Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GSE Reform - Shots Fired
GSE Reform - Shots Fired
• Recent headlines from interim FHFA Director Joseph Otting have suggested that
action on GSE reform may be coming even before Mark Calabria is confirmed by
the Senate.
• The FHFA and Treasury technically have the power to end the GSE
conservatorships without Congressional signoff. However, if the changes
threaten to undermine the housing market or decrease the availability of
mortgage credit in the US, Congress is likely to push back.
• Recent media reports suggest that the Trump Administration is likely to work
with Congress on GSE reform. In the meantime, the FHFA could finalize capital
recommendations, change the PSPAs to end the net worth sweep, and endorse
a GSE reform plan as a way of accelerating the process.
• The market impact of any GSE reform news will depend crucially on the issue of
grandfathering current MBS and debt, which we believe any attempt at housing
reform will have to include. Grandfathering existing debt and MBS would actually
help tighten spreads as it would suggest an explicit guarantee of the debt and
limited additional supply.
The news sent shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to their highest levels since late-2016, when Treasury
Secretary Mnuchin hinted suggested that GSE reform is at the top of his to-do list (Figure 1). While MBS
spreads remained largely unchanged on the news, longer-dated GSE debt spreads briefly widened last week
This report is a marketing communication. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements, as outlined in the UK FCA’s COBS, designed to promote the independence of investment research and is also
not subject to any prohibition of dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research, although as a matter of policy TD Securities requires its employees not to deal ahead of the dissemination of this report.
as investors became concerned about potential disruptive changes. Media reports today suggest that the
Trump Administration will work with Congress to unveil changes to Fannie and Freddie soon.
The FHFA has denied that any timing or plans had been discussed, but we believe the change in leadership
suggests that action on GSE reform may be coming sooner than anticipated. Otting also noted that, "The
Treasury and White House viewpoint is that the [FHFA] director and the secretary of Treasury have tremendous
authority and that they would act, I think, independent of legislation if they thought it was the right thing to do."
Note that there has been little support in Congress for bipartisan housing reform, which could significantly
slow reform efforts. In the interim, there are a number of actions the FHFA and Treasury could take to kickstart
the housing reform process. As we noted in a prior publication, Treasury and FHFA can shrink the Fannie/
Freddie footprint by mandating further portfolio decreases, increased CRT, accelerating the UMBS program,
lowering conforming loan limits, and raising G-fees. In the absence of a broader GSE reform plan, however,
these changes could result in increased near-term volatility.
3.0
2.5 Otting
Remarks
2.0
Election
1.5
1.0
J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N J
2016 2017 2018
Source: Bloomberg, TD Securities
• Finalize appropriate capital recommendations: As we have written previously, privatizing Fannie and
Freddie would entail raising a considerable amount of capital. In June, FHFA estimated that the Agencies
would collectively need approximately $181bn in total capital — higher than the $3bn capital buffers each
GSE is currently allowed to maintain (Figure 2). Building the capital organically (via retained earnings) would
take a long time given that the GSEs have earned about $15-20bn per year on average in recent years.
• Change the PSPAs to end the net worth sweep: Fannie and Freddie have collectively paid Treasury
$292bn against draws of $191bn (Figure 3). While these payments were dividends and not meant to be
considered repayments, the 2012 changes to the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements instituted a net
worth sweep in which the GSEs paid Treasury their entire net worth each quarter. Since the sweeps were
instituted, the GSEs have paid Treasury a collective $227bn. If the PSPAs were revised to allow Fannie and
Freddie to retain some capital, this could set them on the path toward gradual reform. A more moderate
approach could be to allow the GSEs to each keep $1-2bn per quarter and gradually rebuild their capital
bases. The PSPAs could also include a mandate for Fannie and Freddie to further shrink their retained
portfolios below the current $225bn limits (Figure 4). As of November 2018, Fannie's retained portfolio
totaled $184bn and Freddie's totaled $222bn.
• Endorse a plan for GSE reform: Previous FHFA Director Mel Watt refused to weigh in on GSE reform,
insisting that such recommendations were not part of the FHFA's mandate. Under new leadership, however,
the FHFA and Treasury could lay out a proposed plan for GSE reform, which could be modeled on previous
proposals such as the MBA plan. While there have been a number of reform proposals, the MBA roadmap
has gradually emerged as one of the leading plans. This plan would ensure that MBS are issued through
the Common Securitization Platform (CSP) while Fannie, Freddie, and other chartered guarantors provide
catastrophic mortgage insurance. As part of this plan, the GSEs would become regulated private utilities.
FHFA and Treasury would need to lay out a reasonable time frame for the transition (which we believe may
be as long as 5-10 years in order to avoid disruptions in the housing market) and address the potential
transitional structure. Note that the MBA plan includes a number of potential options for the transition, calling
for the grandfathering of current debt and MBS. Markets will be paying particularly close attention to this
issue as grandfathering would explicitly guarantee existing debt, tightening spreads.
Obstacles to reform
While the prior changes can be made by the FHFA and Treasury without Congressional signoff, any perceived
overreach could trigger a backlash from Congress. This is likely why recent headlines suggest that the
Administration will look to work with Congress on reform plans. We see a number of factors that could slow any
near-term action on reform:
• Congressional pushback: Maxine Waters, the head of the House Financial Services Committee, has
already requested that Otting provide the committee with "a detailed description of the mission that Treasury
and the White House" have for housing finance policy by February 1. Any significant pushback from House
Democrats could make it difficult to involve Congress in future reform efforts, stalling progress.
• Potential Calabria complications: While the Republicans have a majority in the Senate, a GSE reform plan
that is perceived as overly detrimental to the already fragile housing market could complicate Mark Calabria's
nomination process. Note that housing is an issue that is divisive even within parties, potentially slowing
Calabria's approval. This suggests that a detailed housing reform plan may only be released after Calabria is
confirmed by the Senate.
• Suspending dividends could trigger backlash: Fannie and Freddie collectively earned about $15-20bn
per year on average in recent years. Allowing the GSEs to retain some of this capital could have negative
deficit implications, potentially creating pushback from Congress as deficits are already projected to increase
in the coming years.
Market impact
The market impact of any GSE reform news will depend crucially on the issue of grandfathering current MBS
and debt, which we believe any attempt at housing reform will have to include. The grandfathering of existing
debt and MBS would actually help tighten spreads as it would suggest an explicit guarantee of the debt and
limited additional supply. However, any plan that does not grandfather existing securities and threatens housing
market stability would likely widen debt and MBS spreads. Thus far, there has been little reaction in MBS and
only a temporary widening in longer-term GSE debt spreads.
While we believe that any plan will have to guarantee current debt, we see an increased risk of near-term
volatility in debt and MBS spreads as the market absorbs further news on reform. Given our view that any
further reform efforts will require a further wind down of the retained portfolio and the grandfathering of current
securities, we believe supply scarcity will continue to keep spreads tight over the medium term. In fact, as we
noted in our 2019 Outlook, we expect GSE supply to remain negative in 2019 (declining by $25bn), maintaining
the tailwind for spreads.
Global Macro
Region Publication Date
Weekly Upcoming Week - The Big Three (28 Jan) 25 Jan
Commentary January ECB: Assessing Not (Yet) Validating 24 Jan
AUD: a stronger labour market over 2018 24 Jan
Retail Sales Disappoint, Poloz Still Waiting for Clarity 23 Jan
Trading the ECB 23 Jan
US January FOMC Preview: Promoting Patience 25 Jan
Fed Runoff in the Balance 25 Jan
January ISM: Two out of Three Regional Surveys Ain't Bad 24 Jan
The Pause That Confuses 17 Jan
Canada Canadian Inflation: Taking the Long Way Home 21 Jan
Europe ECB Preview: Still Ignoring Downside Risks? 18 Jan
GBP: Thoughts Ahead of the "Meaningful Vote" 15 Jan
Asia-Pacific Australian Macro Update (in charts) 16 Jan
Rates
Weekly Kicking the Wall Down the Road 28 Jan
US Trade Idea - Let it Bleed 25 Jan
Feb Refunding: Read My Lips - No New Increases 22 Jan
US Rates: Refocusing on Fundamentals 17 Jan
Canada Canadian Inflation: Taking the Long Way Home 21 Jan
Europe ECB Preview: Still Ignoring Downside Risks? 18 Jan
Asia-Pacific Why are ACGB 04/24s bid? 23 Jan
Aust & NZ bond forecast update 18 Jan
Trades Why we're taking profit on 10yr AUD swap EFP wideners 29 Jan
Trade idea: Long 30y USTs vs. Bunds (Beta Weighted) 28 Jan
Trade Idea - Let It Bleed 25 Jan
Take Profit on Pay GBP 5y5y vs. Rec EUR 5y5y 23 Jan
Taking Profits on US 3m5y Payers 17 Jan
FX
Analysis Asia Elections To The Fore 25 Jan
BOJ Preview: All Talk and No Action 22 Jan
Asia's Pain Trade 22 Jan
ECB Preview: Still Ignoring Downside Risks? 18 Jan
GBP: Thoughts Ahead of the "Meaningful Vote" 15 Jan
Trades Buy AUDNZD 23 Jan
EM
Analysis Asia Elections To The Fore 25 Jan
Commodities
Weekly Commodity Radar Beacon Eyes Event Risks 28 Jan
Analysis Central Bank Gold Bugs Adding to Reasons for Positive Outlook 17 Jan
Global Strategy
Richard Kelly Head of Global Strategy richard.kelly@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)20 7786 8448
Global Macro
Michael Hanson Head of Global Macro Strategy michael.hanson@tdsecurities.com 1 212 827 7186
Annette Beacher Chief Asia-Pacific Macro Strategist annette.beacher@tdsecurities.com 65 6500 8047
Jacqui Douglas Chief European Macro Strategist jacqui.douglas@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)20 7786 8439
James Rossiter Senior Global Strategist james.rossiter@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)20 7786 8422
Brittany Baumann Macro Strategist brittany.baumann@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)20 7786 8439
Robert Both Macro Strategist robert.both@tdsecurities.com 1 416 983 0859
Jack Kempton Industrial Placement Intern jack.kempton@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)20 7786 8422
Global Rates
Priya Misra Head of Global Rates Strategy priya.misra@tdsecurities.com 1 212 827 7156
Andrew Kelvin Senior Canada Rates Strategist andrew.kelvin@tdsecurities.com 1 416 983 7184
Prashant Newnaha Senior Asia-Pacific Rates Strategist prashant.newnaha@tdsecurities.com 65 6500 8047
Gennadiy Goldberg Senior US Rates Strategist gennadiy.goldberg@tdsecurities.com 1 212 827 7180
Pooja Kumra European Rates Strategist pooja.kumra@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)20 7786 8433
Wen Lu US Rates Strategist wen.h.lu@tdsecurities.com 1 212 827 2857
FX Strategy
Mark McCormick North American Head of FX Strategy mark.mccormick@tdsecurities.com 1 416 982 7784
Ned Rumpeltin European Head of FX Strategy ned.rumpeltin@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)20 7786 8420
Mazen Issa Senior FX Strategist mazen.issa@tdsecurities.com 1 212 827 7182
EM Strategy
Cristian Maggio Head of Emerging Markets Strategy cristian.maggio@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)20 7786 8436
Sacha Tihanyi Deputy Head of Emerging Markets Strategy sacha.tihanyi@tdsecurities.com 1 212 827 7043
Mitul Kotecha Senior Emerging Markets Strategist mitul.kotecha@tdsecurities.com 65 6500 8047
Paul Fage Senior Emerging Markets Strategist paul.fage@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)20 7786 8424
Izidor Flajsman Emerging Markets Strategist izidor.flajsman@tdsecurities.com 44 (0)207 786 8414
Commodities
Bart Melek Head of Commodity Strategy bart.melek@tdsecurities.com 1 416 983 9288
Ryan McKay Commodity Strategist ryan.mckay@tdsecurities.com 1 416 982 5816
Daniel Ghali Commodity Strategist daniel.ghali@tdsecurities.com 1 416 983 8075