Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mid Year Review Form MRF
Mid Year Review Form MRF
Mid Year Review Form MRF
Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of Quality
collegial teachers on
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetings
use teacher and with proof of attendance
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
to enrich teaching sessions on use of
practice. teacher and learner Efficiency
feedback to enrich
teaching practice with
proof of attendance
3. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education developed, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services organized and and/or inter-observer
used appropriate agreement form about
teaching and using appropriate
learning teaching and learning
resources, resources, including ICT
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
including ICT, to Examples: Efficiency
address learning Activity sheets/task
goals. sheets/work sheets
PowerPoint
presentations
Video clips
Module
SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
Others
2. Lesson plans/modified Timeliness
DLLs with appropriate
instructional materials
appended
3. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education Assessment selected, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and organized and and/or inter-observer
Reporting used diagnostic, agreement form about
formative and using diagnostic,
summative formative and summative
assessment assessment strategies
strategies 2. Prepared lesson
consistent with plans/modified DLLs
curriculum highlighting appropriate
requirements. use of formative
assessment strategies
3. Developed diagnostic
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
with sample Efficiency
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample
accomplished rubrics
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality
Education evaluated learner written work with
Services progress and summary of results and
achievement with signature of parents
using learner 2. Formative/summative
attainment data. assessment tools with
TOS and frequency of Efficiency
errors with identified least
mastered skills
3. Class records/grading
sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs showing index of
Timeliness
mastery
5. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education Communicated corrected test papers of
Services promptly and the same 3 learners in the
clearly the same learning area with
learners’ needs, parents’ or guardians’
progress and signature and date of
achievement to
receipt
key stakeholders,
2. Minutes of PTA meetings
including Efficiency
parents/guardians or Parent-Teacher
. conferences in all
quarters with proof of
parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s
or guardian’s signature in
all quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
Timeliness
parents/guardians using
various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress
and achievement
submitted to other
stakeholders