs is:
V’ = (10 studs)(17.68 k/stud) = 176.8 kip (Eq. I3-1c)
This also represents the compression in the concrete, C, at that point.
% Composite:
There is no longer a Specification requirement that composite beams be at least 25%
composite. However, the Commentary indicates that this is good practice. See Commentary
I3.1.3. Also, the Commentary indicates that Eq C-I3-3 which is used to calculate Ieff is
invalid if the percent composite is less than 25%. Therefore, the program enforces that lower
limit.
Although not explicitly indicated in the Specification, a similar check should be performed at
the location of point loads. This is good practice, to ensure that there is at least a minimum
degree of composite action available at those locations. The program performs this
calculation:
% Composite = (V’Actual / V’Full)( MMax / MAtPointLoad)
= (176.8k / 650.0k) (446.04k-ft / 445.5k-ft) = 27.24%
Stud Spacing:
Minimum Stud Spacing = 4 x Stud Diameter = (4)(0.75”) = 3” o.c.
Maximum Stud Spacing = 8 x Slab Thickness = (8)(3”+3.25”) = 50” o.c., or
= 36” o.c. Controls
Actual Stud Spacing:
In 1st and 3rd Segment: Spacing = 9’ / 10 Studs = 0.9’ / stud = 10.8” per stud. OK
In 2nd Segment: Spacing = 9’/ 3 Studs = 3’ / stud = 36” per stud. OK
Note that the number of studs in the 2nd Segment was controlled by maximum spacing
req’ts. Also note that for this beam, since the deck is parallel to the beam, the spacing of
10.8” can be achieved; if the deck was perpendicular (or at an angle) to the beam, the
spacing of the deck ribs would have controlled the spacing of the studs and would have
impacted the number of rows of studs. The program checks this condition and designs
accordingly.
Precomposite Design:
For this beam there are three unbraced segments, each 9’ long. The program checks each
segment per Chapter F. For this beam the middle segment controls; only the calculations for
that segment are shown.
MDead = (2)(7.555 k)(9’) + (0.044 k/ft)(27’)2/8 = 140.00 k-ft
MLive = (2)(2.70 k)(9’) = 48.6 k-ft
Initial Dead Load Mu = 1.4(140.00 k-ft) = 196.0 k-ft
Precomposite Pos Mu = 1.2(140.00 k-ft) + 1.6(48.6 k-ft) = 245.8 k-ft Controls
@ midspan = 13.5’
Ieff:
I eff = I x + (ΣQn / C f ) ( I tr − I x ) (C-I3-3)
Itr = 843 in4 + (13.0 in2)( 19.467”- 10.35”)2 + (20.23 in2)( 25.325”- 19.467”)2
+ [(81”)(3.25”)3/12] / 13.010
= 2635.6 in4
Ieff = 843 in4 + sqrt(194.5 k / 650.0 k)( 2635.6 in4 – 843 in4) = 1823.6 in3
Deflections:
Initial Load:
Δ = (2)(7.555 k)(108”)[(3)(324”)2 – (4)(108)2] / [(24)(29000)(843 in4)]
+ (5)(.044 k/ft)(1 ft /12 in)(324”)4 / [(384)(29000)(843 in4)]
= 0.7677”
= L / 422.1
Camber: 0.8 (0.768”) = 0.614” < 0.75” Do not camber
Live Load:
Δ = (2)(10.80 k)(0.7064)(108”)[(3)(324”)2 – (4)(108)2] / [(24)(29000)(1823.6 in4)]
= 0.3483”
= L / 930.2